quietpack Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Heres the link http://egotastic.com/2012/03/breaking-news-redskins-trade-for-2-draft-pick-will-nab-rg3/ I doubt this is legit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 There's sports on Egotastic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Heres the link http://egotastic.com/2012/03/breaking-news-redskins-trade-for-2-draft-pick-will-nab-rg3/ I doubt this is legit Wow, this is so lame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverback Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Oh, it's true. Jay Glazer broke the story! Check his twitter now of FoxSports.com later on. Jay Glazer @JayGlazer Major scoopage: Redskins have agreed to a trade w Rams for #2 pick of draft. Rams and Skins swap first rounders this yr w Rams also getting 2 future #1s and additional picks. Story coming on fox sports dot com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 If this is true, and RGIII is out the window... pleeeeaaaasssseeee don't get Tannehill. I feel like we'll overpay for a project QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 OK ... so we are going with Colt McCoy, no "major" free agents and hope & prayer. That oughta work out well... Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverback Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Albert Breer @AlbertBreer Redskins have traded their first-rounder this year, 1s in '13 and '14, plus second-rounder this year to Rams for the second overall pick. Three 1sts and a 2nd rounder to move up 4 spots.... RG3 better win some titles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Watch out, Roethlisberger, Flacco and Dalton ... we are getting Colt a RIGHT TACKLE, Ha! Take that! Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 I heard 3 1st's and a 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Would you rather be the number one overall pick and try to replace Peyton Manning while he is playing somewhere is in the league or Be the guy that just cost a team 3 1st rounders and a 2nd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills-n-Browns-Fan Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Watch out, Roethlisberger, Flacco and Dalton ... we are getting Colt a RIGHT TACKLE, Ha! Take that! Zombo Yeah, the browns aren't looking so hot right now, but all those picks for one player and no supporting cast...if colt sucks next year with the new picks we put around him this year, then we look for a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Yeah, the browns aren't looking so hot right now, but all those picks for one player and no supporting cast...if colt sucks next year with the new picks we put around him this year, then we look for a QB. Can't wait. When do we actually win more than we lose? Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bringbackbrownie2 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Can't wait. When do we actually win more than we lose? Zombo We wouldn't win more games giving up 3 1st rounders and a 2nd rounder for 1 guy. I hope the Browns focus on WRs now instead of Tannehill unless we get him in the 2nd round or later.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverback Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter Before Redskins-Rams deal, Browns tried to make last-minute push to make trade for second overall pick. By then, too late. Matt Williamson @WilliamsonNFL You cannot overspend for a Franchise QB...Fine work by #Redskins...#Browns should be ashamed-was there for the taking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills-n-Browns-Fan Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 We wouldn't win more games giving up 3 1st rounders and a 2nd rounder for 1 guy. I hope the Browns focus on WRs now instead of Tannehill unless we get him in the 2nd round or later.. Tannehill... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 We wouldn't win more games giving up 3 1st rounders and a 2nd rounder for 1 guy. I hope the Browns focus on WRs now instead of Tannehill unless we get him in the 2nd round or later.. Yes, wide receivers that our midget good luck charm can throw to. I don't care what the Redskins traded ... they had the balls, they win. Flash forward three years when we have a new presdent, new coach, new blahblahblah and are rumored to trade up from our highly coveted and hard-earned #5 spot for that hot new QB prospect ... while the Redskins are 10-6. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrigan91 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 The Redskins do at least have balls though. If they can clean up in FA it'll be a great offseason for them Now we don't get who everyone thought was our guy, and that means we have some picks. What the Redskins did doesn't mean anything if we flop on these picks and the Rams, oh damn. That is a happy fansbase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimdawg Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 I dont see how we cant still out bid the skins, is it set in stone yet? Or we just not willing to go over the top? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrigan91 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 I dont see how we cant still out bid the skins, is it set in stone yet? Or we just not willing to go over the top? Set in stone. Sorry. But not really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 IF this is true, WHO CARES? Look at what they had to give up to get him. If we gave all that up, our franchise would be doomed. I know things are bad now, but that would have effectively killed the Browns for good. There is no guarantee that RG3 will pan out. Don't worry, there will be another "can't miss QB" There always is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimdawg Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 It cant be officially done untill tues. And i just read on espn that the browns matched the skins offer but st. Louis preferred to deal to the rams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimdawg Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 IF this is true, WHO CARES? Look at what they had to give up to get him. If we gave all that up, our franchise would be doomed. I know things are bad now, but that would have effectively killed the Browns for good. There is no guarantee that RG3 will pan out. Don't worry, there will be another "can't miss QB" There always is. Agree. I woulda felt really uneasy about givin all those picks up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownIndian Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 RGIII TO CLE .... WHERE ARE YOU? :P :P :P :P :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimdawg Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Look at the bright side fellas, we still have 2 1st rounders this year. We can upgrade the team considerably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Whatever. Somebody had more balls than us. We have a cute little leprechaun with moxie and guts. And a left tackle, a cornerback and a couple defensive linemen. I can hear the teeth chattering in Baltimore and Pittsburgh now. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrownIndian Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 IF this is true, WHO CARES? Look at what they had to give up to get him. If we gave all that up, our franchise would be doomed. I know things are bad now, but that would have effectively killed the Browns for good. There is no guarantee that RG3 will pan out. Don't worry, there will be another "can't miss QB" There always is. I'm sure RG3 will be good for RG3. But Washington is more like build through Draft and FA type team so it makes more sense for them to trade their picks for him and build through draft. We are not going FA route so we need every pick we have. If we hit more than 50% of our picks then it will be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 If the Browns really did match the Redskins offer I don't get why the Rams didn't pick us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Excellent! Hail to the Redskins... But if there's any truth that we tried to match the 'Skins ridiculous offer (#1 and 2 in 2012, 2013's 1 and 2014's 1), I'd be seriously pissed at our FO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrigan91 Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Washington vs Cleveland will be a good game this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.