The Cysko Kid

Oh ccclgbt, you poor thing. Once again you're missing the point completely. It's not offensive. Because time keeps on moving and unless you're a perpetually outraged leftist you can't hold grudges forever. My grandfather fought at Iwo Jima. And he still bought me my first Nintendo in 1986. Made in a country still nominally ruled by Hirohito. You know why? Because he wasn't a sissy. Japan was able to reinvent themselves. So was Germany. So was the South. None of them have to deny dark periods in their history for do we have to ban all mention of it. As long as we can own up to it it can be moved past.

Not at all. What I'm saying is certainly you don't own anything by Sony or Nintendo or Nissan do you? I mean, heavens to betsy, that would be extremely offensive.

I suppose cccjlgbt and Cleve hold the Japanese to the same standard as the descendants of Confederates and nazi soldiers, yes? You don't have any Japanese stuff do you, kids? I mean an awful lot of our brave fellow Americans died fighting them in the Pacific after they sneak attacked us, right? And their actions against the Chinese...hoo boy. That would be a heck of a double standard.

Taxes to pay for the border wall or taxes to pay for the welfare of illegal immigrants? Which would I rather pay? Because either way we're paying. They're not.

Interestingly I'm not seeing them burning Confederate flags. Why do you suppose that is? Is it because it's manufactured outrage that is selectively designed to agitate against the ones they really hate? Hmm? You think anyone really gives the first shit about the civil war or the heritage of either side? Or is it just another point designed to attack what they consider their political enemy?

Interestingly I'm not seeing any Confederate flags there. Am I missing something?

Nice try though.

Who, exactly, is idolizing the South for slave society? I'm pretty sure you won't be able to give any specific examples.

horseshit just further cementing your simple black and white thinking. Are you even capable of higher thought than a dog?

Even Lee himself spoke out against succession and by all accounts Jefferson Davis was none to pleased to have been elected president of the Confederate states.

It's hard to keep all your slavering leftist Dingleberries straight sometimes.

Obviously they should have listened to Sam Houston because everything he said turned out to be accurate, but that changes nothing about what I wrote.

Wasn't Krugman the same pussy who wrote that he got PTSD after test firing an AR-15?

Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for. Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.

Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose. Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives. If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?