Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MLD Woody

"I Don't Think the Science Knows, Actually"

Recommended Posts

Nolte: Scientists Prove Man-Made Global Warming Is a Hoax

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/09/...

Apr 09, 2019 · Even the worst of the worst, even the most maniacal pushing the Global Warming Hoax admit that, at best, we can only cool the planet a couple of degrees, which will do next to nothing if the planet is determined to again warm itself by seven degrees, as we now know it did 2,999,998 years before the Bad Orange Man approved a couple of pipelines.

Dr. Roy Spencer: Science Knows 'Almost Nothing' About ...

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2014/07/10/dr...

Jul 11, 2014 · Spencer continued, saying that science really doesn’t know certifiably “how strong global warming is, what it’s caused by, whether it makes severe weather worse, when it started, when it will end, or whether it’s good or bad.” He said that we do think global warming might be caused by some combination of human activity and Mother Nature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article...

Oct 23, 2014 · 'There is NO climate crisis': Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist. Comments made …

https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/400467/original/...

the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report -- updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The False Alert of Global Warming | The American Spectator ...

https://spectator.org/55208_false-alert-global-warming

Jul 19, 2013 · And if man-made global warming is real, atmospheric as well as surface temperatures should have increased steadily. ... McIntyre thinks there may be more errors but still doesn’t know …

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL.

now NASA expects GLOBAL COOLING.

Hoorta, Tour and woodpecker - the three man made goober warning stooges.

Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Expects Global Cooling

https://www.thestreet.com/mishtalk/economics/...

Jan 29, 2019 · Finally, even if you still believe man-made global warming is a threat, please ponder the notion that governments will not do anything sensible about it. Mike "Mish" Shedlock 5

5 Scientific Reasons That Global Warming Isn't Happening

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/...

Feb 18, 2014 · 2) There is no scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and caused by man: Questions are not decided by "consensus." In fact, many scientific theories that …

That Scientific Global Warming Consensus...Not!

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/17/...

Jul 17, 2012 · Prior to publishing the report, 19 of the 23 had made public statements claiming that global warming is a human-induced problem and/or that action is required to reduce CO2 emissions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

awwww.... they're spamming the thread cuz they don't like it

 

Calm down snowflakes 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cal, if you want to provide the direct NASA link where they say climate change isn't real, I'll be happy to look it over. The link you provided doesn't work

(see, when you just copy and paste your google search results, without actually reading ANYTHING you post, this is what happens....)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 you have actually said pretty much the same thing. Scientists predict something as in these models that turned out to be inaccurate it's "well they were working with the best information they have the time." If later on that information turns out to be otherwise "well then what can you expect." I think that's all anybody is saying. I think I would be fair in giving science the benefit of the doubt by saying that they're going on their best guess given the circumstances. You have a tendency to treat the scientific community, at least the ones you like, the same way as Christians treat.God.

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean the same group of people who said we were heading into another ice age now say we have global warming?....Well, imagine that.

823D5A33-E927-48A8-8A69-A6DA6BA22064.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Cal, if you want to provide the direct NASA link where they say climate change isn't real, I'll be happy to look it over. The link you provided doesn't work

(see, when you just copy and paste your google search results, without actually reading ANYTHING you post, this is what happens....)

I know that. But the description upon looking it up and getting a list is priceless, even if a link doesn't work.

Did all the links work? What do you feeeeeeeellllll about the other links' content?

If you would just learn to do your own research on the internet - you could find this in just a few seconds....well, with you, and not knowing how to type...

5 minutes.

but still -

https://finance.townhall.com/columnists/mikeshedlock/2019/01/30/amidst-global-warming-hysteria-nasa-expects-global-cooling-n2540500

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that was weird. I was at the site, copied the site address, and it still didn't work.

Did it three times, and now it worked.

Very strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See, woodpecker, I've been talking about rainforests being destroyed and sun activity for years.

You and a few others always mocked it.

well, now go mock NASA.

********************************************

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/30214-nasa-sees-climate-cooling-trend-thanks-to-low-sun-activity

Monday, 01 October 2018

NASA Sees Climate Cooling Trend Thanks to Low Sun Activity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the first comment from the link above:

"

James Matkin 2 years ago

The earth is actually cooling and NASA grudgingly begins to admit reality over the fiction of failed computer modelling by the iPCC. So much waste and damage from the futile attempt to reduce our Co2 emissions for a colder climate. The climate alarmists have ignored solar natural variability not because of the science but because of their left wing economic agenda. They have ignored leading science papers like the 400 page study THE NEGLECTED SUN Why the Sun Precludes Climate Catastrophe, by Professor Fritz Vahreholt and Dr. Sebastian Luning. This study demonstrates that "the critical cause of global temperature change has been, and continues to be, the sun's activity." As NASA admits the sun is in a cooling phase and the solar cycles make impossible "the catastrophic prospects put forward by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the alarmist agenda dominant in contemporary Western politics."

"

*********************************************************

    So, after all the al gore worship, and all the leftwing political cult wailing..... we were right.

That means, shep, Hoorta, and woodpecker... you were......................starts with a "W".

.....................

five letters.............................................

rhymes with "sarong"...................................................belong.........................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It Turns Out a Number of Fires on the West Coast Aren't Because of 'Climate Change'

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/09/14/it-turns-out-a-number-of-fires-on-the-west-coast-arent-because-of-climate-change-n2576193

The left continually tells us that "climate change" is the reason behind wildfires. In fact, Washington State Gov. Jay Inslee (D) even went so far as saying we should call them "climate fires." 

 

Most of the West Coast – Washington State, Oregon, California, and Idaho – are on fire. While the left is pushing their climate change theory, police are arresting arsonists for sparking these dangerous fires.

Oregon - Almeda Fire

A 41-year-old man was arrested in Oregon for starting one of the two origins of the Almeda fire, located just outside of Medford. Oregon State Fire Marshal’s office spokesman Rich Tyler said Michael Jarrod Bakkela started one of the fires, which eventually merged to create one giant wildfire.

Neighbors saw Bakkela set a fire outside of his home. When the blaze grew out of control, those neighbors had to flee the scene, Oregon Live reported. When the Jackson County Sheriff's Department arrived on scene, they saw Bakkela standing next to a large fire.

According to the Record Searchlight, roughly 80,000 people had to evacuate because of the fire that has destroyed more than 5,700 acres. Bakkela is being held on 15 counts of criminal mischief and 14 counts of reckless endangerment. Four people have died from the Almeda fire.

Oregon - Brush Fires

Portland authorities arrested 45-year-old Domingo Lopez, Jr. for allegedly starting a brush fire with a Molotov cocktail. He ignited the device along I-205 but firefighters were able to extinguish the flames before the fire grew out of control. 

A witness came forward, pointing out Lopez as the suspect. When confronted, Lopez reportedly admitted to starting the fire, KATU-TV reported.

Lopez was released Monday. It wasn't long before authorities arrested him again for starting six more brush fires along I-205. Portland Fire put out three of the fires while members of the community put out the other three. 

Authorities took Lopez to a nearby hospital for a mental health evaluation. They are also considering what charges to press against the arsonist. He did, however, receive six citations for reckless burning. 

California 

A woman in Monterey County, California was arrested on suspicion of intentionally starting fires along the 101 freeway. The woman was identified as 37-year-old Anita Esquivel, KION-TV reported.

Washington State

Washington State Troopers in Puyallup arrested multiple people attempting to start fires along the interstate. 

According to KIRO-TV, a bystander Facebook Lived the second incident.

“I’m out here on 167 right now,” the man said in the live stream. " Looks like a fire literally just started and I just rolled up on it and it looks like it’s going crazy. I’m here with the police and they’re talking to me about it because I just called it in."

The man reportedly pulled up, poured gasoline next to a business and set it on fire.

Even though arson has played a major role in the fires on the West Coast, the FBI in Portland has debunked the theory that Antifa is setting them.

And remember, the El Dorado Fire in California started on accident, during a gender reveal party. The couple doing throwing the party used a pyrotechnic device that displays a colored smoke.

Regardless of who started these fires or why, these need to be part of the conversation. Automatically attributing wildfires to climate change is irresponsible. And it's a way for the left to push their Green New Deal agenda. 

Just look at what former Vice President Joe Biden is running with, as recently as today:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did.... Did you just copy and paste a comment from an article as "evidence" in a scientific debate?

...

Cal, you don't know the first thing about doing actual research. You just post google searches of phrases you already believe. You don't read your links. And if you did, its from some right wing biased political source. Which, shocker, is a BAD source.

 

Now I always get a kick out of your climate denial claims (or the claims you're parroting) that act like NASA is on your side. Because they aren't. They clearly aren't. So when something like that comes up it's easy to show you're wrong. 

 

 

https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2893/nope-earth-isnt-cooling/

2893_Earth_temp_final_rev7-25-19.gif

 

 

So, again, if you want to link something FROM NASA that shows them saying climate change isn't real then please do so. 

 

 

 

 

This has been happening for the almost decade I've posted her. You still have no idea what you're talking about. You still have no idea what a legitimate source is. All you know is it now a political issue so you need to blindly follow your side.

It's a real shame that nothing significant will get done until you and others like you die off. Just another case of "American exceptionalism"... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you are a liar and a birdbrained low life woodypeckerhead.

I've read up on this subject for years now.

There is no "virtually all doubt is over" . I told sheply that, and I've told you that,

others have told you that for years. Maybe man made global warming makes you

excited enough to go to the bathroom. Maybe you need a whole lot more fiber in your diet.

You cried and cried over this subject, wet your tailfeathers over it, you sqawked and flocked like

a bird Shirley Temple.

   You all changed if from "man made global warming" because we helped you make asses of yourselves.

You started calling it "climate change" because climate does change. hahaha

asswhole.

https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/20972/20190504/expert-says-the-earth-is-actually-cooling.htm

"Climate change itself is already in the process of definitively rebutting climate alarmists who think human use of fossil fuels is causing ultimately catastrophic global warming. That is because natural climate cycles have already turned from warming to cooling, global temperatures have already been declining for more than 10 years, and global temperatures will continue to decline for another two decades or more. That is one of the most interesting conclusions to come out of the seventh International Climate Change Conference sponsored by the Heartland Institute, held last week in Chicago.

"Check out the 20th-century temperature record, and you will find that it's up and down pattern does not follow the industrial revolution's upward march of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), which is the supposed central culprit for man-caused global warming and has been much, much higher in the past. It follows instead the up and down pattern of naturally caused climate cycles," says Peter Ferrara, who served as one of the speakers at the conference.

"Temperatures dropped steadily from the late 1940s to the late 1970s. The popular press was even talking about a coming ice age. Ice ages have regularly occurred roughly every 10,000 years, with a new one actually due around now." Ferrara said.

Ferrara adds that "In the late 1970s, the natural cycles turned warm and temperatures rose until the late 1990s, a trend that political and economic interests have tried to milk mercilessly to their advantage." Actually, the incorruptible satellite measured global atmospheric temperatures show less warming during this period than the heavily manipulated land surface temperatures.

But that is not all. Earth is also currently experiencing a surprisingly long period with very low sunspot activity. That is associated with the earth's history with even lower, colder temperatures. The pattern was seen during a period known as the Dalton Minimum from 1790 to 1830, which saw temperature readings decline by two degrees in a 20-year period, and the noted Year Without A Summer in 1816.

Even worse was the period known as the Maunder Minimum from 1645 to 1715, which saw only about 50 sunspots during one 30-year period within the cycle, compared to a typical 40,000 to 50,000 sunspots during such periods in modern times. The Maunder Minimum coincided with the coldest part of the Little Ice Age, which the earth suffered from about 1350 to 1850. The Maunder Minimum saw sharply reduced agricultural output, and widespread human suffering, disease and premature death.

The outstanding question now is just how cold this present cold cycle will get. Will it be modest like the cooling from the late 1940s to late 1970s? Or will the lack of sunspots drive us all the way down to the Dalton Minimum, or even the Maunder Minimum?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.academia.edu/37664273/_THE_EARTH_IS_ACTUALLY_COOLING_NASA_says_due_to_low_sun_activity_Record_Plunge_despite_Rising_Co2_The_0_8_C_increase_over_140_years_is_too_small_and_within_the_range_of_natural_variability_to_constitute_human_made_global_warming

" THE EARTH IS ACTUALLY COOLING," NASA says due to low sun activity: Record Plunge despite Rising Co2. The 0.8* C increase over 140 years is too small and within the range of natural variability to constitute human-made global warming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Global Warming: A Scheme To Redistribute Wealth ...

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/12/no_author/global-warming-a-scheme-to-redistribute-wealth/

Dec 05, 2019 · As the “science” behind man-made global warming has been increasingly discredited, the story has changed. Now it’s not about saving the environment but about redistributing wealth, says a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ottmar Edenhofer, a co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group III and a lead …

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By ...

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/noel-sheppard/...

Nov 18, 2010 · If you needed any more evidence that the entire theory of manmade global warming was a scheme to redistribute wealth you got it Sunday when a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told a German news outlet, "[W]e redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy."

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare ...

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-

Feb 10, 2015 · Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man's stewardship of the environment.But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now ...

GOLDSTEIN: Failed climate policies are about wealth ...

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-failed-climate-policies-are-about-wealth-redistribution

Oct 10, 2018 · The UN says Canada and the global community must now achieve far deeper emission cuts than the ones they agreed to in 2015, even …

UN’s Top Climate Official: Goal Is To ‘Intentionally ...

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/un-s-top-climate-official-goal-intentionally-transform-economic-0

Feb 18, 2015 · The twin objectives of the U.N.’s next major climate change conference, which will be held in Paris in December, are to raise at least $100 billion per year in NDCs from industrialized nations while reducing their greenhouse gas emissions to zero by the end of the century to stop global warming even though, according to satellite data, there ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

want a laugh at woodpecker's stupid expense?

******************************************

from that last link:

“This will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change…It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation,” said Figueres, who said last year that Communist China, the world’s top emitter of greenhouse gas, is “doing it right” regarding climate change while calling the U.S. Congress “very detrimental” in the fight against global warming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, from

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/un-s-top-climate-official-goal-intentionally-transform-economic-0

The UNFCCC is the parent treaty of the 2005 Kyoto Protocol, the world’s first legally binding emissions reduction treaty, which the U.S. Senate refused to ratify. According to UNFCCC’s website, “the ultimate objective of both treaties is to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that will prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system.”

To achieve that goal, $10.2 billion has been pledged by 27 developed nations as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to help Third World countries cope with the alleged effects of climate change, including a $3 billion pledge made by President Obama last November in what one official called a “game-changing moment.”

But that won’t be enough to prevent global temperatures from increasing 2 degrees Celsius by 2100, Figueres said, a prediction based on the U.N.’s now discredited computer climate models.

The twin objectives of the U.N.’s next major climate change conference, which will be held in Paris in December, are to raise at least $100 billion per year in NDCs from industrialized nations while reducing their greenhouse gas emissions to zero by the end of the century to stop global warming even though, according to satellite data, there has been no warming for more than 18 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

woodpecker is a changling. He pretends to be a human, but morphs into a woodpecker as soon as he

enters this forum....

then morphs into a belligerent antagonistic, judgemental, complete ASS. lol.

then back again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

Yes, it changes. but woodpecker's scientists had political motivations.

 

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GISSTemperature/giss_temperature2.php

mitchell_QR_rt.gif

Hahahahahaha

 

This just proves to me you don't read any articles you post. Or maybe you do and you just don't comprehend what you're reading?

As soon as you post from a legitimate source, like NASA, you do yourself in. What a surprise. 

 

Go read that whole article.

It isn't supporting your beliefs... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did read the entire article, yes, it does mention climate change etc be valid according to two.

The entire point, your beakness, is that it IS NOT SETTLED.  SCIENTISTS DISAGREE. Read all the other links,

you cherry-picking birdbrain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical Trump supporter. I bet one of you clowns on here has a truck like this.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×