TexasAg1969 Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 39 minutes ago, The Cysko Kid said: What I find humorous is that you're complaining about the blaze being brainwashing but you, in the recent past, posted 100% seriously that you felt Donald Trump was a dictator. Forgive me if I feel you have negative credibility. Anyone who ignores the laws of this country with impunity to run the country as he wants has indeed become a dictator. At the moment that is exactly what he is doing. Remember Hitler and Chavez were also elected, but they also ran their countries without conforming to the existing laws and by systematically tearing down the governmental checks on their power. So for not recognizing this in Herr Trump, you have negative credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 3 hours ago, Vambo said: What is the big issue here? Are there rules as to how many times you need post in each section of the board even during the off season? Does everyone need to post in the same style? Nope, that isn't the point. I don't think there are any hard-and-fast rules, just bad form in my opinion. All I'm saying, and again I'm not accusing anybody, is if one person makes up more than one screen character to support his or her ideology or arguments I personally think it's bullshit. I don't have the leveling of administration power to check but if I was convinced that there was a problem with somebody I could certainly ask administrators to check and eliminate the account of the fakes. At this point I think it's just kind of an easy deflection for some people who don't like what they see posted to just disregard it because they claim it's from an alt or a biased source. Lots easier than responding and proving something is right or not. For instance no one doubts that The Rachel Maddow Show is a biased program but if she posts actual tweets from Donald Trump that doesn't make them fake. Just that I know which direction her reaction will probably be. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambo Posted April 16, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: Nope, that isn't the point. I don't think there are any hard-and-fast rules, just bad form in my opinion. All I'm saying, and again I'm not accusing anybody, is if one person makes up more than one screen character to support his or her ideology or arguments I personally think it's bullshit. I don't have the leveling of administration power to check but if I was convinced that there was a problem with somebody I could certainly ask administrators to check and eliminate the account of the fakes. At this point I think it's just kind of an easy to flexion for some people who don't like what they see posted to just disregard something because they claim it's from an alt or a biased source. Lots easier than responding and proving something is right or not. For instance no one doubts that The Rachel Maddow Show is a biased program but if she posts actual tweets from Donald Trump that doesn't make them fake. Just that I know which direction her reaction will probably be. WSS I have no reason to make ALT accounts I have no issue having the administration to very at any time. I just came to have some fun with other Browns fans. Being the off season football talk is slow so I decided there is always plenty of nonsense going on in politics. Thank you for your response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chemist Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 On 4/16/2019 at 1:51 PM, TexasAg1969 said: Anyone who ignores the laws of this country with impunity to run the country as he wants has indeed become a dictator. At the moment that is exactly what he is doing. Remember Hitler and Chavez were also elected, but they also ran their countries without conforming to the existing laws and by systematically tearing down the governmental checks on their power. So for not recognizing this in Herr Trump, you have negative credibility. Hitler was not elected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Chemist said: Hitler was not elected. Semantics. His party was elected via coalition and as head of his party he was appointed by his party as Chancellor. So under their system of government he was elected. https://www.quora.com/Was-Adolf-Hitler-democratically-elected-What-does-his-ascendancy-show-us-about-human-nature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 On 4/16/2019 at 1:51 PM, TexasAg1969 said: Anyone who ignores the laws of this country with impunity to run the country as he wants has indeed become a dictator. At the moment that is exactly what he is doing. Remember Hitler and Chavez were also elected, but they also ran their countries without conforming to the existing laws and by systematically tearing down the governmental checks on their power. So for not recognizing this in Herr Trump, you have negative credibility. more stupid slur vs our MAGA president you didn't vote for. Get freaking over it, or STFU already, that's my opinion. Your slurs never say what laws he "ignores" Fact is, the Supreme Court keeps agreeing with PRes Trump. Even the fed court of appeals agreed with him. meanwhile, it's YOUR leftwing democrat socialists who are facing indictments and prison time, now that rosenstein has a boss that has not recused himself. Not once have you ever given any reason for your meaningless slurs. You just don't want him to win in 2020. Sounds like all you do is level hate speech at Pres Trump. Pretty cowardly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said: Semantics. His party was elected via coalition and as head of his party he was appointed by his party as Chancellor. So under their system of government he was elected. https://www.quora.com/Was-Adolf-Hitler-democratically-elected-What-does-his-ascendancy-show-us-about-human-nature Of course he was elected. Among other things scapegoating one group of people like the Democrat Party does with Rich, old white Etc and Promises of socialism to revive an actually devastated economy. People eat that shit up. Our economy is great even at its lowest point in the last 20 years is great compared to Germany before the Takeover. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chemist Posted April 18, 2019 Report Share Posted April 18, 2019 5 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: Semantics. His party was elected via coalition and as head of his party he was appointed by his party as Chancellor. So under their system of government he was elected. https://www.quora.com/Was-Adolf-Hitler-democratically-elected-What-does-his-ascendancy-show-us-about-human-nature He lost the only election he participated in. He was reluctantly appointed Chancellor by the President after the communist party started gaining popularity as a means to stop the commies (the Nazi party actually lost seats in Congress in the election before Hitlers appointment). He did not gain total authority until President Von Hindenburg died and (Hitler) abolished the office of President. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.