TopDawg31 Posted March 25, 2017 Report Share Posted March 25, 2017 So I read in the PD today that Hue and sashi are focusing their time on personal visits and letting the scouts handle the pro days. I'm ok with that. Makes sense, can't be everywhere at once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted March 25, 2017 Report Share Posted March 25, 2017 Holy shi$ here Gip. Am losing my mind LMAO!! Here's the deal. Living in Carolina I have watched UNC a bunch..#1. Fedora was on NFL radio this week. Fedora was asked why Williams over Mitch? Larry Fedora explained "Mitch was just as prepared as Marquise Williams was. Mitch showed that when Mitch got on the field as he also pushed Williams all season. But,how do I(fedora)pull a guy in Marquise off the field if the starting QB wins 11 games & wins our main goal as the ACC Title"? #2.Stanford,NC.State & Miami was probably the best Mitch saw at the secondary position. He failed. Did not play Clemson. Watch the Fla.State tape. Mitch fared well with average secondary's. They won the FSU game Running over FSU. Yes, Mitch has had his clutch moments in every game. But he's late on some & tries to make up for it in arm strength & his ball placement on a couple go the other way..If Mitch is at #12, am probably pulling my hair out till the name is called..Mitchell will be a Cinderella Story alright. Let's just get it Right.. You don't follow. The "Cinderella Story" comment had nothing to do with MT....it was just in reply to the Carl Spackler photo. That's all. Don't read more into something that isn't there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted March 25, 2017 Report Share Posted March 25, 2017 Just who we need for a QB-Cinderella. Isn't that Tom Brady? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gumby73 Posted March 25, 2017 Report Share Posted March 25, 2017 You don't follow. The "Cinderella Story" comment had nothing to do with MT....it was just in reply to the Carl Spackler photo. That's all. Don't read more into something that isn't there. Mr. Eric Church even wrote a song on me Gip. Mr. Misunderstood.give it a ear. But if the local kid saves His childhood browns it will be a Cinderella Story. I believe the Fedora part of my post should answer most posters questions about "Why Marquise over Mitch"? that is except maybe for that 1 attorney in the crowd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted March 27, 2017 Report Share Posted March 27, 2017 Mr. Eric Church even wrote a song on me Gip. Mr. Misunderstood.give it a ear. But if the local kid saves His childhood browns it will be a Cinderella Story. I believe the Fedora part of my post should answer most posters questions about "Why Marquise over Mitch"? that is except maybe for that 1 attorney in the crowd I don't think that a guy that is mentioned as being the best QB in the draft by at least half the pundits can be considered "Cinderella" even if he comes here and succeeds. Expectations would be very high on him to succeed. That is the opposite of Cinderella. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted March 27, 2017 Report Share Posted March 27, 2017 Why the hell would that have a bearing on anything? Because it does... http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/03/browns_will_host_mitch_trubisk.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted March 27, 2017 Report Share Posted March 27, 2017 Because it does... http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/03/browns_will_host_mitch_trubisk.html This is a whole different thing than what we were talking about. In this scenario, MT does not count against the 30 player visits, because he is a local boy. The post I responded to seem to imply that he could not work out for the Browns because he is a "local boy". That was a rule that I thought was being sited. Some misimpression going on apparently, by me or otherwise. So, no, no, this is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted March 27, 2017 Report Share Posted March 27, 2017 Well, you responded to my post saying he could workout in Berea, to which you replied why it mattered he was local. It does matter he was local, and I gave you a citation for it. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted March 27, 2017 Report Share Posted March 27, 2017 It matters because it keeps him from counting as one of our 30 visits... Probably the only reason we invited him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted March 27, 2017 Report Share Posted March 27, 2017 Well, you responded to my post saying he could workout in Berea, to which you replied why it mattered he was local. It does matter he was local, and I gave you a citation for it. like I said, Must have gotten signals crossed. There was the whole business about a player NOT being allowed to be worked out by a team at their team business (which I think is incorrect), then for some reason I thought you were saying that he could not be worked out because he was "local". What you didn't say which perhaps would have cleared it up is that his "workout" with the Browns would not count as one of the 30 player workouts. So I get that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.