calfoxwc Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 https://www.ammoland.com/2018/09/dem-gillum-threatens-florida-gun-owners-as-gop-increasingly-betrays-them/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=52f20c4ca7-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-52f20c4ca7-20770865#axzz5S7GCHPNE "It figures that collectivist Gillum, supported by the Democratic Socialists of America (whose songs promise “And when the revolution comes, We'll kill you all with knives and guns”), is determined to strip from us the means to resist those presuming the power to define and bestow our rights or redefine and withhold them. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Socialists_of_America Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 interesting that so many now think they are super-elite more than all other Americans, based on their socialist ideology. Even more interesting - is their hypocrisy. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin Everyone is free to write and say whatever he likes, without any restrictions. sure, but look at the dem socialists who are harrassing reps and their wives in restaurants, shouting down conservative speakers. The only way a farce movement can succeed to a point, is by ulterior motives to eloquent alleged "ideals" Peaceful surrender of power by the bourgeoisie is possible, if it is convinced that resistance is hopeless and if it prefers to save its skin. It is much more likely, of course, that even in small states socialism will not be achieved without civil war, and for that reason the only programme of international Social-Democracy must be recognition of civil war, though violence is, of course, alien to our ideals. Their cause is the only cause that allows for violence, even though they are against it...yep. You betcha they think it. Look at antifa. Disarmament is the ideal of socialism. There will be no wars in socialist society; consequently, disarmament will be achieved. But whoever expects that socialism will be achieved without a social revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat is not a socialist. Dictatorship is state power based directly on violence. And in the twentieth century — as in the age of civilisation generally — violence means neither a fist nor a club, but troops. To put “disarmament” in the programme is tantamount to making the general declaration: We are opposed to the use of arms. There is as little Marxism in this as there would be if we were to say: We are opposed to violence! Riiiiight. WE "have to be disarmed"...but you reserve the right to resort to violence because your socialist cult is soooo special. Read on. It's true: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/oct/01.htm We shall not achieve socialism without a struggle. But we are ready to fight, we have started it and we shall finish it with the aid of the apparatus called the Soviets. No thanks, we are AMERICA, you can shove it - we are KEEPING our guns. STFU You cannot do anything without rousing the masses to action. A plenary meeting of the Soviet must be called to decide on mass searches in Petrograd and the goods stations. To carry out these searches, each factory and company must form contingents, not on a voluntary basis: it must be the duty of everyone to take part in these searches under the threat of being deprived of his bread card. We can't expect to get anywhere unless we resort to terrorism: speculators must be shot on the spot. Moreover, bandits must be dealt with just as resolutely: they must be shot on the spot. Say, what happened to you not allowing violence in your phoney "movement" ??? You must act with all energy. Mass searches. Execution for concealing arms. Also quoted as Make mass searches and hold executions for found arms One clever writer on statecraft correctly said that if it is necessary for the realization of a well-known political goal to perform a series of brutal actions then it is necessary to do them in the most energetic manner and in the shortest time, because masses of people will not tolerate the protracted use of brutality. … Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 so, in that article, though I lost it, it talks about their right to resort to terrorism to get control. bunch of nutjobs. And emotional knee jerk liberals just vote for them without using their minds. and they don't know history. Lenin, etc, is what so many of these fool socialists learn. I guess it makes them all feel like darth vaders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.