Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Biden Selects Kamala Harris as his VP


Canton Dawg

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Bob806 said:

Naw, I've been saying it for years, just decided to write it now lol

Ok..sorry if I had mistaken you for a flaming liberal who all of a sudden wants to play the "why just can't we just all get along" card.

Trust me though, that will manifest itself on the left should God forbid Biden be elected.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Sorry but he made a misogynistic comment without supporting evidence. This has been followed by several others doing exactly the same thing. I merely made an observation.

Now if they all wish to provide proof, go for it.

Well, for starters, former San Francisco mayor admitted to having a relationship with Harris while he was mayor and married. He was in his 60s and she was in her late 20s at the time. Dunno about you, but I don't know many women in their 20s who go after dudes in their 60s for bf material based on their six-pack abs and charming personalities. He also admitted to using his influence to help her get jobs in government while they were dating:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/01/27/willie-brown-kamala-harris-san-francisco-chronicle-letter/2695143002/

So, I mean it's not that far out of the realm of possibility to say that she slept her way up the ladder of government. Definitely not misogyny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

but you have labeled senior citizens, you know, "scary old people", for a long time.

They are quite terrifying when they're in seats of power, like Congress, the White House and the Supreme Court.

I've been advocating for years for a mandatory retirement age for public officials. There's always outliers, but for the most part, mental and physical faculties begin to sharply decline in people's 60s, and I'd rather not have a bunch of geriatrics holding the purse strings and nuke codes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Handing the job to someone strictly because of race (and gender) is racism. 

As usual in recent times, the Democrats can't get out of their own way, and if I was a lefty I would be furious that they handed the win to Trump..... AGAIN. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Well, for starters, former San Francisco mayor admitted to having a relationship with Harris while he was mayor. He was in his 60s and she was in her late 20s at the time. Dunno about you, but I don't know many women in their 20s who go after dudes in their 60s for bf material. He also admitted to using his influence to help her get jobs in government while they were dating:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/01/27/willie-brown-kamala-harris-san-francisco-chronicle-letter/2695143002/

So, I mean it's not that far out of the realm of possibility to say that she slept her way up the ladder of government. Definitely not misogyny.

But, and I say this with the purest of intentions, if you hear of any feel free to let me know.

🥰

WSS

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, D Bone said:

Handing the job to someone strictly because of race (and gender) is racism. 

 and sexism. Don't forget that one!

As usual in recent times, the Democrats can't get out of their own way, and if I was a lefty I would be furious that they handed the win to Trump..... AGAIN. 

WSS

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harris is exactly the opposite of what Biden needed in order to compete with President Trump in November.

BIDEN'S SELECTION OF HARRIS FOR VP MEANS DISASTROUS SAN FRANCISCO ECONOMIC MODEL COULD GO NATIONWIDE

Harris is from California, a far-left state that Biden was certain to win regardless of who he selected to be his running mate.

She garnered so little support and enthusiasm among Democratic Party voters during the primary season that she chose to drop out of the race in December, more than a month before the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.

 

Harris has been heavily criticized by many on the far left for her stances on some criminal justice issues while she served as the top prosecutor of San Francisco from 2004 to 2011 and attorney general of California from 2011 to 2017.

For example, she previously opposed a statewide police body camera mandate, fought against a reduction to California’s mandatory minimum law, and opposed the legalization of marijuana -- a position she has since reversed.

TRUMP VS. BIDEN: STOCK MARKET WILL PICK THE WINNER

She has a long, well-documented record of political opportunism and grandstanding, going all the way back to her days in San Francisco.

According to an SF Weekly report from 2009, “The cops, in turn, argue that District Attorney Kamala Harris, a striver and candidate for Attorney General, is loath to take difficult cases lest she blemish her political future with an embarrassing loss.”

But worst of all, Harris has in recent years adopted increasingly more radical policy positions, frequently aligning herself with socialist politicians like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.

BIDEN PLEDGES TO ROLL BACK TRUMP'S $2 TRILLION TAX CUTS

Perhaps the most notable example is Harris’s support for Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, the most radical, socialistic proposal in history.

Among other things, AOC’s Green New Deal resolution, which Harris co-sponsored in the Senate in 2019, includes a call for single-payer health care, retrofitting every home and business building in the country, a new system of publicly-owned banks, free college tuition, “universal access to healthy food,” a federal jobs guarantee, the complete destruction of the fossil-fuel industry and requirements that would prevent Americans from purchasing gasoline-powered cars.

All told, the American Action Forum estimates the Harris-backed Green New Deal could cost as much as $94 trillion over 10 years, making it the most expensive plan ever proposed.

Harris’s support for the Green New Deal and other socialistic policies such as a basic income program for most Americans and a $2,000 monthly “stimulus” check that would be paid out for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, put her squarely outside of the political mainstream and moves the Biden campaign even further to the left than it has already drifted over the past two months.

When you add up all of Harris’s proposals, it’s hard to see how her platform differs substantially from that of Bernie Sanders. Although Harris denies she is a socialist, her recent track record suggests that is exactly what she is.

KAMALA HARRIS, BIDEN'S RADICAL VP PICK SIGNALS BAD NEWS FOR AMERICAN WORKERS, ECONOMIC RECOVERY

Biden’s decision to choose Harris is bizarre, to say the least. She provides almost no political benefits and a whole lot of far-left baggage.

The reason Biden was chosen by Democratic Party primary voters in the first place is precisely because they didn’t want a socialist on the ticket, and yet, that’s exactly what they have ended up with now that Harris has joined the Biden campaign.

Harris’s socialist policy views will not play well in the conservative Midwest and moderate upper Midwest. Middle-of-the-road voters in states such as Michigan and Wisconsin, as well as swing states further to the east, like Pennsylvania and North Carolina, have no interest in voting for the socialist policies championed by Harris.

When they find out just how radical Biden’s new running mate is, it could very well prove to be catastrophic for his campaign.

With that in mind, the only person who should be happier with this pick than Kamala Harris is Donald Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, D Bone said:

Handing the job to someone strictly because of race (and gender) is racism. 

As usual in recent times, the Democrats can't get out of their own way, and if I was a lefty I would be furious that they handed the win to Trump..... AGAIN. 

Absolutely, I was thinking the same thing when Biden said he was going to pick a female “of color”.

So much for choosing the best candidate based upon their skill set, regardless of race and gender.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jbluhm86 said:

Well, for starters, former San Francisco mayor admitted to having a relationship with Harris while he was mayor and married. He was in his 60s and she was in her late 20s at the time. Dunno about you, but I don't know many women in their 20s who go after dudes in their 60s for bf material based on their six-pack abs and charming personalities. He also admitted to using his influence to help her get jobs in government while they were dating:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/01/27/willie-brown-kamala-harris-san-francisco-chronicle-letter/2695143002/

So, I mean it's not that far out of the realm of possibility to say that she slept her way up the ladder of government. Definitely not misogyny.

You mean my gf is lying?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jbluhm86 said:

Will do. I turned 34 last month, and I feel like a creeper talking to women in their early 20s.

Give it a couple decades Bud. Haha. Almost similarly a cougar is a woman in her forties that digs guys in their 20s. For me a cougar would be well into her eighties oh... Not that it's completely out of the question but, well, you know.

But would I still do Sophia Loren just for the resume????

WSS

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Westside Steve said:

Give it a couple decades Bud. Haha. Almost similarly a cougar is a woman in her forties that digs guys in their 20s. For me a cougar would be well into her eighties oh... Not that it's completely out of the question but, well, you know.

But would I still do Sophia Loren just for the resume????

WSS

I think Raquel Welch looks pretty good for a woman of her age.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

What CD said was misogynist. Ask him to check it out with the significant female in his life. And he does not get to add anything to what he posted to explain his comment either. Accusing any woman of fucking her way to the top with zero evidence to support that kind of comment is misogynist. Apparently you just don't get that.

As for Palin this is actually what she said:

"During that appearance, interviewer Charles Gibson asked her what insight she had gained from living so close to Russia, and she responded: “They’re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska” 

SNL then spoofed it as her saying, "From my house."

 

And fiscally you are a fake Republican who just saddled us with $4 Tril in deficit spending via you King 🤴 excluding COVID bailout. I cannot verify if that qualifies you as a piece of shit however. Look in the mirror.😱

At least Palin is pretty good at geography, something Trump isn't.  :D  

4 hours ago, Vambo said:

image.png.8577940ad34aeb5c44ec931f8ddf8a7b.png

Straight out of the QAnon playbook....   Baseless right wing paranoid horse shit...  

EDIT: PS- The pure hatred I'm seeing sure tells me where the collective feeling of this Forum are regarding the Democrats.  Keep on watching FOX for pointers on how to tear down Biden and Harris.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hoorta said:

At least Palin is pretty good at geography, something Trump isn't.  :D  

Straight out of the QAnon playbook....   Baseless right wing paranoid horse shit...  

EDIT: PS- The pure hatred I'm seeing sure tells me where the collective feeling of this Forum are regarding the Democrats.  Keep on watching FOX for pointers on how to tear down Biden and Harris.... 

That has to be one of the least self-aware statements I've read on the board. I'm surprised it's coming from you brother.

WSS

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

You’ve obviously been basking in the warm glow of CNN 24/7 the way you bash Trump.

If he has an OLED TV, there will be no hiding it. 😄

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

You’ve obviously been basking in the warm glow of CNN 24/7 the way you bash Trump.

Here's the problem CD- as I see it...  this entire thread is Exhibit A of why it's totally OK to bash Biden and Harris, but say anything contradictory (even if it's true) to the continuing love fest here for Cheetos Jesus- why TDS!!! TDS!!! TDS!!! 

So you guys can stuff your hypocrisy where the sun don't shine....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hoorta said:

Here's the problem CD- as I see it...  this entire thread is Exhibit A of why it's totally OK to bash Biden and Harris, but say anything contradictory (even if it's true) to the continuing love fest here for Cheetos Jesus- why TDS!!! TDS!!! TDS!!! 

So you guys can stuff your hypocrisy where the sun don't shine....  

It IS totally OK to bash these 2 mental midgets.

You can’t turn on a fucking TV or radio without hearing one of the media’s meat puppets bash Trump.

If by chance the dimentia patient and his hoe get elected come November, you may want to get used to it.

What comes around...goes around.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, hoorta said:

Here's the problem CD- as I see it...  this entire thread is Exhibit A of why it's totally OK to bash Biden and Harris, but say anything contradictory (even if it's true) to the continuing love fest here for Cheetos Jesus- why TDS!!! TDS!!! TDS!!! 

So you guys can stuff your hypocrisy where the sun don't shine....  

lying about PRes Trump and FAILING to back it up with any legit substance, is TDS.

You do it, you got it. You can't NAME ONE GOOD OR GREAT THING OBAMAO/BIDEN DID IN EIGHT YEARS, but

you are offended by Pres Trump's sometimes stupid tweets, while he is doing HUNDREDS of GREAT/GOOD THINGS FOR AMERICA, and has kept more promises than most demoquack presidents combined. You can stick a cork in it - and have a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

It IS totally OK to bash these 2 mental midgets.

You can’t turn on a fucking TV or radio without hearing one of the media’s meat puppets bash Trump.

If by chance the dimentia patient and his hoe get elected come November, you may want to get used to it.

What comes around...goes around.

Then by the same standard, it's totally OK for anyone to bash mental midget President Lysol.... So you can stop with the TDS bullshit.....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

lying about PRes Trump and FAILING to back it up with any legit substance, is TDS.

You do it, you got it. You can't NAME ONE GOOD OR GREAT THING OBAMAO/BIDEN DID IN EIGHT YEARS, but

you are offended by Pres Trump's sometimes stupid tweets, while he is doing HUNDREDS of GREAT/GOOD THINGS FOR AMERICA, and has kept more promises than most demoquack presidents combined.

OMG- you're are so far in denial- you're hopeless....  I've done so at least a dozen times with documented stuff about his BS- and you just suffer from selective amnesia.... 

But keep on living it Trump's fantasy world Cal, have a nice big slug of his snake oil.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo removed the comments section on all of its propaganda because they couldn't stand the majority speaking against their agenda..... Some of the weakest shit I've seen in recent memory.  

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...