Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Steelers did not make it to the play-offs


Jibz

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply
pota~to Potat~o I guess. Anyway , The AAFC had a few good Squads (Yes One Outstanding squad) ... But as a League. Left a little to be desired .

 

Right, being probably the superior league, it did leave little to be desired. FYI, the AAFC in fact had better overall attendance than the NFL during the years they competed with each other. They paid their players better. The AAFC had numerous black players when the NFL had none. And FYI, the three teams (or successors) of the AAFC that survived have won 13 NFL titles since 1950, and may be in the verge of a 14th. that is nearly 24% of all the titles competed for since that "merger".

What it did leave to be desired was competitive balance. At the time, the Browns were just too good for everybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong answer! There is only one champion! This is exactly the point I was driving at from the beginning.....back in the 40's, 50's and 60's when there was little or no structure, and people used different criteria to declare whatever champion they liked it simply doesn't equate to today's definition of "a champion".

 

No, you are wrong. There were two champions. There was clear structure. Don't know what is unclear to you. There was the NFL and its champion. And there was the AAFC and its champion, then later the AFL and its champion.

The criteria wass that you won the championship game of these respective leagues. Any moron with a 25 IQ who can count to 2 can figure this out.

Yes, there were competing leagues, and competing champions. And it all eventually got ironed out through the mergers that occurred, first the AAFC, then the AFL mergers with the NFL so that ultimately a single champion could be named.

But certainly, for anyone with an above kindergarten education it was simple to figure out.

In 1964 the Browns were NFL Champions and the Buffalo Bills were AFL champions.

And in 1966, it was decided these ttwo leagues should move to decide which of the winner's of the two leagues should become the single champion.

I know you are not as stupid as you profess such that you can't count to two. And you are not that ignorant either.

You fully comprehend the facts, and the truth. Its just that you want to play your little Joseph Goebbels role and apply warped and twisted propaganda for your own ends.

Even Goebbels could count to 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Brown, Otto Graham, Lou Groza, Elroy "Crazy Legs" Hirsch, Len Ford, Dante Lavelli, Ace Parker, Marion Motley, Joe Perry, Y.A. Tittle and Bill Willis are just SOME of the Hall of Famers that came out of the AAFC.

 

These are ALL-TIME NFL greats that stand above the crowd even today.

 

And then there is the fact that the AAFC Champions blew out the defending NFL Champion Philadelphia Eagles 35-10 in their first NFL game, and went on to win the NFL championship their very first year.

 

It was not a minor league, it had as good as, or better talent than the NFL as evidenced by the Browns dominance in the NFL and the number of great AAFC players that went on to star in the NFL.

 

Give it up, Steeler fans, the Browns were true champions eight times, and are recognized as such by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. There is nothing left to argue. They were the best.

 

Zombo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, being probably the superior league, it did leave little to be desired. FYI, the AAFC in fact had better overall attendance than the NFL during the years they competed with each other. They paid their players better. The AAFC had numerous black players when the NFL had none. And FYI, the three teams (or successors) of the AAFC that survived have won 13 NFL titles since 1950, and may be in the verge of a 14th. that is nearly 24% of all the titles competed for since that "merger".

What it did leave to be desired was competitive balance. At the time, the Browns were just too good for everybody.

Point taken , and I had read some of that . But come on dont twist it that the AAFC was Superior to the NFL. No one is buying that Gip. The balance issue was because No Draft and No rules...just the Best Organization went out and signed WHATEVER They wanted. That was Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point taken , and I had read some of that . But come on dont twist it that the AAFC was Superior to the NFL. No one is buying that Gip. The balance issue was because No Draft and No rules...just the Best Organization went out and signed WHATEVER They wanted. That was Cleveland.

 

 

I don't see how he's twisting it. He just presented the facts, plain and clear, which clearly show the AAFC had better teams. From top to bottom, the NFL was more solid in terms of competition. But the AAFC's best teams were clearly head and shoulders above even the competition of the NFL, as evidenced by the Browns' first game against an NFL opponent. I believe 487 yards of total offense and a 25 point margin of victory against one of the NFL's premier defenses speak loud enough for all to hear. Don't forget the Browns' won the NFL[\b] Championship that year, with their AAFC[\b] team. If that doesn't prove anything, then you are truly thick.

 

The reason the NFL is around to this day is because of it's ability to recognize great teams, and realize when they were in danger. The NFL was threatened by the AAFC as well as the AFL, and recognized it. There's a reason they absolved three teams from the AAFC. They realized their potential. The Browns and 49ers had tremendous upside, talent-wise and business-wise. The Colts were a lesser team in both aspects, seeing as how Buffalo had better attendance and a better record, but Buffalo just got screwed over because of their location. The NFL realized it could benefit from taking in these teams, and it was a fantastic decision, wouldn't you say? Other than the fact that the Browns' embarassed essentially every NFL team from the get-go, the merger worked out swimmingly.

 

 

And, don't forget, we're about one year away from going back to the "No rules" era. If this CBA thing doesn't work out, it's going to be just like it was in the AAFC- money buys talent, and talent wins championships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always known I would be wrong some day.....this isn't it! Gip, you are becoming the ultimate spin master....you should work for Obama!

 

I am not trying to downplay what the Browns did back in the 50's and 60's.....they were simply the best, as the Steelers have proven to be in modern football. Many here who really have no clue about the reality of what it takes to be great have convinced themselves that since the Browns suck and the Steelers own them then the Steelers must cheat, pay the refs, bribe the NFL.........it's really just an indication of how desperate the bitter losers are......and this forum feeds off them!

 

I have no problem giving the Browns the props they deserve for their accomplishments in a different era of football, just don't try to minimize what the Steelers have accomplished by spinning the truth about what football was back then. We could truthfully say that the Steelers have won far more than 6 championships because they won the AFC championship 7 times and AFC North/Central championship numerous times but that would be spinning the truth to fit the argument ........kinda like you're doing.

 

You are wrong this day, as you have been in the past, and probably certainly will be in the future.

Again, you want to be like the holocaust denier and try to change history by saying "it simply didn't happen". Well, it did happen. There were two champions in those various years. That is just a pure undeniable fact. Yes, it would have been nice if those teams all played off and boiled it down to a single champion. But that wasn't the case. They did eventually get around to doing that, but the FACTS are that on certain occasions America just had to live with shared titles in Professional Football, just like we have had to live with co-National Champions in College Football in numerous years. Nothing you can say or do can change those facts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1965 NFL AFL Green Bay Packers (NFL,10-3-1), Buffalo Bills (AFL,10-3-1)

1964 NFL AFL Cleveland Browns (NFL,10-3-1), Buffalo Bills (AFL,12-2)

1963 NFL AFL Chicago Bears (NFL,11-1-2), San Diego Chargers (AFL,11-3)

1962 NFL AFL Green Bay Packers (NFL,13-1), Dallas Texans (AFL,11-3)

1961 NFL AFL Green Bay Packers (NFL,11-3), Houston Oilers (AFL,10-3-1)

1960 NFL AFL Philadelphia Eagles (NFL,10-2), Houston Oilers (AFL,10-4)

 

1949 NFL AAFC Philadelphia Eagles (NFL,11-1), Cleveland Browns (AAFC,9-1-2)

1948 NFL AAFC Philadelphia Eagles (NFL,9-2-1), Cleveland Browns (AAFC,14-0)

1947 NFL AAFC Chicago Cardinals (NFL,9-3), Cleveland Browns (AAFC,12-1-1)

1946 NFL AAFC Chicago Bears (NFL,8-2-1), Cleveland Browns (AAFC,12-2)

 

 

Here they are, here are the facts. Direct from the source.

You want to be a fu**ing ostrich and stick your head up your ass to smell your own sh** about that, fine. Just remember, no one else is interested in your sh**.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point taken , and I had read some of that . But come on dont twist it that the AAFC was Superior to the NFL. No one is buying that Gip. The balance issue was because No Draft and No rules...just the Best Organization went out and signed WHATEVER They wanted. That was Cleveland.

 

 

OK, so, how is that any different really from today's major league baseball, or even free agency we have now in football?

Should we delegitimize all the Yankees World Series victories....or the American League merely because they could afford, or were astute enough to identify and sign the best players? (and remember, it wasn't just that the NFL teams couldn't sign many of those best players....they WOULDN'T sign them because they were black)

And by certain objective measures the AAFC was indeed initially superior: attendance, revenue, average pay given to players (though having more black players isn't an objective measure of superiority...it is a subjective measurement).

Later, yes, the competitive imbalance did create instability which led to the merger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how he's twisting it. He just presented the facts, plain and clear, which clearly show the AAFC had better teams. From top to bottom, the NFL was more solid in terms of competition. But the AAFC's best teams were clearly head and shoulders above even the competition of the NFL, as evidenced by the Browns' first game against an NFL opponent. I believe 487 yards of total offense and a 25 point margin of victory against one of the NFL's premier defenses speak loud enough for all to hear. Don't forget the Browns' won the NFL[\b] Championship that year, with their AAFC[\b] team. If that doesn't prove anything, then you are truly thick.

 

The reason the NFL is around to this day is because of it's ability to recognize great teams, and realize when they were in danger. The NFL was threatened by the AAFC as well as the AFL, and recognized it. There's a reason they absolved three teams from the AAFC. They realized their potential. The Browns and 49ers had tremendous upside, talent-wise and business-wise. The Colts were a lesser team in both aspects, seeing as how Buffalo had better attendance and a better record, but Buffalo just got screwed over because of their location. The NFL realized it could benefit from taking in these teams, and it was a fantastic decision, wouldn't you say? Other than the fact that the Browns' embarassed essentially every NFL team from the get-go, the merger worked out swimmingly.

 

 

And, don't forget, we're about one year away from going back to the "No rules" era. If this CBA thing doesn't work out, it's going to be just like it was in the AAFC- money buys talent, and talent wins championships.

 

 

Question on this CBA thing: I understand that next year may be an "uncapped" year. I assume that means that there will be no salary cap? Does that mean that one wealthy team could, if it wanted, buy up all the best free agents? I mean, could the rich as Cresus Randy Lerner buy up Julius Peppers and Brandon Marshall and DeMeco Ryans and Darren Sproles and anyone else they want? Also, just because it is an uncapped year doesn't mean that the "Draft" is going to go away.

In theory, if the Players Association wanted, I guess they could make a demand to abolish the draft and make every college player a free agent....and go to the highest bidder. Doubt that would happen.

In fact, aren't the owners looking for an additional cap on rookie salaries....a scale....so they can put more money into the hands of the proven veterans rather than the unproven rookies?

Can you answer any of these questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Brown, Otto Graham, Lou Groza, Elroy "Crazy Legs" Hirsch, Len Ford, Dante Lavelli, Ace Parker, Marion Motley, Joe Perry, Y.A. Tittle and Bill Willis are just SOME of the Hall of Famers that came out of the AAFC.

 

These are ALL-TIME NFL greats that stand above the crowd even today.

 

And then there is the fact that the AAFC Champions blew out the defending NFL Champion Philadelphia Eagles 35-10 in their first NFL game, and went on to win the NFL championship their very first year.

 

It was not a minor league, it had as good as, or better talent than the NFL as evidenced by the Browns dominance in the NFL and the number of great AAFC players that went on to star in the NFL.

 

Give it up, Steeler fans, the Browns were true champions eight times, and are recognized as such by the Pro Football Hall of Fame. There is nothing left to argue. They were the best.

 

Zombo

 

Great post Z Man and spot on.

 

The Browns own the Steelers in Championships and they didn't have to cheat to get theirs either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question on this CBA thing: I understand that next year may be an "uncapped" year. I assume that means that there will be no salary cap? Does that mean that one wealthy team could, if it wanted, buy up all the best free agents? I mean, could the rich as Cresus Randy Lerner buy up Julius Peppers and Brandon Marshall and DeMeco Ryans and Darren Sproles and anyone else they want? Also, just because it is an uncapped year doesn't mean that the "Draft" is going to go away.

In theory, if the Players Association wanted, I guess they could make a demand to abolish the draft and make every college player a free agent....and go to the highest bidder. Doubt that would happen.

In fact, aren't the owners looking for an additional cap on rookie salaries....a scale....so they can put more money into the hands of the proven veterans rather than the unproven rookies?

Can you answer any of these questions

?

 

 

The way I understand it, teams will have unlimited spending power. But, there's provisions included that will cut down on the number of FA's available. For instance, the number of seasons required to become a UFA goes up to six. Another provision states that each club will be able to use a Transition Tag on any of their unrestricted free agents. The Transition Tag is essentially just a second Franchise tag, and can be used to tie down a UFA that a team doesn't want to part with unless they get some serious reimbursement. So, while it is theoretically possible that the richest team could nab as many players as they wanted, the actual list of available and affordable FA's will be severly cut down.

 

 

And I heard they wanted a cap on rookie salaries, which I agree with, but I don't know if that's part of this whole problem or just another problem in and of itself.

 

 

I don't really have a firm grasp on this situation, it kind of all goes over my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you are wrong. There were two champions.

 

 

Gipper, it doesn't matter what you prove to him because he edits out what ain't convenient. His franchise gets the same astericks - they're giving Mark McGwire today. How much did those counterfeit rings really mean when Mike Webster sold every damn one of them to a pawn shop? It sounded like Steve Courson had the same guilty conscience because he stopped wearing his rings.

 

Bottom line: The Browns were in 10 consecutive Pro Football Championships:

1946 (won)

1947 (won)

1948 (won)

1949 (won)

1950 (won)

1951 (lost)

1952 (lost)

1953 (lost)

1954 (won)

1955 (won)

 

How many Pro teams in ANY sport made the Championship 10 consecuitive years? Cleveland won 70% of those suckers in that 10 year period. That's easily the BEST dynasty pro football has ever seen.

 

1964 (won)

 

Is it any wonder WHY Pittsburgh wanted to emulate Cleveland by going after Paul Brown's pupil Chuck Noll? And when it was time to replace Noll - didn't they grab yet another former Cleveland Brown player by the name of Bill Cowher? And what about the BEST team in the 70s that went PERFECT without steroids + a backup QB starting most of their games? Along came another former Cleveland Brown by the name of Don Shula to lead his Miami Dolphins team into 3 consecutive Superbowls (after he had Baltimore in a Superbowl or two). Imagine that!

 

If you go by the most Championship victories - the best QB of all time is Otto Graham. Any historian will tell you the best RB to ever suit up in the pros is Jim Brown. It is what it is.

 

The inconvenient truth remains: without the Cleveland Browns there still would be no such thing as the Pittsburgh Steelers.

- Tom F.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how he's twisting it. He just presented the facts, plain and clear, which clearly show the AAFC had better teams. From top to bottom, the NFL was more solid in terms of competition. But the AAFC's best teams were clearly head and shoulders above even the competition of the NFL, as evidenced by the Browns' first game against an NFL opponent. I believe 487 yards of total offense and a 25 point margin of victory against one of the NFL's premier defenses speak loud enough for all to hear. Don't forget the Browns' won the NFL[\b] Championship that year, with their AAFC[\b] team. If that doesn't prove anything, then you are truly thick.

 

The reason the NFL is around to this day is because of it's ability to recognize great teams, and realize when they were in danger. The NFL was threatened by the AAFC as well as the AFL, and recognized it. There's a reason they absolved three teams from the AAFC. They realized their potential. The Browns and 49ers had tremendous upside, talent-wise and business-wise. The Colts were a lesser team in both aspects, seeing as how Buffalo had better attendance and a better record, but Buffalo just got screwed over because of their location. The NFL realized it could benefit from taking in these teams, and it was a fantastic decision, wouldn't you say? Other than the fact that the Browns' embarassed essentially every NFL team from the get-go, the merger worked out swimmingly.

 

 

And, don't forget, we're about one year away from going back to the "No rules" era. If this CBA thing doesn't work out, it's going to be just like it was in the AAFC- money buys talent, and talent wins championships.

LOL ...Delusional No Other response necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-9 , 3-9 , The Colts and 49ers records in 1st year after the Teams entered the NFL from the AAFC. The Browns stacked squad clearly the Class of this Awesome "League".

And the Browns were a free spending team using the Fame of Paul Brown to Stack that team .

Quite an advantage , especially in an age where Football players were looking to Maximize salaries.

Black players were excluded from the NFL from 1934 to 1945.. the AACF started in 1946 .. The NFL had already started to sign and Play black players. The AAFC was NOT the NFL. They had ONE Team that was NFL Caliber. Be Proud that was you team. But thats all there is to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-9 , 3-9 , The Colts and 49ers records in 1st year after the Teams entered the NFL from the AAFC. The Browns stacked squad clearly the Class of this Awesome "League".

And the Browns were a free spending team using the Fame of Paul Brown to Stack that team .

Quite an advantage , especially in an age where Football players were looking to Maximize salaries.

 

So your argument is that we were the best team in both the NFL and AAFC, and that we were only good because we had a great coach? Yeah, I'd buy that.

 

And I didn't realize players today weren't trying to maximize their salaries. I was always under the assumption that they wanted to make the most money possible, how foolish of me to assume.

 

Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL ...Delusional No Other response necessary.

 

 

Your lack of a response was evidence enough that you have no valid response. My seven year old cousin employs this same tactic when she realizes that she's wrong. She simply says "You're crazy", and then huffs and puffs her way to her room, where she then slams the door.

 

You guys would probably be great friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-9 , 3-9 , The Colts and 49ers records in 1st year after the Teams entered the NFL from the AAFC. The Browns stacked squad clearly the Class of this Awesome "League".

And the Browns were a free spending team using the Fame of Paul Brown to Stack that team .

Quite an advantage , especially in an age where Football players were looking to Maximize salaries.

 

So now you are saying that the Browns championships don't count because they were better than everybody else?

 

Zombo

 

:unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your argument is that we were the best team in both the NFL and AAFC, and that we were only good because we had a great coach? Yeah, I'd buy that.

 

And I didn't realize players today weren't trying to maximize their salaries. I was always under the assumption that they wanted to make the most money possible, how foolish of me to assume.

 

Try again.

No You had ALL the elements lining up to be a Magnet to players. And Damn... You guys were the Class of Football... at least by year 3 you were. You all should be proud of that Team. But the NFL doesn't recognize the Titles. And its been rehashed over and over. Its delusional to count them as NFL Titles. And if they are NOT NFL titles . who cares ? You guys thats it. The rest of us dont recognize them as anything but Titles in a secondary League. Same as it ever was....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now there is a disillusion, bitter, post!

Bottom line: The Browns were in 10 consecutive Pro Football Championships:

 

1950 (won)

1951 (lost)

1952 (lost)

1953 (lost)

1954 (won)

1955 (won)

 

3 wins ...3 losses in the NFL. Impressive but Not DOMINANT !! 4 of 6 would have been wow , and 5 of 6 WOW !! Quit sniffing your own Azz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gipper, it doesn't matter what you prove to him because he edits out what ain't convenient. His franchise gets the same astericks - they're giving Mark McGwire today. How much did those counterfeit rings really mean when Mike Webster sold every damn one of them to a pawn shop? It sounded like Steve Courson had the same guilty conscience because he stopped wearing his rings.

 

Bottom line: The Browns were in 10 consecutive Pro Football Championships:

1946 (won)

1947 (won)

1948 (won)

1949 (won)

1950 (won)

1951 (lost)

1952 (lost)

1953 (lost)

1954 (won)

1955 (won)

 

How many Pro teams in ANY sport made the Championship 10 consecuitive years? Cleveland won 70% of those suckers in that 10 year period. That's easily the BEST dynasty pro football has ever seen.

 

1964 (won)

 

Is it any wonder WHY Pittsburgh wanted to emulate Cleveland by going after Paul Brown's pupil Chuck Noll? And when it was time to replace Noll - didn't they grab yet another former Cleveland Brown player by the name of Bill Cowher? And what about the BEST team in the 70s that went PERFECT without steroids + a backup QB starting most of their games? Along came another former Cleveland Brown by the name of Don Shula to lead his Miami Dolphins team into 3 consecutive Superbowls (after he had Baltimore in a Superbowl or two). Imagine that!

 

If you go by the most Championship victories - the best QB of all time is Otto Graham. Any historian will tell you the best RB to ever suit up in the pros is Jim Brown. It is what it is.

 

The inconvenient truth remains: without the Cleveland Browns there still would be no such thing as the Pittsburgh Steelers.

- Tom F.

 

damn good post man! i said it a few weeks ago when i chose a pic of jim brown holding up the 1964 championship trophy for my sig, the browns were one of the original football dynasties and no one can deny that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No You had ALL the elements lining up to be a Magnet to players. And Damn... You guys were the Class of Football... at least by year 3 you were. You all should be proud of that Team. But the NFL doesn't recognize the Titles. And its been rehashed over and over. Its delusional to count them as NFL Titles. And if they are NOT NFL titles . who cares ? You guys thats it. The rest of us dont recognize them as anything but Titles in a secondary League. Same as it ever was....

 

 

So, we have to be at fault because we knew how to run a franchise? I'm failing to see your argument. It just sounds like you're agreeing with me over and over again.

 

The NFL doesn't have to recognize the titles, they weren't won in the NFL. Instead they were won in a league where any NFL team would have been second-best, as proved by the Browns sheer dominance upon their admittance into the NFL. The Pro Football Hall of Fame does recognize the titles, however, and I'll stick with that.

 

The fact of the matter is that the Browns have won more league championship than the Steelers. You can't argue with it, it's the truth. It's backed by facts. It happened.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it any wonder WHY Pittsburgh wanted to emulate Cleveland by going after Paul Brown's pupil Chuck Noll? And when it was time to replace Noll - didn't they grab yet another former Cleveland Brown player by the name of Bill Cowher? And what about the BEST team in the 70s that went PERFECT without steroids + a backup QB starting most of their games? Along came another former Cleveland Brown by the name of Don Shula to lead his Miami Dolphins team into 3 consecutive Superbowls (after he had Baltimore in a Superbowl or two). Imagine that!

 

If you go by the most Championship victories - the best QB of all time is Otto Graham. Any historian will tell you the best RB to ever suit up in the pros is Jim Brown. It is what it is.

 

The inconvenient truth remains: without the Cleveland Browns there still would be no such thing as the Pittsburgh Steelers.

 

LOL..Ok , I agree Chuck Noll came from Winning and Rooney had to think "Hey this guy is worth a Shot". But Cowher played for a Browns team that was know for Close but NO Cigar. Add to that bill Cowher was Pittsburgh Born and Bred.

Otto Graham hilarious... Couldn't start for Half the NFL Teams Today. Jim Brown was truly a one of a kind player. The Browns do indeed play a part in the Steelers legacy , especially with Noll.

Thanks for being our Coaching "University". Too bad your front office had NO IDEA what they had in Chuck Noll. Of course with out Bradshaw , Swann , Stallworth , Greene , Greenwood , Hamm , Lambert , Blount , Harris .... On and On. Chuck Noll would have never been either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it funny that Browns fans imagine so many things.....they can invent all kinds of things to make the Browns look good and even more things to make the Steelers look bad.

 

Only on a forum dedicated to disillusion Steeler haters!

 

This forum is dedicated to the Browns. It's just overrun by dimwitted nobheads such as yourself. It would be helpful if you at least knew a smidgen about the things you argue about, but just like any Steeler fan, you're completely ignorant.

 

 

Have a nice day.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly! this is one example out of many to prove that the browns titles in the past are still as good as gold (or platinum lol) today. trolls want to get all technical when it comes to the browns championship titles though and be unfair.

 

if the teams were so weak back then and it was so easy to win a championship, how come the stoolers couldn't win one back then? how come they got ran over and abused by the browns so much and couldn't win a title back then if it was so easy? yeah, that's what i thought.

 

the cleveland browns are one of the original football dynasties, regardless of what anyone says.

 

20040911212624.jpeg

 

it sure looks like the nfl recongnized the browns championship in this pic that was taken in 2004. paul taglibue (nfl commish at the time) presented this trophy to the members of the 64 championship team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otto Graham hilarious... Couldn't start for Half the NFL Teams Today. Jim Brown was truly a one of a kind player. The Browns do indeed play a part in the

 

Of course he couldn't. He'd 89 years old. I'd like to see any 89 year old try and play professional football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum is dedicated to the Browns. It's just overrun by dimwitted nobheads such as yourself. It would be helpful if you at least knew a smidgen about the things you argue about, but just like any Steeler fan, you're completely ignorant.

 

 

Have a nice day.

Just another dumb-ass comment from you. Lets lump "ALL" in the same boat. Thats as dumb as a Steeler fans saying ALL the Browns players suck. You sound like the Bitter prejudice imbecile that you make yourself out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he couldn't. He'd 89 years old. I'd like to see any 89 year old try and play professional football.

More Brain Surgery from a man needing a Brain Surgeon aka TCPO !!! I think you know I meant in his Prime . 6`1`` what a Buck ninety five. With a 5.1 40 yrd dash. Lucky he played against DB and LBs running the same speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...