Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

The Senate exists for moments like this.


Vambo

Recommended Posts

meanwhile, back at the ranch....

several dems are already indicating they are leaning towards

voting to stop the impeachment crap.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/multiple-dem-senators-already-considering-voting-against-president-trumps-impeachment-report-says

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

After having been exposed as a fraud and corrupt, can anyone, including Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Fake NBC News, continue to listen to his con?

well, there are Fox folks like Mike Wallace, for example, who still shill for the left, because they want to be bigger time wealthy with a CNN contract. Sucking up to lies makes them money. It's the left's "15 minutes of fame and fortune" again and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

well, there are Fox folks like Mike Wallace, for example, who still shill for the left, because they want to be bigger time wealthy with a CNN contract. Sucking up to lies makes them money. It's the left's "15 minutes of fame and fortune" again and again.

Ironic however that someone in the WH released this which supports the Dems contention. Just my usual monthly monkey wrench for the Trumpette monkeys.🙈🙉🙊

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/bolton-ukraine-aid-trump/2020/01/26/id/951396/?ns_mail_uid=6d52df85-236f-4a8f-8332-d84fdb5d6ebf&ns_mail_job=DM86270_01262020&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010104wys7hv

Let him testify!😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Ironic however that someone in the WH released this which supports the Dems contention. Just my usual monthly monkey wrench for the Trumpette monkeys.🙈🙉🙊

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/bolton-ukraine-aid-trump/2020/01/26/id/951396/?ns_mail_uid=6d52df85-236f-4a8f-8332-d84fdb5d6ebf&ns_mail_job=DM86270_01262020&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010104wys7hv

Let him testify!😂

I would say let them all testify but then this clown show would go on for months and months. I would love to see the so called whistleblower testify, Joe and Hunter Biden, Schiff and a host of others but what is the purpose? No impeachable crime was committed. Just end it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldBrownsFan said:

I would say let them all testify but then this clown show would go on for months and months. I would love to see the so called whistleblower testify, Joe and Hunter Biden, Schiff and a host of others but what is the purpose? No impeachable crime was committed. Just end it.

This is John Dean all over again. You make the points the Nixon defenders tried to make. The tapes proved Dean right. At the heart of all this now is an impeachable crime of using a foreign government to go after a political opponent. That is against current law whether you want it to be or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said:

This is John Dean all over again. You make the points the Nixon defenders tried to make. The tapes proved Dean right. At the heart of all this now is an impeachable crime of using a foreign government to go after a political opponent. That is against current law whether you want it to be or not.

Here’s how bad things are going for the Dims, they actually have Swallowell begging for evidence against Trump on social media...think about that for a minute! 😂😂😂😂

741B5902-1D64-4127-AD15-19A3C3CDA847.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said:

This is John Dean all over again. You make the points the Nixon defenders tried to make. The tapes proved Dean right. At the heart of all this now is an impeachable crime of using a foreign government to go after a political opponent. That is against current law whether you want it to be or not.

Um,,he didn't need to use a foreign government to go after Biden. Biden admitted in front of the whole world on video for all to see,  explaining how he threatened to hold funds if the prosecutor investigating his son wasn't fired. There you'll find actual corruption that you chose to ignore.

Secondly, had Ukraine been squeaky clean then you may have a case. Ukraine happens to be a hotbed of corruption.  By law, and by an agreement designed to  expose  corruption signed between Ukraine and B. Clinton,  Trump had every right to say what he did.

https://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/106th-congress/16/document-text

For you and assholes like you who want to tear up the ballots of 60 million voters by removing a president from office over one phone call ..well, like I said, you're assholes. The only way you fuckers will ever get over TDS is by killing yourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said:

This is John Dean all over again. You make the points the Nixon defenders tried to make. The tapes proved Dean right. At the heart of all this now is an impeachable crime of using a foreign government to go after a political opponent. That is against current law whether you want it to be or not.

The hypocrisy of the dems is stunning. I would say a good portion of these democrat  hypocrites never were so concerned about the security of Ukraine when Obama was president. In fact when Russia invaded Ukraine and Ukraine was begging the United States for military weaponry all the Obama administration would basically give them is band aids and blankets...no lethal weaponry for fear of upsetting Putin. Trump has given Ukraine way more aid and the lethal military weapons the Obama admin would not do. 

Trump has been consistent with our aid to countries that he wants to make sure other nations are sharing the burden as well as not giving any aid to corrupt countries. What Joe and Hunter Biden did may not be against the law but it screams of corruption that at least needs to be investigated and for all the lib media talk that it has been investigated I don't believe it has. Hunter Biden was given all that money for no other reason than the corrupt Ukranian gas company was at least attempting to buy influence. Then the prosecutor looking into corruption at the company Hunter Biden "worked" was fired on the threat of his father Joe Biden that Ukraine would lose aid if they didn't. Talking about a real quid pro quo here.

So the bottom line is the president of Ukraine states he never felt pressured to investigate the Bidens or Ukraine would lose aid and the aid was given without any promise of an investigation and what is left is a possible thought crime the dems want to undo an election over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hannity has been saying on the radio - Bolton said that Pres Trump said to him, that he WANTED to hold up the Ukraine aid...til they started investigating the bidens.

   But that never once got back to the Ukraine, not ever. So, NO quid pro quo.

That's similar as me saying I think I want to rob a bank to pay off my pickup truck. Except, of course, I would never actually do that.

and then some liberal nutjob says "see? Cal robbed a bank " !

because he is a socialist dishonest anti-American lowlife coniving leftwing commie sombeitch, there's no truth of any crime there.

the left is now "feeling" that they can live the book "1984" because they have all the power in the house.

Time to put all this garbage to the dumpster, end it once and for all. It has been, they even admitted, a ploy to ruin Pres Trump's chances of being re-elected, in terms of covering up all the great things he has done.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

This is John Dean all over again. You make the points the Nixon defenders tried to make. The tapes proved Dean right. At the heart of all this now is an impeachable crime of using a foreign government to go after a political opponent. That is against current law whether you want it to be or not.

17903454_10158949965035725_3181251005684
 

I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the transcripts of my calls with President Zelensky are all the proof that is needed, in addition to the fact that President Zelensky & the Foreign Minister of Ukraine said there was no pressure and no problems. Additionally, I met with President Zelensky at the United Nations (Democrats said I never met) and released the military aid to Ukraine without any conditions or investigations - and far ahead of schedule. I also allowed Ukraine to purchase Javelin anti-tank missiles. My Administration has done far more than the previous Administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:
17903454_10158949965035725_3181251005684
 

I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the transcripts of my calls with President Zelensky are all the proof that is needed, in addition to the fact that President Zelensky & the Foreign Minister of Ukraine said there was no pressure and no problems. Additionally, I met with President Zelensky at the United Nations (Democrats said I never met) and released the military aid to Ukraine without any conditions or investigations - and far ahead of schedule. I also allowed Ukraine to purchase Javelin anti-tank missiles. My Administration has done far more than the previous Administration.

King Liar has no credibility. Zero. Nada. Nunca.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

King Liar has no credibility. Zero. Nada. Nunca.

Agree John Bolton has "no credibility. Zero. Nada. Nunca."   just trying to sell his book.  John Bolton loves WAR.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

Hannity has been saying on the radio - Bolton said that Pres Trump said to him, that he WANTED to hold up the Ukraine aid...til they started investigating the bidens.

   But that never once got back to the Ukraine, not ever. So, NO quid pro quo.

That's similar as me saying I think I want to rob a bank to pay off my pickup truck. Except, of course, I would never actually do that.

and then some liberal nutjob says "see? Cal robbed a bank " !

because he is a socialist dishonest anti-American lowlife coniving leftwing commie sombeitch, there's no truth of any crime there.

the left is now "feeling" that they can live the book "1984" because they have all the power in the house.

Time to put all this garbage to the dumpster, end it once and for all. It has been, they even admitted, a ploy to ruin Pres Trump's chances of being re-elected, in terms of covering up all the great things he has done.

"Furthermore, there are glaring issues with The New York Times story on the leaked manuscript," the RNC's Steve Guest wrote. "Not only does it omit direct quotes from Bolton’s manuscript, it doesn’t cite any named sources."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-bolton-leak-publisher-denies-coordination

Good interview give a listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fleitz said presidents of both parties should be able to confide in their national security advisors and that the best confidants are the ones who give the officeholder peace of mind that their ideas and musings will not appear in the press or in books.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-bolton-friend-fred-fleitz-national-security-trump-book

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the phony ? ! allegation that Pres Trump said to Bolton, that he wanted to withhold that aid until

they announce the Biden investigations.

whatever.

I've said before - If I said I wanted to rob a bank and pay off our pickup truck...

that isn't a crime. Neither is being a lying jerkface.

Bolton has shot down any chance of being in government service again. But CNN/MSNBC will keep paying him

big bucks as another dishonest innuendo/false rumor and propaganda hack.

AGAIN - no "there" there. Nothingburger. Because Pres Trump never withheld the aid. I believe Bolton was one of the leakers earlier on, and that is why Bolton had to go.

What a disreputable "witness".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

the phony ? ! allegation that Pres Trump said to Bolton, that he wanted to withhold that aid until

they announce the Biden investigations.

whatever.

I've said before - If I said I wanted to rob a bank and pay off our pickup truck...

that isn't a crime. Neither is being a lying jerkface.

Bolton has shot down any chance of being in government service again. But CNN/MSNBC will keep paying him

big bucks as another dishonest innuendo/false rumor and propaganda hack.

AGAIN - no "there" there. Nothingburger. Because Pres Trump never withheld the aid. I believe Bolton was one of the leakers earlier on, and that is why Bolton had to go.

What a disreputable "witness".

Ever more the reason to put him on the stand for testimony. Once he is under oath, he cannot lie, under threat of perjury.

For the record, I am also open for the Bidens and any other witnesses being called as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jbluhm86 said:

Ever more the reason to put him on the stand for testimony. Once he is under oath, he cannot lie, under threat of perjury.

For the record, I am also open for the Bidens and any other witnesses being called as well.

What is the worst case scenario for Trump if Bolton testifies Trump told him he wanted the aid to Ukraine held unless Ukraine investigated the Bidens? Trump would be guilty of a thought crime because the facts are the aid was eventually given to Ukraine with no promise to investigate the Bidens. The president of Ukraine also said he felt no pressure to do anything to get the aid. Anyway you slice this it should have never resulted in an impeachment. At most here all you have is a "thought crime". Do we really want to impeach presidents over "thought crimes?"

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

Ever more the reason to put him on the stand for testimony. Once he is under oath, he cannot lie, under threat of perjury.

For the record, I am also open for the Bidens and any other witnesses being called as well.

but the point is, and has always been - to drag on the farce to effect a defeat of a current president that is KEEPING HIS PROMISES to us that elected him, has the economy roaring, has redone/going to redo bad trade deals, put two HONEST Supreme Court Justices - helped and supported our VETERANS HUGELY, supported the LIVES of UNBORN and BORN CHILDREN, defended our gun rights, our first amendment,....etc.

the left can't run on issues. they have no good ideas to fix any damn thing. So they invented the farce, drug it out til the voters went south on it in the polls, and now they want the Senate to drag it out for no legitimate reason. This manuscript of Bolton's has been out there for how long? a year? and just at the perfect point of controversy, it's "leaked" out there?

enough of this crap. Bolton is just another turd. He wants to make money selling his book and be a popular contributor ($$$$) on CNN, and MSNBC...

and, try to screw over the President that terminated him. Apparently, he's been a deep stater all along, from the Reagan days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

Ever more the reason to put him on the stand for testimony. Once he is under oath, he cannot lie, under threat of perjury.

For the record, I am also open for the Bidens and any other witnesses being called as well.

Yes Nancy and crew should have done this and not rushed through the one sided process.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

Ever more the reason to put him on the stand for testimony. Once he is under oath, he cannot lie, under threat of perjury.

For the record, I am also open for the Bidens and any other witnesses being called as well.

actually, the left witnesses do lie in front of Congress. They believe they are too powerful to go to jail.

CIA director John Brennan lied to you and to the Senate ...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-director-john-brennan-lied...

Jul 31, 2014 · CIA director John Brennan lied to you and to the Senate.

Author: Trevor Timm

Former CIA director Brennan lied to Congress about Steele ...

https://www.rt.com/usa/475443-brennan-lied-to-congress

Once it emerged that the Steele Dossier – which among other things, accused Trump of hiring prostitutes to urinate on a bed in a Moscow hotel room – was unverifiable and most likely false, Brennan was grilled by Congress.

Brennan Lied About Not Including Steele Dossier In IC ...

https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/09/brennan-lied-about-not-including-steele-dossier...

The new report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed former CIA Director John Brennan lied to Congress about whether the dossier authored by Christopher Steele …

Former CIA director John Brennan caught lying to Congress ...

https://www.independentsentinel.com/former-cia-director-john-brennan-caught-lying-to...

Dec 10, 2019 · The IG report confirmed that Brennan lied to Congress. He said the Hillary-Steele dossier was not relied upon for the Obama administration’s Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). That wasn’t the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...