Guest mz. Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I've suspected this but never could tell due to the fact our HC was a moron, too. Thanks again, Phil. One league source noted that the roster is in bad shape after the reign of fired general manager Phil Savage, and that only one current defensive player -- Shaun Rogers -- would be good enough to start for the Ravens or Steelers. Another said neither linebacker Beau Bell nor Martin Rucker, two players the Browns traded up to select in the 2008, will be able to cut it in the NFL. From here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Yeah 'spec, I didn't agree with the rest-of-our-D sucks crap either, but the Rucker/Bell news is disheartening at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masters Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 And who is this league source? Probably the same source that talked about how good CLE would be this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alendor Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 considering corey williams who we just picked up and was a starter and pro bowler at GB, i'd say they are full of shit. and thats only naming 1 other player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sony Reed Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 considering corey williams who we just picked up and was a starter and pro bowler at GB, i'd say they are full of shit. and thats only naming 1 other player Corey Williams never made a Pro Bowl Typical Browns fans who think our players are better than they are, people keep making excuses about injuries and the coaching when people fail to realize this team is not as talented as we all want to believe. I agree with the article that only Rogers could start for any team, the remainder of our defense Pool and Jones are both slow and not ball hawks at safety, McDonald is a nickle back, Eric Wright would be a 3rd cornerback, D'Qwell could start for some 4-3 teams, Wimbley, McGinest and Davis would not start for anyone and Corey Williams and Robaire Smith would be rotation guys. Offfensively Edwards would start along with Joe Thomas and Steinbach and a healthy Winslow, other than those guys Shaffer, Hadnot and Fraley would not start for many teams,, neither would Lewis who is just about finished and Stallworth if used correctly still could be a #2 or #3 receiver. Wake up folks we don't have the talent you all have been fooled into thinking we have. RAC may have been a terrible head coach but he and injuries are not the only reason this team won 4 games. You can't win without talent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Yeah 'spec, I didn't agree with the rest-of-our-D sucks crap either, but the Rucker/Bell news is disheartening at best. I think that was a pretty dumb statement for him to make since we haven't even seen them play. Bell was hurt all year so what do you judge that by? Rucker was inactive most of the year because RAC would rather play Dinkins. WTF is that all about. You need two LBs and a corner and you have the makings of a nice defense. Don't forget they had Poole, Holly and Robaire Smith out all year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earle Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Outstanding. Although In the limited action we saw him, Rucker looked pretty good. I think Bell only got in on a handful of ST plays, so we really don't know. Also I think Wright and McDonald could start on most teams, same with Jones and maybe Pool. Of all our linebackers only Jackson would stand a chance at starting. In Sewage we trust. Bell sucks he was in on some special teams plays but he has to slow of a reaction time to make any good plays. (Bell)which way did he go? which way did he go? Rucker has good hands Im not sure about his speed or route running we really didnt get a chance to see him Just maybe we can draft a LB who has some good instincts for the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Bell sucks he was in on some special teams plays but he has to slow of a reaction time to make any good plays. (Bell)which way did he go? which way did he go? Rucker has good hands Im not sure about his speed or route running we really didnt get a chance to see him Just maybe we can draft a LB who has some good instincts for the game. Bell had a bad knee all year. He was only active about 4 games. You know a bad knee does tend to slow you down. If you got a good take on his LBing ability in that time period and from a few special team plays then you should be the next GM. I not saying he is going to be great, but please spare us, because you don't have a clue of what he can do as a healthy LB and neither does Grossi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alendor Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 my bad, so many of our players have made the pro bowl its easy to make mistakes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 If Bell and Rucker are not big-time players, I'm not real concerned ... what were they 4th rounders? If you are banking on 4th rounders to carry your team, you are in trouble. What troubles me is watching guys this weekend that I was dying for us to take, only for us to pass on, in the first round: Ed Reed and Adrian Peterson. All we had to do was hand the commissioner a little piece of paper and they would both be Browns. Ozzie Newsome took Ed Reed and Haloti Ngata, we took William Green and Kameron Wimbley ... I don't think Beau Bell is our problem. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sony Reed Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Bell had a bad knee all year. He was only active about 4 games. You know a bad knee does tend to slow you down. If you got a good take on his LBing ability in that time period and from a few special team plays then you should be the next GM. I not saying he is going to be great, but please spare us, because you don't have a clue of what he can do as a healthy LB and neither does Grossi. Would you like to tell us Browns fans how many practices you have watched of both Bell and Rucker? I would think coaches that watch these guys everyday would know more than a guy from Youngstown You seem to post here like you are a expert and have run some NFL team, why don't you call Mr. Lerner and ask for a interview you seem to have all the answers........Why don't you display your resume so we can all see your great NFL knowledge You could become the new GM of the team ............ I think a front office of you and Lums would be great for the Browns and you could hire Ghoolie as the head coach..........Think you get get us a Super Bowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sony Reed Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Outstanding. Although In the limited action we saw him, Rucker looked pretty good. I think Bell only got in on a handful of ST plays, so we really don't know. Also I think Wright and McDonald could start on most teams, same with Jones and maybe Pool. Of all our linebackers only Jackson would stand a chance at starting. In Sewage we trust. Would you name the teams that Wright and McDonald could start for Also what teams could Jones who can't cover and Pool who has poor instincts start for.......I am curious IMO, this defense has 2 NFL starting players Rogers and D'Qwell in a 4-3 defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Mn, I hope I'm this big a curmudgeon when I'm 75... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roach Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I agree with the article that only Rogers could start for any team, the remainder of our defense Pool and Jones are both slow and not ball hawks at safety............... Agreed. Not only that, but Jones plays like a sissy- the guy just doesn't want to get in plays. We need a Safety or two that wants to be on TV- not in the stands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Not as sure about Bell. I thought he looked like a terror on film but now everybody says he's slow and stiff... and we've done that with Davis. Though slow and stiff works for dicks, it doesn't work for football players. Add in the guy isn't known for being very sharp, and you have a prospect who is fighting some long odds. I never understood drafting him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 considering corey williams who we just picked up and was a starter and pro bowler at GB, i'd say they are full of shit. and thats only naming 1 other player Overrating that clown KILLED us because Robaire Smith was on IR so we had no solutions for him. I don't care what excuses are offered - he STUNK in a 3-4 so the idea was atrocious. It also means we didn't feel compelled to draft anyone there. We paid him a Pro Bowl salary and got an exchange value of 0 sacks even though Savage was excited about his ability to rush the passer. When you have more offsides penalties than sacks as a millionaire - let's just say I'm glad the OWNER asked "why the freak am I paying this sweat the GNP of a couple small countries?" Now we're gagging on his cap hit. We didn't go 4-12 because we were spoiled with front 7 talent and I think our team sack totals reflect that. When Rogers trots off the field it's instant stinkage. There isn't anything that can convince me I need to excuse Williams when I just watched a documentary of Jack Youngblood who played with a fractured Fibulla that was described as breaking like a twig in week 5 and Youngblood said "tape my ass up I'm a football player." He played all the way through the playoffs and into the SB STILL pressuring QBs and it wasn't because Ray Malavasi was the next Vince Lombardi coaching him up. It's because he was born to be a football player instead an overpaid candyass game check casher. We gotta get back to FINDING football players instead of the same old "just give me my damn game check" types. Now that we've fired the coach and GM - it STILL doesn't erase what our front 7 looks like or is perceived as around the league. The next GM has his work cut out for him so we HAVE to draft better to improve our cap health. As we learned the hard way, the Head Coach and the GM need to be cohesive for things to work. It's a chemistry thing so if Shep tells me Kokkinos or Kinkos works efficiently with Mangini - then Lerner ought to give that a very strong consideration if Mangini is his guy. - Tom F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Masters Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 R. Smith went on IR after CLE got Williams. He also played hurt all year, yet still produced at times. Williams would start just about anywhere in the NFL, though likely as a 4-3 DT, which is where he more naturally fits. He was a bit of a square peg into a round hole. But it's not like its an easy transistion from 4-3 DT to 3-4 DE. He was credited w/ a half of sack, a forced fumble, and 4 PD, to go with 50 tackles. To put it in perspective, Williams performed on par with Keisel of PIT, Bannan of BALT, Coleman of NYJ, Catillo of SD, or Warren of NE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daydawg19 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I'll say this with a great deal of conviction: Martin Rucker does not suck. I mean, I don't know if he can cook, but he can run and catch the football very well. He did it a TON at Missouri. Not as sure about Bell. I thought he looked like a terror on film but now everybody says he's slow and stiff... and we've done that with Davis. Staph...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KardiacKid26 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Beau wasn't even on the field, so how can you judge him? I mean, if he would have started 4 games next to Jackson and did decent, i wouldn't call him a bust. Plus, sewage drafted Bell to be Davis' replacement and Martin Rucker for insurance to Winslow. That's why i was begging Romeo to experiment with the younger guys in the last couple of games to see what we have for next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 Corey Williams never made a Pro Bowl Typical Browns fans who think our players are better than they are, people keep making excuses about injuries and the coaching when people fail to realize this team is not as talented as we all want to believe. I agree with the article that only Rogers could start for any team, the remainder of our defense Pool and Jones are both slow and not ball hawks at safety, McDonald is a nickle back, Eric Wright would be a 3rd cornerback, D'Qwell could start for some 4-3 teams, Wimbley, McGinest and Davis would not start for anyone and Corey Williams and Robaire Smith would be rotation guys. Offfensively Edwards would start along with Joe Thomas and Steinbach and a healthy Winslow, other than those guys Shaffer, Hadnot and Fraley would not start for many teams,, neither would Lewis who is just about finished and Stallworth if used correctly still could be a #2 or #3 receiver. Wake up folks we don't have the talent you all have been fooled into thinking we have. RAC may have been a terrible head coach but he and injuries are not the only reason this team won 4 games. You can't win without talent Know who thinks their a coach with all the answers? Your opinion isn't any better then anyone elses. Get a life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aloysius Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 Come on, guys. Let's just all agree that none of us really know anything These reports on Bell & Rucker really surprise me. I may have not been a fan of Bell (based on him being "exposed" at the Senior Bowl), but I wouldn't have gone so far as to say that Bell couldn't cut it in the NFL. Neither would have Mike Mayock, who compared Bell to Jets' linebacker David Harris. Charles Davis also pointed out that Bell played the roaming weakside linebacker spot at UNLV - not the position an unathletic stiff would end up starting at. The Rucker comment confuses me even more. My guess is that the league source was commenting on Rucker not being able to develop as a blocker, which could be true. But I can't see a big guy with soft hands being unable to eek out a niche as a slot receiver/red zone target in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JewDago Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 as long as rucker's willing to go over the middle and take some shots, he'll be fine. like aloy said, there's no way a big guy with soft hands doesn't make it in the NFL as a niche player. joe jurevicius, anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlaygroundLegend Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 Im really pissed at people who dont see the potential awesomeness of B-mac. He is so underrated its rediculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 Obviously the "only Rogers" thing is bullshit. I mean OBVIOUSLY. Corey Williams already started for Green Bay and was really good, 7 sacks each of the past two years. The talk in Green Bay is that they lost a lot in run defense when they lost him. So that one's a "duh," so the minimum is two. But now you're going to suggest that the #1 tackler in the NFL couldn't start for 31 teams? I refuse to believe you or anyone else would say something so undeniably Retarded. So let's assume we have at least three players who could start for most other teams. Considering we were 13th in the NFL in pass defense in spite of ZERO pass rush, it's a given that our four defensive backs are better than those on about 18 other teams, right? In spite of their youth? If Wright, Jones, or Pool make it to free agency some day, any of the three would be very popular and would have plenty of suitors. Jones struggled in the first half of the year but came on late. I'd say 30 teams would LOVE Brandon McDonald as their nickel back, but I'll conservatively say three of our DBs would start on many other teams. So we can agree that 6 of our defensive starters would start on most other teams. Saying otherwise is just being, as mz the pussy put it, a curmudgeon. Oh, wait: Wimbley is too good of an athlete not to start and do better on defenses way better than ours. But I'll hold off. BAH, HUMBUG! Other than Rodgers- who deserved his Pro Bowl berth, and the CBs (impossible to accurately evaluate them with zero pass rush) the rest of the defense was mighty suspect in my book. We shouldn't be talking barely adequate- I want to see guys good enough to win the Browns a Super Bowl. We might have better overall talent than the Bengals or Kansas City, but that's not saying much. Shep, did you watch any of the Baltimore- Dolphins game? Catch it on NFL Network if you didn't, because that's what a REAL defense is supposed to look like. It's the kind of defense that can win championships. Any comparison of Ed Reed (or Poly-moo-moo from the Squealers) to Poole or Jones is a figment of your imagination. The heart of the 3-4 is your linebackers, and I've been saying for years Andra Davis blows. NE knows when to get rid of overpriced over the hill talent- see McGinest or Andruzzi. Wimbley might be a great athlete, but it's all about production. You want to mention him in the same breath as Terrell Suggs or any other top pass rushers I'd care to mention? Put down the crack pipe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 If Bell and Rucker are not big-time players, I'm not real concerned ... what were they 4th rounders? If you are banking on 4th rounders to carry your team, you are in trouble. What troubles me is watching guys this weekend that I was dying for us to take, only for us to pass on, in the first round: Ed Reed and Adrian Peterson. All we had to do was hand the commissioner a little piece of paper and they would both be Browns. Ozzie Newsome took Ed Reed and Haloti Ngata, we took William Green and Kameron Wimbley ... I don't think Beau Bell is our problem. Zombo Wouldn't have even have had to take Willie Green if you know who had taken a guy by the name of (hint: initials LT) instead of Fatso Warren. Our list of first round busts post 1999 is approaching the Bungles level of futility- but it's more than that- at least the really good teams occasionally find gems in the later rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 I disagree. The Browns have two players that could start for a good defense. That's twice as many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas5737 Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 Shep, did you watch any of the Baltimore- Dolphins game? Catch it on NFL Network if you didn't, because that's what a REAL defense is supposed to look like. It's the kind of defense that can win championships. Any comparison of Ed Reed (or Poly-moo-moo from the Squealers) to Poole or Jones is a figment of your imagination. The heart of the 3-4 is your linebackers, and I've been saying for years Andra Davis blows. NE knows when to get rid of overpriced over the hill talent- see McGinest or Andruzzi. Wimbley might be a great athlete, but it's all about production. You want to mention him in the same breath as Terrell Suggs or any other top pass rushers I'd care to mention? Put down the crack pipe. That reminds me, did anyone else notice that Bart Scott sucked big time in that game and wasn't giving much effort? I really hope we don't make a run for him (I think he is a free agent, could be wrong) this offseason, seemed heartless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 The Browns have 6-7 players on defense who could start for most other teams. Not all, but most. I know you think I stalk you around, but I don't know it it is that high....I was thinking maybe 3-4 tops....for most teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JewDago Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 rogers and wright could start for pretty much any team. wright might be the #2 corner, but he'd start. d'qwell could probably start for at least half the teams in the league, a healthy sean jones 75%. and that's it. corey williams could be just about any 4-3 team's second DT, if one were to consider that starting. that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YtownBrownsBacker Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 rogers and wright could start for pretty much any team. wright might be the #2 corner, but he'd start. d'qwell could probably start for at least half the teams in the league, a healthy sean jones 75%. and that's it. corey williams could be just about any 4-3 team's second DT, if one were to consider that starting. that's it. Poole could start for a lot of teams. Robaire Smith could start or be in the line rotation for most 3-4 teams. Sean Jones is a free agent, let's see how much action he gets in FA. Someone is going to sign him to start at SS. There a a whole lot of teams that would love to have some of our young guys to develop into solid starters. McDonald, Hall and Rubin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.