Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JAFBF

Story time . . . Swamp draining (Pucker Factor high)

Recommended Posts

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-the-obama-doj-let-russian-lawyer-natalia-veselnitskaya-into-the-u-s/

The U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York granted Veselnitskaya immigration parole in October 2015, setting an expiration date of January 7, 2016, DOJ attorneys later told the court. On January 4, Veselnitskaya's request to extend her parole was denied, according to a declaration filed in U.S. District Court on January 5. In that filing, Veselnitskaya asked the judge to allow her to remain in the U.S. to defend Katsyv. She added she had "been harassed by the Government despite being paroled into the United States" when trying to return from a trip to London that November.

 

On January 6, 2016, Judge Thomas P. Griesa of the Southern District of New York heard arguments over Veselnitskaya's request to remain in the U.S. According to a court transcript, he asked the government's attorney, Paul Monteleoni, if the Justice Department would agree to grant a one-week extension of Veselnitskaya's immigration parole status. Monteleoni replied that he did not "have the final say but I will certainly pass the request along to those in the government who do, and I think for an extension of that length I'm optimistic."

It is unclear under whether the DOJ granted Veselnitskaya another extension to continue her work in the U.S., but records of the case make no further mention of an extension being granted beyond January 14, 2016.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to questions about whether Veselnitskaya was granted immigration parole after January 14 and, if not, how she was permitted entrance to the U.S. for the meeting in Trump Tower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so the deep state, via deep staters in obamao's corrupt regime, arranged for this russian lawyer to REGAIN, AGAIN,

open permission to come here, and to come here to show up in Trump Tower.

set up.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-the-obama-doj-let-russian-lawyer-natalia-veselnitskaya-into-the-u-s/

"The U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York granted Veselnitskaya immigration parole in October 2015, setting an expiration date of January 7, 2016, DOJ attorneys later told the court. On January 4, Veselnitskaya's request to extend her parole was denied, according to a declaration filed in U.S. District Court on January 5. In that filing, Veselnitskaya asked the judge to allow her to remain in the U.S. to defend Katsyv. She added she had "been harassed by the Government despite being paroled into the United States" when trying to return from a trip to London that November.

 

On January 6, 2016, Judge Thomas P. Griesa of the Southern District of New York heard arguments over Veselnitskaya's request to remain in the U.S. According to a court transcript, he asked the government's attorney, Paul Monteleoni, if the Justice Department would agree to grant a one-week extension of Veselnitskaya's immigration parole status. Monteleoni replied that he did not "have the final say but I will certainly pass the request along to those in the government who do, and I think for an extension of that length I'm optimistic."

It is unclear under whether the DOJ granted Veselnitskaya another extension to continue her work in the U.S., but records of the case make no further mention of an extension being granted beyond January 14, 2016.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to questions about whether Veselnitskaya was granted immigration parole after January 14 and, if not, how she was permitted entrance to the U.S. for the meeting in Trump Tower."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this another highly speculative post with a few interesting bits.

 

This one is in regards to this thread :

 

http://thebrownsboard.com/topic/52145-ginsburg-misses-oral-arguments-for-the-first-time-in-decades/

 

Let's start here (from today) :

 

image.png.b6fbf507eaaa6d80c0e948bdfb73d17c.png

 

So it seems she hasn't gone back to work yet.

 

From the Ginsberg thread, I posted about the WH already working on a "short list" for her replacement "just in case".

 

We got this Sunday (didn't post).

image.png.d4131ffafb4d176c8e2095b1fe6febae.png

http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/

 

This morning this (box post is above).

image.png.f3dbb5b9eaabafc74ad0c3f7ad88cc26.png

The very next day is the start of her missing work.

 

Now here's a goodie :

image.png.cef52a7e436be053515a668e5b54f70c.png

 

53-47 could have two meanings here (it was also posted right before Kavanaugh was confirmed).

The Senate is 53-47.

Kavanaugh was/is 53 when confirmed.

Amy Coney Barrett will be 47 on Jan 28.

 

A lot of the Kavanaugh going first is making a LOT more sense now.

It showed how low and how far the Left will go to block what is coming (Wall is another example).

Amy Coney Barrett as the next Supreme Court Justice (replacing RBG no less) would cause epic meltdowns.

 

 

There is a lot of speculation going on that she (RBG) is not even around anymore (out of the Country or   .   .   .   ).

 

Supporting this, there is a picture floating around (I'm not posting) that shows Hospital Records pulled up for RBG.

The last entry is for 12/31/18 (Radiological).

 

Then today, on Dilley's Q&A broadcast, one of his Intel suppliers (Orion Group) dropped this little nugget :

 

Quote


Dilley's Intel (source) :

 

How cold is Ruth Bader Ginsberg's corpse ?

Oops - is that disinformation, or fact ?

 


I have seen chatter earlier on this last bit, and it fits very nicely with a few of the earlier items if you think about it.

Why would the WH say they have a "short list" being prepped for one ?

 

Should be quite a show watching how this one plays out   .   .   .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

so ur on record as saying she's dead?

I'm on the record that she'll be out Feb if not earlier.

 

 

Here's an exercise for you, tell me your conclusions.

Do a timeline for China starting, oh, say 1/1/19 to approximately present.

Tell me a Story.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JAFBF said:

I'm on the record that she'll be out Feb if not earlier.

 

 

Here's an exercise for you, tell me your conclusions.

Do a timeline for China starting, oh, say 1/1/19 to approximately present.

Tell me a Story.

 

 

U do rem u were "on the record" a couple months ago on a friday that she would be out by the following mo day......right? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JAFBF said:

 

 

Here's an exercise for you, tell me your conclusions.

Do a timeline for China starting, oh, say 1/1/19 to approximately present.

Tell me a Story.

 

 

Thing is, im not an impulsive bullshit weaver.....weaver of bullshit. So anything i read i take into context which "time" is a component of that. Ur asking me to.spin u some bullshit over a 9 day period with a country thats been around since people were still dodging sabre tooths here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

U do rem u were "on the record" a couple months ago on a friday that she would be out by the following mo day......right? 

 

Pretty sure I said February-ish, which the current Theatrics are looking to support.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, JAFBF said:

Pretty sure I said February-ish, which the current Theatrics are looking to support.

 

Ah ah ah foil boy.....u stated she had days till rerirement 2 or 3 months ago. Ive already called u on this multiple times so.dont act like its new. When she busted a rib, u said she was done by the start of the week. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/9/2018 at 2:59 PM, JAFBF said:

Follow ups and odd things.

 

image.thumb.png.4dd0ada2866183f47655986b04598bc3.png

 

Have heard Ginsberg and Sessions items were not supposed to happen until next week, but were moved up on POTUS 

 

 

Rem that from nov?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Clevfan4life said:

Rem that from nov?

image.thumb.png.b16bf71f84fa589be8e1203fdce012e9.png

 

Technically wasn't my call was just supporting info to what was going around at that time.

Also the only time I used that source as it has not been too impressive upon the few revisits to it since then.

 

The topic of this timeframe was just the announcement of Retirement.

 

image.thumb.png.462f6979e7af7020d7f55eefd488bd67.png

 

Tendering / announcement may well have happened, I have no way to prove or disprove it at this time.

Jan/Feb is right in this last post.

 

 

How about this, does trip your trigger ? :

 

image.png.6285afe7a51c94d2c765ee2d65d06605.png

https://www.smobserved.com/story/2018/12/22/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-will-retire-from-the-us-supreme-court-in-january-2019/3658.html

 

I had this several weeks ago (original post back in September), but personally I don't put much stock in this Pub so never used it.

Could be legit, but I don't think so.

 

Ya'll think I'm intentionally trying to yank your chains, I'm not.

 

Before you go there, the HAARP stuff was not my theory either, I was passing on the theories floating around in response to a question (curiosity) to what was being bounced around.

This was the Observatory(s) being shut down / seized by the FBI - last explanation given is it was to do with Child Porn (Janitor)   .   .   .   yeah, ok.

 

 

Tell ya what, if RBG is still on the Supreme Court end of Feb I'll drop outta here until something serious happens (arrests or whatever).

 

Frankly, with some things I've seen the last few days, I like my odds.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JAFBF said:

image.thumb.png.b16bf71f84fa589be8e1203fdce012e9.png

 

Technically wasn't my call was just supporting info to what was going around at that time.

Also the only time I used that source as it has not been too impressive upon the few revisits to it since then.

 

The topic of this timeframe was just the announcement of Retirement.

 

image.thumb.png.462f6979e7af7020d7f55eefd488bd67.png

 

Tendering / announcement may well have happened, I have no way to prove or disprove it at this time.

Jan/Feb is right in this last post.

 

 

How about this, does trip your trigger ? :

 

image.png.6285afe7a51c94d2c765ee2d65d06605.png

https://www.smobserved.com/story/2018/12/22/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-will-retire-from-the-us-supreme-court-in-january-2019/3658.html

 

I had this several weeks ago (original post back in September), but personally I don't put much stock in this Pub so never used it.

Could be legit, but I don't think so.

 

Ya'll think I'm intentionally trying to yank your chains, I'm not.

 

Before you go there, the HAARP stuff was not my theory either, I was passing on the theories floating around in response to a question (curiosity) to what was being bounced around.

This was the Observatory(s) being shut down / seized by the FBI - last explanation given is it was to do with Child Porn (Janitor)   .   .   .   yeah, ok.

 

 

Tell ya what, if RBG is still on the Supreme Court end of Feb I'll drop outta here until something serious happens (arrests or whatever).

 

Frankly, with some things I've seen the last few days, I like my odds.

 

 

 

rem I mentioned to you 2 months ago that RBG was tentatively slated to retire at the beginning of 19? Now ur acting as if this is some sort of "scoop" that ur right wing conspiracy whack jobs landed. No, the "scoop" was supposedly that she was gonna retire in Nov....which never happened. "24-48 hours"...….

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×