Vambo Posted May 15, 2023 Report Share Posted May 15, 2023 'FAILED TO UPHOLD' FIRST ON FOX Durham report reveals conclusions of probe into Trump-Russia investigation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted May 16, 2023 Report Share Posted May 16, 2023 great 2016 ... thanks Durham, NOW DO THE COVERUP in 2017 including the 2 impeachments, Muellers BS investigation et al.... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted May 16, 2023 Report Share Posted May 16, 2023 what he is really saying is that it will go nowhere as far as congress is concerned 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 16, 2023 Report Share Posted May 16, 2023 https://redstate.com/bonchie/2023/05/16/greg-gutfeld-hits-it-out-of-the-park-on-the-durham-report-and-what-it-means-n746733 Greg Gutfeld on fire: "You have people saying the country will not survive Trump so your moral duty is to cheat… They created a devil that was so big and so vast that it made all action permissible and it made every institution subject to suspicion."pic.twitter.com/SRLf0XQwhT — Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) May 16, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 16, 2023 Report Share Posted May 16, 2023 Desantis is the man. Doesn't have the baggage, but he has all the courage to tell the truth and ACT ON IT https://www.theblaze.com/news/republicans-react-to-durham-report 'It reminds us of the need to clean house at these agencies': DeSantis and other Republicans react to Durham report by decrying weaponization of government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 16, 2023 Report Share Posted May 16, 2023 On 5/15/2023 at 7:09 PM, Vambo said: 'FAILED TO UPHOLD' FIRST ON FOX Durham report reveals conclusions of probe into Trump-Russia investigation Thats great, now what? Wiil there be a price(s) to pay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted May 17, 2023 Report Share Posted May 17, 2023 23 hours ago, FairHooker11 said: great 2016 ... thanks Durham, NOW DO THE COVERUP in 2017 including the 2 impeachments, Muellers BS investigation et al.... Yes, I remember when Omarosa said that she had Trump on tape using the “N” word. Funny that tape still hasn’t surfaced. 🤔 Couldn’t possibly be a load of horse shit…could it? I’m sure Larry or Woodrow or one of the other Biden nut swingers believe it as gospel. https://people.com/politics/omarosa-manigault-tapes-donald-trump-n-word-apprentice/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted May 20, 2023 Report Share Posted May 20, 2023 Not that anyone is surprised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted May 20, 2023 Report Share Posted May 20, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted May 20, 2023 Report Share Posted May 20, 2023 2 hours ago, Axe said: Even the good book of the bible tells us so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 20, 2023 Report Share Posted May 20, 2023 14 hours ago, cccjwh said: Not that anyone is surprised. The denial is strong here, Very strong. Have you read the report? If not then go back to your culture war. It's far more crucial a topic than FBI corruption. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted May 20, 2023 Report Share Posted May 20, 2023 1 minute ago, FY56 said: The denial is strong here, Very strong. Have you read the report? Nope... They never deal in facts... It's inconvenient for them.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 21, 2023 Report Share Posted May 21, 2023 On 5/19/2023 at 9:24 PM, cccjwh said: Not that anyone is surprised. The nothingburger allegation had been settled a long time ago, before you demonrats began your bogus investigation. But you wouldn't know about that right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 21, 2023 Report Share Posted May 21, 2023 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted May 21, 2023 Report Share Posted May 21, 2023 On 5/20/2023 at 10:43 AM, nickers said: Nope... They never deal in facts... It's inconvenient for them.. Right, look at all the indictments. Don't let those facts get in the way of your crying. "Crime of the Century!" 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted May 21, 2023 Report Share Posted May 21, 2023 25 minutes ago, cccjwh said: Right, look at all the indictments. Don't let those facts get in the way of your crying. "Crime of the Century!" 😄 There's no doubt there's more than enough evidence to bring indictments, but corruption is the reason you won't see any, not innocence. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted May 22, 2023 Report Share Posted May 22, 2023 16 hours ago, Jax said: There's no doubt there's more than enough evidence to bring indictments, but corruption is the reason you won't see any, not innocence. "No doubt", yet there aren't any indictments. Your feelings aren't evidence of corruption. That you have to use nut job's favorite excuses for no evidence? "They covered up the crimes so well that it like it there weren't any." It's assertion that is impossible to prove or disprove. Which makes it the assertion worthless. The "Crime of Century". no indictments. Investigate the massive voter fraud. Cheetos commission report - 23 state-wide. The Trump campaign-commissioned report said analysts had “high confidence” there were only nine deceased voters in Fulton county, Georgia. The researchers also said they believed the “potential statewide exposure” of dead voters was 23, the newspaper said. Trump’s own research showed that voter fraud did not cost him election – report | Donald Trump | The Guardian Hey, I'm sure there was 18,000 dead voters, the dems just brought them back to life when people followed up. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted May 22, 2023 Report Share Posted May 22, 2023 Do you even know what topic we're on? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted May 22, 2023 Report Share Posted May 22, 2023 1 hour ago, Jax said: Do you even know what topic we're on? GOP investigates that came away with nothing. Pretty long list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 22, 2023 Report Share Posted May 22, 2023 4 minutes ago, cccjwh said: GOP investigates that came away with nothing. Pretty long list. 7 hours ago, cccjwh said: "No doubt", yet there aren't any indictments. Your feelings aren't evidence of corruption. That you have to use nut job's favorite excuses for no evidence? "They covered up the crimes so well that it like it there weren't any." It's assertion that is impossible to prove or disprove. Which makes it the assertion worthless. The "Crime of Century". no indictments. Investigate the massive voter fraud. Cheetos commission report - 23 state-wide. The Trump campaign-commissioned report said analysts had “high confidence” there were only nine deceased voters in Fulton county, Georgia. The researchers also said they believed the “potential statewide exposure” of dead voters was 23, the newspaper said. Trump’s own research showed that voter fraud did not cost him election – report | Donald Trump | The Guardian Hey, I'm sure there was 18,000 dead voters, the dems just brought them back to life when people followed up. 😄 Ill ask you again. Do you even know what topic we're on? We are on the Durham report. Try to keep on track. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 13 hours ago, FY56 said: Ill ask you again. Do you even know what topic we're on? We are on the Durham report. Try to keep on track. A GOP investigates that came away with nothing = Durham report. Kind like the Twitter investigations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 In other words, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 1 hour ago, cccjwh said: Kind like the Twitter investigations. Or the Mueller Report. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 2 hours ago, cccjwh said: A GOP investigates that came away with nothing = Durham report. Kind like the Twitter investigations. So then no. The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something. Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings. It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 39 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said: Or the Mueller Report. And then when The House subpoenaed Mueller because they didn't like his report. What a show that was. The obsession these demonrats had with trying to get rid of Trump. Jeezus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 1 hour ago, FY56 said: So then no. The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something. Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings. It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember? You are joking right. Righty thinking. GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 23, 2023 Report Share Posted May 23, 2023 49 minutes ago, cccjwh said: You are joking right. Righty thinking. GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts. Again it's not just hypocrisy it's not just facts it's the stunning realization that you guys are blind as to the reason that some people in the power structure hate Donald Trump. Has nothing to do with ideology which gets traded back and forth with every Administration but it's like country music artists at rock and roll bands usually agree that discos are evil. He's just the outsider and the power structure needs to prove to America that the voters are not now nor have they ever been in charge of anything. WSS 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 24, 2023 Report Share Posted May 24, 2023 9 hours ago, cccjwh said: You are joking right. Righty thinking. GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts. Who I listen to happens to be a liberal. Alan Dershowitz concluded that the Durham report was damning. There was far more evidence to open up an investigation of Hillary Clinton, but the FBI saw the evidence "through the prism of bias against Donald Trump". For a government agency to take upon themselves "to do the right thing" and make sure that Trump was not going to be elected president is a dangerous precedent. You are the epitome of one in denial. Get your head out of your liberal ass. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FY56 Posted May 24, 2023 Report Share Posted May 24, 2023 9 hours ago, cccjwh said: You are joking right. Righty thinking. GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts. Part II A GOP investigation, I'll give you that. What you fail to grasp is that this investigation was called for and legitimate. You demonrat fuckers through a government agency attempted to oust a duly elected president, remember? My initial claim that it was not a GOP solely because of Durhams reputation of neutrality. He wasn't hired by Republicans to go after Demonrats. He has been staunchly neutral and unbiased, investigating both Republicans and demonrats. If only every politician possessed that quality. Democratic Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy told CNN at the time that Durham had “a reputation of being apolitical and serious,” while Mark Meadows – then the Republican chairman of the hardline Freedom Caucus – called Durham an “outstanding choice.” Durham, who became a lawyer in 1975, is known for having handled high-profile, sensitive investigations in both Democratic and Republican administrations during his decadeslong career with the Justice Department. He was appointed by then-Attorney General Janet Reno in 1999 to investigate corruption surrounding the use of FBI informants in Boston, and later by then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey to investigate the CIA’s destruction of videotapes of detainee interrogations in 2008. Durham closed the latter probe without bringing any charges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.