134 replies to this topic

[heckofajobbrownie]

Can you describe for us what is wrong with Jerry Sandusky raping a kid in the shower, or in his basement, as the now 18-year-old boy described in detail yesterday in court? What would be abnormal about that?

And how is that different from, say, a 30-year-old man who might think certain women are beautiful, but isn't sexual attracted to them, but is sexually attracted to men?

[heckofajobbrownie]

Also, why don't you name me one time when you think I've argued something I didn't believe in order to serve some agenda. I don't think you actually believe this, and that this is how you lash out.

Also, what do you imagine my agenda is, getting Cal to vote for Obama? What possible agenda could I have in here, other than wasting time?

[VaporTrail]

You just admitted as most of us would if we were being honest that you could certainly be attracted to someone illegal. Perfectly normal and natural?
So if that's perfectly normal and natural what's wrong with coach sandusky?

Steve, this is the conclusion you came to? wtfuck? How many times do we have to spell out for you that it's about consent?

[heckofajobbrownie]

You know what? Never mind. There's no point.

[MLD Woody]

Wait a sec.... I never said I wanted to have sex with a 14 year old, lol. You are making some crazy conclusions. You asked if I had a better chance to be aroused by a 15 year old girl or a dude. Obviously that answer isn't a dude, lol.

Of course I probably would have to not know her age and she's have to look old for her age.

But if you want to bone 15 year olds then that would explain your stance here. You're not anti gay, you're just pro pedo

But I think Heck and Vapor already did a good job telling you how ridiculous you're being.

[calfoxwc]

I just took the title from the page and used it.

It is just one study - it's more of an indicator...

Vapor's appraisal is very fair - when I have the time,

I'd like to go find a few of the reports I've read in the past,

about the importance of both female and male figures

being in childrens's lives.

It had to do with self-actualization.

well, if I had the time to go re-read Joseph Campbell's

"Hero of a Thousand Faces" I would enjoy that.

BTW, I don't think that the two sexes figures in a child's life..

is necessarily excluded by a gay couple who adopt....

but then again... ?

[MLD Woody]

But then again what?

[calfoxwc]

is necessarily excluded by a gay couple who adopt....

but then again... ? Woody
********************************
geez. Seriously? "but then again", refers to the inverse of what I surmised about gay couples who adopt, not having other sexes

in their lives as opposite sex mentors/influences in the child's life. It isn't necessarity excuded... but may be a dominant trend anyways?

Honestly - do you think before you ask questions like this?

Wait - you're a lib. sorry.

[Kosar_For_President]

oh jeezzz there is nothing normal at all about this or is there anything normal about two queers raising and corrupting some poor kid.

[VaporTrail]

I love how regularly the crazies equate homosexuality with bestiality and pedophilia, it really showcases your ignorance.

[heckofajobbrownie]

I think Bunker was one of the guys in the audience for this and has yet to recover.

[The Cysko Kid]

You guys take such an arrogant stance on arguing just to argue, and now look at you lot. This thread has degenerated into name calling.

[heckofajobbrownie]

Oh, come on, Cysko. That clip is funny.

[VaporTrail]

You guys take such an arrogant stance on arguing just to argue, and now look at you lot. This thread has degenerated into name calling.

Like you're one to talk? Really dude, you were name calling on the first page in another thread! And now you're going to take the moral high ground?

This forum was never anything but name calling. If you don't believe me, look at how Woody got welcomed. I remember it being the same for me when I first came here, too.

[calfoxwc]

When you start the name calling,

the response name calling is self defense.

The latter is justified.

the former negates any legitimate claim to victimhood.

[The Cysko Kid]

Like you're one to talk? Really dude, you were name calling on the first page in another thread! And now you're going to take the moral high ground?

This forum was never anything but name calling. If you don't believe me, look at how Woody got welcomed. I remember it being the same for me when I first came here, too.

Please try and comprehend what you read. I never said I was against name calling, that was you guys. I merely point out that now you're all engaging in it. I seem to remember a consenses that it was serious discussion or nothing. Now look at you.

[VaporTrail]

Please try and comprehend what you read. I never said I was against name calling, that was you guys. I merely point out that now you're all engaging in it. I seem to remember a consenses that it was serious discussion or nothing. Now look at you.

The name calling doesn't piss me off. Your hypocritical attitude toward it does.

For example, here:
Your name calling derailed this thread.

In the other thread:
Hurrr, hurr, Woody, leave the talking to the adults, you 4-F, Hippie faggot. You contributed next to nothing of value and spoke out of your ass.

I mean, it's one thing if your attitude changes over the course of months, but these are simultaneous threads. Practicing one thing while preaching another. And while we're on the topic of name calling, go eat a shit sandwich, hypocrite.

[Westside Steve]

Name calling?
Time for all parties involved, right left or center, to grow a pair.
WSS

[MLD Woody]

I don't expect anything out of Bunker or Cal. Hell, I'm not even sure how Bunker functions on a day to day basis.

As for Cysko, he admitted in another thread he talks out of his ass and shouldn't be taken seriously, so I won't listen to or take anything seriously that he says

[The Cysko Kid]

I don't expect anything out of Bunker or Cal. Hell, I'm not even sure how Bunker functions on a day to day basis.

As for Cysko, he admitted in another thread he talks out of his ass and shouldn't be taken seriously, so I won't listen to or take anything seriously that he says

Well woody as your opinions are among the most follower-y and asinine in this board, anything I say for the purpose of debate should be considered more serious than anything you say ever.