Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Group asks President to impose martial law, hold new election


DieHardBrownsFan

Recommended Posts

the point was made, though, that this election was rigged by the left. That is a FACT.

It's also a fact that realistically, nothing can stop them from benefitting. Pandora's box has been opened,

and later on, the damage to America will be very obvious.

WKD: These 3 Countries Tried Socialism. Here's What ...

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/wkd-these-3...

Oct 20, 2019 · After decades of ever-declining economic growth and ever-rising unemployment, all three countries abandoned socialism and turned toward capitalism and the free market.

Socialism: The Failed Idea That Never Dies

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rainerzitelmann/2020/...

Mar 16, 2020 · This is the stage at which intellectuals claim that the country in question—for example the Soviet Union, Maoist China, or now also Venezuela—was never “really” a socialist country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:
 
WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT!!!

Dear President (for now) Trump. You swore an oath to "preserve protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States against all threats, foreign and domestic".  Guess that doesn't mean much to you now- if it ever did. Sign off on very unconstitutional martial law for a new election? Just because your immense ego is hurt because you lost an election?  

I had to look up Pinochet- but if the shoe fits- wear it Donnie. Look in a mirror Cheetos- right now YOU ARE the biggest threat to the Constitution of the United States, and that's truly scary.  MHO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America - American Thinker

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/...

Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America. By John Eidson. The century-long attempt to kill capitalism in America gained a dramatic head of steam in the 1960s with the rapid ascendency of ...

**************************************************

    So, we MUST fight the corruption of our elections, our Constitution/Bill of Rights, and if you aren't all in with that,

you are pretty much a traitor to your own country, and surely you should just go live in venezuela.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America - American Thinker

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/...

Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America. By John Eidson. The century-long attempt to kill capitalism in America gained a dramatic head of steam in the 1960s with the rapid ascendency of ...

**************************************************

    So, we MUST fight the corruption of our elections, our Constitution/Bill of Rights, and if you aren't all in with that,

you are pretty much a traitor to your own country, and surely you should just go live in venezuela.

 

Funny you can actually site Chavez, but have no insight into the playbook he set up that DJT tried to use. Stack the court and steal the election.

EDIT-and you are obviously NOT all-in on the Constitution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Funny you can actually site Chavez, but have no insight into the playbook he set up that DJT tried to use. Stack the court and steal the election.

EDIT-and you are obviously NOT all-in on the Constitution.

oh, please, go look up what "stack the court" means. Every president who filled an EMPTY LEGIT SPOT on the court was stacking the court?

   Why don't the meaning of words matter to you irrational haters? Go the freak look up the HUNDREDS OF GREAT THINGS PRES TRUMP and PENCE ACCOMPLISHED for AMERICA.

   and, name one legit way I'm not all in on the Constitution. You can't, imaginary wonder fighting with windmills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The democrats want to stack the court.  How did Trump know a SC Justice would die a month or so before the election.  He did the same thing the democrats would have done under Obama if they had majority in the Senate.  You guys sure stretch the truth.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

and, name one legit way I'm not all in on the Constitution. You can't, imaginary wonder fighting with windmills.

You will not abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court. That by definition makes you against the Constitutional authority granted them as the 3rd power within our Constitutional government. You believe in authoritarianism, not Constitutional government, because you don't like how this all turned out against that Liar whom you still think should be there for another 4 years. He lost. The Supreme Court agrees he lost. But you do not. Logic then says you do not believe in the Constitution.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

You will not abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court. That by definition makes you against the Constitutional authority granted them as the 3rd power within our Constitutional government. You believe in authoritarianism, not Constitutional government, because you don't like how this all turned out against that Liar whom you still think should be there for another 4 years. He lost. The Supreme Court agrees he lost. But you do not. Logic then says you do not believe in the Constitution.

 

one more time, (are you proud of being dense? is it on purpose...or you can't help it?)

The court did NOT DECIDE. They just didn't HEAR it based on STANDING.

That MEANS that it had nothing to do with the MERITS of the case.

Being happy with the widespread fraud seems very, very cowardly to me. and marxist/communist. That

is what marxists/communists do.

What the guilty states did, was UNCONSTIUTUTIONAL per experts.

You ain't one of em, so go whittle on a toothpick with a rock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

one more time, (are you proud of being dense? is it on purpose...or you can't help it?)

The court did NOT DECIDE. They just didn't HEAR it based on STANDING.

That MEANS that it had nothing to do with the MERITS of the case.

Being happy with the widespread fraud seems very, very cowardly to me. and marxist/communist. That

is what marxists/communists do.

What the guilty states did, was UNCONSTIUTUTIONAL per experts.

You ain't one of em, so go whittle on a toothpick with a rock.

One more time. When the Supreme Court thinks lower courts got it right they vote NOT TO HEAR the case. They let the lower court decisions stand if they agree with them. You need a course in how SCOTUS works. If 4 or more think a lower court made a mistake, they will hear the case and make a full court decision. If none think it has merit, they just send that little "denied" note.

EDIT: Do you really think that if at least 4 members thought that there was widespread voter fraud which decided the election wrongly which the lower courts ruled improperly they would actually choose not to hear the case? If you believe that then you truly have no hope whatsoever. Of course they would hear the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

go read the decision. IT was based on STANDING. Go look up the word. I did. Your infantile rationalization doesn't validate the meaning of real words.

  You can go look up the definitions of words online. If you don't know how, don't ask woodpecker because he doesn't know either.

Standing is a matter that is not relevant to merit. You can have plenty of merit, but if you don't have standing, they won't hear a case.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...