Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OldBrownsFan

Mark Levin on the border wall standoff

Recommended Posts

The border wall standoff exposes the Democrats' vile hypocrisy, and the leftist propaganda is flowing like a river. Levin discusses and explains the important facts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

because he's standing on principle, woodypeckerhead.

you wouldn't know anything about that, never have.

doesn't seem like you ever will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, calfoxwc said:

because he's standing on principle, woodypeckerhead.

you wouldn't know anything about that, never have.

doesn't seem like you ever will.

If I've said it once, I've said it a million times

You're everything that's wrong with American politics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yet, that means nothing because you don't explain why you make such a stupid claim, woodypeckerhead.

You just emotionally knee jerk.

and you peck:

8eqJnHR.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jbluhm86 said:

 

Levin points out that if any president lawfully acts on this statute of the powers they have under a national emergency that the congress can still over rule the president with a simple majority in the House and the Senate as well as it being able to be challenged in Federal Court. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does Mark Levin get his own thread. What a right wing radio host is blaming the demo for the shutdown? Holy shit stop the presses, breaking news "Water is wet."

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump blamed Obama for the last shutdown. Likewise, this one is on Trump. The guy made a campaign promise that was pie in the sky and people bought it. Mexico isn't paying for the wall. The amount of property that will have to be stolen via eminent domain will be massive.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Trump blamed Obama for the last shutdown. Likewise, this one is on Trump. The guy made a campaign promise that was pie in the sky and people bought it. Mexico isn't paying for the wall. The amount of property that will have to be stolen via eminent domain will be massive.

For the record they should shut it down more often, especially in budgetary matters. No reason to have budgetary laws with hard caps if you're not ever going to use them. Plus how much would you care if he didn't accept responsibility for the shutdown? The lefties are going to blame him anyway, right? And the guys on the right won't care, at least not much. Most of them are on the side of border security. 

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cccjwh said:

How does Mark Levin get his own thread. What a right wing radio host is blaming the demo for the shutdown? Holy shit stop the presses, breaking news "Water is wet."

 

 

Levin is talking about the hypocrisy of the left many of whom like Obama, Hillary Clinton and Schumer who all  (not that long ago) were saying the same radical things that Trump is saying about the need for border security. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Levin is talking about the hypocrisy of the left many of whom like Obama, Hillary Clinton and Schumer who all  (not that long ago) were saying the same radical things that Trump is saying about the need for border security. 

What a right wing radio host the shit talking demos? You don't say. Next thing you know Rush Limbaugh will ignore his own party hypocrisy and start saying all demos are socialists.  Wait let me post an article about how GOP use to outraged when leaders lied. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cccjwh said:

What a right wing radio host the shit talking demos? You don't say. Next thing you know Rush Limbaugh will ignore his own party hypocrisy and start saying all demos are socialists. 

Instead of criticizing the messenger why not address the message of the dems hypocrisy on border security?

25 Years of Democrats' Illegal Immigration Hypocrisy

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-02-01-25-years-of-democrats-illegal-immigration-hypocrisy/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Instead of criticizing the messenger why not address the message of the dems hypocrisy on border security?

25 Years of Democrats' Illegal Immigration Hypocrisy

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-02-01-25-years-of-democrats-illegal-immigration-hypocrisy/

 

Usually any site claiming common sense...............................doesn't have any.😜

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Usually any site claiming common sense...............................doesn't have any.😜

Look at the actual videos of what the dems have been saying for the last 25 years about the need for border security  (which speaks for itself) and then make a common sense judgment they are being hypocrites today. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Instead of criticizing the messenger why not address the message of the dems hypocrisy on border security?

25 Years of Democrats' Illegal Immigration Hypocrisy

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-02-01-25-years-of-democrats-illegal-immigration-hypocrisy/

 

That's pretty easy. The people who the demo represent changed their minds about the wall. So their representatives changed their position. That is how Representative Democracies are supposed to work. Maybe you could explain why Trump is ignoring the 64% who are opposed to shutting down the government for the wall?

American voters oppose building a wall on the Mexican border 54 - 43 percent and say 54 - 44 percent the wall is not necessary to improve border security, according to a Quinnipiac University National Poll released today. 

This is the highest level of support for the wall since the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pe-ack) University National Poll first asked the question in November 2016. 

Opposition to the wall is 57 - 40 percent among women, 90 - 8 percent among Democrats. Republicans support the wall 86 - 14 percent. Independent voters are divided as 45 percent support the wall, with 51 percent opposed. Men also are divided as 47 percent support the wall, with 51 percent opposed. White voters are divided 49 - 50 percent. Opposition is 78 - 16 percent among black voters and 68 - 27 percent among Hispanic voters. 

By a wider 62 - 34 percent, American voters oppose shutting down the government because of funding differences over the wall. Republicans support shutting down the government over the wall 59 - 33 percent, the only listed party, gender, education, age or racial group supporting a shutdown. 

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2590

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And not one time did this MF mention the lack of cowbell in modern  rock music.   Like... How am I supposed to look at my President if he won't address that big issue?!?! 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

That's pretty easy. The people who the demo represent changed their minds about the wall. So their representatives changed their position. That is how Representative Democracies are supposed to work. Maybe you could explain why Trump is ignoring the 64% who are opposed to shutting down the government for the wall?

American voters oppose building a wall on the Mexican border 54 - 43 percent and say 54 - 44 percent the wall is not necessary to improve border security, according to a Quinnipiac University National Poll released today. 

This is the highest level of support for the wall since the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pe-ack) University National Poll first asked the question in November 2016. 

Opposition to the wall is 57 - 40 percent among women, 90 - 8 percent among Democrats. Republicans support the wall 86 - 14 percent. Independent voters are divided as 45 percent support the wall, with 51 percent opposed. Men also are divided as 47 percent support the wall, with 51 percent opposed. White voters are divided 49 - 50 percent. Opposition is 78 - 16 percent among black voters and 68 - 27 percent among Hispanic voters. 

By a wider 62 - 34 percent, American voters oppose shutting down the government because of funding differences over the wall. Republicans support shutting down the government over the wall 59 - 33 percent, the only listed party, gender, education, age or racial group supporting a shutdown. 

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2590

Polls are highly inaccurate nowadays due to cell phone usage.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tiamat63 said:

And not one time did this MF mention the lack of cowbell in modern  rock music.   Like... How am I supposed to look at my President if he won't address that big issue?!?! 

Maybe they need some more cowbell in rap music and/or country music too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Polls are highly inaccurate nowadays due to cell phone usage.

Bahahaha. 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

 

 

You keep on living in your safe place. "but but but the polls aren't accurate..." 🤣

 

It was a good year for polls. This time, they got the basic story of the election right: a Democratic House and a Republican Senate. And on average, the final polls were closer to the results than any election in a decade. Best of all, the polls were relatively unbiased, meaning that one party didn’t systematically overperform or underperform its final poll results.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/21/upshot/polls-2018-midterms-accuracy.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the biased NY Times for a source....not acceptable.

1 minute ago, cccjwh said:

You keep on living in your safe place. 

 

It was a good year for polls. This time, they got the basic story of the election right: a Democratic House and a Republican Senate. And on average, the final polls were closer to the results than any election in a decade. Best of all, the polls were relatively unbiased, meaning that one party didn’t systematically overperform or underperform its final poll results.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/21/upshot/polls-2018-midterms-accuracy.html

When it comes to bad polling just say president Trump...

Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning: Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation

NEW YORK (Reuters) - With hours to go before Americans vote, Democrat Hillary Clinton has about a 90 percent chance of defeating Republican Donald Trump in the race for the White House, according to the final Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll/clinton-has-90-percent-chance-of-winning-reuters-ipsos-states-of-the-nation-idUSKBN1322J1

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Using the biased NY Times for a source....not acceptable.

When it comes to bad polling just say president Trump...

Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning: Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation

NEW YORK (Reuters) - With hours to go before Americans vote, Democrat Hillary Clinton has about a 90 percent chance of defeating Republican Donald Trump in the race for the White House, according to the final Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll/clinton-has-90-percent-chance-of-winning-reuters-ipsos-states-of-the-nation-idUSKBN1322J1

I'm sorry, do you not understand how percentage work? 

And...

LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

Although the NY Times is a left wing rag you like to use it alot so this one is fer you:

NY Times..Hillary Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html

 

Non Cheetos Jesus you really don't understand how percentages work.... I would laugh but it is kind of sad.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cccjwh mz the pussy translation:

  "I'm a pouty little ignorant beeach but I get a little attention so I feeeeeel better about myself...sometimes..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump won even though most polls predicted he wouldn't. Now every poll that says something I disagree with us invalid because Trump. 

 

Trump's election had the hidden consequence of being a big blow to the publics understanding and acceptance of math and statistics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cccjwh said:

Non Cheetos Jesus you really don't understand how percentages work.... I would laugh but it is kind of sad.

 

Percentages based on what???? bad polling that is what ...there you go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×