Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Milwaukee Art Museum's embrace of condom portrait of pope draws disgust


OldBrownsFan

Recommended Posts

The decision by the Milwaukee Art Museum to acquire and prominently display a controversial portrait of Pope Benedict XVI fashioned from 17,000 colored condoms has created outrage among Catholics and others who see it as profoundly disrespectful, even blasphemous.

Many suggest that if a piece were as offensive to other faith traditions or communities it would not be tolerated, much less embraced. (try this with the image of Muhammad)

 

Johnson, who was in Memphis, Tenn., working on a new condom-related installation last week, stood by her past explanation that she wanted to spark a conversation, not deride a religious figure. (try this with the image of Muhammad, that should spark some conversation)

 

Keegan said museums "present art and ideas on a broad range of subjects... that challenge and engage."

"If museums made their decisions on donor reaction or negative responses to programming, we as a nation and a free society would be far poorer than the loss of a future donation," he said. (some Muslim art along the same lines given to the Pope would be very engaging)

 

For some reason it is only the Christian faith that gets this kind of "art" treatment. It is an easy target. The double standard gets old.

 

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/milwaukee-art-museums-embrace-of-condom-portrait-of-pope-draws-disgust-b99527618z1-310570591.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They fielded 200 complaints and some donors dripped their donations. If it were Muhammed and they received one single complaint it would be down. You know this is true.

 

It's true mainly because some fanatic mooslim will take a rifle to someone over it, not because Islam is somehow looked at in a more favorable light. That's what always kills me about the right, they have this woven tale in their minds that liberals secretly want to live under a caliphate. As if liberals have worked for womens and gay rights all these years just so a caliph can come along and shit on all of it literally overnight. Yes likely scenario indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberals who support this type of defamatory art against the Christian faith but are too cowardly to do the same to the Muslim faith just show their true colors of being cowardly bullies. What faith is throwing gay people off of roofs today and killing thousands of innocent people? In what name is all of the evil terrorism around the world being done?

 

Out of FEAR none of these courageous *artists* would make artwork like these with the Muslim religion so let's call these hypocritical cowards out for who they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's true mainly because some fanatic mooslim will take a rifle to someone over it, not because Islam is somehow looked at in a more favorable light. That's what always kills me about the right, they have this woven tale in their minds that liberals secretly want to live under a caliphate. As if liberals have worked for womens and gay rights all these years just so a caliph can come along and shit on all of it literally overnight. Yes likely scenario indeed.

The irony here is that in your woven mind you actually believe that. Libfucks cant even live under a country whos people hold Christian traditions let alone a caliphate ya clown.

Conservatives believe that liberals are hypocritical, double standard assholes that will defend Islam just so they can attack Christianity.

THE CRUSADES!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See How NY Times Handled Two Very Different Pieces of Religion-Themed Art: ‘Worst Kind of Hypocrite’

 

Earlier this year, the New York Times joined other media outlets in proclaiming it wouldn’t print cartoons of Islam’s Prophet Muhammad as it deemed such art “intentionally provocative.” On Monday, the news outlet published a photo of a portrait of Pope Benedict XVI made out of 17,000 condoms.

The decision to show the latter and not the former quickly sparked angry comments and accusations of hypocrisy from readers online.

 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/06/29/nyt-berated-over-its-handling-of-two-very-different-pieces-of-religion-themed-art-worst-kind-of-hypocrite/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The irony here is that in your woven mind you actually believe that. Libfucks cant even live under a country that holds Christian traditions let alone a caliphate ya clown.

Conservatives believe that liberals are hypocritical, double standard assholes that will defend Islam just so they can attack Christianity.

THE CRUSADES!!!!

 

I'd prefer living in a country that allows the individual and not the 'country' itself to hold whatever religious ideals they choose to.

 

That said, I find this picture hilarious. Far too many people taking things too seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libfucks cant even live under a country whos people hold Christian traditions let alone a caliphate ya clown.

 

 

So you're in agreement then that liberals aren't a sekret sect of muslims then right? I have to ask cause you tend to be a complete dripping moron and fool most of the time but if you at least concur on this point than perhaps there's some brain cells left up there that are furiously rubbing themselves together and generating some computational awareness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...