Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

TWITTER CENSORS PRES TRUMP's LATEST TWEET


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

for "glorifying" ??? just a pitiful excuse for censorship.

Still don't see it, all wet in Egypt, greta woodpecka?

https://www.theblaze.com/news/twitter-suppresses-trump-tweet-rioting

Twitter suppresses President Trump's tweet for 'glorifying violence' amid rioting: 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts'

Trump's tweet also referred to rioters as 'THUGS'

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

for "glorifying" ??? just a pitiful excuse for censorship.

Still don't see it, all wet in Egypt, greta woodpecka?

https://www.theblaze.com/news/twitter-suppresses-trump-tweet-rioting

Twitter suppresses President Trump's tweet for 'glorifying violence' amid rioting: 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts'

Trump's tweet also referred to rioters as 'THUGS'

 

Trump seeks to clarify tweet on Minneapolis: 'Looting leads to shooting'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Do you understand what censorship means?

His tweet is still viewable with one extra click...

You've struggled with the first amendment before though so I guess this shouldn't be a surprise

so what? when to they make it ten clicks, you woodypeckerhead? I don't struggle with the 1st Amendment nothin - you are just a birdbrain loser poster troll. "bot" lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ilhan Omar’s daughter, Isra Hirsi, helped spread around a list of supplies needed for the violent riot in Minneapolis Wednesday evening

Among the provisions that the DSA requested, were the following:

Plywood for shields
Tennis Rackets
Hockey Sticks
In addition to typical first aid tools to counteract inflammation caused by tear gas and pepper spray.

 

 

 

2020-05-29_192549.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

so what? when to they make it ten clicks, you woodypeckerhead? I don't struggle with the 1st Amendment nothin - you are just a birdbrain loser poster troll. "bot" lol

 

It wasn't censorship. Do you understand that? Your thread title is claiming it is censorship and it objectively isn't. 

Can you admit that it isn't or are you just that delusional? If so lmk so I know not to waste my time

You struggle with it all of the time. Specifically how freed of speech isn't freedom from consequence. Almost always in stories involving someone being homophobic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

 

It wasn't censorship. Do you understand that? Your thread title is claiming it is censorship and it objectively isn't. 

Can you admit that it isn't or are you just that delusional? If so lmk so I know not to waste my time

You struggle with it all of the time. Specifically how freed of speech isn't freedom from consequence. Almost always in stories involving someone being homophobic.

nobody is "homophobic". and we aren't afraid of woodpecker poop on the board, either. YOU are a waste of time. Of course it is censorship - it got "restricted" unfairly. "restricted" is censorship, stupid. The anti-Pres Trump reeks it's ugly head everywhere in liberal asswhole land. Luckily for you, a birdbrain can also be a lefty.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-twitter-renew-attack-tag-tweet-glorifying-violence-2020-5

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even a freaking liberal reporter says it was insane for them to step in it. Apparently, woodpecker lives in his own woodpecker poop. Does he have to stink up this forum with it?

********************************************************************

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/05/29/liberal-reporter-rips-twitter-for-censoring-trumps-tweets-n2569695

Liberal Reporter Says New Twitter Policy That Censored Trump Would Be Insane...And He Was Just Proven Right

A7cfxZ4g_normal.jpg Making editorial determinations based on your subjective understanding of “historical context,” whatever that means exactly, means you no longer have any claim to being a neutral arbiter. Really bad move https://twitter.com/twittersafety/status/1266272862052085760 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once social media becomes a "neutral arbiter" they legally are NOT PROTECTED under the law.

Now why don't you just be quiet, woodpecker, and let the rest of us have an INTELLIGENT conversation.

We need a "no chirp" zone. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...