calfoxwc
REGISTERED-
Posts
57,474 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
170
calfoxwc last won the day on March 25
calfoxwc had the most liked content!
About calfoxwc
- Birthday 12/18/1950
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Ohio
-
Interests
Traveling, fishing, camping, gardening/farming,groundhog/squirrel/turkey hunting,
***BROWNS***
Recent Profile Visitors
38,951 profile views
calfoxwc's Achievements
-
getting crazier all the time. Whoreta's fani is getting her big mouth and butt in trouble with Congress. She should have been taken off the case, now she's running her big mouth again despite the judge's displeasure at her big mouth running. She should be held in contempt of Congress pretty soon - she's hiding relevant documents, and submitting docs about "federal grants" instead. She's nasty and should be disabarred. https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/03/28/fani-willis-documents-jim-jordan-n2172021 Fani Willis Throws a Tantrum in Response to Jim Jordan's Threat of Contempt for Failure to Produce Docs
-
Knife violence - liberal girlieman alert
calfoxwc replied to calfoxwc's topic in POLITICAL DISCUSSION
Boy, it's a good thing knife bump stocks are illegal..... -
that is really sick. Looks like the Ukraine city that the russians raped, murdered, tortured and bombed.
-
https://www.reuters.com › world › us › yes-trump-can-win-2024-election-here-are-four-reasons-why-2023-12-12 Yes, Trump can win the 2024 election. Here are four reasons why Jan 22, 2024Here are four reasons why | Reuters. Yes, Trump can win the 2024 election. Here are four reasons why. WASHINGTON, Jan 22 (Reuters) - He has been impeached twice, tried to thwart the peaceful ...
-
"knives are too easy to get". "You don't need a knife". "Ban all knives with a point". "Ban all knives with a sharp edge" We need another Amendment that says we the PEOPLE shall be allowed to own knives, and a well-knifed militia, etc, and knife ownership shall NOT BE INFRINGED. https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2024/03/27/four-dead-five-injured-in-mass-stabbing-in-rockford-illinois-no-known-motive-at-this-time-n2172012 Four Dead, Five Injured in Mass Stabbing in Rockford, Illinois; No Known Motive at This Time
-
yeah, great point. Terrorists would want to plan it when the most cars would be on it. Terrible tragedy - that ship has had a major problem before. Although, it seems strange that it happened exactly when they were going to be turning under a bridge, and I question the speed they were traveling at. I have heard they dropped on anchor but it was too late, and I heard neither of the two anchors were dropped.
-
but woodpecker and the rest of the greenies LOVE them some imaginary super alternative energy. I guess they read it in some superman comic book. I wonder how many millions it would take to replace all those solar panels, and how long it would take. Meanwhile - in reality land: https://www.masterresource.org › windpower-problems › wind-power-least-sustainable-resource Wind Power: Our Least Sustainable Resource? Wind Power: Our Least Sustainable Resource? By Craig Rucker -- October 25, 2016. "A single 1.7 MW wind turbine, like the 315 Fowler Ridge units, involves some 365 tons of materials for the turbine assembly and tower, plus nearly 1,100 tons of concrete and rebar for the foundation. Grand total for the
-
Speaking of third party, this DEMOCRAT I would vote for
calfoxwc replied to FY56's topic in POLITICAL DISCUSSION
yep. even money from china - dark money now favors the dems dramatically, I think. But it should NEVER have been a thing. But it has for many, many years - ("We the People of the United States") lose control of our elections with the dark money. https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › 2020-election › democrats-used-rail-against-dark-money-now-they-re-better-n1239830 Democrats used to rail against 'dark money.' Now they're better at it ... But the limited picture that has emerged so far in 2020 shows $14.2 million in dark money has been spent supporting Democrats or against Republicans versus $9.8 million to support Republicans or ... *************************************** https://www.nytimes.com › 1998 › 05 › 18 › us › clinton-says-chinese-money-did-not-influence-us-policy.html Clinton Says Chinese Money Did Not Influence U.S. Policy May 18, 1998Pres Clinton says reported political campaign contributions from China to Democrats did not influence his foreign policy, and welcomes further investigation into decisions that made it easier for ... -
btw, you show extremely obvious favoritism towards the palestinians and our support of them. You complain we support Israel - you want them to not fight back and take out hamas when they keep using civilians as shields and firing missiles? You never complain about all the money we send to the palstinians/hamas and the un org. That seems to be fine, but our support to Israel - that is totally wrong? baloney.
-
It's gotten to the point of this hip drop tackle penalty could start getting smaller db's injured when trying to stop a big power rb in the open field, te..... maybe they should ban defensive backs tackling above the rb/te's waist. I don't know - we'll see how it goes, but I think it's not going to be good. Maybe they should just require a specially designed knee brace and require it on the field or some thing.... (probably been tried ...)
-
Speaking of third party, this DEMOCRAT I would vote for
calfoxwc replied to FY56's topic in POLITICAL DISCUSSION
I'm having trouble understanding the problem with "Citizens United" Supreme Court ruling. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained " What was Citizens United about? A conservative nonprofit group called Citizens United challenged campaign finance rules after the FEC stopped it from promoting and airing a film criticizing presidential candidate Hillary Clinton too close to the presidential primaries." ***************************** So, THAT part of it - is excellent. They had no right to tell Citizens United that they were not allowed to do a video on higgardly clinton for whatever reason they had. "too close to the election" ???? baloney. However, Bob, the unlimited expenditures by the wealthy funding the giant PACs and Super PACS - that is very bad. The basis seems to be a "First Amendment" issue - but giving the rich (either side) unlimited control - compared to the common folks - broaching "election interference" maybe. That part of it needs to go. The first and primary reason - needs to stay. **************************** "That’s because leading up to Citizens United, transparency in U.S. elections had started to erode, thanks to a disclosure loophole opened by the Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, along with inaction by the IRS and controversial rulemaking by the FEC." *************************** SO, before the half? wrong decision of Citizens United, transparency was already eroding. Again, the FEC sued "Wisonsin Right to Life over poltiically targeted "rule making" by the FEC. So, it isn't valid to blame republicans for "Citzens United" and "Wisconsin Right to Life" - you should blame the corrupt dems/deep state actors for screwing with those groups, forcing the courts to get involved to stop the unfair political targeting. Again - the decision to open unlimited spending to PACS and Super Pacs - was an asinine result? that I don't get why they would have gone there. If the corrupt FEC hadn't tried to provide cover for higgardly, it would never have gone to court.