Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

How Can/Will The Browns Blow It? Or Not?


The Gipper

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, boo fagley said:

1- Jared Goff - looks like a keeper. Rams are a promising team for 2018.

2 -Jam Winston - Bust. Terrible QB draft. Mariota is fair.

3- Andy Luck - Always injured

4- Cam Newton - Better than average. Made it to a Super Bowl and choked.

5- Sam Bradford - Always injured.

6- Matt Stafford - Better than average.

7- Jamarcus Russel - Bust

8- Alex Smith - Better than average

9- E Manning - Enough said.

10- Carson Palmer - Better than average.

11- David Carr - Bust from day 1.

12- Mike Vick - Bust. Tarkentons dont make it in todays NFL, but some teams think that they do.

13- Tim Couch - Enough said.

14- P Manning - HOF  Enough said.

15- Drew Bledsoe - Better than average.

16- Jeff George - Bust.

17- Troy Aikman - HOF Enough said.

18- Vinny Testaverde - Better than average.

19- Bernie Kosar - 

20- Steve Young - HOF

21- John Elway - HOF

Available in the 2018 draft I take 1 of these 7 -  Elway, Young, Kosar, Aikman, P Manning, E Manning and Jared Goff.

GM grounds for firing on draft day if 1 of these 6 -  Couch, George, Carr, Vick, Russel and Winston.

Post season QBs these 5 - Testaverde, Palmer, Luck, Newton and Smith.

Overrated these 3- Bledsoe, Stafford and Bradford. Luck too.

 

Inny Testicle turdie was lazy.. never watched film as much as he shouldve.. He had bad work habits... Couldnt read defenses to save his soul...Was a turnover machine.. He sucked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nickers said:

Inny Testicle turdie was lazy.. never watched film as much as he shouldve.. He had bad work habits... Couldnt read defenses to save his soul...Was a turnover machine.. He sucked!

I can disprove most of that with two words.... Bill Belichick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tour2ma said:

I can disprove most of that with two words.... Bill Belichick.

Or, just use his stats....not that they are great....but a guy doesn't play 20 years by being a complete bum:

Passing

 
 
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV
Career       233 214 90-123-1 3787 6701 56.5 46233 275 4.1 267 4.0 89 6.9 5.9 12.2 198.4 75.0   417 2992 6.07 5.16 5.9 29 33 142
7 yrs NYJ     65 61 35-26-0 1094 1854 59.0 12497 77 4.2 58 3.1 82 6.7 6.2 11.4 192.3 80.2   77 545 6.19 5.64 4.0 14 13 42
6 yrs TAM     76 72 24-48-0 1126 2160 52.1 14820 77 3.6 112 5.2 89 6.9 5.2 13.2 195.0 64.4   197 1549 5.63 4.15 8.4 8 9 41
3 yrs CLE     37 31 16-15-0 578 998 57.9 7255 47 4.7 37 3.7 81 7.3 6.5 12.6 196.1 80.9   46 271 6.69 6.00 4.4 1 3 24
2 yrs BAL     29 29 8-20-1 596 1019 58.5 7148 51 5.0 34 3.3 86 7.0 6.5 12.0 246.5 82.8   54 399 6.29 5.81 5.0 3 4 25
1 yr CAR     7 6 2-4-0 94 172 54.7 952 5 2.9 6 3.5 65 5.5 4.5 10.1 136.0 65.8   9 46 5.01 4.07 5.0 1 1 0
1 yr DAL     16 15 5-10-0 297 495 60.0 3532 17 3.4 20 4.0 53 7.1 6.0 11.9 220.8 76.4   34 182 6.33 5.27 6.4 2 3 10
1 yr NWE     3 0   2 3 66.7 29 1 33.3 0 0.0 23 9.7 16.3 14.5 9.7 137.5   0 0 9.67 16.33 0.0     0
1987 24 TAM qb 14 6 4 0-4-0 71 165 43.0 1081 5 3.0 6 3.6 40 6.6 5.5 15.2 180.2 60.2   18 140 5.14 4.21 9.8     4
1988 25 TAM QB 14 15 15 5-10-0 222 466 47.6 3240 13 2.8 35 7.5 59 7.0 4.1 14.6 216.0 48.8   33 292 5.91 3.27 6.6 2 3 6
1989 26 TAM QB 14 14 14 5-9-0 258 480 53.8 3133 20 4.2 22 4.6 78 6.5 5.3 12.1 223.8 68.9   38 294 5.48 4.34 7.3 2 2 9
1990 27 TAM QB 14 14 13 6-7-0 203 365 55.6 2818 17 4.7 18 4.9 89 7.7 6.4 13.9 201.3 75.6   38 330 6.17 5.01 9.4 3 3 9
1991 28 TAM QB 14 13 12 3-9-0 166 326 50.9 1994 8 2.5 15 4.6 87 6.1 4.5 12.0 153.4 59.0   35 234 4.88 3.45 9.7     4
1992 29 TAM QB 14 14 14 5-9-0 206 358 57.5 2554 14 3.9 16 4.5 81 7.1 5.9 12.4 182.4 74.2   35 259 5.84 4.72 8.9 1 1 9
1993 30 CLE QB 12 10 6 3-3-0 130 230 56.5 1797 14 6.1 9 3.9 62 7.8 7.3 13.8 179.7 85.7   17 101 6.87 6.36 6.9 1 1 7
1994 31 CLE QB 12 14 13 9-4-0 207 376 55.1 2575 16 4.3 18 4.8 81 6.8 5.5 12.4 183.9 70.7   12 83 6.42 5.16 3.1 0 1 8
1995 32 CLE QB 12 13 12 4-8-0 241 392 61.5 2883 17 4.3 10 2.6 70 7.4 7.1 12.0 221.8 87.8   17 87 6.84 6.57 4.2 0 1 9
1996* 33 BAL QB 12 16 16 4-12-0 325 549 59.2 4177 33 6.0 19 3.5 86 7.6 7.3 12.9 261.1 88.7   34 270 6.70 6.37 5.8 2 3 16
1997 34 BAL QB 12 13 13 4-8-1 271 470 57.7 2971 18 3.8 15 3.2 54 6.3 5.7 11.0 228.5 75.9   20 129 5.80 5.16 4.1 1 1 9
1998* 35 NYJ QB 16 14 13 12-1-0 259 421 61.5 3256 29 6.9 7 1.7 82 7.7 8.4 12.6 232.6 101.6   19 140 7.08 7.68 4.3 3 3 14
1999 36 NYJ qb 16 1 1 0-1-0 10 15 66.7 96 1 6.7 1 6.7 27 6.4 4.7 9.6 96.0 78.7   0 0 6.40 4.73 0.0     0
2000 37 NYJ QB 16 16 16 9-7-0 328 590 55.6 3732 21 3.6 25 4.2 63 6.3 5.1 11.4 233.3 69.0   13 71 6.07 4.90 2.2 4 4 9
2001 38 NYJ QB 16 16 16 10-6-0 260 441 59.0 2752 15 3.4 14 3.2 40 6.2 5.5 10.6 172.0 75.3   18 122 5.73 5.01 3.9 5 5 10
2002 39 NYJ qb 16 5 4 1-3-0 54 83 65.1 499 3 3.6 3 3.6 35 6.0 5.1 9.2 99.8 78.3   9 62 4.75 3.93 9.8 1 0 2
2003 40 NYJ qb 16 7 7 2-5-0 123 198 62.1 1385 7 3.5 2 1.0 61 7.0 7.2 11.3 197.9 90.6   6 48 6.55 6.80 2.9 1 1 5
2004 41 DAL QB 16 16 15 5-10-0 297 495 60.0 3532 17 3.4 20 4.0 53 7.1 6.0 11.9 220.8 76.4   34 182 6.33 5.27 6.4 2 3 10
2005 42 NYJ qb 16 6 4 1-3-0 60 106 56.6 777 1 0.9 6 5.7 47 7.3 5.0 13.0 129.5 59.4   12 102 5.72 3.60 10.2     2
2006 43 NWE   14 3 0   2 3 66.7 29 1 33.3 0 0.0 23 9.7 16.3 14.5 9.7 137.5 99.9 0 0 9.67 16.33 0.0     0
2007 44 CAR qb 16 7 6 2-4-0 94 172 54.7 952 5 2.9 6 3.5 65 5.5 4.5 10.1 136.0 65.8 33.8 9 46 5.01 4.07 5.0 1 1 0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think he sucked.. I remember when he went to Miami.. Jimmy Johnson use to rag on him for not doing film study..He was more worried about getting his schwanse lit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The Gipper said:

How would you even know that?

I saw an interview with JJ a long time ago.. He has said it himself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Gipper said:

Vinny's TD to Int. ration for his career was about  1:1.     Not good for these days....and not really good for a lot of the time he played.  Still, he managed over 46000 yards passing, which is good for 13th all time.

Plus career 56% completions. As they said in Tampa, Vinny is just good enough to get you beat...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Unsympathetic said:

 

Does the 105 mean they find him to be the 105th best prospect available in this draft?  I have heard reports to that effect before....but the allure of his big arm will give him a much higher draft slotting.   Maybe this just goes to show the reaching that is happening these days for QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, nickers said:

I saw an interview with JJ a long time ago.. He has said it himself...

So Bill B. brought Vinny to three different teams despite terrible preparation???

Does that sound right to you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Gipper said:

I mean the part about getting laid.   Doubt that Jimmy Johnson said that.

He eluded to something on that order.. I can't remember verbatim... But Jimmy had a way of saying what he felt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tour2ma said:

 

So Bill B. brought Vinny to three different teams despite terrible preparation???

Does that sound right to you?

 

Tour- all time W-L,  90-123-1. Turrible, just turrible. Sure, he played on some bad teams, but I'd still take Archie Manning over Vinny.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tour2ma said:

We're talkin' preparation, h....

 

 

 

 

Sorry... couldn't help myself....

Agida can do bad things LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, The Gipper said:

Kudos to you for recognizing that Steve Young and Bernie Kosar were taken with the equivalent of the #1 overall pick of the draft.

But I think it is a bit early to judge Winston. And Vick had some very productive....and winning years.

I also give both Carr and Couch a bit of a break.  Both Carr and Couch were  the first pick of  teams that up to that point were just paper teams.  And in Couch's case he took the team to the playoffs in 3 years....even if he did not start the playoff game due to injuries.  And, of course, it was injuries that curtailed his career.

Tampa will be looking for another QB in a couple of years when Winston doesnt deliver. Vick was overrated.

Carrs draft was terrible QB wise. Perhaps the thing that should have been done is sign a vet QB. Then take Julius Peppers or Dwight Freeney or Ed Reed or Lito Shepard @ # 1. Couch had 18 TDs and 18 INTs that season. I watched that playoff game vs the Steelers and Holcomb played really well. What I most remember about that game was the players convincing Davis to challenge a play that he never should have. Of course, he lost the challenge and IIRC a time out that was a factor in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we draft Antonio Callaway.

he seems like a perfect Hue project that should be picked at 4.  1st round talent fo sho!!

marijuana schmariwanna... draft that talent!!  No red flags here!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be the best Draft the Browns have had since they took Jim Brown. It is also the easiest draft to proceed properly. 

1) There are three big, promising QBs available.There is no consensus as to which is best. Any, or all 3 of them may turn out to be great QBs. As lonf as the Browns get one of them, they will have satisfied the responsibility of taking a shot at a top QB prospect.

2) Barkley is the best player in the draft.

Barkley with #1. One of the top QBs left at #4.

ANy other move will be AGAIN, a draft that come back to make the Browns look stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, boo fagley said:

Tampa will be looking for another QB in a couple of years when Winston doesnt deliver. Vick was overrated.

Carrs draft was terrible QB wise. Perhaps the thing that should have been done is sign a vet QB. Then take Julius Peppers or Dwight Freeney or Ed Reed or Lito Shepard @ # 1. Couch had 18 TDs and 18 INTs that season. I watched that playoff game vs the Steelers and Holcomb played really well. What I most remember about that game was the players convincing Davis to challenge a play that he never should have. Of course, he lost the challenge and IIRC a time out that was a factor in the game.

Well...it WAS Couch who "lead" the team that year.   Holcomb started a couple of games due to Couch's injuries, plus the playoff game.   Torn Rotator Cuff AND torn Labrum caused Couch's demise.  

Passing

 
 
No. Player  Age Pos G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD
  Team Total 26.3   16   9-7-0 338 552 61.2 3665 27 4.9 22 4.0 78 6.6 5.8 10.8 229.1 80.5   35 253 5.81 5.05 6.0 4 5
  Opp Total     16     299 513 58.3 3441 20 3.9 17 3.3   6.7 6.00 11.5 215.1 77.8   28 172 6.0 5.4 5.2    
2 Tim Couch 25 QB 14 14 8-6-0 273 443 61.6 2842 18 4.1 18 4.1 78 6.4 5.4 10.4 203.0 76.8   30 213 5.56 4.61 6.3 3 4
10 Kelly Holcomb 29 qb 4 2 1-1-0 64 106 60.4 790 8 7.5 4 3.8 44 7.5 7.3 12.3 197.5 92.9   5 40 6.76 6.58 4.5 1 1
85 Kevin Johnson 26 WR 16 15   1 2 50.0 33 1 50.0 0 0.0 33 16.5 26.5 33.0 2.1 135.4   0 0 16.50 26.50 0.0    
88 Frisman Jackson 23   7 0   0 1 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0   0.0 39.6   0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0    
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

ON NFL Net yesterday one of the commentators said that the QB bust will be whichever ones the Browns take because they are so good at identifying them (or something to that effect).

Well.....that is in fact their track record.    Of course, it is also hindsight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ghoolie said:

This should be the best Draft the Browns have had since they took Jim Brown. It is also the easiest draft to proceed properly. 

1) There are three big, promising QBs available.There is no consensus as to which is best. Any, or all 3 of them may turn out to be great QBs. As lonf as the Browns get one of them, they will have satisfied the responsibility of taking a shot at a top QB prospect.

2) Barkley is the best player in the draft.

Barkley with #1. One of the top QBs left at #4.

ANy other move will be AGAIN, a draft that come back to make the Browns look stupid.

Barkley's best moves are with pom poms in his hands.    He will be nothing more than a cheerleader.  He will continue the long tradition of First round Penn State RB busts:    Kijana Carter, Curtis Enis, Blair Thomas.  

Drafted Players

 
  • Share & more
    • Modify & Share Table
    • Embed this Table
    • Get as Excel Workbook (experimental)
    • Get table as CSV (for Excel)
    • Strip Mobile Formatting
    • Copy Link to Table to Clipboard
    • About Sharing Tools
    • Video: SR Sharing Tools & How-to
    • Video: Stats Table Tips & Tricks
  • Glossary
Rk Year Rnd Pick   Pos DrAge Tm From To AP1 PB St CarAV G GS Att Yds TD Rec Yds TD College/Univ  
1 2011 6 177 Evan Royster RB 23 WAS 2011 2013 0 0 0 4 32 2 81 416 2 25 180 0 Penn St. College Stats
2 2007 3 90 Tony Hunt RB 21 PHI 2007 2008 0 0 0 0 14 2 14 25 2 6 42 0 Penn St. College Stats
3 2004 7 241 Sean McHugh FB 22 TEN 2004 2008 0 0 1 2 40 17       23 301 0 Penn St. College Stats
4 2003 1 27 Larry Johnson RB 23 KAN 2003 2011 1 2 4 51 85 55 1427 6223 55 154 1373 6 Penn St. College Stats
5 2002 4 107 Omar Easy FB 24 KAN 2002 2005 0 0 0 0 53 0 4 1 0 6 42 1 Penn St. College Stats
6 1998 1 5 Curtis Enis RB 22 CHI 1998 2000 0 0 1 10 36 18 456 1497 4 59 428 2 Penn St. College Stats
7 1996 3 92 Jon Witman RB 24 PIT 1996 2001 0 0 3 3 85 43 37 129 0 39 263 0 Penn St. College Stats
8 1996 4 115 Brian Milne RB 23 IND 1996 2000 0 0 2 3 63 38 36 126 4 57 324 1 Penn St. College Stats
9 1996 6 198 Stephen Pitts RB   SFO     0 0 0                   Penn St. College Stats
10 1996 7 218 Mike Archie RB 23 HOU 1996 1998 0 0 0 0 23 0 6 24 1 5 25 0 Penn St. College Stats
11 1995 1 1 Ki-Jana Carter RB 21 CIN 1996 2004 0 0 0 12 59 14 319 1144 20 66 469 1 Penn St. College Stats
12 1993 6 144 Richie Anderson FB 21 NYJ 1993 2004 0 1 5 29 161 82 318 1274 4 400 3149 14 Penn St. College Stats
13 1992 8 205 Sam Gash FB 23 NWE 1992 2003 0 2 5 13 177 78 121 327 2 169 1347 13 Penn St. College Stats
14 1991 6 158 Leroy Thompson RB 22 PIT 1991 1996 0 0 0 18 80 9 404 1390 6 153 1193 5 Penn St. College Stats
15 1991 8 214 Gary Brown RB 22 HOU 1991 1999 0 0 3 27 99 47 1032 4300 21 84 631 3 Penn St. College Stats
16 1990 1 2 Blair Thomas RB 22 NYJ 1990 1995 0 0 3 20 64 36 533 2236 7 71 513 2 Penn St. College Stats
17 1987 1 14 D.J. Dozier RB 21 MIN 1987 1991 0 0 0 8 43 11 172 691 7 33 301 2 Penn St. College Stats
18 1987 3 80 Tim Manoa RB 22 CLE 1987 1991 0 0 1 9 53 24 236 938 6 40 308 2 Penn St. College Stats
19 1987 3 81 Steve Smith RB 23 RAI 1987 1995 0 0 6 20 128 91 429 1627 9 131 1250 13 Penn St. College Stats
20 1985 12 328 Tony Mumford RB 22 NWE 1985 1985 0 0 0 0 2 0             Penn St. College Stats
21 1984 3 70 Jon Williams RB 23 NWE 1984 1984 0 0 0 0 9 0             Penn St. College Stats
22 1983 1 3 Curt Warner RB 22 SEA 1983 1990 0 3 6 60 100 94 1698 6844 56 193 1467 7 Penn St. College Stats
23 1982 5 126 Mike Meade RB 22 GNB 1982 1985 0 0 0 3 49 8 72 261 1 21 126 2 Penn St. College Stats
24 1981 1 28 Booker Moore RB 22 BUF 1982 1985 0 0 2 6 51 32 115 420 1 75 423 1 Penn St. College Stats
25 1980 2 46 Matt Suhey RB 22 CHI 1980 1989 0 0 7 34 148 100 828 2946 20 260 2113 5 Penn St. College Stats
26 1980 6 154 Mike Guman RB 22 RAM 1980 1988 0 0 4 24 106 52 342 1286 11 150 1433 4 Penn St. College Stats
27 1979 6 145 Bob Torrey RB 22 NYG 1979 1980 0 0 0 1 14 0 13 61 1 2 3 0 Penn St. College Stats
28 1978 6 155 Steve Geise RB   CIN     0 0 0                   Penn St. College Stats
29 1975 4 102 Tom Donchez RB 23 BUF 1975 1975 0 0 0 0 14 0             Penn St. College Stats
30 1974 1 11 John Cappelletti RB 22 RAM 1974 1983 0 0 5 34 105 63 824 2951 24 135 1233 4 Penn St. College Stats
Rk Year Rnd Pick Player Pos DrAge Tm From To AP1 PB St CarAV G GS Att Yds TD Rec Yds TD College/Univ College_link
31 1974 5 106 Gary Hayman RB 22 BUF 1974 1975 0 0 0 0 15 0 17 61 0       Penn St. College Stats
32 1972 1 13 Franco Harris HOF RB 22 PIT 1972 1984 1 9 12 102 173 162 2949 12120 91 307 2287 9 Penn St. College Stats
33 1972 2 48 Lydell Mitchell RB 23 BAL 1972 1980 0 3 6 90 111 84 1675 6534 30 376 3203 17 Penn St. College Stats
34 1970 3 58 Charlie Pittman RB 22 STL 1970 1971 0 0 0 0 18 0 4 7 0       Penn St. College Stats
35 1967 16 415 Mike Irwin HB   BUF     0 0 0                   Penn St. College Stats
36 1966 8 116 Don Kunit HB   DAL     0 0 0                   Penn St. College Stats

 

Not much since the early 70s....though, I guess Larry Johnson is pretty good.  Didn't even realize he was a Penn Stater.

I guess Curt Warner  (not Kurt Warner)....from 1983 was pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb logic. THere is absolutely no statistical, emotional, moral, physical data from this schidt chart that indicates anything about how well Barkley will perform. His genetics, drive, intelligence and physical abilities are not affected in any way by what school he chose to attend.

The reason the Browns blow is because of the exact mental masturbation you just performed. Browns culture is literally an example of just how stupid human beings can be. Instead of looking at the man, you wasted time in your life assembling a fukcing chart that has no meaning for the upcoming draft. This is why my picks and predictions are always more accurate than people like you.

Again, there are three QBs who all offer a high degree of promise. HOWEVER............. can you tell me which one is best? You can't. And neither can anyone else. The top three are even odds. You are just as likely to strike paydirt picking first, as you are taking the last one left. So, only to a dickhead would it make sense to use #1 #1 on a pick that does not give you a draft advantage.

QB at #1  #1? Yeas, for idiots like you and Browns management.

The proper draft strategy. The ONLY draft strategy for Cleveland is BARLEY #1 (Clear cut best player in the draft)......... and a QB out of the top three that is left.

FURTHERMORE........................ Taking Barkley #1 GUARANTEES we get one of the top 3 QBs. Taking a QB at #1 guarantees that at #4..........we really won't have a clear cut BEST to use the pick on.

The reason the Cleveland Browns are 1- 31...and I have told you morons this all along, is because they PURPOSELY REFUSE to participate in drafting the premium play making prospects.

Whether or not Barkley pans out isn't even the issue. The issue is, ALL the experts pretty much see him as the best football player in this draft. Why a team would have a chance to take the best player in the draft and not take it? Only a fukcing idiotic, imbecile of a human being could understand. But then again...........THAT is Browns culture................. LOSER CLUTIRE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Ghoolie said:

Dumb logic. THere is absolutely no statistical, emotional, moral, physical data from this schidt chart that indicates anything about how well Barkley will perform. His genetics, drive, intelligence and physical abilities are not affected in any way by what school he chose to attend.

No shite Sherlock....you are just now getting around to figuring out this is a lot of bullshite?  Congratulations...your intellect is now at 3rd grade level.

The reason the Browns blow is because of the exact mental masturbation you just performed.

No, it isn't you pompous wanker....I have nothing to do with how the Browns make their decisions.  Nor do you...nor any other fan.  To suggest otherwise is cretinous.

 

Browns culture is literally an example of just how stupid human beings can be. Instead of looking at the man, you wasted time in your life assembling a fukcing chart that has no meaning for the upcoming draft.

Again...no, it isn't. Jane you ignorant slut. Browns culture has nothing to do with but a few human beings on this earth...the owners and the GMs and the coaches.  I simply spent time doing something that was entertaining to me and provocative to others.  Congratulations, not only have you attained third grade intellect....you have just been named Boob of the year for falling for this. I didn't even have to add sinkers to the line to catch you.

 

This is why my picks and predictions are always more accurate than people like you.

No, they are not, you just lie about what predictions you have made.  Most of your predictions have been of the Paxton Lynch variety...off by miles.

Again, there are three QBs who all offer a high degree of promise. HOWEVER............. can you tell me which one is best? You can't. And neither can anyone else. The top three are even odds. You are just as likely to strike paydirt picking first, as you are taking the last one left. So, only to a dickhead would it make sense to use #1 #1 on a pick that does not give you a draft advantage.

Welll....it looks like perhaps you have graduated to a 4th grade intellect. You got at least one thing something close to right in your tantrum. These QBs ARE hard to distinguish....and one you get at 4 could very well be just as good or better as one you get at #1.

QB at #1  #1? Yeas, for idiots like you and Browns management.

The more you type....the more it is evident that you only concentrate on your own navel lint.  Did you see the thread that ME, Myself, and I started called The Prudent Solution?  Go back and read what I said before you begin regurgitating your own jizm.  I said to think about not taking a QB until the late 1st/early 2d round.

The proper draft strategy. The ONLY draft strategy for Cleveland is BARLEY #1 (Clear cut best player in the draft)......... and a QB out of the top three that is left.

FURTHERMORE........................ Taking Barkley #1 GUARANTEES we get one of the top 3 QBs. Taking a QB at #1 guarantees that at #4..........we really won't have a clear cut BEST to use the pick on.

Actually....the better strategy would be to take Chubb #1....and to leave the merengue dancer out on the dance floor.  He just won't be that good.

The reason the Cleveland Browns are 1- 31...and I have told you morons this all along, is because they PURPOSELY REFUSE to participate in drafting the premium play making prospects.

Yea, sure they refuse on purpose.   You really are a Gump, aren't you.   Where did we find you....on a park bench in Savannah?

Whether or not Barkley pans out isn't even the issue. The issue is, ALL the experts pretty much see him as the best football player in this draft. Why a team would have a chance to take the best player in the draft and not take it? Only a fukcing idiotic, imbecile of a human being could understand. But then again...........THAT is Browns culture................. LOSER CLUTIRE.

Of course whether or not Barkley pans out is the issue. The failure of Richardson, or Coleman, or Quinn/Manziel/Weeden etc. etc to pan out sure as hell has been "THE ISSUE".   The failures of the offensive skill players they have chosen over the years is what has resulted in this losing culture (aside from having loser fans like you)  Barkley would just be another one of those in the long line.   I agree that the Browns should NOT fail to take the best player in this draft....only problem for you is that The Squaw ain't the best player.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Gipper said:

 

Gip, please, turn your O2 tank back on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I haven't posted in awhile guys, but I have noticed a few things here, some good and some bad. I'll just go over some highlights.

Ghoolie made a point, and whether you want to look at it as good/bad is your call. Barkley coming from Penn State doesn't matter for his production, BUT there are schools who are known for quality positions, not all to do with the player, but the COACHING. Penn State is known as LB U, and Wisconsin turns out great OL. Then there are schools who just turn out great players, such as Alabama, Ohio State, USC, etc.

There are 4 guys who are looked at as top QB prospects, I have no clue who will be the best, but I think the safest pick is Darnold, and biggest boom or bust is Allen.

You guys have to give Ghoolie credit, he has now said 3 QBs, meaning he is either easing up a bit or covering his bases. I don't mind Ghoolie, and he wont admit it, but he has mentioned in past 3 different QB as top, Jackson, Baker, Rosen. 

But I HAVE to get after you Ghoolie for your last statement. Saying it doesn't matter how Barkley pans out as he is consensus top player so they aren't making a mistake. Last year, Garrett was even higher consensus top player and that was wrong? Whether you like Garrett or Barkley is a moot point for your argument, for THAT argument, you CANT have it both ways.

Hope everyone enjoys the draft tomorrow. God Bless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...