LionOfBuddha Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 This guy first posted it 3 days ago, he’s not a media guy, but apparently his manager is a part time division 1 ref. Coming from a regular guy, it seems like a whole lotta nothing. But now guys like Bucky Brooks are saying this trade might be looming. Apparently, it depends on if Darnold’s visit with the Bills goes well. If it does, the Bills will pull the trigger and move up to 1 to get Darnold. We will move to number 2, and also get 12 from Buffalo and their #1 next year. Giants will get 4 and 22. Here is the original guy who posted the rumor 3 days ago: Click on the tweet and scroll down to get the whole story. Also, here’s Bucky Brooks and Daniel Jeremiah hinting at it as well Now, if the rumor Tour posted was true, that coaching staff wants Darnold, and FO wants Mayfield it looks like Baker will be our guy at #2 after the Bills take Darnold at 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7moses7 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 Did someone say Baker Mayfield ? 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghoolie Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 Hue wants Black Tarkenton. Can you imagine how many coffees Dorsey has to fetch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch Oven Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 7 minutes ago, Ghoolie said: Hue wants Black Tarkenton. Can you imagine how many coffees Dorsey has to fetch. Do you think if you keep repeating the same thing enough, people will care about what you say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigalow80 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 This makes zero sense from the browns perspective. Why would they make this trade? There is almost no value to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionOfBuddha Posted April 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 26 minutes ago, Ghoolie said: Hue wants Black Tarkenton. Can you imagine how many coffees Dorsey has to fetch. Lol dude, they’re not taking Lamar Jackson. Obviously their #1 guy isn’t Darnold so they’re comfortable moving to 2. They’re picking a QB at 2, and it’s not going to be Lamar. It’s probanly going to be Baker Mayfield. And check Dorsey’s history, he doesn’t fetch coffee for anyone. He literally wasn’t liked at Kansas City because he didn’t tell anyone who he was going to pick. He does what he wants, he gives no Shmucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionOfBuddha Posted April 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bigalow80 said: This makes zero sense from the browns perspective. Why would they make this trade? There is almost no value to it. If Darnold isn’t their #1 guy, they move to 2 and still get their QB. They get the Bills #1 pick next year, and probably some additional picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch Oven Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 16 minutes ago, D Bone said: If the Browns truly don't want Darnold and they were actually offered this, they'd be complete idiots to pass it up. Are you sure about that D Bone? The Browns would go from #1 and #4 this draft to #2 and #12... and get Buffalo's 1st rounder next season. Let's say they have a normal Bills 7-9 season... which puts the pick around #12-15 or so.... So #1 and #4 or #2, #12 and #12-15. I think I'll go with the quality over the quantity, especially considering the Browns already have three 2nd rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigalow80 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 The browns lose too much value in this trade for it to be worth it. If they want to play the board fine, but they can easily get more than that for the number one pick. Plus, they already turned down the jets offer. If they want to trade #1, ok. But they better be getting more than the #2 and #12 picks and a 1 next year. It better be #2, both 2nd rounders from Buffalo and next year's number 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bone Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 24 minutes ago, Dutch Oven said: Are you sure about that D Bone? The Browns would go from #1 and #4 this draft to #2 and #12... and get Buffalo's 1st rounder next season. Let's say they have a normal Bills 7-9 season... which puts the pick around #12-15 or so.... So #1 and #4 or #2, #12 and #12-15. I think I'll go with the quality over the quantity, especially considering the Browns already have three 2nd rounders. I quickly read the trade at us falling back to 2, while still having 4 plus gaining 12 and the 1 next year...... Guess I failed reading comprehension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 Geeze. Just stay where you are Dorsey. Take Rosen or Darnold and pick the best non QB at #4. PLEASE! Don't Phuck Around! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 So the Browns give up #1 and #4 to get #2, #12 and a #1 next year? That trade makes no sense whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Bigalow80 said: This makes zero sense from the browns perspective. Why would they make this trade? There is almost no value to it. Agree I don't see where this works out in the Browns favor will you get the number to you go down to 12 and 22 and the Shmuck was the number one next year Jesus Christ almightyAgree I don't see where this works out in the Browns favor will you get the number to you go down to 12 and 22 and the Shmuck was the number one next year Jesus Christ almighty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 Dropping one spot? Eh. Dropping 8 in the first? Better get me more than a 1st next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 Let's clarify those Browns go from number one to number two then they go from number four to number 12. And then all they get for making those moves is the number one next year ? What horse shite is that? They should get number two number 12 and number 22 for all that. Not something next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cvcanedy Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 I mean it sounds like a REALLY credible source. We can probably just book it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
htownbrown Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 The Giants would be the real winners here. Move 2 spots and get #22 for it. The Browns would move back 9 total spots for a 1st next year. Thats not even close to fair. It would make the #2 pick worth more than the #1. And the world would laugh once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darren15 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 My head is spinning ......... thank god we never allowed anything like this in our draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghoolie Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 1 hour ago, LionOfBuddha said: Lol dude, they’re not taking Lamar Jackson. Obviously their #1 guy isn’t Darnold so they’re comfortable moving to 2. They’re picking a QB at 2, and it’s not going to be Lamar. It’s probanly going to be Baker Mayfield. And check Dorsey’s history, he doesn’t fetch coffee for anyone. He literally wasn’t liked at Kansas City because he didn’t tell anyone who he was going to pick. He does what he wants, he gives no Shmucks He is a coffee fetcher. He had to accept a 1 - 31 head coach and was told by the owner that he is not the HCs boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghoolie Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 22 minutes ago, The Gipper said: Agree I don't see where this works out in the Browns favor will you get the number to you go down to 12 and 22 and the Shmuck was the number one next year Jesus Christ almightyAgree I don't see where this works out in the Browns favor will you get the number to you go down to 12 and 22 and the Shmuck was the number one next year Jesus Christ almighty Ah................. they drafted Winslow, Manzeil, Quinn, Coleman, Willie Green, Two_Tackle-Texac and Crisco Hands Coleman......................WTF made sense in any of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darren15 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 Chad Forbes @NFLDraftBites 5h5 hours ago More Multiple Folks saying #Bills #Giants #Browns working on 3 Team Trade... Browns would slide to 2nd, Bills would land 1st Overall & Giants would slide to 4th or 12th. Heard it from few people.... Browns would be monetizing taking Josh Allen... Remember, it's silly season... It will only happen if the Browns get screwed, its the way of the world .... I think its cowpoop by the way, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonTaylor Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 A year ago, I would have believed something like this with Sashi in charge. We need a QB (who can sit for a season) and then top of the draft actual talent on the field this season at 4 not a mid first rounder and another pick next year. We need playmakers not picks. If we stay put at 1 and 4, we get our choice of any QB and either Chubb, Barkley or whoever the BPA is on Dorsey's board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 3 hours ago, Bigalow80 said: This makes zero sense from the browns perspective. Why would they make this trade? There is almost no value to it. Exactly. The Browns would get screwed in this situation. Considering the Jets gave up 3 second round picks just to move from #6 to #3. Ahem- draft value chart says the Bills owe us at least 1,000 points before we even start thinking about it. For us dropping to #2 and #12- in my book, even the both the Bills second round #53 and #56 + their first round next year isn't enough. PS- from the Bills perspective assuming they think Darnold is Da Bomb- it's a great deal, and not out of line. Three firsts and two seconds to move up to #1. Even if we have Darnold and Mayfield rated the same, losing out on the #4 still isn't worth it. Doubtful the Giants would think moving from #2 to #4 and getting the #22 would be worth their while either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Ghoolie said: He is a coffee fetcher. He had to accept a 1 - 31 head coach and was told by the owner that he is not the HCs boss. Nah- Dorsey along with Wolf are just in charge of the draft, they don't give a schmuck what Jackson thinks. Hue is out with Haslam interviewing the Homeless Guy for input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 15 hours ago, Ghoolie said: Ah................. they drafted Winslow, Manzeil, Quinn, Coleman, Willie Green, Two_Tackle-Texas and Crisco Hands Coleman......................WTF made sense in any of that? And all the guys primarily responsible for drafting those players are no longer employed by the Browns. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. EDIT: direct quote from Hue, Building the Browns Episode 1- just watched it today. "We have a (draft) process led by you (Dorsey)". Sorry Tom, when it comes to the draft, Dorsey is calling the shots, not Hue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 2 hours ago, LionOfBuddha said: Lol dude, they’re not taking Lamar Jackson. Obviously their #1 guy isn’t Darnold so they’re comfortable moving to 2. They’re picking a QB at 2, and it’s not going to be Lamar. It’s probanly going to be Baker Mayfield. And check Dorsey’s history, he doesn’t fetch coffee for anyone. He literally wasn’t liked at Kansas City because he didn’t tell anyone who he was going to pick. He does what he wants, he gives no Shmucks We don't know that- and it will take a hell of a lot more than what's rumored the Bills are currently offering to get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 As Hoorta said, looking at the charts we lose a lot of draft value on this trade. The only way I see it happening is if we got any interesting Bills' players. And I can only think of Tre'Davious, and he's too young and too promising to be involved in a trade, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionOfBuddha Posted April 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 30 minutes ago, hoorta said: We don't know that- and it will take a hell of a lot more than what's rumored the Bills are currently offering to get it done. Right. I'm speaking in this hypothetical situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 8 hours ago, darren15 said: Remember, it's silly season... No, actually it isn't. The 'Silly Season' is a term from Formula 1 racing. It starts in the latter part of the F1 schedule when drivers are being rumoured for various different rides (teams) for the following F1 season. We're nowhere near the Silly Season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gumby73 Posted April 17, 2018 Report Share Posted April 17, 2018 BillsMafia..can we not post stuff like this right before bedtime? Mafia owes me a nights sleep..Thanks for putting this to rest..am going back to work to sleep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.