A Felony To Protest In Front Of The Secret Service
#1
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:06 AM
#2
Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:54 PM
on every media platform op, ....
but now? silence.
Fascism is good if it's THEIR fascism.
We are in very serious trouble as a country.
Obamao is quickly becoming more Chavez/Putin/Fidel/Mao week by week.
Big, very serious trouble.
#3
Posted 21 April 2012 - 07:35 PM
"If we can't stand outside the President's hotel and yell at him, he'll never hear our side!" Yeah, ok, cause every form of modern communication doesn't work.
I bet you Fox News scared some elderly people though, so that worked.
#4
Posted 24 April 2012 - 08:17 AM
That Fox News guy is freaking out like this is the first time we've ever passed a law limiting free speech, lol.
"If we can't stand outside the President's hotel and yell at him, he'll never hear our side!" Yeah, ok, cause every form of modern communication doesn't work.
I bet you Fox News scared some elderly people though, so that worked.
So you are officially on board to eliminate the first amendment.
(BTW I say screw the protesters...)
WSS
#5
Posted 24 April 2012 - 10:45 AM
So you are officially on board to eliminate the first amendment.
(BTW I say screw the protesters...)
WSS
.... ok
I also don't think you should yell FIRE! in a crowded theater, so I guess I want to eliminate free speech there as well
#6
Posted 24 April 2012 - 11:24 AM
.... ok
I also don't think you should yell FIRE! in a crowded theater, so I guess I want to eliminate free speech there as well
Of course that's not what they're talking about here.
They're talking about keeping protests out of the view of the president.
Far enough away, assumably, to make him safe from them even though it would certainly serve to insulate him.
The old people you feel are being scared arent usually the ones involved in protest.
If anyone wants to be scared I suppose it would be whoever thanks their stupid protests are changing peoples minds.
WSS
#7
Posted 24 April 2012 - 12:42 PM
Of course that's not what they're talking about here.
They're talking about keeping protests out of the view of the president.
Far enough away, assumably, to make him safe from them even though it would certainly serve to insulate him.
The old people you feel are being scared arent usually the ones involved in protest.
If anyone wants to be scared I suppose it would be whoever thanks their stupid protests are changing peoples minds.
WSS
Cuz the only thing the president knows about are things he sees first hand
#8
Posted 24 April 2012 - 12:45 PM
Cuz the only thing the president knows about are things he sees first hand
Well if you're good with it I don't care.
I would imagine had it been president bush having the secret service clear out a bunch of protesters you guys well some of you guys would be squealing like stuck pigs.
WSS
#9
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:14 AM
Later on, things change, so they are FOR the same thing, if it benefits them.
It's a sickly entitlement, emotional business. Most all liberals do it.
It's the ultimate psychological corruption...thoughtless knee jerk emotional reaction, instead of reason.
Egad. They ALL DO IT.
#10
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:14 AM
Two, the reasons you described are bad bit per lie should be able to change their minds based on new info. I'd be more worried if they didn't.
#11
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:32 AM
By Bush or Reagan it would be liberal socialist hatemongers screaming "FASCISM" every seond of the day,
on every media platform op, ....
but now? silence.
Fascism is good if it's THEIR fascism.
We are in very serious trouble as a country.
Obamao is quickly becoming more Chavez/Putin/Fidel/Mao week by week.
Big, very serious trouble.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander cal. This should be common sense. America is so partisan that no matter who is in power, democrat or republican, the other side will immediately oppose anything they say or do and scream facism! Racism! Socialism! Communism!
#12
Posted 01 May 2012 - 10:19 AM
He never had communist parents and/or mentors. He never had a historical marxist saying as his new motto,
he never taught classes on Saul Alinski.
Obamao - there's nothing like his socialist dumbass fascism in our American history.
I criticized Bush for not stomping down on illegal immigration. Of course, he did have a dem congress...
But Obamao and Holder are SUING ARIZONA TO MAKE THEM STOP STOPPING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. Seems to me, that
Woody, Heck, Vapor and Sad"brownsfan" are extreme liberals,,,, some of them apparently know each other. Libs never post alone.
They seem to always have a shep or a woodpecker or a Heck or Vapor to help them with their "I can't think, so I blindly feel" baloney.
#13
Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:10 PM
#14
Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:37 PM
#15
Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:44 PM
Oh, baloney. Bush never had communists like Van Jones, and socialists and radicals all over his admin.
He never had communist parents and/or mentors. He never had a historical marxist saying as his new motto,
he never taught classes on Saul Alinski.
Obamao - there's nothing like his socialist dumbass fascism in our American history.
I criticized Bush for not stomping down on illegal immigration. Of course, he did have a dem congress...
But Obamao and Holder are SUING ARIZONA TO MAKE THEM STOP STOPPING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. Seems to me, that
Woody, Heck, Vapor and Sad"brownsfan" are extreme liberals,,,, some of them apparently know each other. Libs never post alone.
They seem to always have a shep or a woodpecker or a Heck or Vapor to help them with their "I can't think, so I blindly feel" baloney.
So wait I am a extreme liberal now? I don't even consider myself a liberal.
#16
Posted 01 May 2012 - 03:53 PM
Like, the occupiers feel that they are the "99".
They are...99% STUPID.
#17
Posted 01 May 2012 - 05:01 PM
Yes,so far you are. Liberals always feel that they are mainstream.
Like, the occupiers feel that they are the "99".
They are...99% STUPID.
Oh snap!
Well when you are that far to one side, people near the middle may seem extreme to you.
#18
Posted 01 May 2012 - 10:09 PM
Per the silly test, I am one click NE of the middle.
We are the mainstream. I think you were off the chart to the SW.
#19
Posted 01 May 2012 - 10:28 PM
Also, if we go pure distance from (0,0) to the point, I was 2.27 and you were 1.85, hardly a big difference
Also, I was more moderate as far as the first one than you
Also, I'd probably be more moderate in the last part if I thought being gay was an abomination and you had to follow the Bible to have any morals...
#20
Posted 01 May 2012 - 10:43 PM
You just FELT afraid to answer like you really feel, because you felt intimidated.
Libs Lie Like Little Gollums.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












