Wheres the Xxxxxxx riots for this? Xxxx you liberals

[DieHardBrownsFan]

https://www.foxnews.com/us/north-carolina-boy-cannon-hinnant-murder?fbclid=IwAR07TxV27PypUInoV8nE1ZkakkuCYiH7M87mGQADyCTAZWtSjJ2c6AsVz0c

[calfoxwc]

did I hear any leftie on the board have a comment about this? black man, thug, goes out and shoots a young white kid

in the head?

5 years old. what a horrific tragedy.

But, it doesn't make the left FEEL good about losing the last election, and probably losing this one big.

No political benefit, they do NOT give a damn.

[htownbrown]

The problem is liberals think this case is rare (which is true) and the george floyd case is common (which is false).

The reaction should be louder in this case not because a black person killed a white person, but rather it was a kid that never pistol whipped old ladies for dope money.

 

[Axe]

[Axe]

No, the problem is the liberals on this board think they are oh so cerebral. 🤣

 

They THINK they are above it all..

 

Fucking cowards are what they are..

 

Yet another thread the fucking cowards won't touch..

[MLD Woody]

Obviously terrible. Guy is evil. Been posted here multiple times.

 

Clearly being politicized for certain reasons, in an attempt to somehow discredit it distract from other very real issues. 

I'll leave it at that.

[Axe]

21 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

Clearly being politicized for certain reasons, in an attempt to somehow discredit it distract from other very real issues. 

I'll leave it at that.

You pc of shit!

[Vambo]

2 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Obviously terrible. Guy is evil. Been posted here multiple times.

 

Clearly being politicized for certain reasons, in an attempt to somehow discredit it distract from other very real issues.  

I'll leave it at that.

[Gorka]

9 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Obviously terrible. Guy is evil. Been posted here multiple times.

 

Clearly being politicized for certain reasons, in an attempt to somehow discredit it distract from other very real issues. 

I'll leave it at that.

Don't ever come here again saying you aren't a liberal.

The real issues you guys sweep under the rug.

[Vambo]

11 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Obviously terrible. Guy is evil. Been posted here multiple times.

 

Clearly being politicized for certain reasons, in an attempt to somehow discredit it distract from other very real issues. 

I'll leave it at that.

[calfoxwc]

2 minutes ago, Vambo said:

[Westside Steve]

Sorry about editing the title (there seem to be a non-heterosexual member of the board who gets outraged over that) but I agree with you 100%. This is disgusting. Even more disgusting that some scumbags complain that stories like this draw attention away from the real problem of systemic racism.

Bastards.

WSS

[MLD Woody]

21 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

Sorry about editing the title (there seem to be a non-heterosexual member of the board who gets outraged over that) but I agree with you 100%. This is disgusting. Even more disgusting that some scumbags complain that stories like this draw attention away from the real problem of systemic racism.

Bastards.

WSS

Who was outraged over the title?

[Westside Steve]

3 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

Who was outraged over the title?

Only one guy frequently bitches about bad language in the subject titles. I forget who he is. I'm just trying to protect some of our members who may not emotionally equipped for that kind of thing. Just my way of giving back to the community. 😉

But on a serious note oh, and remember this is Facebook a real cesspool, I have heard people going on and on about the story taking away from the problem of institutionalized racism. I find that disgusting.

WSS

[MLD Woody]

42 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

Only one guy frequently bitches about bad language in the subject titles. I forget who he is. I'm just trying to protect some of our members who may not emotionally equipped for that kind of thing. Just my way of giving back to the community. 😉

But on a serious note oh, and remember this is Facebook a real cesspool, I have heard people going on and on about the story taking away from the problem of institutionalized racism. I find that disgusting.

WSS

I guess I don't know who that is as no one has ever bitched, to my knowledge, about the word "fuck" in titles. 

All I can remember is someone bringing up another user referring to multiple liberal women they don't like as sluts, and how that in particular is a bad look for the Browns board. I'm pretty sure that particular user didn't even formally request the title be changed, so if it was, I can only imagine the mod of the board read that comment, agreed it was a bad look, and censored it on their own.

I would also say that if the mod, on their own, censored the title of this thread, and then said that it was because of the previously mentioned user, that would be pretty disingenuous. Especially considering the language and context of the censored wording in completely different between the two threads. 

I mean a moderator would have to be pretty biased to try something like that. Hopefully no mods here would ever do. 

[Westside Steve]

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

I guess I don't know who that is as no one has ever bitched, to my knowledge, about the word "fuck" in titles. 

All I can remember is someone bringing up another user referring to multiple liberal women they don't like as sluts, and how that in particular is a bad look for the Browns board. I'm pretty sure that particular user didn't even formally request the title be changed, so if it was, I can only imagine the mod of the board read that comment, agreed it was a bad look, and censored it on their own.

I would also say that if the mod, on their own, censored the title of this thread, and then said that it was because of the previously mentioned user, that would be pretty disingenuous. Especially considering the language and context of the censored wording in completely different between the two threads. 

I mean a moderator would have to be pretty biased to try something like that. Hopefully no mods here would ever do. 

Gosh I must have forgotten that was you. 

Thanks for bringing me up to date. Frankly I think the word fuck is probably more offencive to the GP, I mean most people not you, than slut which seems to throw you into a fit of incontinence. 

Of course the last time you cried about it it was probably pretty on target. The definition of slut is a promiscuous woman; a woman who has many sexual partners. 

WSS

 

PS and yes I did change the word slut in a couple of posts titles. Silly me I thought you, or even a more normal poster, might have actually been offended or someone else might have been offended and you weren't just being an asshole because you hate Cal.

 

[MLD Woody]

1 hour ago, Westside Steve said:

Gosh I must have forgotten that was you. 

Thanks for bringing me up to date. Frankly I think the word fuck is probably more offencive to the GP, I mean most people not you, than slut which seems to throw you into a fit of incontinence. 

Of course the last time you cried about it it was probably pretty on target. The definition of slut is a promiscuous woman; a woman who has many sexual partners. 

WSS

 

PS and yes I did change the word slut in a couple of posts titles. Silly me I thought you, or even a more normal poster, might have actually been offended or someone else might have been offended and you weren't just being an asshole because you hate Cal.

 

Oh right, sorry, I forgot you live in your own little world where you make up what I believe and say instead of actually taking into account what I say and do.

I'm not surprised you have 0 grip on reality but it's a shame that means the mod has no grip on reality. 

 

If you disagree than keep slut in the title. You're the mod. Don't blame me. Go ahead and put it back. Display it proudly. 

 

And I don't think anyone else here has called a woman slut in their thread title other than Cal. Just fyi. 

I'd make the comment that it was a bad look for the board regardless. 

[calfoxwc]

1 hour ago, Westside Steve said:

Gosh I must have forgotten that was you. 

Thanks for bringing me up to date. Frankly I think the word fuck is probably more offencive to the GP, I mean most people not you, than slut which seems to throw you into a fit of incontinence. 

Of course the last time you cried about it it was probably pretty on target. The definition of slut is a promiscuous woman; a woman who has many sexual partners. 

WSS

 

PS and yes I did change the word slut in a couple of posts titles. Silly me I thought you, or even a more normal poster, might have actually been offended or someone else might have been offended and you weren't just being an asshole because you hate Cal.

 

LOL LOL

The Surprising Roots of the Word ‘Slut’

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-surprising-roots-of-the-word-slut

Apr 14, 2017 · In other words, in the 14 th century, at least one author was using slut to refer to a man, and if you read the context of that quote, it’s clear that Chaucer, for once, didn’t have sex on his...

[calfoxwc]

1 minute ago, MLD Woody said:

Oh right, sorry, I forgot you live in your own little world where you make up what I believe and say instead of actually taking into account what I say and do.I'm not surprised you have 0 grip on reality but it's a shame that means the mod has no grip on reality. If you disagree than keep slut in the title. You're the mod. Don't blame me. Go ahead and put it back. Display it proudly. And I don't think anyone else here has called a woman slut in their thread title other than Cal. Just fyi. I'd make the comment that it was a bad look for the board regardless. 

OTH, I have NEVER used the fword, or cword, or the sword. Those are also a bad look.

Liberals like Hoorta and his little woodpecker always demand to control the narrative, and they get to pick and choose

what words are offensive to them, but refuse to let not-liberals choose what words are offensive TO THEM.

Lenin-marxism/progressiveism/liberalism - have become synonymous.

[Axe]

Who doesn't like sluts?  🤣

[Westside Steve]

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Oh right, sorry, I forgot you live in your own little world where you make up what I believe and say instead of actually taking into account what I say and do.

 were you or were you not the guy that complained?

I'm not surprised you have 0 grip on reality but it's a shame that means the mod has no grip on reality. 

 you're just mad that the mod doesn't think you're smarter than you think you are. I'm not sure that anybody does. But my job isn't to kiss your ass. Just to try to keep spam and pornography and some of the more outrageous bulshit off the board. That's it pal. If you want somebody to protect you from Cal hire a bodyguard.

 

If you disagree than keep slut in the title. You're the mod. Don't blame me. Go ahead and put it back. Display it proudly. 

but fuck is okay with you right? And your boyfriend Cleve shit was good with you right? And you whined like a little bitch when I took off his actual pornography right?

 

And I don't think anyone else here has called a woman slut in their thread title other than Cal. Just fyi. 

there's got to be a so what in here... and just for the fuck of it I don't think that constant name calling is the best way to point out the flaws in somebody's character or policies or opinions and prior statements. And I think he overdoes the bullshit. But again it's not my place to protect you. Man up.

I'd make the comment that it was a bad look for the board regardless. 

WSS

[DieHardBrownsFan]

If I had wrote fuk instead of fuck.  Is it the c that makes the difference in the meaning?

[calfoxwc]

OMG. The c letter. You should be asham...dammit....I just repeated it.

The dreaded scary "C" letter.

Then there's the scary "w" letter, and you know who will be offended by that....

[Westside Steve]

8 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

If I had wrote fuk instead of fuck.  Is it the c that makes the difference in the meaning?

Oh I really don't give a fuck you guys have heard my language. I personally just try to keep the f-bombs and the other really Jagged words out of the titles of the threads. That's all. Woody whined about slut one time so I included that. You never know what's going to offend the upper echelon or some random jerk off reading the board and pitching a bitch. What times we live in our so over-the-top political t correctness the canceled culture left-wing maggots who want everything they don't like hidden or destroyed, all of that shit. But let's not get off the subject DieHard this story is one of the worst I've seen in years in American politics. Sure shit like this happens all the time but... These bastards on the left (not all  but  too many and even the less strident ones spend a lot more time reacting to the murder of George Floyd) literally don't care or Worse push back against it because it makes the BLM sons of bitches look bad. Which they are. 

WSS

[Vambo]

17 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Oh right, sorry, I forgot you live in your own little world where you make up what I believe and say instead of actually taking into account what I say and do.

I'm not surprised you have 0 grip on reality but it's a shame that means the mod has no grip on reality. 

 

If you disagree than keep slut in the title. You're the mod. Don't blame me. Go ahead and put it back. Display it proudly. 

 

And I don't think anyone else here has called a woman slut in their thread title other than Cal. Just fyi. 

I'd make the comment that it was a bad look for the board regardless. 

[calfoxwc]

I reckon any time now woodpecker will start screaming "citizen's arrest, citizen's arrest" for being mean about his hero and heroines.