Vambo Posted November 18, 2020 Report Share Posted November 18, 2020 'FICTITIOUS, NONEXISTENT' VOTERS 2 men charged in ballot fraud scheme involving 8,000 applications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 18, 2020 Report Share Posted November 18, 2020 From the article: "None of the fraudulent ballots in question were submitted in the general election, he added." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 18, 2020 Report Share Posted November 18, 2020 every day, whistleblowers and legal affidavits are streaming in, per Sydney Powell. What they have done has blown up in their faces. This is the most corrupt, most dangerous time in our American election history. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted November 18, 2020 Report Share Posted November 18, 2020 "[m]ost of the objections raised in the submitted affidavits are grounded in an extraordinary failure to understand how elections function.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 19, 2020 Report Share Posted November 19, 2020 4 hours ago, calfoxwc said: every day, whistleblowers and legal affidavits are streaming in, per Sydney Powell. What they have done has blown up in their faces. This is the most corrupt, most dangerous time in our American election history. Most dangerous to prosecute through social media rather than courts of law which is really what those who don't want democracy, unless it's their side, to work. DJT is a sick narcissist who runs it this way rather than allow the legal process to take place. Jump right in with him then you do not believe in democracy or rule of law either. You only believe you are right, which does not make it so any more than this virus magically going away made it so for the former king (in his own mind🤴). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 19, 2020 Report Share Posted November 19, 2020 3 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: Most dangerous to prosecute through social media rather than courts of law which is really what those who don't want democracy, unless it's their side, to work. DJT is a sick narcissist who runs it this way rather than allow the legal process to take place. Jump right in with him then you do not believe in democracy or rule of law either. You only believe you are right, which does not make it so any more than this virus magically going away made it so for the former king (in his own mind🤴). if you are going to keep saying such stupid stuff, at least own up to it that you don't have any idea what you're talking about and are trolling. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 19, 2020 Report Share Posted November 19, 2020 7 hours ago, calfoxwc said: if you are going to keep saying such stupid stuff, at least own up to it that you don't have any idea what you're talking about and are trolling. Stupid? No, it's spot on. Either you believe in the rule of law and democracy or you don't. Since you will not agree to abide by the courts concerning so far unfounded claims of voter fraud, then all you believe in is autocracy. Your guy wins despite over 5,000,000 more votes that say different along with the exact same difference in electoral votes DJT got in 2016. That is where it leads Mr. Logic, when you refuse to believe in the court system as one of the 3 main check and balance powers of our democracy. You are a believer in an autocrat who still hopes his SCOTUS appointment he had to get in before the election will keep him in power. Yep, pure Chavez playbook. Welcome to Dictatorship. Moving to South America or Africa would have been easier. And you call yourself logical. Hah! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 21, 2020 Report Share Posted November 21, 2020 Are you still mulling this over? Still waiting for an agreement that whatever the courts rule you will abide by. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted November 21, 2020 Report Share Posted November 21, 2020 On 11/19/2020 at 7:43 AM, TexasAg1969 said: Stupid? No, it's spot on. Either you believe in the rule of law and democracy or you don't. Since you will not agree to abide by the courts concerning so far unfounded claims of voter fraud, then all you believe in is autocracy. Your guy wins despite over 5,000,000 more votes that say different along with the exact same difference in electoral votes DJT got in 2016. That is where it leads Mr. Logic, when you refuse to believe in the court system as one of the 3 main check and balance powers of our democracy. You are a believer in an autocrat who still hopes his SCOTUS appointment he had to get in before the election will keep him in power. Yep, pure Chavez playbook. Welcome to Dictatorship. Moving to South America or Africa would have been easier. And you call yourself logical. Hah! Did the Obama admin follow the rule of law concerning the FISA court with its phony evidence? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 21, 2020 Report Share Posted November 21, 2020 Tex still thinks the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor. The courts will not rule there wasn't serious dramatic voter/vote count fraud. There are over 1000 LEGAL AFFIDAVITS proving it. That is, under perjury conviction reality - they are telling the freaking truth. All around the country. But the swing states where they have corrupt democrats - it is worse than profound. We've never seen this amount of ballot spewing all over a dem controlled state by the millions/hundreds of thousands - to people who are dead, not living there anymore....etc etc etc etc etc. This is a presidential election fraud crisis - it's systemic to the entire democratic socialist mafia. and if it doesn't get resolved, or can't be resolved... I don't fault the courts for their decisions, unless they are appointed leftwing activist courts. Tex doesn't like trial by social media? Tex doesn't like UNSUBSTANTIATED claims? LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL That is all he's done for the last almost 4 years. You really stepped in your own crap now, Tex. Hope you have rubber boots on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted November 21, 2020 Report Share Posted November 21, 2020 Donald J. Trump Big voter fraud information coming out concerning Georgia. Stay tuned! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 22, 2020 Report Share Posted November 22, 2020 On 11/19/2020 at 7:43 AM, TexasAg1969 said: Stupid? No, it's spot on. Either you believe in the rule of law and democracy or you don't. Since you will not agree to abide by the courts concerning so far unfounded claims of voter fraud, then all you believe in is autocracy. Your guy wins despite over 5,000,000 more votes that say different along with the exact same difference in electoral votes DJT got in 2016. That is where it leads Mr. Logic, when you refuse to believe in the court system as one of the 3 main check and balance powers of our democracy. You are a believer in an autocrat who still hopes his SCOTUS appointment he had to get in before the election will keep him in power. Yep, pure Chavez playbook. Welcome to Dictatorship. Moving to South America or Africa would have been easier. And you call yourself logical. Hah! I will not respect an activist anti-Constitutional judge/court that makes social justice/criminal judgements and declarations. See below. so, consider this, Tex who knows very little about responding legitimately: Tell me how you would respect this criminal idea of fake investigating/charging someone based on political hatred: https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2020/11/21/once-again-the-media-is-silent-jonathan-turley-weighs-in-on-michigan-ags-legal-threats-against-republican-legislators/ Once again, the media is silent’: Jonathan Turley weighs in on Michigan AG’s legal threats against Republican legislators Michigan AG Nessel and others are suggesting that Republicans who oppose certification or even meet with President Trump on the issue could be criminally investigated or charged. Once again, the media is silent on this abusive use of the criminal code. https://t.co/IlEQ3roKsE — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) November 21, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 22, 2020 Report Share Posted November 22, 2020 Meanwhile in Penn. https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/trump-pennsylvania-giuliani-lawsuit-235604325.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted November 22, 2020 Report Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said: Meanwhile in Penn. https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/trump-pennsylvania-giuliani-lawsuit-235604325.html Supreme Court! MAGA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 22, 2020 Report Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Supreme Court! MAGA! $20 says the SCOTUS won't even hear it because it was such a botched legal "argument" by an incompetent old man blowing unfounded conspiracy theories out his ass. The trumpy team can appeal it, but it ain't even gonna get to first base. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted November 22, 2020 Report Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 hour ago, calfoxwc said: I will not respect an activist anti-Constitutional judge/court that makes social justice/criminal judgements and declarations. See below. so, consider this, Tex who knows very little about responding legitimately: Tell me how you would respect this criminal idea of fake investigating/charging someone based on political hatred: https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2020/11/21/once-again-the-media-is-silent-jonathan-turley-weighs-in-on-michigan-ags-legal-threats-against-republican-legislators/ Once again, the media is silent’: Jonathan Turley weighs in on Michigan AG’s legal threats against Republican legislators Michigan AG Nessel and others are suggesting that Republicans who oppose certification or even meet with President Trump on the issue could be criminally investigated or charged. Once again, the media is silent on this abusive use of the criminal code. https://t.co/IlEQ3roKsE — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) November 21, Neither he nor you provided a link to the actual "threats" alleged here. How about putting that link so people know what the hell he (and you) are talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 22, 2020 Report Share Posted November 22, 2020 5 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: Meanwhile in Penn. https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/trump-pennsylvania-giuliani-lawsuit-235604325.html judge braun was appointed by your obaMao commie. so there ya go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.