Jax

They're already in place, but instead they direct them to buses, dumbass. Do you not know about all the 'secret' illegal alien processing centers, you should get educated. Money for tech, what kind of stupidity is that? Get the hell out of here until you know something and have an intelligent answer. We also didn't see these massive herds invading during Trumps time, could that be cause your dumbass leader invited them all during his campaign? I'll give you a hint, yes. Now you dimwits want to blame Trump for your mess, typical dumbass cult.

Hey, has Biden changed any other laws so he could politically prosecute some new rivals?

They don't care about getting the truth out, not that they have any, they just want paid.

Dumbass, they're called illegal aliens for a reason, what could that be? Oh yeah, it's already a law. Tell me again why they need a special bill?

That would be your cult leader, Biden.

You figured him out!! All of Trumps hard work to conceal his real plan ruined by one slip up. -dumbass cult Nevermind he was the president once already and the real threat was the media constantly lying and harassing him.

You're right, he's not corrupt at all, hahaha, dumbass cult It's not the crackhead, it's Russia, Russia, Russia The FBI was only going off the word of a single 'Russian' informant with no other eveidence, hahaha

I know flooding our country with 20+ million illegals doesn't help

Hahahaha, brainwash complete

Ignorance is bliss. Doesn't realize his opinions and feelings don't matter, yet he accepts this list with FDR at #2 who was way worse than what he accuses Trump of. Hell, Clinton cheated on his wife during his presidency lol. Keep preaching though.

He's just twisting facts again when he knows we're referencing his other post on who commits the most mass shootings. He's trying to turn it into a gun argument now, which he loses constantly which is why he desperately wants to use little kids in school now, while he argues it's not ok to shield kids from perverts.

And this is their #2 pick? lol

Hell no ID checks?? Road trip anyone?

I wonder why we don't hear anything about the superbowl shooting anymore...hmmm And Biden was all set to go full dictator over it, I wonder what happened.

If you could...

Quality posting as usual all the while trying to blame others of the same.

Charged by a corrupt court, let me know when he's in jail after actually being convicted.

Not a clue, why didn't you look it up and post it? I'm sure it's no different than here. However, it doesn't mean much. If you know anything, the point is we are supposed to have sanctions on them, you shouldn't even see American candy bars there, much less be cheaper. What Tucker shows is how little sanctions are doing lol, but our Democratic friends and msm say otherwise.

Stay stupid.

Here's another story from a fellow entrepreneur. The key thing here is to ignore it's Trump. I know for our resident lefty Trump hating dumbasses it's hard to do, even if they give away court rulings and rights to hate him. Just like any court case, it now sets a precedent. I also know it's from a site you pretend to hate just because you can't offer anything of value to counter, but it's all mostly a direct quote. Only a moron, or if you're in the dumbass cult, would consider this good in any shape or form. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/exclusive-new-york-became-my-top-loser-state/ He further slammed Engoron’s prior ruling that Trump’s 20-acre Mar-a-Lago home in West Palm Beach, Florida, was worth just $18 million, asking, “Why does the judge have a say in that?” He continued, “The Judge isn’t lending anything,” after noting that it’s the responsibility of lenders to agree on property value before loaning money. O’Leary added, “When you determine the value of a stabilized building or stabilized facility like Mar a Lago, you look at all the comparables, you look everywhere, and you decide what the market price is. You’re the bank, you’re taking that as collateral, and you’re deciding that you’re going to take that risk on behalf of your risk committee. That’s what you do. You don’t need a judge for that. That’s not what they do.” While O’Leary doesn’t know if this was a politically motivated attack on Donald Trump, he says it is an “UnAmerican” attack on “every city in America, every player, every investor, every risk-taker, and every entrepreneur in real estate.” My problem with this is it’s setting bad precedent and bad policy. And it’s a direct assault on the 11th sector of the S&P 500. I mean, you got to understand my perspective. I’m an investor, and I invest in real estate. It’s my largest holding. When we develop buildings, we create jobs. It’s a fundamental sector of the economy, not only for job creation in every city but also for investors. When buildings get stabilized and start generating cash, they get put into REITs. And many, many, many retirees own these REITs for income, and they have for decades and generations. And the methodology, the entrepreneurial aspect of risk-taking in real estate development, whether it’s residential or commercial or office or retail, it doesn’t matter; it’s always the same. If you’re a developer, and you start by building your first building, and you do a construction loan, you’re taking a huge risk. And if you’re successful, you end up with a stabilized building, and then you have a stabilized building that may be generating a six or seven percent return; that’s the cap rate. You go to a bank and say, “Here’s my building. I think it’s worth $400 million, and I want to borrow $200 million against the building. I bought another piece of land, I’m building another building right beside it, and I need $200 million, and I’ll put up my building that’s worth $400 million here as collateral.” And the bank, and this has been going on since the beginning of time, the bank will say “No, we looked at it, and we think it’s worth $300 million. We don’t think it’s worth $400 million, and here’s the reasons we think it’s only $300 million.” And this negotiation goes on and has forever in every city. And the bankers are very sophisticated that lend in real estate development. They’ve been doing it forever. They have their own process of due diligence, and you, as the developer, are always promoting your building in the very best light. That has been going on forever. There’s nothing illegal about it. It’s a bartering system between two private entities, or public sometimes—it doesn’t matter. And it’s fully transparent, and that negotiated settlement is upon which the new loan is granted along with the terms and covenants. What happened here is absurd. I don’t understand why the complaint was brought in the first place. Nobody in real estate development does. I don’t see anybody that lost anything. All parties were satisfied. And this judge, out of nowhere, says I’m going to make this claim against this developer—forget that it’s Trump. This has nothing to do with Trump. This is a direct assault on every real estate developer in America. And if it’s true that this developer, which happens to be Trump, why we’re talking about this case. obviously, he gets so much focus. But if he’s guilty, then they’re all guilty, everybody. Let’s let’s find all of these developers guilty in every city in America and, frankly, all around the world. And let’s stop that. Let’s shut down this sector, this important sector of the economy and make sure never, never, never do we do another building. We cannot do this ever again. We’ll go back and live in caves again. On whether businesses and investors should anti-free market flee states like New York: I made an individual decision as an investor, and I’m very, very vocal about it. I want to support winner states, winner governors, winner senators that understand the importance of all eleven sectors of the S&P and building an environment, a platform where we can go and risk capital in their state and create jobs and have stable policy. New York is not one of those. It was the worst; it was number two, and now it’s number one. And I’m happy to just talk about this ‘till the cows come home; I’m just one individual, but this is really crazy what’s happening here. And I think as investors, I’m just one investor, but I just want to support those states that have good policy. I don’t care if they’re red or blue. It has nothing to do with it. Do they have a good manager? Has the senator ever run a business or made payroll? Same with a governor, do these people understand how hard it is to create a job and how hard it is to maintain a business in any state? So, if you overtax, or you start to punish, like in Massachusetts, you just drive people out. They make their decisions quietly, and they leave, and those great entrepreneurs go do it somewhere else. We need a healthy competition between states. We need to support the winner states and punish the loser states. And the good people in every loser state, the only way I can do it is vote with my dollars. I vote with my dollars. I don’t give money to loser states. I want the people in those loser states to fire their managers and hire better managers to attract capital back, not just me. I’m just one investor, but this is a market decision. But when you see policy like this, you have to shout out, you have to shine the spotlight on it, and say, “This is a loser state, a 100% loser state and here’s why.”

The report is written strangely... "shooting that wounded 10, injured 13" Isn't wounded the same as being injured? Then this: "None of the wounded have life-threatening injuries, and the attack isn’t being considered an act of terrorism, authorities said. However, Adams said he considered the attack to have been an act intended to bring terror to subway riders." Why are we so hung up on labels and words? Anyways, I get the point. Doesn't fit the narrative today.