DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 With the weakened Military and Intelligence community he inherited from good Ole Billy Bob Clintoon, he did the best he could. Good luck in the future President Bush. God help our future with whom will be taking office in a couple of days. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yeahDAisafuturehofer... Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 PDB August 6 2001- "Bin laden determined to strike inside USA" Heck of a job Bushie! Dont let the door hit you in the ass on the way back to Maine. What would anyone else done better to stop 9/11? What could have been done any better to prevent something like that happening again post 9/11? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 He has come to visit us!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB&J Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 For some reason I don't see how having the only major foreign attack on US soil since the 40s, and using it as an excuse to take a dump on civil liberties in the past eight years is keeping us safe and free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Pres Bush and Cheney got briefings for the last eight years, every day, about our national security. I personally, to be objective, think they completely screwed up on the illegal immigration issue, but thank GOD and Pres Bush and Cheney and our intel and our military etc, for not being attacked again after 9/11. Keeping us safe was the #1 priority. That's the success, primarily, of this administration. And, at least we didn't plummet into gas rationing, double digit interest rates, and runaway inflation. And we all have to hope that Obama's baggage gets thrown off the train, and he ends up being a solid American pres. I do have misgivings about some in his cabinet, but overall, nothing like what I was concerned might happen. We'll see. But, I'd feel better if libs would admit that the federal deficit is a serious problem under Obama, not just under Bush. Obama has the aid package up to 875 BILLION? I think all farmers need a bailout of all their debt, to keep food prices low, and crops abundant. We just bought a nice haybine at an auction. (cuts hay) Show me the money, dammit. ROF,L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB&J Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 To say we haven't been attacked since 9/11 is stupid. We hadn't been attacked since 12/7/1941 before then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiperBowl Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 He has come to visit us!!! Out with the old Boss and in With The New Boss there are Stupid People Everywhere! Thank You Bushy for your Years of Service! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Super Fly Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 He is Coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 To equate Pearl Harbor with al-quaida is illiterate. With the surfacing of international terrorism that reached our shores, since 9/11, Pres Bush and VP Cheney and all those folks in our intel and military... have stopped it from happening again, for the last 7 and a half years. THAT is HUGE. don't be emotional, PB&J, learn to think critically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB&J Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 The reason we haven't been attacked again since then is logistical, not because Bush hired chuck norris to burn the bill of rights. It takes a lot of effort and money to coordinate an attack. Don't try to tell me international terrorism has only been around for the past 15 years, it has been around for decades. And I am not saying Imperial Japan= Al Qaeda, I am simply saying we were not attacked in the nearly 60 years between 1941 and 2001 by a foreign faction on our soil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 911 may have been the last attack on american soil but it sure was a better 8 years than what we had with Clinton, under Clinton we had the Ok city bombing and the we had the Janet Reno attacks on the church in Waco. Plus we didnt have all this white water crap and the Clinton Chronicles in which there was a list of numerous dead people who commited suicide by shooting themselves from the back of the head. Bush had done a lot to stimulate the American economy up until the past 2 years when the Lefty Dems took over congress and stifled the economy in order to get one of there own in the executive branch. Even though Bush wasn't always as conservative as I would of liked he did do better than his predeseccor. May God bless us all and intervene with the days to come under socialist Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Yes, Dan - but the major reasons are: 1. The war against terror. Couldn't be helped, had to be spent. 2. Republicans didn't cut other spending, they also didn't communicate worth a crap about cutting spending with the media. And Pres Bush didn't communicate much at all about a lot, except for... national defense/war on terror. I would be a lot happier if Clinton had gone to war against al-quaida and ran up the deficit in doing so BEFORE 9/11. The U.S. could have saved all that deficit from occuring, if we had simply used tactical nukes on N. Pakistan and gassed the enemy large scale. But that would have been an unthinkable travesty. We took the high road, relative to that... and the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ deficit happened. But I will NOT rail against Obama for the continued war on terror, either. We MUST win that, no matter who the pres is. I just hope some hateful libs will finally stop ridiculing our troops and cheering the deaths of soldiers in the war on terror under Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osusev Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 good god did everyone on the right conveniently forget the other world trade center bombing or oklahoma city bombing? Its the SAME thing, criminal factions that use guerrilla tactics against a nation. THIS WAS A CRIMINAL ACT AND BUSH DID NOTHING TO MAKE US "SAFER". Prosecuting criminals is one thing, invading and destroying Iraq and Afghanistan is another. Stupid is what it was and the 2 TRILLION plus dollars that imbecile and his neocon cronies dont exactly help our economy and deficit....except for China to own more of us. NO organized and recognized country "attacked us" just a criminal group that Bush thought he could take a sledgehammer to and failed. Al queda is spread all over the world and where is Osama Bin Laden.... O yea alive and free and probably in Pakistan our "ally". talk about keeping us safe while our economy and way of life due to oil pressure on prices in a more unstable area due to Bush invading Iraq and our deficit skyrocketing and social security surplus was used to fuel the "war/occupation" in Iraq and our over extended multiple tour military is in the worst recession since the depression.... Osama and Al queda with their criminal actions won. Bush the Retard and Cheney the war profiteer reacted like a simpleton school yard bully and our crashing economy thanks to them and the failed republican laissez faire principles led us to where we are now. Celebrate "keeping us safe" from basically a middle east Mob with religous zealouts.... Yes his actions are keeping us "safe" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 good god did everyone on the right conveniently forget the other world trade center bombing or oklahoma city bombing? Its the SAME thing, criminal factions that use guerrilla tactics against a nation. McVeigh wasn't part of an international terrorist organization dedicated to the ruination of the US Israel and western civilization. Whether or not you're on board with that philosophy. Osama and Al queda with their criminal actions won. Yes they did. Obama won the election. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 SEV - The World Trade Center bombing was in 1993, right? Clinton was pres in '93. And in the years that followed, during Clinton's presidency, the last three years of the terrorists' 9/11 planning... about 2 years of their planning was during the Clinton admin. AFTER 9/11, Pres Bush and VP Cheney and all those military/intel folks have kept us safe. Completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Yes they did. Obama won the election. WSS Really, Steve? You believe this, or did you say that to appeal to the chimps here?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Really, Steve? You believe this, or did you say that to appeal to the chimps here?? You aren't seriously asking me if I believe Ahmedinijad, Bin Laden Chavez, Kim Jong-il et al are very pleased with the outcome are you? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Yes, I am. Those are all such rational folks, so they're easy to read and make assumptions for. For all I know they could give a rat's ass who the President is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Yes, I am. Those are all such rational folks, so they're easy to read and make assumptions for. For all I know they could give a rat's ass who the President is. For all you know.......... heh heh WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 For all you know.......... heh heh WSS For all any of us know. That the thing with hatred; it is rather irrational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 For all any of us know. That the thing with hatred; it is rather irrational. Actually Mike I think it's completely rational. It's human nature pure and basic. We complicate it with our clumsy human ability to think in the abstract and assign right and wrong. The "hatred" is animalistic need for dominance, as I see it, and not good or evil without some kind of spirituality. So, however, is the impulse to resist the dominance of others. We tend to look at history in tiny increments. But that's another thread. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Actually Mike I think it's completely rational. It's human nature pure and basic. To me, it (hatred) is a highly irrational, knee-jerk reaction to something different, foreign, or "scary." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 To me, it (hatred) is a highly irrational, knee-jerk reaction to something different, foreign, or "scary." But in the context we use here the "hate" goes both ways. Sooner or later we should realize that there really aren't "idiots" or "madmen" running things here or for the enemy. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Sooner or later we should realize that there really aren't "idiots" or "madmen" running things here or for the enemy. WSS They ALL (Bush, Cheney, bin Laden, Ahmadinejad) hate based on differences in religion, language, economic structure and even physical appearance. They create divides, wars, murder. Every single one of them. Therefore, they are ALL "madmen" and "idiots," Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Super Fly Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 love that man, love that he is done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 How soon will libs call Obama a murderer ? Actually, my guess is, the media won't be reporting anymore on any more US casualites. They will be vewy vewy quiet, the cwazy wabbits... sounds to me like the war on terror will still be a major undertaking with Obama. Which, is a great thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 They ALL (Bush, Cheney, bin Laden, Ahmadinejad) hate based on differences in religion, language, economic structure and even physical appearance. They create divides, wars, murder. Every single one of them. Therefore, they are ALL "madmen" and "idiots," Steve. No more or less than the empty suit elect. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aloysius Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 Thanks GW. You set up the FEmA concentraton camps for the NWO. at which T & I will be slottered. Nice post, Bunker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We need Tom Tupa Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 They ALL (Bush, Cheney, bin Laden, Ahmadinejad)... Olbermann, is that you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 My bad. I forgot Palin and McCain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.