Vambo Posted August 15, 2022 Report Share Posted August 15, 2022 'LIKELY TO COMPROMISE' DOJ asks judge to keep Trump affidavit sealed after Garland publicly pushed for warrant transparency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 16, 2022 Report Share Posted August 16, 2022 of course, they are dirty, are obviously caught doing a historic dishonest "hit" campaign. again. remember comey of the fbi leaked? remember peter strzok and lisa page? etc etc etc etc. their arrogance is dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted August 16, 2022 Report Share Posted August 16, 2022 I know the trump humpers are itching to attack the whistle blowers that confirm your lord and savior was hiding US secrets. But I guess you'll have to wait. Keep those computer skills sharp, you'll need to be ready to track down their family members and call in those death threats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambo Posted August 16, 2022 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2022 'INTEREST OF TRANSPARENCY' Live Updates Trump calls for immediate release of ‘completely unredacted’ affidavit after FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted August 16, 2022 Report Share Posted August 16, 2022 Nothing shady going on here 🙄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted August 18, 2022 Report Share Posted August 18, 2022 LOL! Warrants were given to Trump lawyer and he could have released it himself. Affidavits were never a part of the transparency issue by Garland. Affidavits include too much classified information not releasable to the public for fear of jeopardizing the sources, many of which are not within the U.S. Affidavits include specifically what top secret information was being looked for in Mar a Lago, which of course the Trump legal team had said in writing did not exist there. But of course it did because the trumpy lawyers believed their pathological liar client that all classified documents had been returned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambo Posted August 18, 2022 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2022 13 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said: LOL! Warrants were given to Trump lawyer and he could have released it himself. Affidavits were never a part of the transparency issue by Garland. Affidavits include too much classified information not releasable to the public for fear of jeopardizing the sources, many of which are not within the U.S. Affidavits include specifically what top secret information was being looked for in Mar a Lago, which of course the Trump legal team had said in writing did not exist there. But of course it did because the trumpy lawyers believed their pathological liar client that all classified documents had been returned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 19 hours ago, Vambo said: Here is what you may eventually surface from there to find about trump's claim to automatically declassify everything he took. All 18 former insiders said on the record "Horseshit!" to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 20 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: LOL! Warrants were given to Trump lawyer and he could have released it himself. Affidavits were never a part of the transparency issue by Garland. Affidavits include too much classified information not releasable to the public for fear of jeopardizing the sources, many of which are not within the U.S. Affidavits include specifically what top secret information was being looked for in Mar a Lago, which of course the Trump legal team had said in writing did not exist there. But of course it did because the trumpy lawyers believed their pathological liar client that all classified documents had been returned. If there are charges filed against Trump, the affidavit must be released. It’s the law, the person being charged has the right to know their accuser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 1 hour ago, Canton Dawg said: If there are charges filed against Trump, the affidavit must be released. It’s the law, the person being charged has the right to know their accuser. Since they found the documents not sure why you need to know the accusers. The accusers were correct, CJ stole government property. Wait I know why you need to know, so you can go after them. Have some new shit to throw against the wall and see if it will stick. Flood the forum with shit. 1. Accuser#1 once said Cheetos Jesus was a fucking moron, they are clearly bias against your lord and savior. Ignore the evidence found by the FBI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 https://christianresearchnetwork.org/2022/08/13/new-twist-in-fbi-raid-trump-had-standing-order-to-declassify-documents-taken-to-residence/ “Officials familiar with national security law said courts generally have held the president’s power to declassify is far-reaching and that the process for how that happens can be more happenstance, something the Bush and Obama executive orders from 2003 and 2009 made clear.” (John Solomon – Just the News) Donald Trump’s office told Just the News on Friday that the classified materials the FBI seized from his Mar-a-Lago estate were declassified under a “standing order” while he was president that allowed him to take sensitive materials to the White House residence at night to keep working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 19, 2022 Report Share Posted August 19, 2022 sadly, a complicated truth is often required to show a cowardly lie for what it is - bs. Like russian collusion, etc. https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/breaking-trump-describes-process-how-he-declassified-documents The president's detractors in Congress, the DOJ, and the intelligence community are likely to contest the president's arguments. But officials familiar with national security law said courts generally have held the president's power to declassify is far-reaching and that the process for how that happens can be more happenstance, something the Bush and Obama executive orders from 2003 and 2009 made clear. Obama's executive order no. 13526, issued in 2009, laid out the stringent process all federal officials and agencies needed to follow for declassification, but explicitly exempted the sitting president and vice president from having to follow those procedures. "Information originated by the incumbent President or the incumbent Vice President; the incumbent President’s White House Staff or the incumbent Vice President’s Staff; committees, commissions, or boards appointed by the incumbent President; or other entities within the Executive Office of the President that solely advise and assist the incumbent President is exempted from the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section," the Obama order stated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.