The Cysko Kid Posted December 5, 2016 Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 I'm not talking about that law. I'm talking about the one in question. If I rewrite the post but replace 'it's against the law' with 'one should not be allowed' does that help? No it doesn't help my opinion of the exact same people that rail against Christians not compromising their religious beliefs using the same exact logic but doing it just to be an asshole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted December 5, 2016 Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 Wow... I know I've been gone a while, but not that long... When did your epiphany on abortion rights take place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted December 5, 2016 Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 Wow... I know I've been gone a while, but not that long... When did your epiphany on abortion rights take place? Boom. Id say that includes Cal's stance on gay marriage as well, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 5, 2016 Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 Wow... I know I've been gone a while, but not that long... When did your epiphany on abortion rights take place? isn't the hypocrisy jaw dropping? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 5, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 It's against the law to discriminate based on inherent characteristics - gender, age, race, sexuality, and I'm sure if you tried to refuse service to people based on them being over 7' tall you'd be in trouble too (unless it's a theme park and it's for safety reasons for example). Into which of these categories does Melania fall? ah. so if someone wants service, and they CHOSE to have a ring in their nose, it's okay to refuse service to them? And if their pants droop, and they have BLM pins on? If a gay person comes in with gay pride flag draped around them, they chose to wear it, they can be refused service because of their decision? Wow... I know I've been gone a while, but not that long... When did your epiphany on abortion rights take place? There are no abortion rights. When did you decide the unborn/born child wanted to be murdered? There is no right to murder. Children have rights to live. Just because it's convenient, there is no right to murder someone else. Did you catch a dishonesty virus while you were gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 5, 2016 Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 Ooh ooh ooh I know the next one "The right to be married only exists for REAL, NATURAL marriage!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted December 5, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 wrong. civil unions was the solution to the gays need to justly have official sanction for the legal rights they wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 No shoes, no service. Coat and tie required. The list goes on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 wrong. civil unions was the solution to the gays need to justly have official sanction for the legal rights they wanted. Equal rights. Just, separately from REAL MARRIAGE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Post Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 No shoes, no service. Coat and tie required. The list goes on."that's just the way it is" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 Equal rights. Just, separately from REAL MARRIAGE.Anyway that's true. If the definition of marriage had to be changed to incorporate a certain segment of society that's one thing. If they only sought equal treatment in the eyes of the law a civil union fills that bill. And that should be all a governmental entity is required to supply. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 No shoes, no service. Coat and tie required. The list goes on. I was born without shoes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 Equal rights. Just, separately from REAL MARRIAGE. Separate, but equal v2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Post Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 Buzzkill 2016: The Sober Files Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 Separate, but equal v2.0 http://www.blacknews.com/directory/black_african_american_organizations.shtml WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 I also saw no "White Male" scholarships in engineering... I'M SO TRIGGERED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medicineman Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 Did you try to get a black scholarship? You got to try to get whatever you can find or what is out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 I also saw no "White Male" scholarships in engineering... I'M SO TRIGGERED Actual scholarships or affirmative action programs? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 ah. so if someone wants service, and they CHOSE to have a ring in their nose, it's okay to refuse service to them? And if their pants droop, and they have BLM pins on? If a gay person comes in with gay pride flag draped around them, they chose to wear it, they can be refused service because of their decision? There are no abortion rights. When did you decide the unborn/born child wanted to be murdered? There is no right to murder. Children have rights to live. Just because it's convenient, there is no right to murder someone else. Did you catch a dishonesty virus while you were gone? I believe the Supreme court has said otherwise... Equal rights. Just, separately from REAL MARRIAGE. Yup... separate, but equal cal style... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Separate, but equal v2.0 Damn... beat me to it... more or less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Damn... beat me to it... more or less. I think you'll find I was there first, just some people need to explicitly make the point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Separate but equal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.