Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

FBI: Hillary didn’t just delete her emails, she BLEACHED them


OldBrownsFan

Recommended Posts

Hillary Clinton sure wasn't too concerned about confidential and top secret emails coming across her unsecured personal email server getting hacked by foreign countries but once she saw congress investigating her emails after she left office she took extreme measures to make sure they would not be recovered. I guess she really wants those yoga classes and wedding planning emails for Chelsea to be private.

 

"Hillary went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that no one would read the emails that she deleted. In fact she didn’t just delete them, she bleached them:

 

If Hillary has nothing to hide, why would she go to such lengths, especially considering how she put national security at risk with her illegal email server? She knew the FBI was coming, but she shredded her emails in such a way that they are completely unrecoverable.

Hillary has as much contempt for the law as Obama has demonstrated. And it will be this on steroids if she becomes president."

 

http://therightscoop.com/fbi-hillary-didnt-just-delete-her-emails-she-bleached-them/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Company Hillary Used To Wipe Servers Brags About Stifling Investigation

BleachBit, the service that House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy said Hillary Clinton used to delete emails from her personal server, bragged Friday about its success.

The open source cleaning software published a post titled “BleachBit stifles investigation of Hillary Clinton.”

“She and her lawyers had those emails deleted. And they didn’t just push the delete button; they had them deleted where even God can’t read them. They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or bridesmaids emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see,” Gowdy said on Fox News.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/26/company-hillary-used-to-wipe-servers-brags-about-stifling-investigation/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like, with Clorox or something?

 

Yeah she acted so clueless about wiping out those emails but the lengths she went to to make sure they were never recovered was this extreme and yet the FBI director said "there was no intent" on Clinton's part to hide evidence ...unbelievable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can somebody please give me the Clinton defense for this one.

 

http://time.com/4472874/hillary-clinton-email-server-benghazi/?xid=tcoshare

 

 

Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton to the State Department.

 

--

 

I'm just wondering, she deleted emails regarding a terrorist attack on a US embassy (Who knows what else she deleted TBH fam). But didn't just delete, used professional software that prevents any form of recovery (writing all bits as random 1s and 0s). No intent? We have 100% proof that all of the e-mails she deleted were NOT related to yoga and Chelsea's wedding - despite that's what she said (I mean, every other word she says is a lie so what amiright)

 

So many questions, I need Tour to come and answer them.

 

I mean I'd consider stuff related to Benghazi work-related.

 

IANAL either but let me pose a question

 

Say a child-porno horder freak is being investigated by the FBI. The FBI obtains a warrant for said freak's computer.

 

What happens if the freak uses commercial software to randomly write every bit of the entire hard drive (erase everything in a way that makes forensic recovery impossible) or maybe doesn't wipe the whole thing but only wipes the illegal shit and writes random bits after the EOFs and over free space - before they have a chance to serve the warrant and recover his computer (in Clintons case, she had plenty of time before turning the servers over to the FBI of course)

 

I mean, is that just ok or what's the deal with that? Seems like that's the same thing the Clintons did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta love The Donald's naiveté... dumping "chemicals" on her e-mails... lol...

 

So many questions, I need Tour to come and answer them.

 

You rang?

 

First... Time is apparently going to have to turn in their MSM credentials.

 

Second... how do "These emails were not previously provided by Clinton to the State Department" and "an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton," fit in the same article?

 

Third... best I understand it, so far the thing tying these emails to "Bengazi" is the date stamp on them.

 

 

Sorry, bb... can't do any better right now due to lack of data. A restraint cal and others are not subject to...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The latest classified email disclosure is a joke. The document is so chockablock with classified information — meaning it is so thoroughly redacted — that the State Department might just as well have issued a blank page.

Officials with security clearances know the categories of information that are classified pursuant to an executive order — whether they’re “marked” as such or not. Clinton not only knew the rules, she was in charge of enforcing them throughout her department.

 

But it was retroactively marked! She's too stupid to understand what material is sensitive and isn't sensitive! Why can't you just understand !?!?!?!

 

It's her turn dammit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...