calfoxwc Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Here is what the entire fake impeachment is about : "we be impeaching him so he can't be president while in office and to stop him from being re-elected" https://www.theblaze.com/news/sen-kamala-harris-calls-for-halt-on-president-trumps-judicial-nominations-during-impeachment Sen. Kamala Harris calls for halt on President Trump's judicial nominations during impeachment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 2 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: But he will not be found guilty and this will be a sham of a "trial". Yes, you're right. . .the House did have a sham for a trial. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 FYI - Tex - it isn't the Senate's job to conduct a trial. That is the House's job. The Senate decides if the House's case merits a concurring vote. Anyone with any decency and/or seriousness has to admit the House dems ran a political dishonest FARCE. So, of course, it's crap on it's arrival - it should be flushed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 3 hours ago, calfoxwc said: FYI - Tex - it isn't the Senate's job to conduct a trial. That is the House's job. The Senate decides if the House's case merits a concurring vote. Anyone with any decency and/or seriousness has to admit the House dems ran a political dishonest FARCE. So, of course, it's crap on it's arrival - it should be flushed. No, its the Senates job to conduct a trial. The House gathers evidence, draws up the Articles of Impeachment, and votes to impeach. The articles of impeachment is presented to the Senate for trial. As is often done by judges in regular trials, the Senate can also choose throw the case out. Which I wish McConnell would have done, he knows full well the dems have no fucking case. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 5 hours ago, calfoxwc said: FYI - Tex - it isn't the Senate's job to conduct a trial. That is the House's job. The Senate decides if the House's case merits a concurring vote. Anyone with any decency and/or seriousness has to admit the House dems ran a political dishonest FARCE. So, of course, it's crap on it's arrival - it should be flushed. Sorry Cal, you're wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Gorka said: No, its the Senates job to conduct a trial. The House gathers evidence, draws up the Articles of Impeachment, and votes to impeach. The articles of impeachment is presented to the Senate for trial. As is often done by judges in regular trials, the Senate can also choose throw the case out. Which I wish McConnell would have done, he knows full well the dems have no fucking case. "The House gathers the evidence"..that is the key. The House gathers the evidence, that is their job and not the Senate's. The House isn't supposed to do a half way job of investigation and then leave it up to the Senate to finish the investigation like Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are wanting. This case was supposed to be ready for trial. In fact the dems said they already had overwhelming evidence when they voted on the impeachment articles. Now they want more investigation? What happened to their overwhelming evidence they claimed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 28 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Sorry Cal, you're wrong. Which is pretty rare you must admit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Sorry Cal, you're wrong. I know, as soon as I re-read it just now, I said it backwards. The senate does the trial, the house submits the evidence. something like that. my bad. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 On 1/16/2020 at 7:02 PM, calfoxwc said: I know, as soon as I re-read it just now, I said it backwards. The senate does the trial, the house submits the evidence. something like that. my bad. We have the luxury of being able to admit when we're wrong. Libs don't have that luxury because they're wrong way to often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 Donald J. Trump 10 hrs · They are rigging the election again against Bernie Sanders, just like last time, only even more obviously. They are bringing him out of so important Iowa in order that, as a Senator, he sit through the Impeachment Hoax Trial. Crazy Nancy thereby gives the strong edge to Sleepy Joe Biden, and Bernie is shut out again. Very unfair, but that’s the way the Democrats play the game. Anyway, it’s a lot of fun to watch! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.