The Rg3 Bidding War Has Begun
#41
Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:08 PM
#42
Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:49 PM
Easier to say that about Newton now... What were you saying a year ago?AJ Green Anthony Costanzo and Jabaal Sheard last years 4,22,37 I'd trade them for Newton.
If you are like me and hoping we get RG3 you can just hope the Rams are turned off by going all the way down to 6.
This only considers their ability to still get a player they covet. The further you trade down the more you get in terms of volume of quality picks... thus the talk of WSH's 2013 #1... which will be a high #1... again.From Don Banks at SI regarding the Rams and the #2 pick...
-- In order of likelihood when it comes to potential trade partners, I think St. Louis sees it as No. 4 Cleveland in the pole position, followed by No. 6 Washington and No. 8 Miami. Obviously, the less the Rams have to drop down in the first round, the more attractive the deal will be for St. Louis.
What it comes down to is how close the Rams think they are to breaking out. I think Fischer is a realist and will have convinced them they are not that close. And that means getting maximum value for their #2 and that means more high picks and hello WSH.
If you're scared, you are not convinced... plain and simple.I think RGIII will be fantastic but I'm scared to give up our first 3 picks for one guy when we have so many holes on this team.
#43
Posted 26 February 2012 - 09:32 PM
#44
Posted 26 February 2012 - 09:46 PM
#45
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:47 PM
#46
Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:24 PM
or we can gamble it all and pick RG3
Rg3 and bob the builder in the 7th round (glad rg3 is almost as fast as Vick so he can throw the ball then catch it himself)
or
Kalil, Wilson, Minnifield & McNutt
that's how you build a team
Cincy will still have the best picks....possibly Trent Richardson and Floyd...how are we gonna stop that offense now?
#47
Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:04 AM
What? This post is very confusing.
No, you're confused. Canton Mike got it. You can't get past your Griffin Man-Crush. The Redskins (theoretical) offer IS superior to yours. In fact, it's flat out stupid to those of us who happen to be objective about the situation.
I'll spell it out as simply as I can. If the Redskins offer is true- that's enough value to not only move up to #2 to take Griffin, it's enough to move up to #1 to take Luck.
I fervently hope H&H aren't going to be dumb enough to give away THREE premium picks to move up two draft slots.
IF the Rams would take the Redskins potential offer (they'd be fools not to) Kalil and Blackmon (two blue chip prospects at positions of dire need for the Rams) will be off the board. The Vikings will take one (most likely Kalil) - the Browns will have the other sitting in their laps. So it's time for the Browns to play reverse screw job- hold the Rams hostage.
#48
Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:55 AM
You need to extract the "Blackmon is a top 5 lock" logic from your brain.No, you're confused. Canton Mike got it. You can't get past your Griffin Man-Crush. The Redskins (theoretical) offer IS superior to yours. In fact, it's flat out stupid to those of us who happen to be objective about the situation.
I'll spell it out as simply as I can. If the Redskins offer is true- that's enough value to not only move up to #2 to take Griffin, it's enough to move up to #1 to take Luck.
I fervently hope H&H aren't going to be dumb enough to give away THREE premium picks to move up two draft slots.
IF the Rams would take the Redskins potential offer (they'd be fools not to) Kalil and Blackmon (two blue chip prospects at positions of dire need for the Rams) will be off the board. The Vikings will take one (most likely Kalil) - the Browns will have the other sitting in their laps. So it's time for the Browns to play reverse screw job- hold the Rams hostage.
He's not a top 5 lock, so there is value for STL to trade back to #6 because I believe both Blackmon (if he doesn't run 4.49 or lower) and Floyd (or Rieff) will be there for them to choose.
I don't think the Browns want Blackmon or Richardson @ #4 so therefore it makes trading UP even more of a necessity.
Getting back to which package is more valuable, I think the Rams value #22 more than a 2013 #1 pick from Washington because they have players scouted and are dealing with a known variable.
#4
#22
#33
#66
#96
#100/#118
If the take take the Browns trade, they'll have their choice of four of the top 66 players with them being able to get an impact OT (Rieff) and Receiver (Hill, Jeffrey, Wright) that can be the foundation of their offense for years to come.
If they take the Redskins offer:
#6
#33
#39
#66
#70
#96
Redskins offer includes their #39 + #70 but does that equal #22 + #100 or #118?
What do you think?
#6 + #39 + #70 <<<< #4 + #22 + #100 or #118?
It's not even close.
And in your scenario you had the Rams trading #6 + #33 to the Browns to get back up to #4?????
Why do that when they can make the Browns trade amd keep #33 while getting #4 + #22??
Your post continues to not make any sense just like I stated originally.
If you want to talk about Washington's 2013 #1, then the Browns 2nd rounder continues to make their deal superior but I doubt they even have to include it.
Browns #4 + #22 + 4th rounder (Falcons or our's if it seals the deal) beats any Washington offer that has went public.
#49
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:31 AM
#50
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:38 AM
College? You're shitting us, right?In High school and college I asked out the most beautiful women...
And "asking" ain't dating...
Correction... he had a great 40 time and jumped high and far.I know griffin has had a great combine...
Here's a case for the Rams rumored offer. With Luck effectively off of the board to the Colts, maybe even including pre-draft negotiations and signing, then effectively the Rams have the #1 pick.If the Redskins offer is true- that's enough value to not only move up to #2 to take Griffin, it's enough to move up to #1 to take Luck.
Add to the above at least one team who is completely sold on RGIII and his "1b" status in the draft, and they will assemble a #1 worthy package to move to the #2 slot.
We're not there...
We hope H&H aren't there...
But it does seem that Snyderville is there...
"RGIII-2-DC"
I like the sound of that...
#51
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:50 AM
The reports are that the Browns have sent signals that they are not interested in trading up to get RGIII. Good....but my question is: why would the Redskins bid against themselves?
Because of Snyder's insanity?
#52
Posted 27 February 2012 - 11:07 AM
#53
Posted 27 February 2012 - 11:43 AM
You need to extract the "Blackmon is a top 5 lock" logic from your brain.
He's not a top 5 lock, so there is value for STL to trade back to #6 because I believe both Blackmon (if he doesn't run 4.49 or lower) and Floyd (or Rieff) will be there for them to choose.
I don't think the Browns want Blackmon or Richardson @ #4 so therefore it makes trading UP even more of a necessity.
Getting back to which package is more valuable, I think the Rams value #22 more than a 2013 #1 pick from Washington because they have players scouted and are dealing with a known variable.
#4
#22
#33
#66
#96
#100/#118
If the take take the Browns trade, they'll have their choice of four of the top 66 players with them being able to get an impact OT (Rieff) and Receiver (Hill, Jeffrey, Wright) that can be the foundation of their offense for years to come.
If they take the Redskins offer:
#6
#33
#39
#66
#70
#96
Redskins offer includes their #39 + #70 but does that equal #22 + #100 or #118?
What do you think?
I think what I have always thought: If the Rams want to give us #2 in exchange for #4 and #66, fine. And I might throw in the Browns 3rd rounder in 2013.
And, by the way: all accounts are that the Browns brain trust is thinking along my lines. So be it.
#6 + #39 + #70 <<<< #4 + #22 + #100 or #118?
It's not even close.
And in your scenario you had the Rams trading #6 + #33 to the Browns to get back up to #4?????
Why do that when they can make the Browns trade amd keep #33 while getting #4 + #22??
Your post continues to not make any sense just like I stated originally.
If you want to talk about Washington's 2013 #1, then the Browns 2nd rounder continues to make their deal superior but I doubt they even have to include it.
Browns #4 + #22 + 4th rounder (Falcons or our's if it seals the deal) beats any Washington offer that has went public.
#54
Posted 27 February 2012 - 12:05 PM
Daniel Snyder has always been a bit of an idiot, and overpays for everything. It is one of the reasons the Redskins have been one of the worst teams in the league for 20 years now.
The reports are that the Browns have sent signals that they are not interested in trading up to get RGIII. Good....but my question is: why would the Redskins bid against themselves?
Because of Snyder's insanity?
Have to also keep in mind the Redskins interest in Peyton Manning. They are rumored to be right there with Miami and Arizona in terms of teams with the most interest in picking him up should the Colts release him. That would change things in the draft as well.
#55
Posted 27 February 2012 - 12:09 PM
#56
Posted 27 February 2012 - 12:12 PM
After all, that's what he'll be in a couple years.
#57
Posted 27 February 2012 - 12:14 PM
http://www.grantland...zing-excitement
Seems to be pretty level headed, but was written before the combine. I think a ton of this buzz is media driven seeking a compelling story and we all need to take a step back and remember that NFL front offices rarely listen to what the media has to say...
#58
Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:56 PM
Fwiw, Dan Snyder isn't calling the shots anymore.Daniel Snyder has always been a bit of an idiot, and overpays for everything. It is one of the reasons the Redskins have been one of the worst teams in the league for 20 years now.
The reports are that the Browns have sent signals that they are not interested in trading up to get RGIII. Good....but my question is: why would the Redskins bid against themselves?
Because of Snyder's insanity?
Its a Shanahan-Bruce Allen run organization now.
And as for why the Skins would be bidding against themselves?
Probably to insure that no one can (or is willing) to beat their offer.
And also take this into account: The Skins have had 18 draft picks over the past two drafts...so giving up some picks won't kill them.
Plus, they have almost 50m to spend on free agents.
#59
Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:17 PM
#60
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:21 PM
>>
I am the most gregarious guy you would ever want to meet. People who know me will tell you that I never met a stranger. But this is football dude. The Browns suck the pork plank and they aren't getting any better.
The team needs to be gutted because our players have a losing mentality. I would fire the entire crew and start over. Seriously, that is the only chance this squad has. The players are all shit.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












