Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Looks like it's over.


Westside Steve

Recommended Posts

So it wasn’t America for 8 years when Clinton was President.

Then it was America for 8 years when Bush was President.

Then it wasn’t America again for 8 years when Obama was President 

Then it was America again for 4 years when Trump was President. 
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Browns149 said:

So it wasn’t America for 8 years when Clinton was President.

Then it was America for 8 years when Bush was President.

Then it wasn’t America again for 8 years when Obama was President 

Then it was America again for 4 years when Trump was President. 
 

invalid response, non of those were marxists-sponsored, who want to pack our Supreme Court to own it,

and who want to get rid of the electoral college, and who will ban cows farting, campfires, guns, Christianity and pepperoni rolls, the latter you can buy but only from the gov, after you buy a $200 pepperoni roll license. (gotta get bucks to support socialism, then the money will run out, and we will be venezuela).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

invalid response, non of those were marxists-sponsored, who want to pack our Supreme Court to own it,

and who want to get rid of the electoral college, and who will ban cows farting, campfires, guns, Christianity and pepperoni rolls, the latter you can buy but only from the gov, after you buy a $200 pepperoni roll license. (gotta get bucks to support socialism, then the money will run out, and we will be venezuela).

Trump wanted to pack the Supreme Court. Why else did the new Justice get confirmed in the shortest time ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Browns149 said:

Trump wanted to pack the Supreme Court. Why else did the new Justice get confirmed in the shortest time ever

if you are being facetious, you should put that in pink.

Packing the Supreme Court means "adding about 5 new fake vacancies so the left can put five new leftwing marxist activist judges" to dominate the numbers.

    Pres Trump only FILLED a vacancy, and historically, it has been shown that the time frame was not uncommon at all.

Research it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are not going to add seats on the SCOTUS. And you know it. 
 

 I researched it and she was confirmed in a , much faster, timeline then the last 40 years of appointments. But if you average it out over the entire history of the SCOTUS  then, yes, she was appointed in a slightly faster time then the average

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Because the Senate chose to?  You do realize what packing the supreme court means don't you?

 

Yes. Lighten up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this crying and complaining and nobody mentions that Trump trying to taint the very thing that makes this country great, our ability to VOTE! And the irony of the whole thing is that his supporters don't even realize that he was even trying to suppress the votes of the people that support him! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Browns149 said:

They are not going to add seats on the SCOTUS. And you know it. 
 

 I researched it and she was confirmed in a , much faster, timeline then the last 40 years of appointments. But if you average it out over the entire history of the SCOTUS  then, yes, she was appointed in a slightly faster time then the average 

research better:

How Long Could It Take For Amy Coney Barrett To Be Confirmed? : Supreme Court Nomination President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett with just 38 days before the general election.

Nominee: Sandra Day O’Connor Total length of time: 34 days

President Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor to fill Justice Potter Stewart’s seat on Aug. 19, 1981. Stewart retired on July 3, 1981. Hearings began on Sept. 9 and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to endorse her on Sept. 15. The full Senate confirmed O’Connor on Sept. 21.

Nominee: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Total length of time: 45 days

President Bill Clinton nominated Ruth Bader Ginsburg to fill Justice Byron White’s seat on June 22, 1993. White retired on June 28, 1993. Hearings began on July 20 and the full Senate confirmed Ginsburg on Aug. 5.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

research better:

How Long Could It Take For Amy Coney Barrett To Be Confirmed? : Supreme Court Nomination President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett with just 38 days before the general election.

Nominee: Sandra Day O’Connor Total length of time: 34 days

President Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor to fill Justice Potter Stewart’s seat on Aug. 19, 1981. Stewart retired on July 3, 1981. Hearings began on Sept. 9 and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to endorse her on Sept. 15. The full Senate confirmed O’Connor on Sept. 21.

Nominee: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Total length of time: 45 days

President Bill Clinton nominated Ruth Bader Ginsburg to fill Justice Byron White’s seat on June 22, 1993. White retired on June 28, 1993. Hearings began on July 20 and the full Senate confirmed Ginsburg on Aug. 5.

 

How dare you use FACTS...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

Fox finally called it.

Rest in peace America it was nice knowing you.

😉

WSS

Actually, I think that this election isn't as huge a loss for Republicans as it appears on the surface. Trump has probably lost the presidency, but Democrats have definitely lost huge across the board:

- Big losses for Democrats in the House of Representatives and minimal gains at best in the Senate. Biden may have won the Presidency, but he'll have a harder time jamming through woke Leftist agenda with the GOP checking him in Congress.

-Big losses in state gubernatorial and legislatures across the country.

-Traditionally blue areas flipping red for the first time in decades. While Democratic strongholds in urban areas remained strong, the Democrats lost alot of ground in quasi-urban suburbs.

-Largest percentage of minority votes for GOP in over 60 years; 18% of the national black vote and up to 36% of the national Latino vote went to Trump and the GOP.

-Movements founded by disaffected liberals such as the #Walkawy movement and the #Blexit movement will only get stronger due to the tainted aura of this election and the inevitable crackdown by MSM and Big Tech of dissenting opinions not towing the woke leftist ideology.

 

Trump didn't lose this election so much due to his policies as much as his shitty personality. I'd wager many Biden votes were due to simply not liking Trump rather than supporting Democrats' policies. Going forward, the Republicans need to cultivate candidates with similar policy positions as Trump, but also have personalities easier to digest as well. 2022 and 2024 are just around the corner, and with Democrats seeming to solidify their support of woke leftism, I'd say there's plenty of opportunity for the GOP to gain ground for the future. Woke leftism is by it's very nature a reductionist ideology: the woke members of today are the disaffected voters of tomorrow as the the leftist ideology eats its own and more and more people are shunned for not supporting whatever "inclusive" ideology is the the flavor of the day. If Republicans operate under a "big tent platform", they'll grow by leaps and bounds in the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Actually, I think that this election isn't as huge a loss for Republicans as it appears on the surface. Trump has probably lost the presidency, but Democrats have definitely lost huge across the board:

- Big losses for Democrats in the House of Representatives and minimal gains at best in the Senate. Biden may have won the Presidency, but he'll have a harder time jamming through woke Leftist agenda with the GOP checking him in Congress.

-Big losses in state gubernatorial and legislatures across the country.

-Traditionally blue areas flipping red for the first time in decades. While Democratic strongholds in urban areas remained strong, the Democrats lost alot of ground in quasi-urban suburbs.

-Largest percentage of minority votes for GOP in over 60 years; 18% of the national black vote and up to 36% of the national Latino vote went to Trump and the GOP.

-Movements founded by disaffected liberals such as the #Walkawy movement and the #Blexit movement will only get stronger due to the tainted aura of this election and the inevitable crackdown by MSM and Big Tech of dissenting opinions not towing the woke leftist ideology.

 

Trump didn't lose this election so much due to his policies as much as his shitty personality. I'd wager many Biden votes were due to simply not liking Trump rather than supporting Democrats' policies. Going forward, the Republicans need to cultivate candidates with similar policy positions as Trump, but also have personalities easier to digest as well. 2022 and 2024 are just around the corner, and with Democrats seeming to solidify their support of woke leftism, I'd say there's plenty of opportunity for the GOP to gain ground for the future. Woke leftism is by it's very nature a reductionist ideology: the woke members of today are the disaffected voters of tomorrow as the the leftist ideology eats its own and more and more people are shunned for not supporting whatever "inclusive" ideology is the the flavor of the day. If Republicans operate under a "big tent platform", they'll grow by leaps and bounds in the next few years.

 

Trump made his personality a policy issue

But I agree the election was a referendum on people wanting to get rid of Trump, not people liking Biden.  

 

Also, weed was legalized in many states and Florida voted to increase their minimum wage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Vambo said:

How dare you use FACTS...

 

His facts are wrong. She was nominated on Sept 26 and confirmed on Oct 26  That’s 30 days, and he even got the 38 days part wrong. 

On September 26, 2020, President Donald Trump announced the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the position of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to fill in the vacancy left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. At the time of her nomination, Barrett was a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Senate received word from the president (when a Supreme Court nomination becomes official) on September 29.[1]

300px-President_Trump_Nominates_Judge_Am
President Donald Trump with Amy Coney Barrett and her family, just prior to Barrett being announced as the nominee, September 26, 2020

On October 26, the Senate voted to confirm Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court, with all but one Republican voting in favor and all Democrats voting against; Barrett took the judicial oath on October 27.[2]Democrats rebuked Republicans, stating that they had violated a precedent they established in 2016 when they refused to consider President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland more than nine months before the end of his term, and accused them of hypocrisy.[3] The 35 days between the nomination and the 2020 presidential election marked the shortest period of time between a nomination to the Supreme Court and an election in U.S. history.[4][note 1]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Browns149 said:

So it wasn’t America for 8 years when Clinton was President.

Then it was America for 8 years when Bush was President.

Then it wasn’t America again for 8 years when Obama was President 

Then it was America again for 4 years when Trump was President. 
 

Oh it was a joke. Kinda. Don't get your bowels in an uproar.

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 
 
“We should look at the votes. We’re just beginning the tabulation stage. We should look at these allegations. We’re seeing a number of affidavits that there has been voter fraud. We have a history in this country of election problems. In Pennsylvania you had an order by a Supreme Court Justice to compel them to separate ballots that were received after the legislative deadline. It required the intervention of Justice Alito. That’s a large group of ballots. When you talk about systemic problems, it’s about how these ballots were authenticated, because if there’s a problem in the system about authentication, that would seriously affect the ENTIRE ELECTION - And what concerns me is that we had over a hundred million mail-in ballot in cites like Philladelphia and Detroit with a long series of election problems (to put it mildly).” Jonathan Turley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...