Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Vambo

Planned Parenthood Sues Arizona Because Its Pro-Life Laws Have Saved Too Many Babies From Abortion

Recommended Posts

https://www.lifenews.com/2019/04/12/planned-parenthood-sues-arizona-because-its-pro-life-laws-have-saved-too-many-babies-from-abortion/?fbclid=IwAR3AfmXEaQc2AotugnNqLnMSyq-DBcL2LkQhzGEeHRxE56f4N7P8NM5P3_o

The abortion giant Planned Parenthood just filed a massive new lawsuit against a series of pro-life Arizona laws that are saving unborn babies from abortion.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Vambo said:

https://www.lifenews.com/2019/04/12/planned-parenthood-sues-arizona-because-its-pro-life-laws-have-saved-too-many-babies-from-abortion/?fbclid=IwAR3AfmXEaQc2AotugnNqLnMSyq-DBcL2LkQhzGEeHRxE56f4N7P8NM5P3_o

The abortion giant Planned Parenthood just filed a massive new lawsuit against a series of pro-life Arizona laws that are saving unborn babies from abortion.

 

Planned Parenthood always tries to minimize and distance themselves from the abortions they perform but this lawsuit calls them out for the very active and pro abortion organization  they really are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Planned Parenthood always tries to minimize and distance themselves from the abortions they perform but this lawsuit calls them out for the very active and pro abortion organization  they really are.

If Planned Parenthood is an org that does press for women's bodily autonomy and health, it makes sense that they would sue. Nothing nefarious, just makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“safe, legal, and rare.”. to describe the Democrats' policy outlook on abortion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet Officials from Planned Parenthood constantly tell us that abortions are only a small part of their services so why are they even bothering to sue? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Yet Officials from Planned Parenthood constantly tell us that abortions are only a small part of their services so why are they even bothering to sue? 

Because no one else had to this point? It is still a women's health issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

If Planned Parenthood is an org that does press for women's bodily autonomy and health, it makes sense that they would sue. Nothing nefarious, just makes sense.

Plus, morals be damned, it's costing them money. It's all about the do ray mi.

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OldBrownsFan said:

so why are they even bothering to sue? 

why does the NRA get involved everytime theres a "gun issue"? makes no sense, why would an organization cslled the national rifle associstion bother itself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

why does the NRA get involved everytime theres a "gun issue"? makes no sense, why would an organization cslled the national rifle associstion bother itself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

🙄

The difference is the NRA leaves no doubt they are pro second amendment and everyone knows where they stand. Planned Parenthood constantly tries to act like abortions play a minor role in their operations...Planned Parenthood is heavily invested in abortion no matter how much they try and minimize it to the public. The lawsuit only goes to illustrate it.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OldBrownsFan said:

The difference is the NRA leaves no doubt they are pro second amendment and everyone knows where they stand. Planned Parenthood constantly tries to act like abortions play a minor role in their operations...Planned Parenthood is heavily invested in abortion no matter how much they try and minimize it to the public. The lawsuit only goes to illustrate it.

Is abortion considered a women’s health issue to a good bit of the public?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“Mission: The mission of Planned Parenthood is to provide comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services in settings which preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of each individual, to advocate public policies which guarantee these rights and ensure access to such services..”

If you wonder why Planned Parenthood are filing a law suit, you can look at their mission statement. If they didn’t file that law suit, they would be doing a shitty job of advocating for public policy that protects reproductive rights. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

“Mission: The mission of Planned Parenthood is to provide comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services in settings which preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of each individual, to advocate public policies which guarantee these rights and ensure access to such services..”

If you wonder why Planned Parenthood are filing a law suit, you can look at their mission statement. If they didn’t file that law suit, they would be doing a shitty job of advocating for public policy that protects reproductive rights   the womans right to terminate the life of her baby.

"Reproductive rights"  LOL... like "pro choice" are  terms intended to humanize or mask an underlying agenda that is repulsive...the freedom for a woman to kill her baby.

Call it what it is man.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Gorka said:

"Reproductive rights"  LOL... like "pro choice" are  terms intended to humanize or mask an underlying agenda that is repulsive...the freedom for a woman to kill her baby.

Call it what it is man.

 

You can call it “ultra Slayer baby head mashing” but that won’t change that there are a good deal of people who see it as a reproductive issue and not baby murder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, that went out the window with pba, and ending life after babies are born because the mother decided it was inconvenient.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

well, that went out the window with pba, and ending life after babies are born because the mother decided it was inconvenient.

 

That whole situation is absurd and only damages the case for women to get abortions. In Virginia, I think you can toss toddlers into a wood chipper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

That whole situation is absurd and only damages the case for women to get abortions. In Virginia, I think you can toss toddlers into a wood chipper.

Yeah, and?

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Westside Steve said:

Yeah, and?

WSS

They can carry on as they will. Just making comment. I am very pro gun but if I scream from the roof tops about how I need a bazooka, I might lose some of the fence sitters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

They can carry on as they will. Just making comment. I am very pro gun but if I scream from the roof tops about how I need a bazooka, I might lose some of the fence sitters.

I can live with you owning a bazooka. 😁

WSS

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh, that would be way cool. goodbye groundhogs out in our fields. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×