Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Ohio hs student SUSPENDED because he wouldn't go to the walkout anti-gun protest !


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

https://ijr.com/2018/03/1076385-ohio-student-suspended-refusing-to-leave-classroom/

all one of those liberal morons had to do was to hang out with him. This is why lefty activists have

infiltrated out classrooms all across this country. It's been going on for decades. I dealt with it in the 70's.

it's been a problem festering for that long. Now, it's a huge problem. and many of them are in our courts.

and in the rest of our government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hilliard City School District: Post saying Hilliard student suspended over walkout refusal is fake

 

"...During the time of the walkout, students were given two choices by the school. They could participate in the walkout or go to the commons area of the school. Raterman said their policy is they cannot leave students unattended in the building for security reasons. She said students who went to the commons area could use it as a study hall.

Jacob said he was suspended after not choosing to participate in the walkout or go to the commons area. Jacob said he felt like the protest was too political and did not want to take either side. He said he stayed in the classroom to work on school work and said he knew there could be consequences for his decision.

He told 10TV he was willing to accept those consequences.

Jacob said after the walkout was over, he learned he was suspended for the rest of the day on Wednesday and all day Thursday. Jacob and Scott confirmed the letter being circulated on social media is accurate. The letter said he was suspended for refusing to follow instructions..."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

baloney. They could have had a teacher stay with him in class -- but they were all in on going to the protest.

He didn't want to choose sides. Either way he could get bullied...by leftwing activist teachers.

Just different shades of commie red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

baloney. They could have had a teacher stay with him in class -- but they were all in on going to the protest...

http://www.hilliardschools.org/facts-about-gatherings/

"...In all three high schools, students who chose not to participate in the memorial gatherings were offered the opportunity to remain in the building, under the supervision of school personnel. As a district, we are required to supervise students during the school day. We do not leave students unattended in classrooms. This is the same practice our district implements when students opt out of other school programs or activities. We provide an alternative, supervised location...Students who chose not to participate were provided safe, supervised alternatives in all three high schools. No one was forced or coerced to participate. No one was disciplined for not participating. Our school culture respects the rights of all students. We strive to provide a safe environment for all students, but we do expect students to follow directions and comply with staff requests. This is required to maintain an orderly school environment..."

 

29 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

He didn't want to choose sides. Either way he could get bullied...by leftwing activist teachers...

http://www.hilliardschools.org/facts-about-gatherings/

"There is inaccurate and false information being circulated regarding both the intent of these gatherings and the events that took place during a specific activity at Davidson High School. These gatherings were not political events; they were respectful gatherings remembering the senseless loss of young people. No students were forced to participate. In fact, student participation overall was well under 50% of the student population. The majority of students were comfortable and confident in not participating in these gatherings..."

 

29 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

...Just different shades of commie red.

 

42cc2e6668051d925313874563411535--writin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, StinkHole said:

Stuart

 

You wonder if schools would be this accommodating if students planned anti-abortion walk outs.

Possibly. I'll grant you that there is a strong left-leaning bias in most secondary and post secondary education institutions; but I suppose it would come down to the specific policies of the individual schools. I'd say that the most regressive leftist influenced schools would make a stink about it, but, conversely, I'd imagine more conservative leaning schools and certain religious-based schools wouldn't be so accommodating to pro-abortion walkouts either, if some of their students wished to do so.

In any case, my responses here were to the specific student and school in question, and by the looks of it, it appears not to be a student being suspended for not participating in an anti-gun rally, as many media wonks have made it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuart

Yet another example of how liberalism never solves problems, it only creates new ones.

If their sole  intent was to memorialize those that were killed, couldn't they have simply had an assembly in the gymnasium, rather than make a public spectacle of themselves?

Yes kiddies, the nation is aware of the seriousness of this problem, and your walkouts did as much good as when your mommies paraded around in their pink pussy costumes.

Shmucking liberal sickness.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so, again, why didn't one teacher stay with the one student in the classroom? This isn't any answer.

12 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

http://www.hilliardschools.org/facts-about-gatherings/

"...In all three high schools, students who chose not to participate in the memorial gatherings were offered the opportunity to remain in the building, under the supervision of school personnel. As a district, we are required to supervise students during the school day. We do not leave students unattended in classrooms. This is the same practice our district implements when students opt out of other school programs or activities. We provide an alternative, supervised location...Students who chose not to participate were provided safe, supervised alternatives in all three high schools. No one was forced or coerced to participate. No one was disciplined for not participating. Our school culture respects the rights of all students. We strive to provide a safe environment for all students, but we do expect students to follow directions and comply with staff requests. This is required to maintain an orderly school environment..."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

so, again, why didn't one teacher stay with the one student in the classroom? This isn't any answer.

 

It is a anwser, if you bothered to actually read:

13 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

http://www.hilliardschools.org/facts-about-gatherings/

"...We strive to provide a safe environment for all students, but we do expect students to follow directions and comply with staff requests. This is required to maintain an orderly school environment..."

The school administrators directed students not going to the protest to proceed to the common area. The student in question refused to do so. It's really that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah, so the student was intentionally not given an option to NOT CHOOSE SIDES, which the leftwing revolutionary

guard "teachers" demanded. And everybody knows when you have to choose, the radical side lords it over on the other side -

that is leftwing radical peer pressure politics. There is no freaking reason the student HAD to go to the one place or the other.

That is just forcing the issue. ONE "TEACHER" couldn't stay in the ONE CLASS with the ONE STUDENT? Seriously?

Maybe he is special education a bit, and didn't want to go out into the main crowd and be known as special ed?

    More likely, the leftwing school sombietches were trying to intimidate students to go to the rally, since most of them

would like to go outside. Just a poorly run school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

 

 

3 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

The school administrators directed students not going to the protest to proceed to the common area. The student in question refused to do so. It's really that simple.

Stuart

A Freudian slip there?  Weren't they calling it a "memorial gathering",  not a protest? 

But you're right, a walkout IS a protest...a memorial gathering could have taken place in the gym.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...