something like that. I just didnt want something that could be seen as a rip-off of Ebert and Roeper. I wanted something more structured. Two different methods of doing the same review. Not just a pro and con review, but a review based on one criteria and another based on completely different criteria - not two dissenting reviews based on the same criteria. They might dissent, but they should cover the movie from different angles. That way if both say it sucks, you can be pretty sure it really does suck. :laugh:
