Jump to content
calfoxwc

How liberals see the world, and how it changes

Recommended Posts

Liberals see the world via their own emotions. They win the election - they are happy and they see the world as happy. They think happy thoughts - and they would love for everybody tobe happy they won the election, and love the world. They think good thoughts about all things, and see no evil in anything about their having won.

  But let them lose, and they hate the world. They are angry as all hell. They HATE that they lost. The whole entire universe must be battled, because the world is dumping on them like a toxic landfill. The liberal feel EVERYTHING IS BAD, and an OUTRAGE.

  They start to act out on their anger, and bitterly hate the world.

That explains their emotional flippity-flippity. Everything good and wonderful is BAD when they lose. And everything wonderful and good is great, if they win.

  their emotions run the day, every day for them.

  When they were in school, they got participation trophies. They always WON.

Now, in real life, they lose - all hell breaks loose.

They HATE.

So, they compensate for their FEELINGS of inferiority of LOSING, by being critical of everything in the world.   They refuse to believe God exists, because that would remind them of not being super SPESHUL and ELITE. They refuse to believe that unborn children are people, because that reminds them of consequences.Liberals don't FEEL that consequences for their own actions/failures... are 'fair'. Their failures aren't fair because it makes them SAD or MAD, and emotions is what they go by. After all, they grew up in their schewell, always winning. Everybody won.

they were always "elite"...everybody won whatever it was.

  Now, in real life, everybody doesn't win. It makes them SO angry to fail. and lose. And they HATE the "unfairness".

and they demand a new government, that will be like their schewell days. Socialism. everybody gets a wonderful free ride. Everybody WINS.

of course, they don't care where the money comes from, and how there isn't going to ever be anywhere near enough money.

They never cared where their participation trophies came from, so why should they bother?

It's what liberals do.

Bunch of emotional knee jerkies.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so exactly what conservatives did, ie YOU, for 8 full years. You lost an election, than u lost a second one....and the rage intensified. U are still making jokes about a "former" FIRST Shmucking LADY being a transvestite. But during those 8 years u werent joking, u were furnishing undeniable "proof" of her being born a man, him being a muslim born somewhere else, him wanting to establish martial law and not let the 2016 election even happen therefore becoming dictator.You were sure of it.

None of it came to pass because ur 8 years of unstable emotional outbursting were just a little baby screaming cause he didnt get his way. Exactly what liberals are doing now. You are no different than them. And what u write on this board and have written for so many years is self explanatory. 

Ur a supposed grown man in his golden years who simply cant deal with an educated 22 year old michigan wolverine so u resort to spamming entire threads with pictures of woodpeckers. But u insist on being taken seriously which is impossible because u literally and constantly lie through ur teeth about that which you've said in the past which is a direct admission of embarrassement 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

so exactly what conservatives did, ie YOU, for 8 full years. You lost an election, than u lost a second one....and the rage intensified. U are still making jokes about a "former" FIRST Shmucking LADY being a transvestite. But during those 8 years u werent joking, u were furnishing undeniable "proof" of her being born a man, him being a muslim born somewhere else, him wanting to establish martial law and not let the 2016 election even happen therefore becoming dictator.You were sure of it.

None of it came to pass because ur 8 years of unstable emotional outbursting were just a little baby screaming cause he didnt get his way. Exactly what liberals are doing now. You are no different than them. And what u write on this board and have written for so many years is self explanatory. 

Ur a supposed grown man in his golden years who simply cant deal with an educated 22 year old michigan wolverine so u resort to spamming entire threads with pictures of woodpeckers. But u insist on being taken seriously which is impossible because u literally and constantly lie through ur teeth about that which you've said in the past which is a direct admission of embarrassement 

Unemotionally of course.😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

so exactly what conservatives did, ie YOU, for 8 full years. You lost an election, than u lost a second one....and the rage intensified. U are still making jokes about a "former" FIRST Shmucking LADY being a transvestite. But during those 8 years u werent joking, u were furnishing undeniable "proof" of her being born a man, him being a muslim born somewhere else, him wanting to establish martial law and not let the 2016 election even happen therefore becoming dictator.You were sure of it.

None of it came to pass because ur 8 years of unstable emotional outbursting were just a little baby screaming cause he didnt get his way. Exactly what liberals are doing now. You are no different than them. And what u write on this board and have written for so many years is self explanatory. 

Ur a supposed grown man in his golden years who simply cant deal with an educated 22 year old michigan wolverine so u resort to spamming entire threads with pictures of woodpeckers. But u insist on being taken seriously which is impossible because u literally and constantly lie through ur teeth about that which you've said in the past which is a direct admission of embarrassement 

Don't forget to add "deletes threads when backed into a corner that he can't bullshi.t his way out of" to that list...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Don't forget to add "deletes threads when backed into a corner that he can't bullshi.t his way out of" to that list...

right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jbluhm86 said:

Don't forget to add "deletes threads when backed into a corner that he can't bullshi.t his way out of" to that list...

You guys are still worked up about that?

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

You guys are still worked up about that?

WSS

that behavior defeats the whole "internet forum" concept, you get that right steven? It's not "we're worked up over it"....it's being subjected to endless diatribes about snowflakes this and that and yet the only triggered snowflake behavior comes from roughly 3 or so clowns on the right. None of the left leaning people here act like fgts that can't take a contrary opinion. Nor do any of them assign positions to anybody on the right that those people haven't actually taken...we call it being a "typical steve", not sure why. Who's that steve guy anyway? You know him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

Don't forget to add "deletes threads when backed into a corner that he can't bullshi.t his way out of" to that list...

I wasn't backed into a corner, you simply crashed my thread by warping the subject bigtime.

you really got yer pink jammies all crinkled over that one, did ya?

hardy har har, jblew.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

I wasn't backed into a corner, you simply crashed my thread by warping the subject bigtime.

you really got yer pink jammies all crinkled over that one, did ya?

hardy har har, jblew.

do u think anyone buys ur bullsht cal? i called u out on this over a year ago when u started rethreads because someone posted a comment directly addressing ur thread. You just need ur own forum here. Where only u can post and only u can see anything. If i ran this board id call it "cals world". And any login from ur ip address could only post there. And only u. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

furthermore, jblew, it would be nice to have some intelligent, legimate and thoughtful

input on several subjects. Like the Walkaway Movement, benghazi, uranium one, higgardly/dem/obamao fbi, obamao

cia, obaMao "doj" collusion with russia, fast and furious, antifa and liberal hate and violence epidemic around the country,

obaMao gov harrassment of conservative groups, the secret giant giveaway to iran, obaMao supporting terrorist groups with our tax money,

oh, I could go on and on and on and on etc about subjects jblew, , woody and others can't bring themselves to talk about.

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/think-obama-administration-wasnt-corrupt-think-again/

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/scandals-at-state-how-clinton-kerry-used-office-to-enrich-their-families/

whatever. there are millions of posts of legit FACTS of obamao sleazy wrongdoing.

liberals emotionally knee jerk to just ignore it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another day, another embarrassing noshow and tell for the manafort prosecution dirtbags who only

are trying to get manafort to create a false accusation against our President Trump.

no workee.

  they already gave a deal to his buddy, paige.

they aren't prosecuting, they are politically trying to destroy our ELECTED REAL AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

and liberals who thrive on emotion only, as their every day basis for seeing the world, want retribution for losing the election.

which is pretty sick - their higgardly would have been a gigantic disaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/6/2018 at 11:29 AM, Clevfan4life said:

that behavior defeats the whole "internet forum" concept, you get that right steven? It's not "we're worked up over it"....it's being subjected to endless diatribes about snowflakes this and that and yet the only triggered snowflake behavior comes from roughly 3 or so clowns on the right. None of the left leaning people here act like fgts that can't take a contrary opinion. Nor do any of them assign positions to anybody on the right that those people haven't actually taken...we call it being a "typical steve", not sure why. Who's that steve guy anyway? You know him?

I don't suppose anyone is surprised by that nonsense response.

"Defeats the whole internet Forum concept"  🤣

Change your underwear and move along.

WSS

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

I don't suppose anyone is surprised by that nonsense response.

"Defeats the whole internet Forum concept"  🤣

Change your underwear and move along.

WSS

oh wow, i dont suppose anyone is surprised typical steve doesnt know the diff between a forum and a blog. Change ur tampon steve. Maybe this whole FORUM admin is too next level for u. U understand how quickly this forum would die if everyone behaved like cal right? if we all for a week decided to rethread everytime someone posted an opinion in <gasp> an internet politic forum.......this place would die overnight. Guarantee zombo would be in here telling everyone alright next person that does it is going on a break.

can ur faggot butt not acknowledge even the basics? like how quick would that last at the football forum? u and cal should get ur own blogs. u could do useless movie reviews there tgat absolutely no one cares about and best of all no one can refute ur astute well seasoned cinematic observations.

think about it. its the perfect digital retirement community. U can call it "get off stevens lawn" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You ladies should just arm yourselves and meet on a chosen ground...  Gangs of New York style. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve is required to defend Cal

Cal is the same as the liberals he insults

I apparently stopped aging at 22

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

Steve is required to defend Cal

 as you are required to attack no matter what. But in this case you and your girlfriends are going nuts over this deleted post.

Cal is the same as the liberals he insults

 that is true in many cases. I just more often agree with Cal albeit not nearly to the degree.

I apparently stopped aging at 22

 that number seems a little high.

 

WSS

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

steve, woody already is so much more mature than u and cal stacked ontop of each other. hate to tell ya buddy,  but he's not the one spamming the board with bird pics. u guys are the snowiest of snowflakes. u guys have no balls. u sit at home and get so worked up over some 22 yr old kids opinion that one guy shts all over the board with pictures of a bird pecking a cok and the other condones and encourages it. u dont get its old as fuk cause u guys are morons.

in all honesty some of the woodpecker pixs have been humorous....but when u repost them 1000+ times it becomes SPAM. And as a moderator ur supposed to reel that sht in. Posting the same thing over and over and over, in multiple threads......its not funny.

Its like u didnt get ur a_ss beat enough as a child by an older brother so this goofy sht stayed with u ur entire life. The world did u a profound disservice by not giving u an older brother to beat it into u that sht gets old after awhile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I don't think I spend that much time pondering Woody's opinions or lack of which. Matter of fact Cleve I thought about going over the last hundred of his posts and Counting the ones that actually had something worthwhile to say, I'm guessing that would be a pretty small percentage. And I've never said what he was stupid have I? I think you have to have a very keen set of mental tools to get his degree at one of the finer engineering schools in America. However on one hand if he gets backed into a corner making statements or arguments he can't really defend he will stomp out of the conversation in a huff. Ironically on the other hand it seems he has no lack of time to go back and forth insulting Cal on one thing or another.  Of course if I were Woody I might rather have somebody that seems a little bit brighter than you running to my defense on a daily basis.

You yourself occasionally show flashes of intelligence but, like me, sometimes the typos take some of the Shine off of that. Especially your use of 14 year old Valley girl phraseology, which I assume is not just a mistake. And like I said occasionally you have something to say but mostly your entire stick is just being an a-hole. And frankly that's a lot less funny or interesting than woodpecker photos.

WSS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

Oh I don't think I spend that much time pondering Woody's opinions or lack of which. Matter of fact Cleve I thought about going over the last hundred of his posts and Counting the ones that actually had something worthwhile to say

 

The difference between you and the few intelligent people here are that what is worthwhile and what isnt'...isn't dependant on which side they're on. See cal thinks I've had him on ignore because I don't want to see his posts, like he does me....it's not the case. When I have him on ignore it's simply to keep the spam at bay, so I can open and close his posts so I don't have to scroll through his woodpecker photo's. When he's having that time of the month the board becomes unreadable because his posts go entire pages, something tells me you prob are doing the same with his posts but won't admit it. But I have zero issue reading his posts and deciding if they warrant a response from me or not. You guys can't read hardly a single post from Woody that doesn't go straight to your eyeballs like a trump golden shower. You're ladyboys in the truest sense. That's not "running to woody's defense", that's calling you shtcnt ladyfella's for what you are.....intellectual weaklings. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Steve is required to defend Cal

Cal is the same as the liberals he insults

I apparently stopped aging at 22

 

There goes woodypeckerhead the sissy birdbrain AGAIN.

See? he can't stop - being a birddropping brain is all he can do.

  I'm pretty much not needing anybody to defend me - I'm creative enough to do that on my own.

And sure,m woodypeckerhead - an orange is exactly the same thing as a pineapple, because "they are both fruits" as you see it.

idiot.

  and being smarted off to, endless, and threads ruined with diversion smartbutt replies all the time... is the same  thing as

giving you an appropriate nickname because it fits, to convince you someday to grow up.

  "everything is the same" when liberal birdbrain woodypeckerhead FEELS that it makes him "happy" to say it.

"der ...chirp"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

There goes woodypeckerhead the sissy birdbrain AGAIN.

See? he can't stop - being a birddropping brain is all he can do.

  I'm pretty much not needing anybody to defend me - I'm creative schizophrenic enough to do that on my own.

And sure,m woodypeckerhead - an orange is exactly the same thing as a pineapple, because "they are both fruits" as you see it.

idiot.

  and being smarted off to, endless, and threads ruined with diversion smartbutt replies all the time... is the same  thing as

giving you an appropriate nickname because it fits, to convince you someday to grow up.

  "everything is the same" when liberal birdbrain woodypeckerhead FEELS that it makes him "happy" to say it.

"der ...chirp"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There jblewobaMao'srearend again.

using words to fit his twisted liberal emotions...and the use ends up inaccurate.

" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand reality. Common symptoms include false beliefs, unclear or confused thinking, hearing voices that others do not, reduced social engagement and emotional expression, and a lack of motivation.

 

So, I'm arguing with two online forum social hostile people. False beliefs? Maybe - I never promised liberals a pink rose garden with free money plants in it. But I've been very, very clear in my thinking, and it hasn't changed since...eh...forever.

   I don't "hear voices anytime, online, offline... so that is just a meaningless jblewhippodong emotional knee jerkie. And..."reduced social engagement..."? Seriously? How many posts over the years do I have goin? Lack of motivation? I'm here usually every week.

   I just can't get woodypeckerhead or jblewobaMao'srear to STFU unless they want to actually talk issues, as in, the actual subjects of a thread.

   So, I keep nailing it. Liberals use words out of spite - and pay no attention to the actual meanings of the words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

The difference between you and the few intelligent people here are that what is worthwhile and what isnt'...isn't dependant on which side they're on.

 the difference is that you, I can't really speak to the others on the left, only brag about how smart you are. Even your brethren probably think of you as just an a-hole.

See cal thinks I've had him on ignore because I don't want to see his posts, like he does me....it's not the case.

 quick question. Do you think I care whether or not you have Cal on ignore? If you have a problem with him take it up with him. Same with Woody.

When I have him on ignore it's simply to keep the spam at bay, so I can open and close his posts so I don't have to scroll through his woodpecker photo's. When he's having that time of the month the board becomes unreadable because his posts go entire pages, something tells me you prob are doing the same with his posts but won't admit it. But I have zero issue reading his posts and deciding if they warrant a response from me or not. You guys can't read hardly a single post from Woody that doesn't go straight to your eyeballs like a trump golden shower.

 unfortunately  Woodrow rarely has anything to say except snarking at Cal or somebody else .  On the rare occasion he posts a political opinion  sometimes I tend to agree with him .  But most of the time it's just bombast and rubbish .  Yes yes yes now start crying "well he did it too!" 

You're ladyboys in the truest sense. That's not "running to woody's defense", that's calling you shtcnt ladyfella's for what you are.....intellectual weaklings. 

 I think you would have a hard time sifting through the last, let's say, 50 of the Woodmans supposed pick out the ones that had a rational political opinion. Come back and list them. Maybe if you do that you could earmark the ones that I've taken issue with, I'm guessing that will be a relatively small number. But again if you are angry with Cal don't read his posts. But feel free to keep posting about how smart you are. Convince yourself.

 

 

WSS

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and two "OWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW's" are heard in the distance....tenor.gif

compliments of Westside Steve. LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

 

 the difference is that you, I can't really speak to the others on the left, only brag about how smart you are. Even your brethren probably think of you as just an a-hole.

 i dont brag about how smart i am. I consider myself of above avg intelligence but nothing remotely special. What i try to expound here daily is how stupid people here are. Next to people who cobstantly resort to straw man, the hallnark of the inrellectually weak, yeah...i come off like tesla.

I point out here daily how uninformed even on ur own positions, u guys are. I furnish weekly information that took me 60 seconds or less on google that often completely refutes something u or cal just offered as immutable fact. That doesnt make me a genius, that makes me...whats the opposite of lazy? 

quick question. Do you think I care whether or not you have Cal on ignore? If you have a problem with him take it up with him. Same with Woody.

 i do not thimk u care who has who on ignore, as usual the point wafted clear over ur head. I can see how hard this is for u now

 unfortunately  Woodrow rarely has anything to say except snarking at Cal or somebody else .  On the rare occasion he posts a political opinion  sometimes I tend to agree with him .  But most of the time it's just bombast and rubbish .  Yes yes yes now start crying "well he did it too!" 

 I think you would have a hard time sifting through the last, let's say, 50 of the Woodmans supposed pick out the ones that had a rational political opinion. Come back and list them. Maybe if you do that you could earmark the ones that I've taken issue with, I'm guessing that will be a relatively small number. But again if you are angry with Cal don't read his posts. But feel free to keep posting about how smart you are. Convince yourself.

 

1) im not angry with cal, ur like a primitive bot stuck in a logic loop u cant find ur way out of. Pointing out someones behavior doesnt alwsys mean "angry". But these are heady concepts so i digress

2) i see woodys posts daily so i dont know who ur trying to bullsht. Again, if cal posts something here and doesnt like when a 23 yr old rducated kid who knows where and how to look up information that almost always refutes one of cals prime assertions.....and he feels the need to erase contrary posts, give him his very own safe space replete with coloring books and crayons. 

u like to act as if cal only rethreads because woody or someone else made troll posts. Ive seen cal rethread when someone simply posted links to science journals. Literally said nothing just posted links. 

3) i dont need to convinve myself of anything

wssiq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more time I have no idea why you feel the need to involve me in your feud with Cal or your devotion to Woody. Why not try this? Instead of just boasting, try going over the last 50 of Woody's posts and tell me which ones included a salient argument and not just BS? Extra points if you can find some where he and I have a disagreement about something real. Or any point that I've made that you think is invalid?

And again just being an a-hole doesn't make you intelligent. Nor does your unpleasant personality make your opponent's incorrect.

WSS

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell you what Cleve I'll make it even easier. Since you say you read so much stuff, give me the last three arguments or discussions if you will where you have pointed out a flaw in my thinking. Or any substantial political opinion from your protege Woody. Just for memory you don't have to do any real work and look up the BS. If you make a claim we can always go back and find whether it's true or not. You have been known to lie about this stuff.

I'll start you off with a very easy one. Cal has a tendency to claim that there is no such thing as climate change and even if there was its a natural occurrence. While I believe that there is, there's a good chance that human activity can possibly have an effect though to what degree we don't really know nor does anyone have a clear idea how to reverse it.

So here's your chance. PS you can't use that one.

WSS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×