Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Hunter Biden introduced Burisma adviser to VP dad before Ukraine pressure, email shows


Vambo

Recommended Posts

an article Fox News wouldn't publish

NY Post reporters asking not to be put on the article as authors

No other news site has been given access to the harddrive

The PDF+image that has been shared shows metadata it was created the day before the article

Literally from Rudy, who I have no idea why you'd trust outright 

Metadata shows pictures of emails were put in photoshop 

If true, would have been major evidence for a Republican led Senate investigation of Biden... that found Biden innocent

The absolute perfect timing to come out in an election you're losing

 

Funny how the people that like to unironically call others sheep...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Cross confirmations?

 

What, other randos on twitter squaking into the crazy Q echo chamber? 

Rudy, Bannon, and others just for starters.

 

Pretty much a done deal.

 

The MSM have all been provided copies, but they're sitting on it - expected.

They are complicit in covering this up, their end is fast approaching.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JAFBF said:

Rudy, Bannon, and others just for starters.

 

Pretty much a done deal.

 

The MSM have all been provided copies, but they're sitting on it - expected.

They are complicit in covering this up, their end is fast approaching.

 

Hahaha

 

"Rudy and Bannon confirm it too!!!"

 

How can you be so suspicious of the "MSM" but then type that out loud and believe it? How can everything you don't like from the "MSM" be guaranteed lies but two clearly biased individuals saying something you like is rock solid evidence?

 

All of you QAnon folks need help.

And the sad posters on here that are starting to believe that nonsense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

Hahaha

 

"Rudy and Bannon confirm it too!!!"

 

How can you be so suspicious of the "MSM" but then type that out loud and believe it? How can everything you don't like from the "MSM" be guaranteed lies but two clearly biased individuals saying something you like is rock solid evidence?

 

All of you QAnon folks need help.

And the sad posters on here that are starting to believe that nonsense

image.png.e6b336c79df1e0fafc7d708f94a240f3.png

 

image.png.1d6611c1fab360b8aba08d7f4b72d767.png

 

Funny how the Biden Campaign hasn't denied it, and the MSM is not questioning them about it either - instead they ask him about what flavor of Ice Cream he got.

For real.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JAFBF said:

image.png.e6b336c79df1e0fafc7d708f94a240f3.png

 

image.png.1d6611c1fab360b8aba08d7f4b72d767.png

 

Funny how the Biden Campaign hasn't denied it, and the MSM is not questioning them about it either - instead they ask him about what flavor of Ice Cream he got.

For real.

 

So you're response to get more "legit" sources are...

 

Some conservative trying to gain favor with constituents that was a distant third in her republican primary in 2020 and received only .5% of the vote in the general election in 2018 with a different party

And some right wing conspiracy theorist author (which I can see how you find him credible)

 

 

 

So.... Still no legitimate cross confirmation source. More nonsense a QAnon moron would eat up. Stuff that doesn't pass that basic sniff test but plays to your "Trump will save us all" narrative so that's all that matters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

So.... Still no legitimate cross confirmation source. More nonsense a QAnon moron would eat up. Stuff that doesn't pass that basic sniff test but plays to your "Trump will save us all" narrative so that's all that matters

Would you believe it if some “credible” news agency, like CNN, or MSNBC would would report it?

I know there I go again being funny.

Every sane person knows the Dems have the MSM in their back pocket, and wouldn’t dare breathe a word of it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

So you're response to get more "legit" sources are...

 

Some conservative trying to gain favor with constituents that was a distant third in her republican primary in 2020 and received only .5% of the vote in the general election in 2018 with a different party

And some right wing conspiracy theorist author (which I can see how you find him credible)

 

 

 

So.... Still no legitimate cross confirmation source. More nonsense a QAnon moron would eat up. Stuff that doesn't pass that basic sniff test but plays to your "Trump will save us all" narrative so that's all that matters

 

Uh huh, totally bogus accounts.

 

image.png.ff4a5976e6b3a43c193f3d8d0ee4cd89.png

image.thumb.png.0a585e7505e0b4fa849b7ac28e3b3cf9.png

https://flanaganforsenate.org/

 

 

image.png.a7b679f354548c3f6434d046c4d15f7c.png

image.thumb.png.b31d46e97e03aa1b0afba30bc505981d.png

image.png.066f5e1f0fc1b550664772ffb6ad2496.png

http://rootforamerica.com/about/

 

Yep, just a couple of nobody's with no credentials at all.

🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JAFBF said:

 

Uh huh, totally bogus accounts.

 

image.png.ff4a5976e6b3a43c193f3d8d0ee4cd89.png

image.thumb.png.0a585e7505e0b4fa849b7ac28e3b3cf9.png

https://flanaganforsenate.org/

 

 

image.png.a7b679f354548c3f6434d046c4d15f7c.png

image.thumb.png.b31d46e97e03aa1b0afba30bc505981d.png

image.png.066f5e1f0fc1b550664772ffb6ad2496.png

http://rootforamerica.com/about/

 

Yep, just a couple of nobody's with no credentials at all.

🙄

Umm... The fact they have bios (that you're pulling from their own site meaning they're as positive as possible) doesn't mean they have "credentials".

 

 

Maybe you just legitimately don't understand this at all. Maybe it's a QVC-type old folks falling for stuff on the internet thing. 

You know that just having a Twitter account doesn't make you a legit source, right?

Because I'm starting to think you just fundamentally don't understand. Which would explain a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Because I'm starting to think you just fundamentally don't understand. Which would explain a lot. 

woodpecker translation: "I'm starting to emote and play rope a dope with myself because I don't know anything about anything...peck peck peck"

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...