Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning throws clerk in jail


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

I just know that if my job responsibilities are altered at work that they would boot my ass if I decided to intentionally refuse to fulfill my job duties.

Yes, so? Should you be imprisoned?

I assume you can think of nothing that you would refuse to do for your boss. Cool I'll keep you in mind when I'm hiring.

 

;)

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 341
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

The similarity is personal convictions can't override legislation and court decisions. A civil servant must serve under the guidelines provided.

I think you're pretending to misunderstand the change in the job description. Had it included issuing marriage licenses to homosexuals (or where a thong a burga or a swastika armband) when she got the job she would not be qualified for it. If you are ordered to do any of that after you get the job... As simple as that.

No problem letting her go.

 

 

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, so? Should you be imprisoned?

I assume you can think of nothing that you would refuse to do for your boss. Cool I'll keep you in mind when I'm hiring.

 

;)

WSS

I already said she shouldn't have been arrested. However, she signed on for it knowing that getting arrested for refusal to do her job is a possibility.

 

If my boss said to throw on chapstick, I would quit on moral grounds haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, so? Should you be imprisoned?

I assume you can think of nothing that you would refuse to do for your boss. Cool I'll keep you in mind when I'm hiring.

 

;)

WSS

 

Not sure about Kentucky but in our neck of the woods each elected official files an oath of office. that oath, and I generalize, states that the person will uphold the laws of the United States, etc. If the person refused to resign and willingly refused to perform the duties they are required by law, then they would probably got to jail here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not sure about Kentucky but in our neck of the woods each elected official files an oath of office. that oath, and I generalize, states that the person will uphold the laws of the United States, etc. If the person refused to resign and willingly refused to perform the duties they are required by law, then they would probably got to jail here.

In which case I think its fucked up and so would you if it was some situation that didn't suit your ideology.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In which case I think its fucked up and so would you if it was some situation that didn't suit your ideology.

 

WSS

 

Obviously that's why you aren't a civil servant but that is the necessity of the job. A civil servant loses the ability to discriminate when they take the job. That's what makes the system work, you are given a set of guidelines and responsibilities and you do the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Obviously that's why you aren't a civil servant but that is the necessity of the job. A civil servant loses the ability to discriminate when they take the job. That's what makes the system work, you are given a set of guidelines and responsibilities and you do the job.

With respect I don't think that's necessarily true nor would you support forcing behavior that you personally thought morally objectionable.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With respect I don't think that's necessarily true nor would you support forcing behavior that you personally thought morally objectionable.

 

WSS

 

Unfortunately it is true we just typically think of police officers, judges, district attorneys, etc. in a different light. Again not sure about Kentucky but in most states County, Town and City Clerks are state constitutional officers given the duty as clerk of the court and registrar of deeds. Their office hours, fees, etc. are set by state law and how they operate are governed by such. The issuance of the marriage license is a matter of law, not personal preference, the same as the recording of a deed. I am pretty certain that there are several NYS Sheriffs who do not want to enforce the provision of the NYS Safe Act that limits the amount of rounds in a magazine but they have to nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With respect I don't think that's necessarily true nor would you support forcing behavior that you personally thought morally objectionable.

 

WSS

 

No one's forcing her to hold this job.

 

She's using her government position to enforce her religious beliefs on the people she's supposed to be serving. If she doesn't want to do her job, she should quit. Since she chooses not to quit, she should be fired. Since forced removal of her position requires impeachment, the government's only option here is to let her continue to shit on the constitution or hold her in contempt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that stupid bitch realize we have SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN THIS COUNTRY?

 

Dumb cunt.

[/quot

 

Apparently not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What law did she break?

 

 

 

 

Waiting......

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Waiting......

 

 

 

 

 

Oh that's right, she didn't break a law. There is no law in Kentucky pertaining to marriage as of right now. The Supreme Court has no authority to make laws. It's in the constitution that only congress and the states can do that. All the Supreme Court can do is offer an opinion on the constitutionality of existing laws. They gave the opinion that laws passed preventing gay marriage are unconstitutional and that's it. There are still no laws granting gay marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not pretend this bitch would have turned down a solid paying job had she known she might toss a few gays a marriage license. As pointed out, her Christian convictions are hit and miss.

 

Nothing more than a publicity stunt from a woman who all of the sudden wants to be gods righteous sword. This boils down to a woman not dping her job. Job objectives change all the time, so long as your company acknowledges and trains you ahead of time - it's clear cut. Do your duty. No controversy here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what the opinion would be if a Democrat clerk refused to issue handgun permits :o

 

He would have to fired as well, literally no difference between the two cases. You're a public servant, you do what the govt requires. If you work for a private company and say you know...my religion doesn't like me working on Fridays. I'm supposed to be praying to my god all Friday long..... what's gonna happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. Letter of the law, etc etc.

 

I'd have less of a personal problem with this lady if she wasnt such a sinner herself.

After being divorced, numerous times, and committing adultery, and having a child out of wedlock, her religious argument holds NO water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy fuck i just read up on this cunt and her so called "moral" convictions. My fucking god. You know what I said earlier that I felt she probably shouldn't be in jail, yeah no fuck that...hypocrites like her shouldn't be allowed to live for gods sake. A complete waste of organic matter. She is the very definition of a hypocrite asshat spewing do as I say not as I do garbage. She can die for all I care. She said it's a "heaven or hell issue". Yeah well that case closed on you a long time ago. No moral standing for what she's doing.

 

Yes I know people do change, but it ain't like it happened just once in her past. With her previous actions she lost the ability to self righteously stand before others and deny them something that she SO CLEARLY shit all over. She shit on the institute of marriage. She literally did german scat porn all over it. If marriage is all about what Christians say it is, this woman shit right in gods mouth. Right up in it. Then made him wipe her ass with his tongue. Just inconceivable levels of nerve this woman has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letter of the law only counts when it benefits your side right?

 

WSS

I have no side. Clearly there is no law allowing gay marriage however there isn't one banning it either. So her inserting the religious moral ground is slightly disturbing.

 

With that said, why hold off against the queers? Adulterers, thieves, addicts, anyone with tatoos, eats shell fish, does not honor their father nor mother - I'd say deny them as well. Let's hate all people equally. That's the natural way, Louis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tiam - the lady's past doesn't equal her present. On principle, regardless of

her tainted past, the gov has no right to force people to all of a sudden violate who

they are, because of a violation of our Constitution, which is how I see the stupidass

vote for perversion. It was just a tribute to the hostile, vicious left.

 

"If they had let her pull the religious freedoms card, any worker of any religion could pull that nonsense. Muslim working at a restaurant? No pork for anyone. Muslim working at the DMV? No licenses for women. Jehovah witness nurse? No blood transfusion for you. Etc. " Logic

**************************************

Totally invalid reasoning. Pork has always been, and restaurants surely always had pork. Same thing for licenses for women

in America - has been for many, many, many, many decades. Jehova witness baloney. They always had aversions to

blood transfusions, and the hospitals have always done them.

 

Obviously, the difference is, taking the job with the contradiction in duties at THAT TIME, vs having a dubious,

unConsitutional immoral ruling by the activist courts. They have NO RIGHT to demand that all Americans throw

our their long standing definition of marriage and redefine it as perverted.

 

"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". Americans are not allowed to do that anymore...well, except for

the left and the perverts in the left. They are allowed to intimidate, sue, force others to accept the perversion they demand

to be accepted, put people out of their jobs, socially ostracize anyone that doesn't toe the line, ...

indeed, even intimidate the U.S. Supreme Court and any other court in the country.

 

And anyone who disagrees is their enemy. That doesn't sound like the Constitution to me.

*****************

Link to comment
Share on other sites


9/3/2015

Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

Kim Davis has been sentenced to jail for following the word of God. As Kim said prior to her hearing, "If the Word of God isn't worth fighting for, I don't know anything that is."

Our religious liberties are being trampled. See my extremely important update below – Mat.


Today, U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Rowan County, Kentucky, County Clerk Kim Davis to be taken into custody by federal marshals and to remain in jail until she agrees to issue licenses for same-sex "marriage" bearing her name. The plaintiffs did not even request incarceration, but Judge Bunning said that financial fines were not enough and ordered her to jail.

Everyone is stunned at this development. Kim Davis' First Amendment - protected religious liberties and right of conscience have been trampled under foot. Kim Davis is being treated as a criminal because she cannot violate her conscience.


Today's events will escalate the national debate to a new level. This is not the kind of America the Founders envisioned or that most Americans want.

+ + We need "all hands on deck!"

This battle is far from over, but we need your help!

Liberty Counsel's team of attorneys is pursuing all legal means to find solutions to the problems created for Kim and other public servants nationwide when five unelected lawyers serving on the Supreme Court willfully imposed same-sex “marriage" on over 320 million Americans through an unjust ruling. Now an arrest order by Judge Bunning has exacerbated the problem.

I am asking for every friend of Liberty Counsel to declare, Yes! I Stand with Kim Davis. Click on the banner below to be immediately added to this vital new component to our nationwide Push for Liberty Campaign!

standwithkim_button.jpg

Prior to her court appearance, Kim told Decision Magazine

"I have weighed the cost…. But it is through God and His grace and strength that I stand, that I can have a smile on my face.

Those licenses leave my office through my authority," she said. “I cannot be party to that. I just can't. … If the Word of God isn't worth fighting for, I don't know anything that is.

We serve a living God who is alive and on the throne," she said. "He knows exactly where I am, and I know that His hand is upon me and upon His people. He is in full control."

Kim Davis is a woman of strong faith. She never sought to be in this position. She would rather not be in this predicament. But here she is. All she asks is to be true to God and her conscience. And the tragedy is that there are simple ways to accommodate her convictions. Just remove her name from the marriage licenses. That's all she has asked from the beginning.

As I'm sure you're aware, we do not charge Kim Davis or any other client for our legal representation. We depend on your financial support - and right now I need your help to fill a war chest to defend Kim Davis and many others who are seeking our help against this increasing legal onslaught.

Please go here now and help Liberty Counsel with a gift of $20, $40, $100 or more at this critical time - or click on the banner below to make your best tax-deductible gift possible...

supportpush.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamao was a dirtbag, and the left couldn't care less, and refuse to admit it..

 

But let this woman have a dirtbag PAST, and the left uses it against her now.

 

Whatever works, one way and another opposite way.... as long as the left gets

what they want - more political power, and more free stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamao was a dirtbag, and the left couldn't care less, and refuse to admit it..

 

But let this woman have a dirtbag PAST, and the left uses it against her now.

 

Whatever works, one way and another opposite way.... as long as the left gets

what they want - more political power, and more free stuff.

Cal, you should celebrate. This lady is probably clicking her heels together. She will make millions off of Christians who will shower her in money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...