Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
TexasAg1969

WTF!!

Recommended Posts

Trump administration predicts a 6 degree temp rise and 30 in. sea level rise by 2100 and still disassembles EPA?

That is more than just f'n crazy. And this comes from Newsmax, not some left wing rag. Nothing like pure clean CO2 coal right?

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/globalwarming-climatechange/2018/09/28/id/883946/?ns_mail_uid=6d52df85-236f-4a8f-8332-d84fdb5d6ebf&ns_mail_job=DM6402_09292018&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010104becumf

EDIT: Correction from ft. to inches made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone in this board will be dead then.  I and a few others in here will be having a ball.  Others will be in a twilight zone dimension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

"i have a suggestion to keep u all occupied..   learn to swim.....learn to swim..."

 

Shmuck you. You don't quote Tool.  That's my job.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.

Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

30 inches. My god. 30ft would be cya to the human race. 

Sorry- I miss-wrote it. I meant 30 inches. Correction being made. Still that's 2 1/2 feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first. 

I agree, what science are referring to?

Do we have hard evidence of what is causing global warming?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

30 ft  and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton

As usual, you have no clue..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Axe said:

As usual, you have no clue..

He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Axe said:

And overall,

5735690507_23d5b93c1c.jpg

And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

calm down faggot meat

Got yer faggot meat right here young man..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well hopefully we don't all die before Mark lewisohn finishes that Beatles trilogy. 

So how many of you actually believe the catastrophic changes will be here in less than 83 years? And how many think but reassembly the EPA would save us?

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many think round about arguments against hyperbolic language designed to make you defend against statements you never made instead  of the actual issue at hand that's been debated here countless times with dozens of denier "studies" shown to be false would be a good use of time? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Current meteorological technology can’t accurately predict the path of a hurricane beyond 48 hours, but we’re supposed to believe a forecast 180 years into the future...right.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.

Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.

So any rise in water world wide is Trumps fault?  The EPA can stop this horrible disaster from happening?  I don't get it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One  thing is since the Trump Administration is predicting ill effects from global warming the conservationists will now start calling MMGW a hoax.

😳

WSS

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?

WSS

I was not in favor of a president who does not believe global warming is real and thus withdraws us from international efforts to do something about it. That does not mean I am in favor of us being left holding the bag alone, but that we at least remain in the game and not go into denial. Are there things wrong with the EPA? Sure. But wholesale dismantling is not the answer, especially when you put a pure fossil fuels guy in charge who also does not believe in global warming, but does believe in corporate profits only. 

And I never posed as a Libertarian, only said I was thinking about it after discussing with my cousin who, like me, thinks 🤴 is an absolute fraud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

liberals feel issues, they don't THINK issues.

sad state of affairs for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, calfoxwc said:

liberals feel issues, they don't THINK issues.

sad state of affairs for them.

says the people who think mmgw cant be legit cause jesus wouldnt let us down like that

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you all are a Sheet load of morons 

good luck with your lives 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

I was not in favor of a president who does not believe global warming is real and thus withdraws us from international efforts to do something about it. That does not mean I am in favor of us being left holding the bag alone, but that we at least remain in the game and not go into denial. Are there things wrong with the EPA? Sure. But wholesale dismantling is not the answer, especially when you put a pure fossil fuels guy in charge who also does not believe in global warming, but does believe in corporate profits only. 

And I never posed as a Libertarian, only said I was thinking about it after discussing with my cousin who, like me, thinks 🤴 is an absolute fraud.

Frankly I don't, and many thinking people don't, think about man-made global warming in the same way you hysterical Democrats do.

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×