Clevfan4life Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 and then we can all just take a deep breath and talk about the 12th. Srsly 33 reps and a 4.6.....just take the dude and slowly work him into what looks to be an already good budding rotation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-combine/0ap3000000790123/Myles-Garrett-puts-up-33-reps-on-the-bench-press Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaineDeSoulis Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Garrett/Webb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-combine/0ap3000000790123/Myles-Garrett-puts-up-33-reps-on-the-bench-press This makes it freakier. https://www.instagram.com/p/BRRMIXvjal_/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Perine ran slow 4.65 but did 30 reps, not bad for a RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Perine ran slow 4.65 but did 30 reps, not bad for a RB. Very Earnest Byner like I might add. I'll take another football heart and soul like that here any day of the week especially in the bargain territory we can probably land him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Garrett reeks of bustakevious to Me.. just say no... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Garrett reeks of bustakevious to Me.. just say no... Barkevioys was nowhere near this guy on their tape nor at the combine. He still needs to learn how to stack and shed properly but comparing him to 240lb barkevious that should have been a lb'ers or safety is not right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Barkevioys was nowhere near this guy on their tape nor at the combine. He still needs to learn how to stack and shed properly but comparing him to 240lb barkevious that should have been a lb'ers or safety is not right Agreed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Garrett reeks of bustakevious to Me.. just say no... Who do U want then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Who do U want then? Mitchell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Mitchell Oh trubisky, I was looking for dudes with that last name like who the fuck is this now? Its "Mitch" tho.....and fair enough. Some mocks have him dropping into the 20's now tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Oh trubisky, I was looking for dudes with that last name like who the fuck is this now? Its "Mitch" tho.....and fair enough. Some mocks have him dropping into the 20's now tho Mitch says its "Mitchell" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBC mike Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 If we don't take Garrett I will be super pissed. No need for a QB early in first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchie Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Actually he has requested to go by the name Mitchell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Trubisky doesn't get to dictate what we call him. Its Mitch end of discussion. Im not into last names used as firsts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchie Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection? Maybe we sign a FA QB? I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Trubisky doesn't get to dictate what we call him. Its Mitch end of discussion. Im not into last names used as firsts the world does NOT revolve around you homo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Oh god, you think Garrett is Mingo AND you want Trubisky at 1? Let's pray the front office doesn't agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 we need a QB.. fuck Garrett... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyceRolls Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 If Garrett is a bust then all of the drafting experts should find new jobs because it's literally a concensus. Browns shouldn't over think it. And while I agree that we should address QB at 12, what if someone like Fournette or Adams falls to us at 12? Maybe then we look at the second round, first selection. But what if Peppers falls out of the first round? Then we're left with the second round, second selection? Maybe we sign a FA QB? I just don't know what to think. Like a kid in a candy shop! Hue said he doesn't think his favorite QB will be there at 12, which can be translated several different ways. If they go with Garrett first, and see their QB sitting there at 12 it's pretty much a done deal. Adams would make it interesting, but i can't believe there would be 11 players selected ahead of him unless someone hacks his phone and posts a video of him performing satanic rituals or some shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 the world does NOT revolve around you homo... Jesus Christ dude do u think i was serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted March 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 we need a QB.. fuck Garrett... Right. And while we're at it, fuck Julio jones too. And fuck Khalil mack and joey bosa too I mean what a list of bums fuck that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blitzz2 Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Garrett,bpa. Pretty damn simple. But Garrett/Adams would be like a wet dream. Then trade up somehow to get O.J.Howard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TypicalBrowns Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Didn't know you can actually sign the player before the draft even starts if you have the number one pick. Just sign Garret and not waste 1 minute of time on the clock please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osiris Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 The only way the Browns can screw this draft up is to draft someone other than Garrett. Please don't get cute with this one. Plenty of QBs to be had at pick 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beare Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 garnett at 1 best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there? your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 If we don't take Garrett I will be super pissed. No need for a QB early in first Actually, there is a need for a qb early in the first. But you can't have everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchie Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 garnett at 1 best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there? your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor That's what I think as well. Garrett, Fournette, 2 great players in the second round, a center in the 3 red round and Taylor in FA. That's a potential era-changing draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 Didn't know you can actually sign the player before the draft even starts if you have the number one pick. Just sign Garret and not waste 1 minute of time on the clock please But it's the NFL's primetime spring show! The talking heads need at least 10 minutes to discuss why the Browns should draft Garrett. The only way the Browns can screw this draft up is to draft someone other than Garrett. Please don't get cute with this one. Plenty of QBs to be had at pick 12. Sure enough plenty to be had- but will they be any good? Webb, Kaaya, Peterman, Dobbs, Kelly. Probably plenty of UFAs too. garnett at 1 best player available at 12 (love fournette if he is there? your new qb is gonna be tyrod taylor Just no to Taylor. RE: Fournette- running backs that try to run defenders over tend to have a short shelf life. My bet is assuming we're taking Garrett- the top qbs will be gone by #12. May as well take another defensive player with that pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.