Jump to content

Gunz41

REGISTERED
  • Content count

    837
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

210 Excellent

About Gunz41

  • Rank
    Pro Rookie
  • Birthday 09/20/1985

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Virginia
  • Interests
    Coaching, Football, Cleveland Browns,Ohio St and Virginia Tech in football, UNC in basketball, LA Lakers, Playing Pool

Recent Profile Visitors

3,259 profile views
  1. OP, you aren't understanding people's point. Nelson could end up being great, generational guy, but at that time wasn't the teams biggest need. And just because someone is a generational talent doesn't mean you take him. If the Dolphins select Tua next draft and he plays well and they have the opportunity, should they then draft Trevor Lawrence? But Baker ( no matter what you think of him) doesn't belong in this discussion. Not just because he plays the most important position in sports, but because the Browns could have had Baker AND Nelson, there is no either/or
  2. Gunz41

    Shakegate

    You obviously aren't getting the point. There are MANY things that are told to reporters that don't come out. Case in point Andrew Luck. Everyone was shocked. But Jay Glazer kind of knew before hand. Again Richard Sherman was wrong, 100%. But if you think that history/personal relationships/etc couldn't have factored in then I dunno what to tell you. I haven't said that IT WAS the reason, just that it COULD have contributed. I have no reason to go against reporters wanting to get it out quickly, but that doesn't apply here. Silver is the one that Sherman told, so there was nobody to compete with. And you using the happens all the time, etc. Yep it does, but there are different sectors who will report things differently because of their relationships, affiliation, etc. Again the Hue thing is just what I read. If true, Baker put Hue in a bad situation. As a friend, Silver thought he had ammunition to make Baker look bad. Do you think he would have been as quick to release something negative about Hue (or anyone else he has a relationship with)? Or would Cowherd be quick to release something negative about Sam Darnold? Or how about Rex releasing something about Rob? Or Skip Bayless about anything Cowboys or Tom Brady
  3. Gunz41

    Shakegate

    No, maybe you should read. I never said Hue himself had anything to do with it. From what I heard/read, the reporter is close with Hue, so that COULD have been a reason the reporter ran with the story without verifying it.
  4. Gunz41

    Shakegate

    Exactly how did you miss the part of "maybe I misunderstood." And again, PLEASE find where I took up for Sherman in the slightest? You won't find it. But go ahead and think that it all would have come to if he didn't tell the reporter (who is ALSO wrong for not checking the story before writing it) and also tell me that this reporter being real close to Hue had NOTHING to do with it
  5. Gunz41

    Shakegate

    I'm not saying Sherman isn't in the wrong, he most certainly is. But from what I read it wouldn't have come out if not for the reporter, who obviously has a thing against Baker
  6. Gunz41

    Shakegate

    Yes Sherman lied, but everyone seems to be missing the part (unless I misunderstood) that he wasn't the one who brought it out. He said something to some reporter, who is good friends with Hue and the guy posted the story.
  7. Gunz41

    Shakegate

    Guys you gotta remember, if the 49ers had Kevin Hogan or Colt McCoy they would finish undefeated lol
  8. Gunz41

    How bad do the Browns destroy 49ers?

    There was no excuse to play as bad as the Browns did against Titans, and they just played terrible against 49ers, not dependent on score. I would agree that Ravens would be 2-3 at present. I think that Browns would be 4-1 with Ravens schedule at present. Just because of how awful the Dolphins are. I'm certainly not advocating for how they have looked so far, and even less advocating for the preseason hype of lots of people. They have certainly underperformed with their talent, but as a fan of the team you are cheering for, you were probably the wrong person to say how they suck. And I certainly think you are being very premature for saying Cleveland turns winners into losers. Forget about college records, as that certainly doesn't translate, and the key acquisitions haven't really been winners in the league either.
  9. Gunz41

    How bad do the Browns destroy 49ers?

    What have I said that is delusional? I was the one who replied to you, and I have said since the season was talked about that people are giving the Browns too much hype. I also gave you pure facts, no opinions. The Browns have played a tougher schedule to date than Baltimore. They have also played each other and the Browns were the winner. Transitive property would say that 49ers are 43 points better than the Ravens. I don't believe that. And it would also say that Cleveland is 20 points better than the Chiefs, and I don't believe that. But you come off as bitter saying how bad the Browns are since they actually beat your team. The way you are coming off is like an Auburn fans telling Alabama fans they suck because they got beat by Clemson. Ya know, after Alabama beat them. But let's stay objective here, what do you think Baltimore record would be with the Browns schedule thus far, and what would the Browns record be thus far with the Ravens record?
  10. Gunz41

    How bad do the Browns destroy 49ers?

    You obviously missed the point. You wanted to come on just to say how bad the Browns are, yet they put it on your team. Cleveland got beat by a good team. Whether they will turn it around or not has yet to be determined. They have played 5 games, and have not been at full strength for any of them. Would a full team have won them the game against Titans or 49ers, NO. But could have made a difference in Rams game. Remember they were without ALL starters in defensive backfield. And what guys have they brought in that were winners and now are losing? Again, since the Browns are soooooo bad, or whatever you want to call it, what does that say about YOUR team. Baltimore has beaten Miami (0-5), Arizona (1-3-1, with that win over winless Bengals), and Steelers (1-4, that win over winless Bengals) and losses to Chiefs (4-1) and Cleveland. Cleveland has beaten Jets (0-4), and Baltimore. Losses to Titans (2-3), Rams (3-2, a bad loss to TB and a 1 point loss to 4-1 Seahawks. Also a win over 4-1 NO) and 49ers (4-0). I wonder who has played the tougher schedule? And since Baker has been a Brown, the Browns are 2-1 against YOUR team.
  11. Gunz41

    How bad do the Browns destroy 49ers?

    I'm not one of the guys who was saying how great this team is, I had realistic expectations. But didn't this team that "sucks" beat your team (by screen name). So what does that say about them? Dolphins, Cardinals, Steelers is REALLY impressive
  12. Gunz41

    How bad do the Browns destroy 49ers?

    Well since he said SINCE 1950, he would be correct. This is the dumbest thing I have ever witnessed. If you had read it you would see you are incorrect. But we ALL know you won't admit it
  13. Gunz41

    ***Ravens VS Browns Gameday Thread***

    That isn't what you said, but that makes sense. And Michel wasn't available then. I honestly thought you just forgot about Barkley
  14. Gunz41

    How bad do the Browns destroy 49ers?

    Well the Browns didn't drop 45 on Baltimore so
  15. Gunz41

    ***Ravens VS Browns Gameday Thread***

    I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. But saying Chubb and Michel were the top 2 backs I would say Saquon would certainly be in that conversation too
×