Vagitron Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 Â we see that you have had experience with that. Â Oh Grinder, you kidder you. Â http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaQLKdsAZRs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 Oh Grinder, you kidder you.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaQLKdsAZRs   Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack. Â Â I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manbearpig Posted July 20, 2011 Report Share Posted July 20, 2011 I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground. Â I bet you do, hence your name. I bet you love listning to all kinds of guys moaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 I bet you do, hence your name. I bet you love listning to all kinds of guys moaning. Â Oh FOR sure. Got me dead to rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 and in this corner.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzz..............zzzzzzzzzzzzzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Remember, Shittsburgh is the new San Francisco, and damn proud. Â Â Great for the city whether you agree with it or not. Not everyone is closed minded and ridiculous. Only going to bring more commerce to a currently thriving city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground. Â Â Quack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Great for the city whether you agree with it or not. Not everyone is closed minded and ridiculous. Only going to bring more commerce to a currently thriving city.  That's just fine. More power to you. FYI, as far as "Major League" markets go, both Cleveland and Pittsburgh, believe it or not, are in much better shape than most markets....if you go by Unemployment figures. The following "Major League" U.S. markets all had unemployment figures WORSE than Cleveland did as of May 2011:  Indianapolis Dallas Milwaukee New Orleans Phoenix Houston Jacksonville New York Kansas City Philadelphia Cincinnatti Denver Portland St. Louis San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose Seattle San Francisco Chicago Orlando Memphis Los Angeles Miami Detroit Sacramento Atlanta Charlotte Tampa Raleigh  The ONLY "Major League" markets to have unemployment figures that were better than Cleveland are: Oklahoma City Minneapolis/St. Paul Boston Pittsburgh Green Bay Buffalo Salt Lake City San Antonio Columbus Baltimore  Source: US Department Bureau of Labor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 That's just fine. More power to you. FYI, as far as "Major League" markets go, both Cleveland and Pittsburgh, believe it or not, are in much better shape than most markets....if you go by Unemployment figures. The following "Major League" U.S. markets all had unemployment figures WORSE than Cleveland did as of May 2011:  Indianapolis Dallas Milwaukee New Orleans Phoenix Houston Jacksonville New York Kansas City Philadelphia Cincinnatti Denver Portland St. Louis San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose Seattle San Francisco Chicago Orlando Memphis Los Angeles Miami Detroit Sacramento Atlanta Charlotte Tampa Raleigh  The ONLY "Major League" markets to have unemployment figures that were better than Cleveland are: Oklahoma City Minneapolis/St. Paul Boston Pittsburgh Green Bay Buffalo Salt Lake City San Antonio Columbus Baltimore  Source: US Department Bureau of Labor ok, but what type of jobs are we talking about? that's this whole political shell game bullshit that's been going on for the past two years. do they break it down into sections of the job market? what are the average annual salaries of the same two jobs between those two lists and their cost of living? and if you'll notice the first list are major hubs of the population with high-paying high-end jobs (the only one that threw me off is boston, on your second list).and what about the guy who used to manage a multi-million dollar company, who can't find work at 50% of his past salary and refuses to flip burgers at your local shake shack? a lot of people refuse to accept jobs below what they are worth and are living off the system until everything shakes down or blows up.  oh and to get back on topic: james harrison is still a roided-out ape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Let's give credit where credit is due.  Roidison was spot on about Big Ben:  "Hey, at least throw a pick on their side of the field instead of asking the D to bail you out again," Harrison said. "Or hand the ball off and stop trying to act like Peyton Manning. You ain't that and you know it, man; you just get paid like he does."  Roids must be like a truth serum for the barely evolved.  Zombo  http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/kerry_byrne/07/20/peyton-manning-ben-roethlisberger/index.html?eref=sihp&sct=hp_t13_a2 http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/22526/harrison%E2%80%99s-wrong-about-roethlisberger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 I'm not clicking your links and ending up on some gay porn site. What's your point?  Zombo  Click the links. Directly refutes your previous statement and in handed fashion. Ben also isn't asked to be Peyton Manning but he's a VERY capable passer and one of the best in the league. The links just reaffirm that or you could play it off like I posted porn links. We both know you clicked each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Ben is no Peyton Manning. There is no link in the world that could change my mind.  If Manning had had the Steelers defense the past decade he would probably own four or five rings.  Peyton is the greatest QB of our generation. Ben is just a guy on a good team. That rapes.  Zombo  Peyton Manning is a great QB but he's also one of the biggest choke artists in the league. Give Ben a solid offensive line and the Steelers have another two rings. His stats also show EXACTLY the opposite of what you claim but hey those stats must be wrong. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 How do his stats show the opposite? He has 2 rings. Â Zombo said Peyton would have 4 or 5 with the Steelers team. Without a doubt that is true. His defense was swiss cheese last year and the Colts didn't suffer. With a defense? Forget about it. Â How can you say without a doubt that is true? Do you see how often Ben has to evade a sack over the course of the season. Do you honestly think Peyton Manning could and would do the same? Manning would be on his back a lot with our offensive line. Pouncey was a revelation and thank god for Sean Kugler because he allowed our patch work o-line to work. He was arguably the best acquisition for the Steelers last year. Peyton Manning would not have 4 or 5 rings. Downplaying how good Ben actually is, is also ignorant. I don't expect anyone to agree. We are on a Browns board after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 homo, I've said and have said for years that stats are not indicative of a QB's worth. Yea I'll admit it can help a lot, but there's so many factors that go into a QB's development. Whether or not you would admit it, Ben came into an AMAZING situation for pittsburgh. The first 3 years he was there he had an amazing run game, almost unstoppable defense and a HOF coach. He wasn't asked to do much at all for his first ring and you know that. I'll admit without a doubt he's a top 10 QB in the league, but those stats in those articles don't tell the whole tale. If you would even put Ben as a QB in the same breath as Peyton you would be straight up crazy. The way he understands and plays the game is something frankly I don't the league had ever seen before him. Ben is a good, solid QB who does play clutch. But come on, don't look at a couple slanted stats here  The one that pisses me off more than anything is the YPA. Manning for years has played the short to intermediate game with clark and wayne. They run slants and stick routes about as much as any team in the league. The past 2-3 years Ben has been airing it out to Wallace spreading the ball in general. I also hate the damn TD-INT ratio. It doesn't show game by game stats which is stupid if you really think about it. I can vividly remember Peyton one year throwing 6 ints, and throwing 5 in another. Which means if you take out one bad game the stats are completely different. And to top that all off, ben missing four games could clearly have changed his stats for the worse. They played some pretty good damn teams those first four weeks. Facts are facts, but they DON'T always tell the whole tale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 homo, I've said and have said for years that stats are not indicative of a QB's worth. Yea I'll admit it can help a lot, but there's so many factors that go into a QB's development. Whether or not you would admit it, Ben came into an AMAZING situation for pittsburgh. The first 3 years he was there he had an amazing run game, almost unstoppable defense and a HOF coach. He wasn't asked to do much at all for his first ring and you know that. I'll admit without a doubt he's a top 10 QB in the league, but those stats in those articles don't tell the whole tale. If you would even put Ben as a QB in the same breath as Peyton you would be straight up crazy. The way he understands and plays the game is something frankly I don't the league had ever seen before him. Ben is a good, solid QB who does play clutch. But come on, don't look at a couple slanted stats here  The one that pisses me off more than anything is the YPA. Manning for years has played the short to intermediate game with clark and wayne. They run slants and stick routes about as much as any team in the league. The past 2-3 years Ben has been airing it out to Wallace spreading the ball in general. I also hate the damn TD-INT ratio. It doesn't show game by game stats which is stupid if you really think about it. I can vividly remember Peyton one year throwing 6 ints, and throwing 5 in another. Which means if you take out one bad game the stats are completely different. And to top that all off, ben missing four games could clearly have changed his stats for the worse. They played some pretty good damn teams those first four weeks. Facts are facts, but they DON'T always tell the whole tale.  Ben has been leading the YPA category for a good long while, well before Mike Wallace so your argument above is pretty bunk. Yards per attempt is actually a pretty good statistic and one used more routinely to measure the success of a QB. Ben isn't asked to throw the ball 50 times a game but is more than capable and to say he's not in the same league is ignorant. If he were asked to throw it 50 times a game and had a offensive line that was consistent like Manning he'd put up much larger numbers. As it stands he's a winner and in my eyes that's the most important stat. If I started a franchise tomorrow I'd take Ben over Manning 10 times out of 10. His versatility, mobility, his deep ball accuracy and his poise in the pocket when there is one is up there with the greats. He just doesn't put up the gawdy fantasy football type numbers. I could post a whole bunch of other statistics, arguments supporting my stance but I'll refrain because opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has one. Unfortunately for you my opinion is shared across the entire NFL. Ben is the real deal and the REASON we've gotten to 3 super bowls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 It just really does humor me how you can hide behind stats as if they tells black and white a QB's worth. Just let me ask you a few hypothetical questions and just give your me honest, hopefully unbiased opinion  1. Do you think Ben reaches 3 super bowls without a defense that has consistently ranked top 5 in the league since he's been in?  2. Do you think Ben is as good of a QB without learning under a HOF and all time great coach when he entered the league?  3. Do you think Ben has as much success early in his career without a HOF running back and above average WR's?  I clearly stated I think he's a good QB. but manning came from NOTHING in indy and made that team great. Ben didn't have to make the steelers, the steelers made him. THAT'S exactly why Manning is and always will be known through history as a better QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Ben has been leading the YPA category for a good long while, well before Mike Wallace so your argument above is pretty bunk. Yards per attempt is actually a pretty good statistic and one used more routinely to measure the success of a QB. Ben isn't asked to throw the ball 50 times a game but is more than capable and to say he's not in the same league is ignorant. If he were asked to throw it 50 times a game and had a offensive line that was consistent like Manning he'd put up much larger numbers. As it stands he's a winner and in my eyes that's the most important stat. If I started a franchise tomorrow I'd take Ben over Manning 10 times out of 10. His versatility, mobility, his deep ball accuracy and his poise in the pocket when there is one is up there with the greats. He just doesn't put up the gawdy fantasy football type numbers. I could post a whole bunch of other statistics, arguments supporting my stance but I'll refrain because opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has one. Unfortunately for you my opinion is shared across the entire NFL. Ben is the real deal and the REASON we've gotten to 3 super bowls. Â Â Â You ask any GM hands down who they would build a team around and I guarantee you they all, or most all of them would pick Manning. Ben is a good QB, theres no arguing that. But he's not Joe Montana and for My money...not even Steve young for that matter. I'll tell you what. Not being biased. Id take Brian Sipe over Ben simply because he had the innate ability to flat out read defenses and did it with pretty good,not great WR's. Yes, Dave Logan and Reggie Rucker were good WR's and Ozzy Newscome was an outstanding Pass catching TE. Our Oline was barely as good and maybe a tad less capable than the one your team has now, (back in the late 70's early 80's). Ben makes his living mostly on broken down plays, unlike Manning, who is a "CONSISTENT" passer!. Manning is ten times as accurate as Ben as a passer. Bens percentage completion might look better only because he's not asked to throw the ball as much. 90% of Indy's offense is a "passing offense" meaning they are a "Throw first offense" Unlike the stoolers wich is "Run first,play good defense" And with Bens history of "Off the field issues". I doubt any GM/Owner would gamble on Ben right now, Unless he's Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones. Your sadly grasping at straws Kiddo!. I'll say this...Ben cant even kiss Aaron Rodgers jock as far as QBing goes. Rodgers is already better than Gay Ben...LOL!...Its true and you know it! Â Â Here...Peyton still had more yards overall goofball. Â Quarterback Rating Leaders - Qualified RK PLAYER TEAM ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A LONG TD INT SACK RATE YDS/G 1 Tom Brady, QB NE 492 324 65.9 3,900 7.93 79 36 4 25 111.0 244 2 Philip Rivers, QB SD 541 357 66.0 4,710 8.71 59 30 13 38 101.8 294 3 Aaron Rodgers, QB GB 475 312 65.7 3,922 8.26 86 28 11 31 101.2 261 4 Michael Vick, QB PHI 372 233 62.6 3,018 8.11 91 21 6 34 100.2 252 5 Ben Roethlisberger, QB PIT 389 240 61.7 3,200 8.23 56 17 5 32 97.0 267 6 Josh Freeman, QB TB 474 291 61.4 3,451 7.28 64 25 6 28 95.9 216 7 Joe Flacco, QB BAL 489 306 62.6 3,622 7.41 67 25 10 40 93.6 226 8 Matt Cassel, QB KC 450 262 58.2 3,116 6.92 75 27 7 26 93.0 208 9 Matt Schaub, QB HOU 574 365 63.6 4,370 7.61 60 24 12 32 92.0 273 10 Peyton Manning, QB IND 679 450 66.3 4,700 6.92 73 33 17 16 91.9 294 Â http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nw220 Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Damn i knew Steeler fans were biased but to admit you'd really rather have Ben over Manning is just crazy,put down the pipe my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 another thing I forgot to add to my earlier post is something I hear against peyton all the time which makes me laugh. This argument of "Peyton can't handle the rush and doesn't know what to do when the play breaks down" Guess what folks? Peyton is so damn good that a play RARELY breaks down for him. He doesn't get sacked ever because he knows where the defense is going to be at all times and knows where to throw the ball, period. Trust me, with his limited mobility he would get sacked 2x as much if that wasn't the case. So yea, Ben may be better at "broken plays", but Peyton doesn't need to hardly worry about that because he knows what the defense is doing beforehand. There's a big difference to understand there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 It just really does humor me how you can hide behind stats as if they tells black and white a QB's worth. Just let me ask you a few hypothetical questions and just give your me honest, hopefully unbiased opinion  1. Do you think Ben reaches 3 super bowls without a defense that has consistently ranked top 5 in the league since he's been in?  2. Do you think Ben is as good of a QB without learning under a HOF and all time great coach when he entered the league?  3. Do you think Ben has as much success early in his career without a HOF running back and above average WR's?  I clearly stated I think he's a good QB. but manning came from NOTHING in indy and made that team great. Ben didn't have to make the steelers, the steelers made him. THAT'S exactly why Manning is and always will be known through history as a better QB  1. Absolutely 2. 100% he won under Tomlin so you're point is more than moot and to think that Cowher had this over whelming influence is a little crazy. They didn't even have that great of a relationship. Ken Anderson had more of an effect on Ben than Cowher. 3. Yes and why wouldn't he? Bettis wasn't in the prime of his career when they won the Super Bowl XL. Willie Parker was carrying most of that load and Bettis was a situational back. He had a pretty meager 110 carries that season. Peyton Manning had the team built around him and it still took him a good long while to grab his first ring and your comment on the Steelers making Ben is stupid because the Colts put the pieces around Manning to get the job done. The Steelers had pieces in place and added Ben after the fact. I guess Aaron Rodgers is pretty sorry then too right? He sat under Favre and inherited one hell of a defense. He sucks too aye? lol. Your logic is flawed and your argument is weak. And Zombo yes I said Manning is a choke artist. His team routinely had the best record in the league and they routinely made a early exit. Once because of the arm of one Ben Roethlisberger when the Steelers won XL and the colts expected us to come out running. No instead we came out passing and Ben put up a quick 14 and the colts never recovered. The Steelers WOULD NOT have made any of the 3 recent Super Bowls without Ben and you can take that to the damn bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 You ask any GM hands down who they would build a team around and I guarantee you they all, or most all of them would pick Manning. Ben is a good QB, theres no arguing that. But he's not Joe Montana and for My money...not even Steve young for that matter. I'll tell you what. Not being biased. Id take Brian Sipe over Ben simply because he had the innate ability to flat out read defenses and did it with pretty good,not great WR's. Yes, Dave Logan and Reggie Rucker were good WR's and Ozzy Newscome was an outstanding Pass catching TE. Our Oline was barely as good and maybe a tad less capable than the one your team has now, (back in the late 70's early 80's). Ben makes his living mostly on broken down plays, unlike Manning, who is a "CONSISTENT" passer!. Manning is ten times as accurate as Ben as a passer. Bens percentage completion might look better only because he's not asked to throw the ball as much. 90% of Indy's offense is a "passing offense" meaning they are a "Throw first offense" Unlike the stoolers wich is "Run first,play good defense" And with Bens history of "Off the field issues". I doubt any GM/Owner would gamble on Ben right now, Unless he's Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones. Your sadly grasping at straws Kiddo!. I'll say this...Ben cant even kiss Aaron Rodgers jock as far as QBing goes. Rodgers is already better than Gay Ben...LOL!...Its true and you know it!   Here...Peyton still had more yards overall goofball.  Quarterback Rating Leaders - Qualified RK PLAYER TEAM ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A LONG TD INT SACK RATE YDS/G 1 Tom Brady, QB NE 492 324 65.9 3,900 7.93 79 36 4 25 111.0 244 2 Philip Rivers, QB SD 541 357 66.0 4,710 8.71 59 30 13 38 101.8 294 3 Aaron Rodgers, QB GB 475 312 65.7 3,922 8.26 86 28 11 31 101.2 261 4 Michael Vick, QB PHI 372 233 62.6 3,018 8.11 91 21 6 34 100.2 252 5 Ben Roethlisberger, QB PIT 389 240 61.7 3,200 8.23 56 17 5 32 97.0 267 6 Josh Freeman, QB TB 474 291 61.4 3,451 7.28 64 25 6 28 95.9 216 7 Joe Flacco, QB BAL 489 306 62.6 3,622 7.41 67 25 10 40 93.6 226 8 Matt Cassel, QB KC 450 262 58.2 3,116 6.92 75 27 7 26 93.0 208 9 Matt Schaub, QB HOU 574 365 63.6 4,370 7.61 60 24 12 32 92.0 273 10 Peyton Manning, QB IND 679 450 66.3 4,700 6.92 73 33 17 16 91.9 294  http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating   I didn't read your rambling paragraph because I was distracted by your one comment towards the end. I'm guessing you forgot Ben was suspended 4 games. You also failed to mention that Manning had 679 passing attempts to Ben's 389. Genius argument.  Oh and Jrwhoeverthehell you are Peyton Manning has had a much better offensive line which allows for more time in the pocket. Plays aren't breaking down when Ben goes on the run. His PROTECTION is BUT it should be noted his mobility is a part of his game. Give Ben a decent offensive line. It doesn't even have to be great, just middle of the road and the Steelers would have won this past Super Bowl and at least one other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 I don't think anyone is saying BR is a BAD QB. But to pick him over Manning is asinine dude. Â Trent Dilfer won a SB with the Ravens D. I'm pretty sure Tim Couch could have walked into Pittsburgh, just off the couch, and beaten Arizona. Â First and foremost Ben is NOT Trent Difler. Secondly I don't see why it is, Ben isn't asked to pass the ball 55 times a game. You can look in this very thread and see the stats from this past season. Manning threw 679 times to Ben's 389 so completely different offenses. Yet Ben is tops in yards per attempt. His passer rating is top 10, he's mobile AND has a tremendous deep ball both in the pocket and on the run. Above all else he's a winner. Yes Manning has won a lot of games and thrown for a lot of yards. However he's also lost a lot of big games and that isn't something Ben has done because Ben is a winner. It's a "IT" factor and the mass media comments on it all the time. Check his 4th quarter comeback stats, look at the stats I posted in this very thread about his passer rating and other factors on his side of the field. It's my opinion but I can assure you I'm not the only one with it. I think most people in Pittsburgh would take Ben over Peyton because Peyton would have been murdered behind our o-line this past season. Instead we went to the Super Bowl BECAUSE of Ben. You don't have to go back very far to find Manning's angry tirade when his o-line broke down against the STeelers. He through his entire line under the bus. Either way both great QB's and I'm still taking Ben. Sue me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagitron Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 I didn't mean to sound like BR was Trent Dilfer. That guy is a JOKE. Â All I meant was that a caretaker QB could likely come in and be successful with your team because of its depth and DEFENSE. Â Tommy Maddux had "it" too with Cowher and LeBeau's system. Â Another good example is Charlie Batch, another system guy (average talent level at best) who didn't do to bad when called upon. Â I think it has a lot to do with the team and system. It's your opinion, I don't agree but it is what it is. Â Both good QB's. Â Tommy Maddox didn't have "it" because Tommy Maddox chocked. Ben up until this most recent Super Bowl hasn't chocked and I know that I was pretty damn confident at the end of that game when Ben had the ball with two minutes on the clock. Unfortunately our defense dropped the ball that game. We were spread far too thin, Troy wasn't 100% and their WR's proved too much. A lot of people say GB put up the blue print on how to over come the vaunted Steeler defense. I guess we'll find out soon enough. Ben with or without the Steeler defense is a top 5 QB in this league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manbearpig Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Please don't ever close this board or poor homo will have nothing to do with his "life". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 1. Absolutely 2. 100% he won under Tomlin so you're point is more than moot and to think that Cowher had this over whelming influence is a little crazy. They didn't even have that great of a relationship. Ken Anderson had more of an effect on Ben than Cowher. 3. Yes and why wouldn't he? Bettis wasn't in the prime of his career when they won the Super Bowl XL. Willie Parker was carrying most of that load and Bettis was a situational back. He had a pretty meager 110 carries that season. Peyton Manning had the team built around him and it still took him a good long while to grab his first ring and your comment on the Steelers making Ben is stupid because the Colts put the pieces around Manning to get the job done. The Steelers had pieces in place and added Ben after the fact. I guess Aaron Rodgers is pretty sorry then too right? He sat under Favre and inherited one hell of a defense. He sucks too aye? lol. Your logic is flawed and your argument is weak. And Zombo yes I said Manning is a choke artist. His team routinely had the best record in the league and they routinely made a early exit. Once because of the arm of one Ben Roethlisberger when the Steelers won XL and the colts expected us to come out running. No instead we came out passing and Ben put up a quick 14 and the colts never recovered. The Steelers WOULD NOT have made any of the 3 recent Super Bowls without Ben and you can take that to the damn bank. Â welp, I can safely say I will never take anything you say as more than a biased, ignorant argument. I guarantee you that if you asked even 10 of steeler fans, 9 of them would at least admit those things to be true. However, I suppose living in your ignorant, biased steeler world is better. If you truly, 100% believe that going to that steelers team had NO affect on his prowess as a QB, God help you. You can live in that world haha. They may not have made it to those super bowls without him, but football more than anything is a TEAM sport. Â I've literally said twice now Ben is a good NFL QB, and i'd even go far as to say he is underrated for what he's done. But come on, really? You truly can sit there with a straight face and say going to the steelers and that team had no impact on how he's preformed in the NFL? Give me a damn break man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Peyton Manning is a great QB but he's also one of the biggest choke artists in the league. Give Ben a solid offensive line and the Steelers have another two rings. His stats also show EXACTLY the opposite of what you claim but hey those stats must be wrong. lol   The Colts have won and been in Super Bowls because of Peyton Manning. To a large extent the Steelers have won and been in Super Bowls in spite of Ben Roethlisberger. He is a good QB, but I think the Steelers could have won that SB in 2005? with Spergeon Wynn at QB. Or at least with Charlie Batch. He was a bad QB on a team with a great defense. In 2008 BR had more to do with winning. He was a good QB that year and in that SB game. Without Manning the Colts would be a below .500 team possibly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 First and foremost Ben is NOT Trent Difler. Â Actually, I think the comparison of BR and Trent Dilfer is a very apt comparison. I believe they are both good solid QBs who were able to manage their teams offense while their team's defenses led them to titles. BTW, I don't think this is necessarily a knock on BR. More to the point is that I think Dilfer is probably vastly underrated as a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Tommy Maddox didn't have "it" because Tommy Maddox chocked. Ben up until this most recent Super Bowl hasn't chocked and I know that I was pretty damn confident at the end of that game when Ben had the ball with two minutes on the clock. Unfortunately our defense dropped the ball that game. We were spread far too thin, Troy wasn't 100% and their WR's proved too much. A lot of people say GB put up the blue print on how to over come the vaunted Steeler defense. I guess we'll find out soon enough. Ben with or without the Steeler defense is a top 5 QB in this league. Â Â Top 10 maybe. Not top 5. He is behind Manning, Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Rivers for sure. Where he falls behind them can be subject to debate. You can't just go by statistics. If you did then Jeff Garcia would be considered one of the greatest QBs of all time. BR definitely fits the Trent Dilfer/Brad Johnson mold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Tommy Maddox didn't have "it" because Tommy Maddox chocked. Ben up until this most recent Super Bowl hasn't chocked and I know that I was pretty damn confident at the end of that game when Ben had the ball with two minutes on the clock. Unfortunately our defense dropped the ball that game. We were spread far too thin, Troy wasn't 100% and their WR's proved too much. A lot of people say GB put up the blue print on how to over come the vaunted Steeler defense. I guess we'll find out soon enough. Ben with or without the Steeler defense is a top 5 QB in this league. Â Â Â Just curious..is Chocked a word?...did you mean like "Chock it up " or "Choke"...And you have the nerve to convict others of bad grammar and spelling. get a life and grow up Retard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.