Vambo

Politics 39 mins ago Homeland Security Committee Dems bail from border crisis field hearing

CALL FOR CENSORSHIP Dem senator calls to restrict free speech in wake of Silicon Valley Bank collapse 'COMPLETELY INHUMANE' Dem-run city's homeless crisis spirals out of control: 'This is their vision of utopia'

NO CLASS Marxist teacher calls for urgent war against capitalism: 'Revolutions involve violence'

Browns restructure Deshaun Watson’s contract, get huge cap space help https://www.dawgsbynature.com/2023/3/13/23637461/browns-restructure-deshaun-watsons-contract-cap-space-nfl-free-agency As expected, GM Andrew Berry has restructured the contract of QB Deshaun Watson to give the team $36 million in cap space. We don’t have the details yet but it is likely that this restructure also includes the addition of void years to assist in cap space. Prior to the Watson restructure, the Browns were over the salary cap by about $14 million with Watson’s $54 million cap number taking up a huge chunk of space. With this restructure, Watson will now have the third-highest cap hit behind Myles Garrett and Amari Cooper. Berry could continue to add cap space as he officially releases John Johnson III and, potentially, restructures the deals of Garrett and Cooper. Cooper could also get a contract extension to keep him around a little longer while lowering his cap number. With just the release of JJ3 and the Watson restructure, Cleveland will have around $30 million in cap space to spend for this season. A reminder, cap space does not mean the value of the contract. Berry could sign a couple of big deals (like Dre’Mont Jones) with that amount but must calculate future cap hits, including Watson’s increasing after the restructure, in his planning. A busy day ahead for the Browns starts off with a lot more cap space.

CRUDE MOVE Biden indefinitely blocks millions of acres of land, water from future oil drilling

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/border-crisis-migrants-rush-bridge-linking-mexico-u-s-el-paso-texas-video#&_intcmp=fnhpbt1,hp1bt BORDER CRISIS WATCH: Over 1000 migrants rush border crossing to gain access into the United States

Media Catholic student arrested, charged after saying men and women are different

Politics Dem linked to group funneling millions into torpedoing Biden investigations

HANOI HOMICIDE Jane Fonda suggests 'murder' to fight abortion laws in wild appearance on 'The View'

Politics Dem wants to send illegal immigrants to college for free on your dime

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence".

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence 31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence". 31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe “global average temperatures have increased” during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics? http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence/image_mini Scientific Consensus on Global Warming While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere. This claim originates from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, which has an online petition (petitionproject.org) that states: We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth. To participate in the petition one only needs to mark a check box to show that one has a Ph.D., M.S., or B.S. degree, and then fill in the fields. Unfortunately, that means that anyone can sign the petition, whether they have a degree or not.