Clevfan4life Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 42 minutes ago, tiamat63 said: STFU and let the man work. I for one see what he's doing. Hahahahahahahahahaha, ok....yeah.......i got it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 This video is tech about reddit, but reddit~=4chan.....enjoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 10, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 I'm not the Reporter(s), I just linked the best info available at the time. Too many new links keep popping up for me to dismiss this anymore. On a side note, I am glad at least I've entertained you all. If you can't see things are getting cleaned out . . . : https://ntknetwork.com/the-reckoning-rumor-has-it-reporters-may-reveal-40-congressmen-guilty-of-harassment/ Interesting, look what was just updated: http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=prelim&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section1037&num=0&saved=|Z3JhbnVsZWlkOlVTQy1wcmVsaW0tdGl0bGUxMC1zZWN0aW9uMTAzNA%3D%3D|||0|false|prelim The linked page just happens to be about : Quote §1037. Counsel before foreign judicial tribunals and administrative agencies; court costs and bail Yes, yes foreign in this case . . . but I wonder what else has been updated in this Title 10 document? I'm not in Law, and it's pretty hefty document . . . but the person linking this has pretty high credibility IMO. They are also followed by a certain General Flynn - I wonder why that is ? Lot's of Military action going on lately - huge number of non Transponder low level flights seen across multiple States last night. Yes, there is an exercise going on, but the make up and behavior looks odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 Don't be an enabler. It could have very real consequences Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2017 Was going to edit above post (from today), but this should be quick. More on the RICO charges for those that doubt the source: https://apnews.com/55990c45dbda4bb6ac98fabb506c1e7a/Could-a-law-to-bring-down-the-mob-be-used-in-Weinstein-case This can be applied to quite a few possible up coming scenarios to take down the corrupt. Is Q (4Chan/8Chan) valid? First, I don't rely on only Q posts, I use multiple items that generally relate, as I think I've mentioned before. So, do I think Q is valid? Here are just a few items that lead me to believe Q is/are valid. This was posted while Trump was on the SE Asia trip - note the +++ first in the Q post, then 8 minutes later Trump Tweets using the same +++, and has not used it since. The Q post subject pretty much nails the validity as well. Next was early on (page 1 of this thread I believe) in regards to the Rothschilds. Both the target (Rothschilds) and the Pilot (Green) were ID'd days before the "crash/accident" happened. More recently (yesterday), we have these Timestamp/subject confirmations. Q posts at 13:34 and then Trump Tweets 3 minutes later at 13:37. Note my Time Zone is 3 hours off EST (10:00 + 3 = 13:00) as can be seen in the last Q post (11:15 should be 14:15). If you don't believe that, then Q predated/predicted the Tweet about 3 hours before it happened, which would be even more confirming. I'm sure there are others, but these popped to mind fairly quick and were easy to assemble. Someone even said Q predated/predicted the Pope wanting to change the Lord's Prayer, but that's more digging than I want to get into right now. http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-vatican-our-father-20171208-story.html If Q is fake, then they are either damn good or Time Travelers - take your pick. I prefer to think they're valid. I told everyone this was going to look like serious Tin Foil Hat lunacy until more pieces come together. I do not know the answers to all the Q questions, but the ones that come together pretty much get confirmation from other places, and usually at a later time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 11, 2017 Report Share Posted December 11, 2017 "Is 4chan valid" Lololol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 11, 2017 Report Share Posted December 11, 2017 15 minutes ago, MLD Woody said: "Is 4chan valid" Lololol Uhhh when u gotta have that underage porno.....duhhhh!! Ofc its valid. I think its awesome we can now get our news at the same place we can get our 14 yr old beav shots. So is there any reason to even go anywhere else on the interet? Once 4chan starts its own amazon market place and netflix movie service, end game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 I left out the Saudi Arabia pre-alert . . . oh well. There is some unusual Military activity over DC tonight/tomorrow (wee hours) - seems rather odd to have Fighters and Transports in action in the middle of the night over the Capital. Sealed Indictment rumor is they're passing 9k - now that's a chunk of arrests. Just out: Got curious: Exercise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Ahh so the noob who didnt know how to properly make a bomb was a deep state foil? From the same folks who brought the twin towers down? Do u ever stop to think things through brah? Or do ur fsb controllers frown on too much overthought? Just a get a good conspiratorial story out there dont worry about deets cause americans are stupid and gullible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 yep. George Soros , the corrupt global underminer of nations that don't play the world gov game. Mccain, clintons, obamao, etc etc etc etc... follow the dirty money. and the dirty money is the deep state, and they hate the control that Americans still have at theballot box. NK can get all the biowweapon stuff from the soviets, who back in the day, had an agreement signed to stop all offensive bioweapon research, but immediately invested giant $$$$$$$$$$ secretly to underground secret labs to...development that offensive bioweapon research for advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Coincidence ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 I don't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Stunner in Bama wasn't it? Polls were all over the place - even the Exit Polls had it wrong . . . maybe the Pollsters need to find a new job. Is/was Moore the best Candidate? Awful lot of smoke both for and against him (accusations and frauds). Timing says Hatchet job to me, but in all honesty none of the Candidates even in the Primaries were that great. Hmmmm, Yeah, have to agree for Bama, a big time Red State to go this way, really shocked me. . . . odd thing to say don't you think - "a very short period of time" ? Trap? Surely the Democratic machine isn't stupid enough to try shenanigans with an Election this closely watched . . . are they? Some folks may recall me saying that when Trump makes a seemingly outlandish statement, that if you give it time, it has a very high probability of coming to pass. This one's not taking long at all for things to start shaping up it appears. BTW - keep an eye on Joe Scarborough (Morning Joe), Trump put the light on him a week or so back about a dead Intern found in his office some time back. I'd be worried if I were Joe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Remember, this was a 'special election', meaning he took over Sessions Senate seat. So he is just filling in until the expiration when his term would have been over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Remember, this was a 'special election', meaning he took over Sessions Senate seat. So he is just filling in until the expiration when his term would have been over. Still enough time to do a great deal of damage. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Huh, I wonder why the Write-In votes decreased . . . My my, this Tweet seems to have been loaded: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 12 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Is the fact that this guy is and has been sleeping with his subordinate considered sexual harassment? Is it ethical she's been given a TV job for qualifications that don't seem to be all that strong aside from the fact that she's giving it up to Joe? Where is the outrage? WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted December 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 11 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: Is the fact that this guy is and has been sleeping with his subordinate considered sexual harassment? Is it ethical she's been given a TV job for qualifications that don't seem to be all that strong aside from the fact that she's giving it up to Joe? Where is the outrage? WSS I think they actually got Married - at the very least they are having an open Affair and not trying to hide it. Just ran across this rather interesting item with some dot connecting an some confirmations: Going to need a bigger bag of Popcorn it seems . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, JAFBF said: I think they actually got Married - at the very least they are having an open Affair and not trying to hide it. Just ran across this rather interesting item with some dot connecting an some confirmations: Going to need a bigger bag of Popcorn it seems . . . Yes they did get married. Woody Allen married Soon Yee. Joe was banging Mika well before they got married though Just saying if you read that loose definition of harassment fuucking your subordinate certainly counts. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Im loving this 4chan troll now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Is woody allen now implicated in befarious global schemery? Was he pop culture deep state plant all along? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 47 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said: Is woody allen now implicated in befarious global schemery? Was he pop culture deep state plant all along? I know it's tough but read once in awhile. Scarborough was fuking his underlying but then he married her. Woody Allen was fuking the step daughter but then he married her. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 31 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: I know it's tough but read once in awhile. Scarborough was fuking his underlying but then he married her. Woody Allen was fuking the step daughter but then he married her. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Westside Steve said: I know it's tough but read once in awhile. Scarborough was fuking his underlying but then he married her. Woody Allen was fuking the step daughter but then he married her. WSS Oh im not reading all that Sheet that u have to blow up on ur screen like 20x magnification.....only to find its yet another copy and paste from 4 chan. Yeah i stopped that sht pages ago. Ok so u gave me some goid cliffs there, but now i feel more questions have been created. Scarborough? Morning joe scarborough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 2 hours ago, Clevfan4life said: Oh im not reading all that Sheet that u have to blow up on ur screen like 20x magnification.....only to find its yet another copy and paste from 4 chan. Yeah i stopped that sht pages ago. Ok so u gave me some goid cliffs there, but now i feel more questions have been created. Scarborough? Morning joe scarborough? Oh I don't expect you to read the whole long thing, just explaining why I could. The Woody Allen Scarborough cases. Nothing more. And I think I referred to that list of things that were all considered sexual harassment one of which would be having sex with a subordinate at work. Then somebody said but but but Joe and Mika eventually got married. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Westside Steve said: Oh I don't expect you to read the whole long thing, just explaining why I could. The Woody Allen Scarborough cases. Nothing more. And I think I referred to that list of things that were all considered sexual harassment one of which would be having sex with a subordinate at work. Then somebody said but but but Joe and Mika eventually got married. WSS So joe just harrassed mika into marrying him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 That actually works? Cause id totally rail mika in every hole. ☕️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.