calfoxwc Posted April 25, 2015 Report Share Posted April 25, 2015 These dirtbags are probably going to seek out all Christians everywhere, to force them to accept perversion, or pay up. The judge is probably a gay pedophile. This is garbage. http://dailysignal.com/2015/04/24/state-says-bakers-should-pay-135000-for-refusing-to-bake-cake-for-same-sex-wedding/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 25, 2015 Report Share Posted April 25, 2015 That is just to send the message home that in Oregon it is in your best financial interest to serve gays and be quiet. I disagree with the baker's opinions on gays but I don't think the state government should be able to abuse their power to make you change an opinion. Their business should be theirs to do with it what they will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted April 25, 2015 Report Share Posted April 25, 2015 Libigots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted April 26, 2015 Report Share Posted April 26, 2015 In one case a Christian baker gets fined $135,000 for refusing to make a cake for a gay wedding yet it is OK for another baker to refuse to make a cake if it is a message against homosexuality. Bible verses that condemn homosexuality are now considered hate speech. This is a double standard where one bakery is allowed to run the bakery according to their beliefs while another is forced to run their bakery against their beliefs. Denver's Azucar Bakery wins right to refuse to make anti-gay cakes Christian man wanted cakes with anti-gay messages http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/04/07/colorado-double-standard-bakers-should-not-be-forced-to-make-anti-gay-cakes/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted April 26, 2015 Report Share Posted April 26, 2015 They cannot be serious about fining them that much, I mean they just can't. That's not even "remotely" a compensatory figure. Did they make the cake and then smash it in the lesbians faces when they came to get it? I mean that's now approaching the severity of that fine. 135k has got to be pretty much the years income, or at least severely north of 50% of it. Wtf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted April 26, 2015 Report Share Posted April 26, 2015 It was very traumatic for the gay couple when the Christian baker refused to make the wedding cake: In order to reach $135,000, Rachel and Laurel submitted a long list of alleged physical, emotional and mental damages they claim to have experienced as a result of the Kleins’ unlawful conduct. One of the women, whose name was redacted to protect her privacy, listed 88 symptoms as grounds for compensation. The other, whose name was also redacted, listed 90. Examples of symptoms include “acute loss of confidence,” “doubt,” “excessive sleep,” “felt mentally raped, dirty and shameful,” “high blood pressure,” “impaired digestion,” “loss of appetite,” “migraine headaches,” “pale and sick at home after work,” “resumption of smoking habit,” “shock” “stunned,” “surprise,” “uncertainty,” “weight gain” and “worry.” Then as people rallied to try and help the Christian baker's family with the $135,000 bill the militant gays complained and shut down the Go Fund Me site as apparently refusing to make a cake is a "heinous crime". An effort to raise money online for an Oregon bakery which may have to pay $135,000 for refusing to bake a cake for a lesbian couple was shut down on Saturday after gay rights activists complained to the fundraising company, Go Fund Me. Approximately $109,000 had been raised on behalf of “Sweet Cakes by Melissa,” a Christian-themed bakery owned by Aaron and Melissa Klein in Gresham, Ore. According to the Washington Times, Lisa Watson, the owner of a company called Cupcake Jones, organized the effort to get the fundraiser removed. A spokeswoman for Go Fund Me said that the fundraising campaign violates the company’s terms of service. According to those terms, “Campaigns in defense of formal charges of heinous crimes, including violent, hateful, or sexual acts” are prohibited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted April 26, 2015 Report Share Posted April 26, 2015 It was very traumatic when the Christian baker refused to make the wedding cake: In order to reach $135,000, Rachel and Laurel submitted a long list of alleged physical, emotional and mental damages they claim to have experienced as a result of the Kleins’ unlawful conduct. One of the women, whose name was redacted to protect her privacy, listed 88 symptoms as grounds for compensation. The other, whose name was also redacted, listed 90. Examples of symptoms include “acute loss of confidence,” “doubt,” “excessive sleep,” “felt mentally raped, dirty and shameful,” “high blood pressure,” “impaired digestion,” “loss of appetite,” “migraine headaches,” “pale and sick at home after work,” “resumption of smoking habit,” “shock” “stunned,” “surprise,” “uncertainty,” “weight gain” and “worry.” As I said, this can't be the real world. It just can't. The Gnostics had to have been right about this place. They had to have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 Yep. That judge surely was a gay hippie stoner obamao voter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted April 27, 2015 Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 Yep. That judge surely was a gay hippie stoner obamao voter. So it's a bad thing if a voter wants to express themselves against what YOU don't like??????????????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted April 27, 2015 Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 What are the damages done to the gay couple who were refused a cake? They had about 90 complaints/ailments they listed none of which were documented by any doctor or psychologist so the judge just took their list of grievances as being factual? What kind of judge does that but an activist judge who has an agenda. The fact of the matter is they had no damages. They simply went to another bakery to get their cake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 27, 2015 Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 What are the damages done to the gay couple who were refused a cake? They had about 90 complaints/ailments they listed none of which were documented by any doctor or psychologist so the judge just took their list of grievances as being factual? What kind of judge does that but an activist judge who has an agenda. The fact of the matter is they had no damages. They simply went to another bakery to get their cake. None whatsoever. This is simply a quest for attention and quick cash. The attorney is a scumbag and the couple could have gone anywhere. These people were targeted because of their beliefs. Absolutely counterproductive to your cause if your cause is acceptance. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted April 27, 2015 Report Share Posted April 27, 2015 What are the damages done to the gay couple who were refused a cake? They had about 90 complaints/ailments they listed none of which were documented by any doctor or psychologist so the judge just took their list of grievances as being factual? What kind of judge does that but an activist judge who has an agenda. The fact of the matter is they had no damages. They simply went to another bakery to get their cake. Little to no damage. I mean I understand the overall ruling on discrimination because the next step is for restaurants or pharmacies or whatever to start saying they can refuse service to people simply because they walked in holding hands but were of the same gender. That being said the fine is outrageous and clearly that dmg list is a complete line of horseshit. We have gay kids in schools having far far far worse done to them and this gay couple has the audacity to claim such damages? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 28, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2015 Well, I'm just waitin for the judge to fine those naked gay paraders $135,000 to every straight American in the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted April 28, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2015 Meanwhile, back in REAL America: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/04/27/christian-printer-who-was-punished-by-the-govt-for-refusing-to-print-gay-pride-t-shirts-just-scored-a-major-victory/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 28, 2015 Report Share Posted April 28, 2015 Meanwhile, back in REAL America: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/04/27/christian-printer-who-was-punished-by-the-govt-for-refusing-to-print-gay-pride-t-shirts-just-scored-a-major-victory/ There's a difference there I think. This guy was being asked to print pro-something messages when his religion means he's anti-that. The parallel would be if he refused to print a standard t-shirt for gay people - I mean, if a straight person goes there and asks for a pro-gay t-shirt, he'd still refuse, based on the message, not the customer. If he refuses to make a pro-cabbage t-shirt for the 'Cabbages are fun' group, because the customer is gay, then that's when it enters discrimination waters. Like the bakery - they would provide exactly the same service for anybody else if they weren't gay. If the cake has a message saying "Man Love is the Best - fellatiio gives me a lump in my throat" then sure, they might well be within their rights to decline. In other news, the GoFundMe campaign to pay for the fine in OP has been shut down by the website: http://guff.com/glt-gofundme-cancels-sweet-cakes-by-melissa-fundraising-campaign/20?ts_pid=2 "...the subjects of the 'Support Sweet Cakes By Melissa' campaign have been formally charged by local authorities and found to be in violation of Oregon state law concerning discriminatory acts. Accordingly, the campaign has been disabled." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.