OldBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 I think one of the reasons this country is so divided and hate filled today is the rhetoric being used. This is but one example from a professor at Georgetown University: Georgetown University “distinguished associate professor” Christine Fair thinks all white Republican senators in the Brett Kavanaugh hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee ”deserve miserable deaths.” Oh, and after they’re dead, the professor — who describes herself in her Twitter bio as an “inter-sectional feminist, pitbull apostle, scotch devotee, nontheist, resister” — thinks they should be castrated and fed to pigs. “Look at thus [sic] chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.” Fair wrote on Twitter. https://constitution.com/professor-suggests-gruesome-and-unholy-fate-for-white-republicans/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 Yet nothing on the news. Imagine if it were a conservative professor saying this about Democratic Senators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 the left wants violence to happen. Mad Maxine Waters etc etc...are practically begging for it to start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 imagine if a kid sang about faggits not going to heaven during sunday morning mass.... stop getting hooked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 43 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Yet nothing on the news. Imagine if it were a conservative professor saying this about Democratic Senators. A conservative professor on most universities is a distinct minority but I doubt if the university would be rushing to defend a conservative professor if the roles were reversed. I would bet the free speech argument Georgetown is making to defend this liberal professor would go out the window in favor of saying the comments were hate speech. Victim of Facebook’s War Against Conservatives: My Account Has Been Permanently Terminated by Facebook https://barbwire.com/victim-of-facebooks-war-against-conservatives-my-account-has-been-permanently-terminated-by-facebook/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said: A conservative professor on most universities is a distinct minority but I doubt if the university would be rushing to defend a conservative professor if the roles were reversed. I would bet the free speech argument Georgetown is making to defend this liberal professor would go out the window in favor of saying the comments were hate speech. Victim of Facebook’s War Against Conservatives: My Account Has Been Permanently Terminated by Facebook https://barbwire.com/victim-of-facebooks-war-against-conservatives-my-account-has-been-permanently-terminated-by-facebook/ https://m.facebook.com/julio.severo u mean that julio severo who's fb page i just accessed? ahahahahaahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahaha u fukking sheeple peeple smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 Just now, Clevfan4life said: https://m.facebook.com/julio.severo u mean that julio severo who's fb page i just accessed? ahahahahaahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahaha u fukking sheeple peeple smh Did you read the article???? Right at the top it said it was updated: Update: Seven hours after I published this article in my personal blog, Facebook unlocked my account, AFTER I sent my documents to it. This is the second time that Facebook wants my documents. Years ago, Facebook also disabled my account and only unlocked it after I sent documents proving that I am Julio Severo, the official author of the statements that I publish against the homosexual agenda and Islam. How Facebook will use these documents, I do not know, but I will follow the words of Jesus: “Blessed are you when they persecute you…” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 "To prevent Google from celebrating pride month on their website, Severo suggests the government intervene “militarily,” suggesting that troops be sent to Google headquarters to, “stop its abuses against its users and the American family.” ok, now im starting to see why the guys getting blocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 he's suggesting the military raid google xause they put a rainbow flag on their homepage. U guys who are always talking about the govt coming for ur guns, might wanna consider that precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said: he's suggesting the military raid google xause they put a rainbow flag on their homepage. U guys who are always talking about the govt coming for ur guns, might wanna consider that precedent. Julio Severo, writing on BarbWire, a right wing conservative website run by Matt Barber, shared similar opinions. Severo voiced his frustration with Google show their support for Pride Month on their own website. “I was searching through Google last week when the Google page flashed before my eyes, ‘Celebrate Pride Month’ #ThisIsFamily. This propaganda was accompanied by homosexual flags,” said Severo. The site featured three flag emoji in the small notice at the bottom of their main page, with transgender and bi pride flags alongside the classic rainbow flag. “A whole month to celebrate… perverted homosexual sex and pervert the meaning of family for the advantage of the homosexual agenda,” states Severo. “Cannot Google dedicate a whole month for the celebration of the natural family?” He continues, “Normal people have no pride in anal sex. They are proud of the natural family: a man, a woman and children. No one is proud of a group of worshippers of anal sex celebrating homosexual sex!” Severo complains that Google has never mentioned Christmas or Easter, which he cites as celebrations “massively recognized by Americans.” The popular search engine doesn’t mark religious holidays — only secular ones. I can't find the quote about the military but I agree with the above: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 The White House Must Be Exorcised Of Bisexual Native American Demons, Says Christian Writer It's making more and more sense...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 "The first step for a “visitation” of such spirits is invocation — which was made at the White House. Homosexual spirits heard. Their presence is in the place where they were invoked, until their expelling, which can be done only by people who know and use the authority of Jesus’ name." starting to see it now OBF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 An interaction between spirits of homosexuality and Indian religions is not uncommon. In Brazil, the most prominent homosexualists are adherents of African and Indian religions, very similar to voodoo. These religions embrace all forms of homosexuality as a gift from their “gods.” Such deities are considered demons in the Christian worldview. In Christianity and Judaism, homosexuality is accepted only when there is apostasy in those religions. But in Indian religions, heavily affected by witchcraft, no apostasy is necessary for a homosexual presence in their practices, because homosexuality is active among their witchdoctors and other adherents. -Julio Severo Severo described the spirits/gay demons as being “invisible, lethal and destructive” — which is fascinating given that, as far as anyone knows, no one has ever actually been murdered by one… Still, I think we ought to give him (or his preferred gay demon exorcist) a shot, if only on the off chance that we could get to see someone spewing rainbow-colored pea soup all over the White House china. how bout now obf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 this dude is "obessed" with sodomy....for real. https://medium.com/@juliosevero/anal-sex-love-or-harm-67e2a6772850 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 almost every thing I read of this guy, he works the numero dos intrusion somehow into the point he's trying to make..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 there's something about billy graham that I can't read cause it's in Spanish...but I think I see some references to something "anal". So he manages to critique billy graham and again, work the butt sechs into it. Yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 6 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said: An interaction between spirits of homosexuality and Indian religions is not uncommon. In Brazil, the most prominent homosexualists are adherents of African and Indian religions, very similar to voodoo. These religions embrace all forms of homosexuality as a gift from their “gods.” Such deities are considered demons in the Christian worldview. In Christianity and Judaism, homosexuality is accepted only when there is apostasy in those religions. But in Indian religions, heavily affected by witchcraft, no apostasy is necessary for a homosexual presence in their practices, because homosexuality is active among their witchdoctors and other adherents. -Julio Severo Severo described the spirits/gay demons as being “invisible, lethal and destructive” — which is fascinating given that, as far as anyone knows, no one has ever actually been murdered by one… Still, I think we ought to give him (or his preferred gay demon exorcist) a shot, if only on the off chance that we could get to see someone spewing rainbow-colored pea soup all over the White House china. how bout now obf? Ephesians 6:12 : For we wrestle not against flesh and blood (other people) but against principalites, powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in heavenly places. He is not off the mark. Behind sins are demonic forces. The bible teaches it. Jesus recognized it. When He told the Apostle Peter to "get behind me satan" He was not talking to Peter He was talking to the demonic forces influencing Peter. There is a spiritual realm that you don't reccognize but for believers like myself we see this spiritual realm as even more real than the physcial realm because out of the spiritual realm God created the physical realm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 http://www.livingout.org/the-bible-and-ssa 1. Genesis 19 Sodom has become so associated with homosexual conduct that its name was for many ears a byword for it. But is 'sodomy' really what Sodom is about? The account describes the men of the city attempting to forcibly have sex with two angelic visitors to the city, who have appeared in the form of men. Later parts of the Old Testament accuse Sodom of a range of sins: oppression, adultery, lying, abetting criminals, arrogance, complacency and indifference to the poor. None of these even mentions homosexual conduct. This has led some people to wonder if we have read homosexuality into the Genesis narrative, when in fact the real issue was social oppression and injustice. But a close look at the text makes it clear that homosexuality was in fact involved. Although the Hebrew word for “know” (yada) can just mean to “get to know” someone (rather than to “know” them sexually), it is clear from the crowd’s aggression (and Lot’s dreadful attempt at offering them his daughters as an alternative) that they are looking for much more than social acquaintance. Hence what happens next: the angels warn Lot that judgment is imminent (v.13). In the New Testament, Jude adds an important insight: ...just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. (Jude 7) What happened at Sodom is clearly meant to be something of a cautionary tale. Jude makes it clear that their ungodliness involved sexual immorality. They were punished for sexual sin along with the other sins of which they were guilty. Jude also highlights the nature of their sexual desires: they pursued “unnatural desire” (literally, unnatural “flesh”). Some have suggested that this relates to the fact that the visitors to the city were angelic; Jude references angelic sin earlier in his letter. But these angels appeared as men, and the baying crowd outside Lot’s house showed no evidence of knowing they were angelic. Their desire was to have sex with the men staying with Lot. In other words, it was the homosexual nature of their desires, and not just the violent expression of them, that is highlighted in the New Testament. 2. Leviticus 18 & 20 Leviticus contains two well known statements about homosexual activity: You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination. (Leviticus 18:22) If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. (Leviticus 20:13) “An abomination” is often used to describe idolatry, and some suggest these verses are not condemning homosexual behaviour in general, but only the cultic prostitution connected to pagan temples. It is also often claimed that the fact that these prohibitions appear in a book full of other laws which no Christians think they are expected to follow today suggests that they should not be taken as having abiding moral relevance. But to take the first objection, the language used is not that specific; it refers to lying with a man “as with a woman,” - that is, in very general terms. Secondly, the surrounding verses in each instance describe other forms of sexual sin (such as incest, adultery and bestiality), none of which is anything to do with pagan temples or idolatry, and which we would take as being applicable to Christians today. It is moral, rather than just pagan religious behaviour that’s in view. Furthermore, Leviticus 20:13 highlights both male parties equally, again suggesting general, consensual homosexual activity (as opposed to gay rape or a forced relationship). 3. Romans 1:18-32 Turning to the New Testament, Romans 1 has much to say about the nature and character of homosexual behaviour. Paul’s aim in these early chapters is to demonstrate that the whole world is unrighteous in God’s sight, and therefore in need of salvation. In Romans 1:18-32 he zeroes in on the Gentile world, describing the way it has turned away from God and embraced idolatry. The particular details in the passage may indicate that Paul is using the Greco-Roman culture surrounding his readers as a case in point. Gentile society faces God’s wrath because it has suppressed the truth that God has revealed about himself in creation (verses 18-20). In the verses that follow, Paul illustrates how this has happened, giving three examples of how what has been known about God has been exchanged for something else: they exchange the glory of God for images of creatures (verse 23); the truth of God for a lie, leading to full-blown idolatry, worshipping created things (verse 25); and reject the knowledge of God (verse 28), exchanging “natural” relations for “unnatural” ones: For this reason God gave them up to dishonourable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. (Romans 1:26-27) Two important and sobering truths are apparent from these verses: 1. Homosexual desire is not what God originally intended. This is not to say that homosexual desire is the only thing that God did not originally intend. All of our desires have been distorted by sin. But Paul does describe both lesbian and male homosexual behaviour as “unnatural.” Some have argued this refers to what is natural to the people themselves, so that what is in view is heterosexual people engaging in homosexual activity and thereby going against their “natural” orientation. According to this view, Paul is not condemning all homosexual behaviour, but only that which goes against the person’s own sexual inclinations. But this view cannot be supported by the passage itself. The words for “natural” and “against nature” refer not to our subjective experience of what feels natural to us, but to the fixed way of things in creation. The nature that Paul says homosexual behaviour contradicts is God’s purpose for us, revealed in creation and reiterated throughout Scripture. Paul’s reference to lesbianism as well as male homosexual conduct also supports the idea that he is condemning all homosexual activity, and not just the man-boy relationships that occurred in Roman culture. The strength of Paul’s language here should not make us think that homosexual conduct is the worst or only form of sinful behaviour. Paul may be highlighting it because it is a particularly vivid example, and may have been especially pertinent for his readers in Rome given their cultural context. Either way it is illustrative of something that is the case for all of us: as we reject God we find ourselves craving what we are not naturally designed to do. This is as true of a heterosexual person as of a homosexual person. There are no grounds in this passage for singling out homosexual people for any kind of special condemnation. The same passage indicts all of us. 2. Our distorted desires are a sign that we have turned away from God. It is important to recognize that Paul is talking here in social rather than individual terms. He is describing what happens to culture as a whole, rather than particular people. The presence of same-sex desire in some of us is not an indication that we’ve turned from God more than others, but a sign that humanity as a whole has done so. It is not the only sign, and in everyone there is no doubt more than one sign or another - but it is a sign nevertheless. Paul writes that alongside the gospel, “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men” (Romans 1:19). Though there will one day be a “day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed” (Romans 2:5), there is already a present-day expression of God’s anger against sin. We see God’s wrath in this: he gives us what we want. In response to the exchanges Paul has described, we see three instances of God giving us over to live in the outcome of our sinful desires. This is his present-day judgment against sin. We ask for a reality without him and he gives us a taster of it. In each case the “giving over” results in an intensification of the sin and the further breakdown of human behaviour. God gives humanity over to impure lusts and dishonourable bodily conduct (verse 24), and to “dishonourable passions” (verse 26). The exchanging of natural relations for unnatural leads to being given over to a “debased mind” and the flourishing of “all manner of unrighteousness” which Paul unpacks in a long list of antisocial behaviours (verse 28-31). Sin leads to judgment, but judgment also leads to further sin. The presence of all these sinful acts is a reminder that we live in a world which has deliberately turned away from God in all sorts of ways, and is therefore experiencing a foretaste of God’s anger and courting its final outpouring on the day of judgment. Again, homosexual activity is certainly not the only sinful act. All of us are guilty. But it listed among them as one of the ways in which human nature as a whole has been changed from what God originally intended. 4. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Paul writes: Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Corinthians 6:9-10) In these verses Paul is describing different kinds of people who (unless they repent) will be excluded from the kingdom of God. Four kinds relate to sexual sin, and two of those specifically to homosexual behaviour. The ESV takes the latter and puts them together as “men who practice homosexuality”, while the NIV translates them as “male prostitutes and homosexual offenders”. The first of the two terms relating to homosexuality is malakoi, which translated literally means “soft ones.” In classical literature it could be used as a pejorative term for men who were effeminate; for the younger, passive partner in a pederastic (man-boy) relationship; and to refer to male prostitutes (hence the NIV’s translation). In 1 Corinthians 6 malakoi comes in a list describing general forms of sexual sin, and the context suggests Paul is most likely using it in a broad way to refer to the passive partners in homosexual intercourse, as we are about to see. The second term he Paul uses. is arsenokoitai. This is a compound of “male” (arsen) and “intercourse” (koites, literally “bed”). These are the two words used in the Greek translation of Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, suggesting that Paul is linking back to those two passages. (Paul has already just made a connection with Leviticus in 1 Corinthians 5, where he condemns the church’s acceptance of a man living with his father’s wife using language that echoes Leviticus 18:7-8. For Paul, the sexual sins which Leviticus prohibits remain forbidden for New Testament Christians.) Arsenokoitai, then, is a general term for male same-sex sex, and its pairing with malakoi indicates that Paul is addressing both the active and passive partners in homosexual sex. So what does all this mean for our understanding of homosexuality? 1. Homosexual sin is serious. Paul says the active and unrepentant homosexual, as with all active, unrepentant sinners, will not enter God’s kingdom. Paul urges his readers not to be deceived on this point. He assumes there will be those who deny this teaching, and argue that some forms of homosexual conduct are acceptable to God. But Paul is clear: homosexual conduct leads people to destruction. This is a serious issue. 2. Homosexual sin is not unique. Paul’s list includes other forms of sexual sin (sexual immorality and adultery), and it includes non-sexual forms of sin (drunkenness and theft, for example). Homosexual sin is incredibly serious, but it is not alone in being so. It is wicked, but so is, say, greed. We must not imply that homosexual sex is the sin of our age. If we are to be faithful to Scripture, we must also preach against theft, greed, drunkenness, reviling, and defrauding others, many of which are also trivialised in our society, and all of which also characterize the unrighteous. 3. Homosexual sin is not inescapable. Paul continues in verse 11: “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of God” (1 Corinthians 6:11). These forms of behaviour are not appropriate for the Corinthian church precisely because it is not who they are any more. Some of them clearly had been active homosexuals. They did once live in these ways. But no more. They have been washed, sanctified and justified; forgiven, cleansed from their sins, and set apart for God. They have a new standing and identity before him. However ingrained it may be in someone’s behaviour, homosexual conduct is not inescapable. It is possible for someone living a practicing gay lifestyle to be made new by God. Temptations and feelings may well linger. That Paul is warning his readers not to revert to their former way of life suggests there is still some desire to do so. But in Christ we are no longer who we were. Those who have come out of an active gay lifestyle need to understand how to see themselves. What defined us then no longer defines us now. 5. 1 Timothy 1:8-10 Here Paul writes: The law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, men who practise homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine. (1 Timothy. 1:9-10) He again uses the term arsenokoitai (translated by the ESV as “men who practice homosexuality” as a catch-all term for all forms of homosexual conduct. Also in common with 1 Corinthians, same-sex sex is mentioned among other wide-ranging sins, non-sexual as well as sexual. These forms of behaviour characterize those who are not “just” and for whom the law was given, in order to bring conviction of sin and the need for mercy. All these practices contradict “sound doctrine” and the gospel. They do not conform to the life Christians are now to lead. They go against the grain of the new identity we have in Christ. Conclusion Attempts to read these texts as anything other than prohibitions of homosexual behaviour do not ultimately work. The plain reading of each passage is the right one. It is homosexual practice in general, rather than only certain expressions of it, which are forbidden in Scripture. To attempt to demonstrate otherwise is to violate the passages themselves. Yet these very same texts list homosexuality alongside many other forms of behaviour that are also against God’s will. The very passages that show us that homosexual activity is a sin, make it very clear that it is not a unique sin. It is one example of what is wrong with all of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 I think you would agree Cal that we are to love the sinner and hate the sin. I don't hate homosexuals but because the bible so clearly condemns it as sin I don't want to be put in a position of condoning or approving of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 19 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said: I think you would agree Cal that we are to love the sinner and hate the sin. I don't hate homosexuals but because the bible so clearly condemns it as sin I don't want to be put in a position of condoning or approving of it. Absolutely. Over the years - In a work environment...I knew a few people who I found out ...were gay. Sometimes no surprise, really, but I always treated them exactly like everybody else. They never knew I knew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 u guys know alot about anal sex. 🤔 ☕ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 You're deceived by the devil Cleve! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 6 hours ago, Clevfan4life said: imagine if a kid sang about faggits not going to heaven during sunday morning mass.... stop getting hooked Ain't no homo gonna make it to heaven... It's catchy tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 50 minutes ago, MLD Woody said: You're deceived by the devil Cleve! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 49 minutes ago, MLD Woody said: It's catchy tho totes for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 1 hour ago, MLD Woody said: Ain't no homo gonna make it to heaven... It's catchy tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 2, 2018 Report Share Posted October 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: dont make me post a meme of u and cal heading out to the truckstops in matching 6in pumps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted October 3, 2018 Report Share Posted October 3, 2018 I can tell you where she went wrong........................."scotch devotee". That stuff is awful. Stick to rum.😋🍹 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted October 3, 2018 Report Share Posted October 3, 2018 10 hours ago, Clevfan4life said: imagine if a kid sang about faggits not going to heaven during sunday morning mass.... stop getting hooked Stuart Nice try with your usual "they do bad stuff too" song and dance. That's all the fucck you do around here. You're lame. It hasn't worked anywhere else and it especially won't work on this topic. It is a fact that you leftist bastards are the most vile, hateful, violent, disruptive scumbags in modern day politics. Just 4 out of the countless examples.... https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/northeastern-professor-wishes-death-on-trump https://nypost.com/2017/09/13/missiouri-senator-censured-for-trump-assassination-post/ http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-fresno-state-barbara-bush-20180419-story.html https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/07/after-anti-trump-tweets-fresno-state-removes-adjunct-professor-teaching-position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.