Ibleedbrown

6th times the charm? Can you tell us just 2 times a state flipped their “sanctuary state” stance?

You’ll find it gets easier when you give straight answers. What do you consider truly fair and balanced news outlets?

Wasn’t really my plan to be the defender of the Associated Press here. The media fact check site l used earlier was introduced here by DieHard and seems legit. For example. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/ And https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/ What do you consider truly fair and balanced news outlets? I’m sure you’re aware the likes of Redstate and Blaze are biased yes?

Here’s something on the second. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/12/28/business/economy/second-stimulus-package.amp.html And the first. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/03/25/politics/stimulus-package-details-coronavirus/index.html

You can dissent to your heart’s content my man, haha. To your point about ballot harvesting though, l’m not saying it didn’t happen or anything, but is there enough reliable data that shows what percentage of counted votes were made up of the harvested variety, AND who benefitted from them? I’ll assume you read the article and how they created their formula. The more unreliable the data that goes into it the more unreliable the findings will be. I would argue that using older voters in the state of Texas to formulate a baseline comparison to the whole nation is questionable. They claim they used Texas because of their strict (by comparison) mail in voting laws, but it’s still Texas, and older people, which generally lean conservative. It seems like a reliable study for the state of Texas, but not the nation. The article also mentions another study but didn’t get into the particulars on that one.

The AP is considered one of the least biased news outlets. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/ And no mention of ballot harvesting in the original article. It would likely be difficult to include that in a formula due the lack of available information on how prevalent it was and who benefited from it.

I’m not saying l buy it all. I question their methodology. But with this being a message board it’s dependent on other folks reading it and discussing to really dive into it.

The article is specifically written about mail in voting. Absentee voting isn’t mentioned in it. Basically it’s just a study concluding mail in votes didn’t benefit either party.

In a way this makes sense to me. Mail in voting would seemingly benefit older voters who had a harder time waiting in a line for any length of time, not to mention whatever concerns for covid any particular person may have had, and older voters tend to lean conservative. Had Trump come out in favor of mail in voting l would have expected the data to favor Republicans. https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-coronavirus-pandemic-elections-voting-cfde3aa17d7cecb9e1f2d58f3582dd0d

Cuomo must have the worst moves. “It was nice talking to you. Wanna do it now?”

I’d drink the one laying sideways in the door first. If you forget it’s there it’ll roll out if you open the door too fast.

The guy with a hammer was probably a carpenter. Jesus was a carpenter too. What would Jesus do? Jesus would carry a hammer. Bless him!

They could just make an alternate version of Peter Pan with a female main character. Call it Pussy Pot. It’ll be great.

I was following your lead with the articles you posted about these books getting banned on ebay. I’m expanding what you posted with real time ebay auctions for these books. Here’s another. Up to $280 now. Get ‘em while they’re hot! Limited time only! These are the real life implications of “banning” books. It increases their value. And the bird repartee was fun but you’re now emotionally knee jerking with the insults again so l’ll cut it out. It’s nothing to get upset about. I’m just helping you with the articles you posted about ebay.