DieHardBrownsFan Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 Wire tapping occurred... of Russian Officials and agents. Can't be helped that Trump aides were on the other end of the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 What is REALLY hypocritical...is all the libs never onced asked for higgardly to provide the evidence that she did all she could to save our people in Benghazi, and/or what REALLY HAPPENED... What did she know, and when did she know it? That is the question liberals dishonestly only use in attacking republicans if they can. cept, she couldn't. She let them die, and lied. That was fine with liberals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Stuart Levin lays it all out. Watch video to learn the truth, or continue on with your heads buried in the sand liberal fucktards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fNfGjZdM0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 far, far more devastating and threatening to our country than watergate. Watergate set a dangerous -precedent-... but this is a blockbuster. A gov obamao political dirty tricks witchhunt, for the sake of using it to defeat the Republicans and preserve their radical hold on our gov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 So, congress demanded evidence for the wiretapping claim, and today Spicer starts the "spin" https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/13/sean-spicer-just-explained-why-wire-tapping-is-different-from-wire-tapping/?utm_term=.53ea2335ca26 "“If you look at the president's tweet, he said very clearly, quote, 'wire tapping' — in quotes,” Spicer said during Monday's news briefing, making air quotes with his fingers to emphasize his point. “There's been substantial discussion in several reports. … There's been reports in the New York Times and the BBC and other outlets about other aspects of surveillance that have occurred. The president was very clear in his tweet that it was, you know, 'wire tapping' — that spans a whole host of surveillance types of options.” Ah, the old air-quotes defense. According to Spicer's new argument, Trump didn't necessarily mean wiretapping when he said “wire tapping” — and reporters should know this because he put the phrase in quotation marks. By “wire tapping,” Trump could have been referring to any one among “a whole host of surveillance types.” Obviously." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Look forward to the SNL spoof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 Look forward to the SNL spoof A man has to know his limitations. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 So, congress demanded evidence for the wiretapping claim, and today Spicer starts the "spin" https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/13/sean-spicer-just-explained-why-wire-tapping-is-different-from-wire-tapping/?utm_term=.53ea2335ca26 "“If you look at the president's tweet, he said very clearly, quote, 'wire tapping' — in quotes,” Spicer said during Monday's news briefing, making air quotes with his fingers to emphasize his point. “There's been substantial discussion in several reports. … There's been reports in the New York Times and the BBC and other outlets about other aspects of surveillance that have occurred. The president was very clear in his tweet that it was, you know, 'wire tapping' — that spans a whole host of surveillance types of options.” Ah, the old air-quotes defense. According to Spicer's new argument, Trump didn't necessarily mean wiretapping when he said “wire tapping” — and reporters should know this because he put the phrase in quotation marks. By “wire tapping,” Trump could have been referring to any one among “a whole host of surveillance types.” Obviously." Stuart There is no spin here. As explained by Spicer, Trump tweeted "wire tapping" not wiretapping. How the fuck would you interpret the quotation marks? Trump deliberately put them there for a reason. Quotation marks suggest Trump was making a tongue in cheek accusation implying some sort of surveillance. Actual spin would be if Trump texted (wiretapping) without quotation marks and Spicer tried to explain it away with air quotation marks. Now THAT would be spin. It's amazing I have to explain this to adults. It's your immense hatred for Trumps that blocks out what little reasoning ability liberals have. "Spin" my ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Stuart There is no spin here. As explained by Spicer, Trump tweeted "wire tapping" not wiretapping. How the fuck would you interpret the parenthesis? Parenthesis suggests Trump was making a tongue in cheek accusation implying some sort of surveillance. Actual spin would be if Trump texted (wiretapping) without parenthesis and Spicer tried to explain it away with air quotation marks. Now THAT would be spin. It's amazing I have to explain this to adults. It's your immense hatred for Trumps that blocks out what little reasoning ability liberals have. "Spin" my ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 I actually feel bad for Spicer. If the President had no evidence of someone tapping his phones, he should have never put that tweet out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 access to the information could be classified, as to the perps that did it, with or without a FISA warrant. Let's get real - obamao's loyalists tried to win the election by innuendo via an investigation that was initially denied a warrant twice. They had to reach for some justification so they could go for it. And it was based on nothing at all...except, the dirtiest, leftist, corrupt maneuver by the obamao brown shirts in our gov to sway the American people to not vote for Trump, and help higgardly win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 access to the information could be classified, as to the perps that did it, with or without a FISA warrant. Let's get real - obamao's loyalists tried to win the election by innuendo via an investigation that was initially denied a warrant twice. They had to reach for some justification so they could go for it. And it was based on nothing at all...except, the dirtiest, leftist, corrupt maneuver by the obamao brown shirts in our gov to sway the American people to not vote for Trump, and help higgardly win. Trump had better hope the DoJ finds something to give to the House Intelligence Committee. So far he has Spicer out there having to play mental gymnastics to make it look like the President did not say anything about phone tapping when it came directly from the President that his phones were being tapped. This should irritate people of all political stripes. The President shouldn't just be making things up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Looking forward to the investigation. Remember Obama bragging about no scandals?? HAHA Step 1 to an investigation is to provide evidence of wrong doing to those who would prosecute the matter.... so far no evidence has been given(to the public's knowledge) to congress or DoJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Step 1 to an investigation is to provide evidence of wrong doing to those who would prosecute the matter.... so far no evidence has been given(to the public's knowledge) to congress or DoJ. Oh please. The lefties want an investigation with a special prosecutor for a fishing Expedition on some sort of phantom pipe dream of collusion with the Russians because Hillary got her nasty ass spanked in the election. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Oh please. The lefties want an investigation with a special prosecutor for a fishing Expedition on some sort of phantom pipe dream of collusion with the Russians because Hillary got her nasty ass spanked in the election. WSS Still more evidence of that happening then Obama wiretapping Trump tower But in seriousness if Trump has evidence it needs to go to the right people to investigate, and not a claim on twitter, using the Russian Hacking as an example. here is a list of everything released to the public(and when) http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/26/us/2016-presidential-campaign-hacking-fast-facts/ Granted most of it is second hand or leaked information, you can at least see evidence is being gathered and used to investigate, and not just a random tweet b\c some radio show host said it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Actually no there isn't. No real intelligence officer has ever said that there was evidence of collusion and they have admitted that there is probably some sort of wiretapping going on even if it weren't necessarily directed towards Trump, his friends and Associates might just possibly have been caught in some sort of neck. Still no collusion evidence that they were spied on. By the way the Watergate burglars said that they were looking for actual evidence when they broke into the psychiatrist office. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Admiral Rodgers was head of Obamas NSA and went to Trump tower and told him what was going on during his campaign. At least 4 agencies were wiretapping Trump - NSA, FBI, DOJ and the Treasury department. Spying on Trumps computer system is the same as wire tapping his phones because phone communications travel via fiber optics today. The same network used for computers. Obama is such a loser that he cheated and his party still wound up getting their axxed kicked in the election. If I am Obama, I am getting back to my homeland of Kenya before the crap hits the fan. If all of this is true then Trump should be able to produce evidence of his claims. If Obama was having any of Trump's communications tapped (computers, emails, smoke signals, etc.) then he should have to answer for it. However, Trump made the claim so he has to be produce evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Oh please. The lefties want an investigation with a special prosecutor for a fishing Expedition on some sort of phantom pipe dream of collusion with the Russians because Hillary got her nasty ass spanked in the election. WSS I wouldnt call winning the popular vote 'spanked'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 I wouldnt call winning the popular vote 'spanked'.A win is a win especially for a guy who was projected to be 8 - 15 points behind every step of the way. Republicans hate him because business as usual wasn't working for them anymore and Democrats were so cocksure if they can win with such a horrible candidate that they were deceived by the left-wing media pumping Sunshine up their Collective skirts. Biden probably would have won. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 A win is a win especially for a guy who was projected to be 8 - 15 points behind every step of the way. Republicans hate him because business as usual wasn't working for them anymore and Democrats were so cocksure if they can win with such a horrible candidate that they were deceived by the left-wing media pumping Sunshine up their Collective skirts. Biden probably would have won. WSS Anyone but Clinton would have probably won, Clinton was too polarizing of a figure, and had to much "dirt" on her to be a valid candidate..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Anyone but Clinton would have probably won, Clinton was too polarizing of a figure, and had to much "dirt" on her to be a valid candidate..... Well, that too but I think her horrible personality had something to do with it. just listening to that fucking voice for four years.... Bill and W and even Barack seems like somebody you might like if you sat down with him for a while. And when it comes right down to it that's the president's main job. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Considering the popular vote was won mainly in CA and NY. Everywhere else he killed her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Get the popcorn ready. Obama cant weasel his way out this time. http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-congress-to-probe-trump-wiretap-claim-fbi-disputes-it-2017-3 Your article was from March 6th, congress set a deadline of Monday for the evidence, when the back-pedaling began. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Obama was seen crossing the Mexican Border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Not your ordinary investigation. Obama had all the time he needed between golf games to plan out this caper. We are dealing with the best in the business at blaming everyone else and covering up his trail of deceit and crime. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-justice-department-wiretap-evidence-20170313-story.html I usually don't make a point out of what Presidents do to "relax" but someone who was extremely critical of Obama's golfing outings, has already gone golfing at least 9 times in 7 weeks. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/saturday-president-trump-golfing-article-1.2995302 Can't wait to hear how the microwave was being used as a "listening device" on the 20th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 So outside of the usual suspects and their alts jerking each other off, has their been any actual evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 So outside of the usual suspects and their alts jerking each other off, has their been any actual evidence? Saturday at 11:30 p.m., NBC. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 A win is a win especially for a guy who was projected to be 8 - 15 points behind every step of the way. Republicans hate him because business as usual wasn't working for them anymore and Democrats were so cocksure if they can win with such a horrible candidate that they were deceived by the left-wing media pumping Sunshine up their Collective skirts. Biden probably would have won. WSS Trump, aside from the insane wall talk, had been business as usual. Then a couple questionable nominations and expected regulation roll backs... Besides that, really no major 'swamp'draining or direction changing ideas. A lot of tweets. Unless that's your 'business as usual'..? I would have voted for Biden on principle alone. The man is of integrity and universally respected on both sides of the aisle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Trump, aside from the insane wall talk, had been business as usual. Then a couple questionable nominations and expected regulation roll backs... Besides that, really no major 'swamp'draining or direction changing ideas. A lot of tweets. Unless that's your 'business as usual'..? I would have voted for Biden on principle alone. The man is of integrity and universally respected on both sides of the aisle. Biden's a failed old drunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Joe Biden is a clown, everybody loves a clown. Except he can't stop hitting the sauce and never shuts up. He has stuffed his foot in his mouth so often, he has oral athlete's foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.