IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Eric Mangini Is Sacrificing the Cleveland Browns' Future to Save His Own Job, Is Mangini Being Selfish?
Is Mangini Being Selfish?
Is Mangini Being Selfish?
Yes [ 6 ] ** [35.29%]
No [ 11 ] ** [64.71%]
Total Votes: 17
Guests cannot vote 
mastadave99999
post Dec 2 2009, 07:44 PM
Post #1


College All American
***

Group: REGISTERED
Posts: 106
Thank(s): 22
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Raleigh
Member No.: 837



http://bleacherreport.com/articles/300471-...urce=newsletter

QUOTE

Eric Mangini Is Sacrificing the Cleveland Browns' Future to Save His Own Job



Analyst Written on December 01, 2009
CLEVELAND - NOVEMBER 16: Eric Mangini head coach of the Cleveland Browns watches his team against the Baltimore Ravens at Cleveland Browns Stadium on November 16, 2009 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Matt Sullivan/Getty Images) Matt Sullivan/Getty Images

Cleveland Browns head coach Eric Mangini has been on the hot seat for the greater part of the 2009 season, but now with the Browns' season clearly over, everyone, including Mangini, is playing for their job in 2010.

Mangini is easily one of the most hated people in Cleveland right now, and the hate for him might even compete with the hatred of former owner Art Modell at this point.

So what is Mangini to do to save his own butt?

He has gone on an interview campaign to try to save face nationally and clean up his own name in lieu of a possible firing at the end of the season. By doing this, he feels he can still have a future in the NFL.

His future as a coach in the NFL may not be possible if he does indeed get fired, but the college level might be a better opportunity, and there is a vacancy at Notre Dame (joke).

The reality of what is happening with the Browns is that Mangini is trying to save his job for next year, since the new "football czar" will most likely want his own choice of head coach.

So Mangini is trying to save his own job, but to what extent?

To the extent of sacrificing the potential talent of young players for the Browns' future.

Mangini is not playing younger players due to his own selfishness, but who can blame him?

Anyone in a position of getting fired will do anything possible to save his or her own butt at the expense of something else.

Playing more veterans (former Jets players, specifically Hank Poteat) instead of rookies, who are more prone to making mistakes while they are learning on the job, makes the losses a little less of a debacle.

But come on now...the "football czar" will hopefully be able to see through this failure of a move of rookie sacrifice to make a final decision on Mangini's future with the Browns.

It should be in Mangini's best interest to help save himself by playing the rookies more in the last five games to show that he indeed did choose wisely in the 2009 NFL Draft with his picks and evaluation of those players.

When you look at the 2009 season as a whole, it doesn't look like Mangini can do enough to save himself, but why punish the young guys by keeping them on the bench?

Those same young guys may be able to help Mangini save his job because they might be playmakers who may break out in the next few games.

If the current trend holds, then don't count on seeing any more younger players than have already played, and that's just bad coaching.

Keep digging your own grave, Mangini, because the inevitable will occur at this rate of overall team ineptness.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dawgfanforever88
post Dec 2 2009, 07:54 PM
Post #2


College All American
***

Group: REGISTERED
Posts: 330
Thank(s): 92
Joined: 4-February 09
From: Oberlin, OH
Member No.: 763



QUOTE (mastadave99999 @ Dec 2 2009, 07:44 PM) *


He's not playing his rookies? oh really I had no clue that are #1 receiver had been in the league a few years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mastadave99999
post Dec 2 2009, 07:55 PM
Post #3


College All American
***

Group: REGISTERED
Posts: 106
Thank(s): 22
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Raleigh
Member No.: 837



Yeah I dont know if i agree with this article either? Its not like we had any depth on the team last year, as a result we have to rely on a lot of veteran players.


Consequently, But the whole robiskie story is what bothers me... Can he be that bad?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Following 1 Users Say Thank You to mastadave99999 For This Useful Post:
Big Chuck
Gips
post Dec 2 2009, 08:15 PM
Post #4


All Pro
******

Group: REGISTERED
Posts: 2,398
Thank(s): 126
Joined: 26-October 08
Member No.: 85



I dont think he is being selfish...he has wasted the entire season though so i would call it being foolish..or just being himself ,what you see is what you get..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Following 1 Users Say Thank You to Gips For This Useful Post:
mastadave99999
roach
post Dec 2 2009, 09:31 PM
Post #5


Member since Sept 16th, 2003
******

Group: Registered Member
Posts: 2,030
Thank(s): 119
Joined: 26-October 08
Member No.: 99



Since this article was written on a website thingy, and this Board is a website thingy, i guess it is fair game for being posted. But the entire concept is one of the dumbest things that i've ever read.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pumpkin Eater
post Dec 2 2009, 09:43 PM
Post #6


Pro Veteran
*****

Group: REGISTERED
Posts: 1,956
Thank(s): 242
Joined: 27-October 08
From: Orlando
Member No.: 230



This is very stupid. It's such a dumb question it doesn't deserve a vote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ballpeen
post Dec 3 2009, 07:45 AM
Post #7


Member since Mar 5, 2007
**********

Group: Registered Member
Posts: 7,524
Thank(s): 598
Joined: 26-October 08
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 81



Geesh
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd September 2010 - 10:15 PM