Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OldBrownsFan

Mark Levin on the border wall standoff

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Democrats Funded a 287 Mile Wall in Jordan – LAST YEAR! But Won’t Fund Border Wall in US!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/democrats-funded-a-287-mile-wall-in-jordan-last-year-but-wont-fund-border-wall-in-us/

...but walls are immoral???

Yet another quality source from Old. (<-- this is sarcasm baby cow)

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

A study released  in journal Science Advances: Americans 65 and older were four times more likely to share fake news on social media than younger people during the 2016 election season. 

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaau4586

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

Yet another quality source from Old. (<-- this is sarcasm baby cow)

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

A study released  in journal Science Advances: Americans 65 and older were four times more likely to share fake news on social media than younger people during the 2016 election season. 

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaau4586

 

 

 

Attacking the messenger again and not the message (but if that is all you got?). The facts are the democrats voted to fund 287 million dollars to build a wall in Jordan less than a year ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Attacking the messenger again and not the message (but if that is all you got?). The facts are the democrats voted to fund 287 million dollars to build a wall in Jordan less than a year ago.

When the messenger lies and twists the truth all the time you stop going to them for messages. That is just common sense. Well unless you don't care about what it true or not.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

When the messenger lies and twists the truth all the time you stop going to them for messages. That is just common sense. Well unless you don't care about what it true or not.

 

Simple question... did the democrats vote to fund $287 million to build a wall in Jordan a little less than a year ago or not? Yes they did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Simple question... did the democrats vote to fund $287 million to build a wall in Jordan a little less than a year ago or not? Yes they did.

Demo vote on a bill that was over 2200 pages and which include this:

SEC. 9011. Up to $500,000,000 of funds appropriated by this Act for the Defense Security Cooperation Agency in ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’ may be used to provide assistance to the Government of Jordan to support the armed forces of Jordan and to enhance security along its borders.

I'll looking for the word wall in there..... Nope it isn't there. So you and your source are liars? Or purposely misleading people, so it fits your narrative?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

Demo vote on a bill that was over 2200 pages and which include this:

SEC. 9011. Up to $500,000,000 of funds appropriated by this Act for the Defense Security Cooperation Agency in ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide’’ may be used to provide assistance to the Government of Jordan to support the armed forces of Jordan and to enhance security along its borders.

I'll looking for the word wall in there..... Nope it isn't there. So you and your source are liars? Or purposely misleading people, so it fits your narrative?

Sure the dems didn't vote to fund the wall in Jordan....

The Great Wall of Jordan: How the US Wants to Keep the Islamic State Out

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/pa4vqz/the-great-wall-of-jordan-how-the-us-wants-to-keep-the-islamic-state-out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, OldBrownsFan said:

Sure the dems didn't vote to fund the wall in Jordan....

The Great Wall of Jordan: How the US Wants to Keep the Islamic State Out

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/pa4vqz/the-great-wall-of-jordan-how-the-us-wants-to-keep-the-islamic-state-out

Non Cheetos Jesus, Old you just saw what they vote for. It doesn't say wall, even it if it did the bill was 2200 pages long. But you, like some many of your tribe, lack the ability to admit you were wrong. Mistakes give you a chance to improve yourself, never admitting you make a mistake mean you miss out on those opportunities. Then you end up being being baby cow. Why don't you post some memes now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

Non Cheetos Jesus, Old you just saw what they vote for. It doesn't say wall, even it if it did the bill was 2200 pages long. But you, like some many of your tribe, lack the ability to admit you were wrong. Mistakes give you a chance to improve yourself, never admitting you make a mistake mean you miss out on those opportunities. Then you end up being being baby cow. Why don't you post some memes now. 

Baloney they voted for that wall. (immoral as it may be). 

Because the bill was 2200 pages are you saying they voted for funding the wall out of ignorance of what was in the bill. You could possibly be right there as Pelosi once said we have to pass the bill to find out what is in the bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Politicians are hypocrites? Say it ain’t so!

What is tolerated is based entirely on the team doing it. If a Dem Pres had implemented a bumpstock ban, Republicans would be shitting glass about unintended consequences. Trump does it and the NRA says “please sir may I have another”.

The extreme partisanship is amusing, in a very sad way.

Remember when overcompensating males were carrying their AR-15's to places like Target and Sonic because Obama and His Negro Army were coming for their guns? And yet Trump signed an actual ban and...not a peep. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Baloney they voted for that wall. (immoral as it may be). 

Because the bill was 2200 pages are you saying they voted for funding the wall out of ignorance of what was in the bill. You could possibly be right there as Pelosi once said we have to pass the bill to find out what is in the bill.

Right because when bills are pass the people that vote for them are for everything in the bill. (<-- this is sarcasm baby cow) It's funny you won't let this worthless point go. Demo are doing what the people who voted for them wanted them to do. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

Right because when bills are pass the people that vote for them are for everything in the bill. (<-- this is sarcasm baby cow) It's funny you won't let this worthless point go. Demo are doing what the people who voted for them wanted them to do. 

 

The dems voted to fund a wall in Jordan and that is the bottom line whether they voted for it out of ignorance of what was in the bill or not .

Angel mom offers to bring Nancy & Chuck her son’s ashes to give them perspective on what’s ‘immoral’

An Angel Mom offered to give Democrat leaders a grim “show and tell” reminder of the consequences of not securing the southern U.S. border.

Sabine Durden carries with her the ashes of her son, who was killed at 30 years old when an illegal immigrant slammed into his motorcycle, and wants House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer to understand what the fight for a border wall means.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/01/10/angel-mom-offers-to-bring-nancy-chuck-her-sons-ashes-to-give-them-perspective-of-whats-immoral-712084

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

The dems voted to fund a wall in Jordan and that is the bottom line whether they voted for it out of ignorance of what was in the bill or not .

Angel mom offers to bring Nancy & Chuck her son’s ashes to give them perspective on what’s ‘immoral’

An Angel Mom offered to give Democrat leaders a grim “show and tell” reminder of the consequences of not securing the southern U.S. border.

Sabine Durden carries with her the ashes of her son, who was killed at 30 years old when an illegal immigrant slammed into his motorcycle, and wants House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer to understand what the fight for a border wall means.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/01/10/angel-mom-offers-to-bring-nancy-chuck-her-sons-ashes-to-give-them-perspective-of-whats-immoral-712084

Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies 

appeal to emotion

You attempted to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.

Appeals to emotion include appeals to fear, envy, hatred, pity, pride, and more. It's important to note that sometimes a logically coherent argument may inspire emotion or have an emotional aspect, but the problem and fallacy occurs when emotion is used instead of a logical argument, or to obscure the fact that no compelling rational reason exists for one's position. Everyone, bar sociopaths, is affected by emotion, and so appeals to emotion are a very common and effective argument tactic, but they're ultimately flawed, dishonest, and tend to make one's opponents justifiably emotional.

Example: Luke didn't want to eat his sheep's brains with chopped liver and brussel sprouts, but his father told him to think about the poor, starving children in a third world country who weren't fortunate enough to have any food at all.

 

It's also antidote evident so it a double fallacy. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is for cccjwh mz the pussy:

Immigration-Immoral-High-Ground-768x549.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan Crenshaw Embarrasses Nancy Pelosi After her Latest Dumb Immigration Comment

It’s been an embarrassing week for Democrats and the media this week (see This Photo of Schumer-Pelosi Watching Their Disastrous Response is Everything and CBS Deletes Fact-Check on Donald Trump. Because it Proved Trump was Right). Highlighted yesterday by Nancy Pelosi’s latest refusal for the wall. Her reasoning: People will tunnel under it.

 

At least the people who started a GoFundMe page to build a giant escalator were being sarcastic. But the greatest Democrat leader who has ever lived is super serious. The illegal immigrants will tunnel, she tells us. TUNNEL!!!!!

Maybe the smell of poop from the streets of her native San Francisco has caused Nancytron’s CPU to malfunction. Who knows.

Here comes everyone’s favorite freshman Dan Crenshaw with the heat.

 

Ah yes, the tunnel myth. Because it’s so easy to build tunnels. No one would ever notice. Might as well just do nothing, now that the tunneling option has been exposed.

Can we have a serious conversation now? That’d be great.

I know Crenshaw is new here, but no. No, we can’t have a serious conversation now. If it’s an issue being debated in Congress, a serious conversation is out of the question. We’re strictly going to focus on tunnels, how they’re made, and what to do with the extra dirt. Specifically how illegal immigrants will hide sacks of dirt in their pants and spread it about randomly in front of the Germans. My favorite part is when Esteban McQueeno tries jumping a motorbike over Trump’s wall.

 

 

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/dan-crenshaw-embarrasses-nancy-pelosi-after-her-latest-dumb-immigration-comment/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dste Ace said:

The extreme partisanship is amusing, in a very sad way.

Remember when overcompensating males were carrying their AR-15's to places like Target and Sonic because Obama and His Negro Army were coming for their guns? And yet Trump signed an actual ban and...not a peep. 

I remember, and here’s a pic of one of Obama’s boys checking a guy for weapons.

DFC32E2D-9D4E-4563-BE57-3B758C29C505.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ccc mz the pussy isn't as smart as Hank Johnson

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol

hank makes cccjwh mz the pussy, tex and woody proud with his liberal brilliance:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol.

yeah, not one word about the ignorance of Hank Johnson. He's their hero.

Emotional weird knee jerkie:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Canton Dawg said:

I remember, and here’s a pic of one of Obama’s boys checking a guy for weapons.

DFC32E2D-9D4E-4563-BE57-3B758C29C505.jpeg

And now, for something completely different...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What, appeal to emotion??? Never.

I hear how only liberals are swayed by emotion

 

 

"STOP BEING SO EMOTIONAL!" - he said emotionally

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OldBrownsFan said:

The dems voted to fund a wall in Jordan and that is the bottom line whether they voted for it out of ignorance of what was in the bill or not .

Angel mom offers to bring Nancy & Chuck her son’s ashes to give them perspective on what’s ‘immoral’

An Angel Mom offered to give Democrat leaders a grim “show and tell” reminder of the consequences of not securing the southern U.S. border.

Sabine Durden carries with her the ashes of her son, who was killed at 30 years old when an illegal immigrant slammed into his motorcycle, and wants House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer to understand what the fight for a border wall means.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/01/10/angel-mom-offers-to-bring-nancy-chuck-her-sons-ashes-to-give-them-perspective-of-whats-immoral-712084

If building a wall will end all car crash deaths, then I'm all for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, tiamat63 said:

You ladies should just meet up and Duke it out.  $500 of my own money to the winner. 

LOL..can we bring guns?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×