BrownIndian Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 Im watching Titans Vs Ravens and they showed the QB rating. QB Rating Flacco : 108 Collins: 79 TD Flacco: 1/0 Collins: 0/1 Throws: Flacco: 3/8 Collins 12/18 Looking at this, I feel that Collins is the better QB yet Flacco gets the higher rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSixPat Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 As a rating of one game it means relatively little - I've seen QBs have great games, followed by mediocre games with the mediocre game earning them a better rating. But if you're looking at an entire season and you see a 30 point difference, you've got to begin giving that some more significant respect as a stat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 Im watching Titans Vs Ravens and they showed the QB rating. QB Rating Flacco : 108 Collins: 79 TD Flacco: 1/0 Collins: 0/1 Throws: Flacco: 3/8 Collins 12/18 Looking at this, I feel that Collins is the better QB yet Flacco gets the higher rating. The rating doesn't really tell a complete story over only a half of football, especially one where a QB throws the ball only 8 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geech Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 TD to INT ratio is a HUGE factor in determining QBR. That's why Collins's 1 INT dropped his rating like a rock, and Flacco's 1 TD vaulted his rating like a catapult. -Al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riffer X Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Well if your lumbergh QB rating doesn't mean shit when your lover can't get out of the mid 60's. Except that one game where it was 100+ then it became the end all be all. That one game and it came to be one of the Ten Commandments. Course when Queen had a 104 on two days prep (his only healthy game) it was strictly bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OconRecon Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 As a rating of one game it means relatively little - I've seen QBs have great games, followed by mediocre games with the mediocre game earning them a better rating. But if you're looking at an entire season and you see a 30 point difference, you've got to begin giving that some more significant respect as a stat Bingo. It's like batting averages in the first week of the season. So, like almost any stat, the larger the number studied (passes), the more accurate the information will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earle Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 good old lumbergh is in denial of qb ratings but what comes with that rating is wins and losses so anything rated next to DA is for a loser! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.